Leo Varadkar story in The Village??? - Mod Notes and banned Users in OP updated 16/05

My name is URL

blanch152 wrote: »

Leo has been on radio a lot during the last week, especially compared to the missing in action Mary-Lou.

God bless him, he has. Such as the clueless idiot he actually is

blanch152

jmcc wrote: »

He even wanted his phone back and the Gardai said no.

Regards...jmcc

You are clutching at straws lad. Varadkar is going to spring free from all of this.

skimpydoo

blanch152 wrote: »

Well, gutter journalism will speculate, but I am sure that as a reputable journalist, you wouldn't be indulging in that kind of speculation and will be reporting that Varadkar won't be charged, which is the main point of the story.

I won't be reporting any such thing as I don't cover current affairs or politics. But if I did I would report it with the added caveat that damage has been done to FG and Leo.

My name is URL

blanch152 wrote: »

You are clutching at straws lad. Varadkar is going to spring free from all of this.

And if he doesn't you can just change your username again and take up a new dick to suck

Jizique

blanch152 wrote: »

Leo has been on radio a lot during the last week, especially compared to the missing in action Mary-Lou.

He was on Pat Kenny Thursday for over 30 mins

My name is URL

My name is URL wrote: »

And if he doesn't you can just change your username again and take up a new dick to suck

You might want to consider logging off for the night, dude. Not a good look.

FrancieBrady

blanch152 wrote: »

Well, gutter journalism will speculate, but I am sure that as a reputable journalist, you wouldn't be indulging in that kind of speculation and will be reporting that Varadkar won't be charged, which is the main point of the story.

The article in the Times is speculation blanch. The Garda source is 'speculating' on what might happen.

blanch152

FrancieBrady wrote: »

The article in the Times is speculation blanch. The Garda source is 'speculating' on what might happen.

Pretty much dampening all of the expectation around this.

We were told all day to expect some shattering news, the effective ending of the garda investigation with Varadkar going free, was not what was portended.

My name is URL

Deleted User wrote: »

You might want to consider logging off for the night, dude. Not a good look.

I might want to consider many things tonight.

I might want a takeaway. Or a **** out the back

Who the **** are you to suggest I log off?

skimpydoo

blanch152 wrote: »

You are clutching at straws lad. Varadkar is going to spring free from all of this.

That's what the story in the Sunday Times says. Who is now clutching at straws?

My name is URL

My name is URL wrote: »

I might want to consider many things tonight.

I might want a takeaway. Or a **** out the back

Who the **** are you to suggest I log off?

Just looking out for you. You seem to be very angry, and are dishing out the abuse. There was definite homophobic undertones to your last post as well. Might be time to call it a night, and get a solid 8 hour in.

skimpydoo

blanch152 wrote: »

Pretty much dampening all of the expectation around this.

We were told all day to expect some shattering news, the effective ending of the garda investigation with Varadkar going free, was not what was portended.

Where does it say an effective ending? All we know now is there is a high chance of no prosecution but until we 100% know this, there is no effective ending.

My name is URL

Deleted User wrote: »

Just looking out for you. You seem to be very angry, and are dishing out the abuse. There was definite homophobic undertones to your last post as well. Might be time to call it a night, and get a solid 8 hour in.

Thanks for your utterly transparent concern trolling

FrancieBrady

blanch152 wrote: »

Pretty much dampening all of the expectation around this.

We were told all day to expect some shattering news, the effective ending of the garda investigation with Varadkar going free, was not what was portended.

You'll notice I didn't respond to that poster. Fairly clear they were a fan of Leo's from the get go. Hoped to get frenzy going. He/she failed and seems to have slunk off with their 1 or two post count.

And like I said at the start, Leo surviving and leading FG into the next election would suit my goal fine. So another few months of this story and cloud...hunky dory with me.

skimpydoo

Deleted User wrote: »

Just looking out for you. You seem to be very angry, and are dishing out the abuse. There was definite homophobic undertones to your last post as well. Might be time to call it a night, and get a solid 8 hour in.

I very rarely agree with Dr. Phibes but this is one time that I do. We may be on opposite sides of the argument but this is taking things too far and is homphobic.

Suckit

Deleted User wrote: »

Just looking out for you. You seem to be very angry, and are dishing out the abuse. There was definite homophobic undertones to your last post as well. Might be time to call it a night, and get a solid 8 hour in.

Why homophobic? Do you know that poster knows what sex the other posters on here are?
But I do find it comical that you are worried worried about how people look, while your sole reason for logging back into this forum is to defend an admitted rule breaker. How does that look? Should our children grow up believing it is okay to break the law, particularly if you are a politician? What sort of a confusing message is that sending out?
How does that make an entire party look standing behind that? You should really be watching out how others look a little closer to home and not worry about posters on an anonymous forum.


P.S.
You left out misogynistic, sexist and racist, and a few others.

My name is URL

My name is URL wrote: »

Thanks for your utterly transparent concern trolling

Listen, I'll leave it up to you. This is an emotive topic for a lot of people, and the news this evening would appear to indicate it's a nothingburger story. As many of us predicted from the start.



No need to be telling a respected poster like Blanch to go find a new cock to suck though. Attack the post and not the poster and all that.

My name is URL

Okay.. look. If I said anything that could be understood as homophobic or anything else then I truly apologise. That's not who I am

blanch152

skimpydoo wrote: »

Where does it say an effective ending? All we know now is there is a high chance of no prosecution but until we 100% know this, there is no effective ending.

The Gardai admitting that Varadkar is unlikely to be prosecuted is an effective ending of this. Some straw-clutching going on to think otherwise.

A review of this thread to see some of the posts claiming Varadkar would do jail time would be amusing.

Suckit

blanch152 wrote: »

The Gardai admitting that Varadkar is unlikely to be prosecuted is an effective ending of this. Some straw-clutching going on to think otherwise.

A review of this thread to see some of the posts claiming Varadkar would do jail time would be amusing.

Any Gardai admitting unlikely prosecution does not effectively end anything.
Wishful thinking. I doubt it anyone ever really expected that Leo would be prosecuted (also wishful thinking if they did), but he should be held accountable if found guilty. How that is determined will be anyones guess if he is. But I can't imagine the majority public would be too happy if he wasn't.

blanch152

Suckit wrote: »

Any Gardai admitting unlikely prosecution does not effectively end anything.
Wishful thinking. I doubt it anyone ever really expected that Leo would be prosecuted (also wishful thinking if they did), but he should be held accountable if found guilty. How that is determined will be anyones guess if he is. But I can't imagine the majority public would be too happy if he wasn't.

Plenty of posts on this thread expecting him to do jail time, plenty of others expecting him to be in court.

It's over, lads.

skimpydoo

Whatever happens FG and Leo are damaged. FG will be looking at replacing Leo as they don't want him at the helm for much longer.

Suckit

blanch152 wrote: »

Plenty of posts on this thread expecting him to do jail time, plenty of others expecting him to be in court.

It's over, lads.

We will see.

skimpydoo

blanch152 wrote: »

Plenty of posts on this thread expecting him to do jail time, plenty of others expecting him to be in court.

It's over, lads.

It's not over until the DPP says so.

Jinglejangle69

Suckit wrote: »

Any Gardai admitting unlikely prosecution does not effectively end anything.
Wishful thinking. I doubt it anyone ever really expected that Leo would be prosecuted (also wishful thinking if they did), but he should be held accountable if found guilty. How that is determined will be anyones guess if he is. But I can't imagine the majority public would be too happy if he wasn't.

What???

Now you're saying noone expected him to be prosecuted???

What in gods name have you lads been keeping this thread active everyday for months now so???

Give over, yous all thought he would be charged and in court and found guilty, even prison time was mentioned.

Ah jaysus.

Paddy Cosgrave. That's who you pinned your hopes on.

Jinglejangle69

skimpydoo wrote: »

Whatever happens FG and Leo are damaged. FG will be looking at replacing Leo as they don't want him at the helm for much longer.

Most popular party and leader in the latest polls.

Hmmmm

FrancieBrady

blanch152 wrote: »

Plenty of posts on this thread expecting him to do jail time, plenty of others expecting him to be in court.

It's over, lads.

Plenty expecting this was over a weekin. Plenty expecting him not to be criminally investigated.

Plenty reckoning it is over based on an un-named Garda source speculating and plenty ignoring it has to go to the DPP.

markodaly

jmcc wrote: »

And yet FG did not make any comment when Varadkar was interviewed under caution and had to surrender his mobile. Then again, if FG supporters tolerate such low behaviour in high places, what does it say about them? FG is no longer the party of law and order. It is just FF with better suits. This story does not look like it is quite over yet.

Regards...jmcc

Why would they?

If they did, the same people giving out about this, the likes of Paddy Cosgrove and Mark Caul would be jumping up and down saying FG is trying to interfere with a Gardai Investigation.

But that is the point right, jumping up and down for every little bit of 'news' even though it's not news.

Anyways, looks like Leo won't be spending time in the Joy after all, much to the disappointment of some, which shows that many people don't have a notion.

skimpydoo

skimpydoo wrote: »

Whatever happens FG and Leo are damaged. FG will be looking at replacing Leo as they don't want him at the helm for much longer.

I'm sure the level-headed members and elected reps of FG will decide that. A load of lads with pirate flags in their Twitter bio isn't representative of public opinion.

My name is URL

blanch152 wrote: »

Plenty of posts on this thread expecting him to do jail time

Where are those posts? ??

Can you link to a few?