Trump vs Biden 2020, And the winner is.......... (pt 4) Read OP

Nermal

Deleted User wrote: »

At the end of the day, he’s an old white dude. Just like the old white dudes before them.

I like to quote posts where the words 'old' and 'white' are used in a pejorative sense. Pernicious stuff.

Overheal

jaykay74 wrote: »

An inanimate carbon rod would have been the most popular candidate in history against Trump in 2020. Possibly even more so than Biden. Its mainly anti Trump than pro Biden that got the numbers out.

Hey that was my write in choice for Sheriff.

sondagefaux

Eric Cartman wrote: »

67 million people voting against the moral decay increasing the rate at which that empire collapses, biden is hardly a trot but he has aligned himself with many who back the moral decay movements like BLM, transgender kids, antifa, the rapid spread of islam etc... bidens america will be even more divided, but between those who want to actually slow americas fall and those who want to plunge it into full degeneracy.

You're anti-antifascist? So you're pro-fascist?

is_that_so

https://twitter.com/RepKinzinger/status/1323865750403166209

robinph

The_Brood wrote: »

Again I'm not saying it is or isnt legit, but that is how it will feel for them. Haven't heard of "stolen it at the death" in sports?

And if the counts had been done in the opposite order with mail in votes counted first and then Trumps on the day votes? Would Trump be on course to steal from Biden or would it just be that one of them ends up winning?

Lollipop95

jaykay74 wrote: »

An inanimate carbon rod would have been the most popular candidate in history against Trump in 2020. Possibly even more so than Biden. Its mainly anti Trump than pro Biden that got the numbers out.

Can confirm. My American friends voted not because they like Biden (they think he’s extremely corrupt), but because he’s the lesser of two evils and they’re desperate to get rid of Trump

sondagefaux

[Deleted User] wrote: »

Well, for one.

https://www.factcheck.org/2020/11/clerical-error-prompts-unfounded-claims-about-michigan-results/

Meh...

sondagefaux

sondagefaux wrote: »

Meh...

It is what it is.

Quin_Dub

sondagefaux wrote: »

The head of Wisconsin's Election Commission said yesterday that all Wisconsin votes had been counted. Just the BBC being overly cautious.

I think a few are holding off on "calling it on the basis of the Trump theat of a lawsuit and looking for a recount.

But all votes are counted right now and Biden has won Wisconsin , subject to certification.

The_Brood

robinph wrote: »

And if the counts had been done in the opposite order with mail in votes counted first and then Trumps on the day votes? Would Trump be on course to steal from Biden or would it just be that one of them ends up winning?

I would imagine people who really want Joe to win would feel equally ticked off if a state got flipped in the last 1-2% too and they lost the election. As maybe will happen in Arizona, but Joe will still win it all so it won't sting nearly as much.

Larbre34

No tweets from Trump for 13 hours. He knows his thanksgiving goose is cooked.

gmisk

is_that_so wrote: »

https://twitter.com/RepKinzinger/status/1323865750403166209

It's good to see people from his own party calling him out

y0ssar1an22

trump needs slightly under 40% of remaining to win PA

as in very slightly under. at 39% biden will win by ~6000

Ashbourne hoop

How many votes are left to play for in PA ?

is_that_so

As of this morning, there are close to 50,000 votes left to be counted in Georgia.

is_that_so

Ashbourne hoop wrote: »

How many votes are left to play for in PA ?

About 400K but a lot of big Dem areas.

nullzero

Surely if the roles were reversed the Dems would be demanding re counts as well.

Trump is a buffoon and makes his every action seem OTT and childish but with the way things have been in America of late we'd be seeing the same actions taken by the Dems if the roles were reversed albeit without quite as much of the magical moron dust Trump manages to sprinkle over everything.

MrStuffins

y0ssar1an22 wrote: »

trump needs slightly under 40% of remaining to win PA

If i'm not mistaken, Biden is currently trending 74% - 75% of the count in the remaining areas to be counted.

jimmycrackcorm

The_Brood wrote: »

I would imagine people who really want Joe to win would feel equally ticked off if a state got flipped in the last 1-2% too and they lost the election. As maybe will happen in Arizona, but Joe will still win it all so it won't sting nearly as much.

AFAIR in 2016 Trump looked very surprised that he won for the exact same reason.

y0ssar1an22

is_that_so wrote: »

About 400K but a lot of big Dem areas.

per NYT its about 774k

biko

VinLieger wrote: »

Its hiding its registration data
https://who.is/whois/decisiondeskhq.com
If they were reputable and trustworthy they wouldn't need to do that

Seems they sprung out of nowhere autumn of 2018.
There are no names and no affiliations on their site.

Their Twitter seems to have been https://twitter.com/aoshqdd?lang=en
AOS HQ DD?

nullzero

nullzero wrote: »

Surely if the roles were reversed the Dems would be demanding re counts as well.

Recounts? Yes.

Declaring fraud without evidence? No.

y0ssar1an22

MrStuffins wrote: »

If i'm not mistaken, Biden is currently trending 74% - 75% of the count in the remaining areas to be counted.

i'm not sure. i just looked at the macro level

Larbre34

Ashbourne hoop wrote: »

How many votes are left to play for in PA ?

784,000.

Trumps lead is down from 600,000 to 164,500.

is_that_so

y0ssar1an22 wrote: »

per NYT its about 774k

Per Bob Casey a PA senator an hour ago, it's 400K.

omega man

Larbre34 wrote: »

784,000.

Trumps lead is down from 600,000 to 164,500.

Was over 700k at one point.

ohnonotgmail

nullzero wrote: »

Surely if the roles were reversed the Dems would be demanding re counts as well.

Trump is a buffoon and makes his every action seem OTT and childish but with the way things have been in America of late we'd be seeing the same actions taken by the Dems if the roles were reversed albeit without quite as much of the magical moron dust Trump manages to sprinkle over everything.

by the same actions do you mean screaming fraud at every opportunity with no evidence and assembling mobs outside counting centers?

BobbyMalone

Things hotting up in Las Vegas:


https://twitter.com/AndrewFeinberg/status/1324344957109415936


And according to the Guardian:


The tweet mentions Matt Schlapp as a Brooks Brothers Riot participant. For those of us without total recall of US elections from twenty years ago, my colleague Adam Gabbatt reminded us what the Brooks Brothers Riot was recently:


In late November 2000, hundreds of mostly middle-aged male protesters, dressed in off-the-peg suits and cautious ties, descended on the Miami-Dade polling headquarters in Florida. Shouting, jostling, and punching, they demanded that a recount of ballots for the presidential election be stopped.
The protesters, many of whom were paid Republican operatives, succeeded. A recount of ballots in Florida was abandoned. What became known as the Brooks Brothers riot went down in infamy, and George W Bush became president after a supreme court decision.

MeMen2_MoRi_

is_that_so wrote: »

It's the huge positive of this election, the question is how to maintain it!

Keep making things easier for people to vote, more voting stations in densely populated areas (not just republican areas) make mail in/absentee ballots easier to cast..

All of the above should be done from the federal level imo, I respect the state rights them being able to do their thing, but in a good democracy it shouldn't be about who controls the state and if that state wants to engage all its citizens in voting or making things as difficult as possible.

And as has been seen, the republicans have gained millions more votes from things being made easier also, they've nothing to be scared of, state your case to win voters and let them decide at the ballot.

nullzero

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

by the same actions do you mean screaming fraud at every opportunity with no evidence and assembling mobs outside counting centers?

I never said it would take the same shape, in fact I stated it most likely wouldn't. So your Outrage is misplaced.