Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Leo Varadkar story in The Village??? - Mod Notes and banned Users in OP updated 16/05
Options
Comments
-
FrancieBrady wrote: »24 hours ago you thought there was only one complaint. You are bandying about claims about N. Korea etc rather than accept that in order to test the veracity of the complaints the Gardai will have to review all the evidence available. That is a Criminal Investigation Unit looking into criminal behaviour.
Like every other slew of posts on these platforms, they descend into dancing on the head of a pin.
Some folk love that, sludge every discussion down to its nth degree, admit nothing , fight everything, discect and reduce every argument down to minimal nuances and minutiae.
Solution to everything ...sit down and waffle for months ....years..... decades... while trousering the wedge of those who work to pay their way.
Heh heh..... well trodden tactic.0 -
-
James Brown wrote: »I do not expect anything to come from it, so I'm not looking for anything.
The leader of FG is known to the Garda. It just adds to the humiliation, and deservedly so, upon the FF/FG/Greens for allowing LV go without any sanction or accountability.
Sorry James ,He's not 'known to the gardaí' however much youd like that to be the case
Known to the Gardaí is a pseudonomn for a criminal element
Saying that even under a boards moniker leaves you open to being sued
Theres no protection here
0 -
Sorry James ,He's not 'known to the gardaí' however much youd like that to be the case
Known to the Gardaí is a pseudonomn for a criminal element
Saying that even under a boards moniker leaves you open to being sued
Theres no protection here
A case where the prosecution try to prove Leo Varadkar, former Taoiseach and present day Tanaiste is not known to the Gardai.
Who writes your script?
:pac:0 -
To be fair now,there is no prosecution untill theres a crime and yes 'known to Gardaí' is a pseudomn for criminalityA case where the prosecution try to prove Leo Varadkar, former Taoiseach and present day Tanaiste is not known to the Gardai.
Who writes your script?
:pac:
Not a term that can be used Im afraid,no matter how much you want to 0 -
Advertisement
-
To be fair now,there is no prosecution untill theres a crime and yes 'known to Gardaí' is a pseudomn for criminality
Not a term that can be used Im afraid,no matter how much you want to
I don't think any court case would be brought against anyone for using a term "known to the Gardai" it wouldn't matter if it was a pseudonym, defence would have to prove Leo actually was known to Gardaí, if the DPP/AGS hadn't laughed their sacks off at anyone wanting to prosecute based on that to begin with.
Obviously we're all just shooting the breeze here, and no-one is seriously suggesting that anyone would sue anyone else for posting "Leo Varadkar is known to the Gardai"
Considering Leo Varadkar undoubtedly actually is known to the Gardai. 0 -
Sorry James ,He's not 'known to the gardaí' however much youd like that to be the case
Known to the Gardaí is a pseudonomn for a criminal element
Saying that even under a boards moniker leaves you open to being sued
Theres no protection here
Sued?
He is known. Well known.
I think his association with Fine Gael covers your reading of it, let alone his own antics, like Noonan's siteserv deal, he still finds himself under investigation
0 -
I don't think any court case would be brought against anyone for using a term "known to the Gardai" it wouldn't matter if it was a pseudonym, defence would have to prove Leo actually was known to Gardaí, if the DPP/AGS hadn't laughed their sacks off at anyone wanting to prosecute based on that to begin with.
Obviously we're all just shooting the breeze here, and no-one is seriously suggesting that anyone would sue anyone else for posting "Leo Varadkar is known to the Gardai"
Considering Leo Varadkar undoubtedly actually is known to the Gardai.
There is some limbo dancing going on to try and keep Varadkar's reputation out of where he put it himself.0 -
James Brown wrote: »Sued?
He is known. Well known.
I think his association with Fine Gael covers your reading of it, let alone his own antics, like Noonan's siteserv deal, he still finds himself under investigation
If you and Mc above are trying to assert that you used the term 'known to Gardaí' for any other reason than it being a psudonomn for criminal elements,I'm obviously not going to take you seriously becuse you do know what it means
No crime,no criminal investigation
Veracity first
Thats how this works
You may not like it,but if its your bag,try North Korea0 -
-
Advertisement
-
-
No,none at all,its a thing called due process and frankly you're making a show of yourself trying to ignore it
The only person making a show of themselves is the person who didn't know there was a number of complaints.
And didn't know that corruption can be shown to have taken place without monetary gain and started ranting about posters 'being sued'. 0 -
-
-
FrancieBrady wrote: »The only person making a show of themselves is the person who didn't know there was a number of complaints.
And didn't know that corruption can be shown to have taken place without monetary gain and started ranting about posters 'being sued'.
My ignorance of complaints is all made up by you Francie,I'm afraid
You've no idea why I dont go on about the coruption complaint but seeing as you ask
I expect it will go nowhere because obviously there was and is only 1 GP contract
No set of doctors were ever going to be paid different by the state than any other
Secondly and more crucially,Vradakar was perfectly entitled to call non IMO doctors in and go through the agreement line by line
Ergo Ive zero interest in these complaints because I expect they've no veracity,going on what I know
Ive a big interest in fair process though
Regarding being sued,its not a rant,its fact
Boards.ie is registered in Ireland
You as the person behind your moniker are liable for what you publish here
I do believe its actually in the t's and c's on sign up
If this is news to you,glad to be of service
Isnt everyone lucky vradakar is on record as not being the type that sues0 -
My ignorance of complaints is all made up by you Francie,I'm afraid
You've no idea why I dont go on about the coruption complaint but seeing as you ask
I expect it will go nowhere because obviously there was and is only 1 GP contract
No set of doctors were ever going to be paid different by the state than any other
Secondly and more crucially,Vradakar was perfectly entitled to call non IMO doctors in and go through the agreement line by line
Ergo Ive zero interest in these complaints because I expect they've no veracity,going on what I know
Ive a big interest in fair process though
Regarding being sued,its not a rant,its fact
Boards.ie is registered in Ireland
You as the person behind your moniker are liable for what you publish here
I do believe its actually in the t's and c's on sign up
If this is news to you,glad to be of service
Isnt everyone lucky vradakar is on record as not being the type that sues
Ive seen some waffle in my time but that's right up there0 -
-
Whatisthisnow wrote: »Ive seen some waffle in my time but that's right up there
Hey,dont shoot the messenger 0 -
-
-
Advertisement
-
James Brown wrote: »I was using it tongue in cheek.
He is under investigation as you know.
He isn't yet and I honestly expect wont be,in relation to these complaints anyway for the very simple reasons I outlined
As Leo haters,ye all have a horn for the criminality angle
None of his voter base do(going on the fact his polling has gone up 5 or 6% on last year despite all the mud
That tells me only the converted are listening
Which to me is a waste of time
We've all got to learn to live with that or torment ourselves
I know which I choose
I dont hate the man,I just wouldnt vote for him 0 -
He isn't yet and I honestly expect wont be,in relation to these complaints anyway for the very simple reasons I outlined
As Leo haters,ye all have a horn for the criminality angle
None of his voter base do(going on the fact his polling has gone up 5 or 6% on last year despite all the mud
That tells me only the converted are listening
Which to me is a waste of time
We've all got to learn to live with that or torment ourselves
I know which I choose
I dont hate the man,I just wouldnt vote for him
You'll see most if not all posts about Varadkar relate to something he said or did.
There are a cohort of commentators use and abuse his sexuality, race etc. but you'll find there are people, like yourself with your 'hate' comment, who are merely detracting from the points raised. All those false claims do more to abuse the man IMO.
You make it sound like he's a keeps himself to himself sensible chap getting picked on for no good reason.
Again, it's clear what he did. Folk such as myself are mostly in here to dispute apologist waffle and outlandish defences.
I'd be very happy if he'd no hand in government but while he does and continues to make a gilly of himself, he'll be spoken about.0 -
-
-
Brendan Bendar wrote: »You are just in here because you realise Varadkar is doing a good job and feel that you need to sling what ever mud you can at the man.
Let’s be honest for once.
People are not idiots.
Doing a good job at what bren?
Cmon man, this'll be good.
"Led" Fine Gael to their second worse election in the party's history, made Sinn Fein electable to more people than fine Gael were, lost the public on the state of housing, health (well before a pandemic), allowed himself to be misled by his Tanaiste, dragged his heels on the Maria Bailey controversy, and was caught with his fingers in the till - ref zero craic.
I need the laugh.
Good job with what? 0 -
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement