Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

The 2020 U.S. Election Irregularities.

Options
1202123252684

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 18,242 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    The straw-clutching is getting so insane

    Did election fraud take place or are you endlessly "on-the-fencing" it because you are a hardcore Trump supporter?

    There is a distinct pattern to this, Trump claimed pre-2016 the election was "fixed" (except if he won), which makes utterly no sense. He made the same false claims about Hillary winning the popular vote. He made the same false claims when Cruz won the caucus. He's making the same false claims about the US 2020 election. He constantly makes baseless claims - it's a tactic that works well with his base, and makes it more difficult for them to separate fiction from truth in general.

    His whole life he has claimed things are rigged against him. He claimed the Emmys were rigged when he didn't win with the Apprentice. He's a charlatan who pulls the "it was rigged" card all the time. And yet his followers hang on his every word. Bizarre behaviour.


  • Registered Users Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    Bambi wrote: »
    Facebook and Twitter supressed any mention of Hunter Bidens misdeeds during then election.
    Cool. Evidence for this?
    Or is that being "supressed" also?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,988 ✭✭✭enno99


    hahaha when you come up against crack pot democrat judges what do you expect

    One of them even claimed the suit was racist LOL


  • Registered Users Posts: 40,425 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    enno99 wrote: »
    hahaha when you come up against crack pot democrat judges what do you expect

    One of them even claimed the suit was racist LOL

    3 of the supreme court judges who rejected the case brought by texas were trump appointees. Plenty of the other cases that trump et al lost were presided over by either republican appointed judges or trump appointed judges. Your argument holds no weight.


  • Registered Users Posts: 18,242 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    enno99 wrote: »
    hahaha when you come up against crack pot democrat judges what do you expect

    One of them even claimed the suit was racist LOL

    One of Trump's own appointees laughed his case out of federal court in Wisconsin.

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-12-12/trump-s-wisconsin-election-suit-dismissed-by-federal-judge

    Three of his appointees to the Supreme Court dismissed the Texas case he was part to out of hand. Nice try though.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    enno99 wrote: »
    hahaha when you come up against crack pot democrat judges what do you expect
    So all of the lawsuits were put to democratic judges?
    Including in the supreme court?
    And they all made false judgements?

    You understand how ridiculous that is, right?
    How desperate are you to still believe Trump's bull****.
    enno99 wrote: »
    One of them even claimed the suit was racist LOL

    https://www.npr.org/2020/11/24/938187233/trump-push-to-invalidate-votes-in-heavily-black-cities-alarms-civil-rights-group

    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/dec/12/donald-trump-wisconsin-court-case-2020-election
    In Wisconsin on Saturday, the US district judge Brett Ludwig dismissed one of Trump’s latest lawsuits there that asked the court to order the state’s Republican-controlled legislature to name him as the winner, whereas in fact Biden won Wisconsin on his way to winning the White House.

    Even as Ludwig said Trump’s arguments “fail as a matter of law and fact” an attorney for the president, Jim Troupis, was busy arguing in another case, before a skeptical Wisconsin state supreme court, a lawsuit that, if successful, would disenfranchise hundreds of thousands of voters in Wisconsin’s most diverse counties, Dane and Milwaukee, where Biden won.

    Trump is not challenging any votes in Wisconsin counties that he won.

    “This lawsuit, Mr Troupis, smacks of racism,“ the justice Jill Karofsky said to Trump’s attorney early in his arguments.

    “I do not know how you can come before this court and possibly ask for a remedy that is unheard of in US history … It is not normal,” she added.

    Also, BTWs,
    Brett H. Ludwig
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brett_H._Ludwig
    Assumed office
    September 10, 2020
    Appointed by Donald Trump

    Another crack pot democrat judge yea?

    This took all of ten seconds of googling.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,256 ✭✭✭Ronin247


    enno99 wrote: »
    ballots are folded at the printers dont see any folds here

    So are you therfore saying these were never printed???


  • Registered Users Posts: 40,425 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    King Mob wrote: »
    So all of the lawsuits were put to democratic judges?
    Including in the supreme court?
    And they all made false judgements?

    You understand how ridiculous that is, right?
    How desperate are you to still believe Trump's bull****.



    https://www.npr.org/2020/11/24/938187233/trump-push-to-invalidate-votes-in-heavily-black-cities-alarms-civil-rights-group

    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/dec/12/donald-trump-wisconsin-court-case-2020-election



    Also, BTWs,
    Brett H. Ludwig
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brett_H._Ludwig


    Another crack pot democrat judge yea?

    This took all of ten seconds of googling.

    It is the trump tactic. keep throwing out nonsense after nonsense after nonsense and hope the other side gets tired.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,988 ✭✭✭enno99


    Analysis of dominion software to be released to the public after democrats tried to block it
    Michigan AG evern putting veiled threat at lawyers on twitter over the weekend
    What were they afraid of


  • Registered Users Posts: 25,544 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    enno99 wrote: »
    Analysis of dominion software to be released to the public after democrats tried to block it
    Michigan AG evern putting veiled threat at lawyers on twitter over the weekend
    What were they afraid of

    You make one accusation

    It gets debunked fairly quickly

    You just jump to the next accusation

    Why should anyone take you seriously when you only ever post pure scutter?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    enno99 wrote: »
    Analysis of dominion software to be released to the public after democrats tried to block it
    Michigan AG evern putting veiled threat at lawyers on twitter over the weekend
    What were they afraid of
    Lol, just ignoring the last little embarrassment and hoping no one notices?

    You keep making these claims, yet you can't seem to be able to explain them or defend them. And each time you ignore the points and questions it only serves to make it look like you're just parroting Trump's propaganda in a desperate attempt to avoid accepting your idol lost.

    There was no fraud. Trump is lying like he always does.
    It's ok to accept that you were duped and you were wrong. There's no shame in that.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,988 ✭✭✭enno99


    You make one accusation

    It gets debunked fairly quickly

    You just jump to the next accusation

    Why should anyone take you seriously when you only ever post pure scutter?

    should be easy to refute so ;)


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,966 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    enno99 wrote: »
    hahaha when you come up against crack pot democrat judges what do you expect

    And there it is.


  • Registered Users Posts: 25,544 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    enno99 wrote: »
    should be easy to refute so ;)

    Why bother? You would just flop to the next ridiculous accusation, at this stage you are the thread clown, doing/saying silly things to make people laugh.


  • Registered Users Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    enno99 wrote: »
    should be easy to refute so ;)

    But when we do refute one of your claims, you just ignore it and run away to the next bull**** claim and pretend that you didn't read the previous point.

    Who do you think is buying this routine?


  • Registered Users Posts: 40,425 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Why bother? You would just flop to the next ridiculous accusation, at this stage you are the thread clown, doing/saying silly things to make people laugh.

    there are people laughing?


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,966 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    King Mob wrote: »
    But when we do refute one of your claims, you just ignore it and run away to the next bull**** claim and pretend that you didn't read the previous point.

    Who do you think is buying this routine?

    Interesting correlation between the poster's claims and Trump's claims then ;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,988 ✭✭✭enno99


    there are people laughing?

    He who laughs last. :D


  • Registered Users Posts: 25,544 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    enno99 wrote: »
    He who laughs last. :D

    Doesn't get the joke.


  • Registered Users Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    enno99 wrote: »
    He who laughs last. :D
    Why would you be laughing last?
    We all know that Trump lost and is going to be turfed out.

    You started this thread confident that one of his lawsuits was going to present the evidence for fraud and it would give him back the election.
    Now you're accusing republican, Trump appointed judges of being secret democrats as part of the ploy against your idol.

    The best you can hope for is to continue whining about the false claims of fraud all the way through Biden's first term or until Trump and his following fades out of relevance.
    It's going to be a bit pathetic on the part of Trump followers like yourself.

    You'd actually earn far more respect if you just accepted you were wrong and were duped by obvious bull****.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,213 ✭✭✭Mic 1972


    Trump will leave but the issue with irregularities remains, the elections were stolen and this is not a very start for the new administration


  • Registered Users Posts: 18,242 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    Mic 1972 wrote: »
    Trump will leave but the issue with irregularities remains, the elections were stolen and this is not a very start for the new administration

    Except they weren't and no amount of crying about it like Trump will make it true.


  • Registered Users Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    Mic 1972 wrote: »
    the elections were stolen
    But they weren't though.
    This has been shown by pretty much every lawsuit getting laughed out of every court even by Trump appointed judges.


  • Registered Users Posts: 25,544 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Mic 1972 wrote: »
    Trump will leave but the issue with irregularities remains, the elections were stolen and this is not a very start for the new administration

    No


    They were not.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    They were though..


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,213 ✭✭✭Mic 1972


    There is plenty of witnesses and dont forget the video where you can see the boxes being pulled from under the table with ballots that were counted after the witnesses were asked to leave
    Yes, stolen election indeed


  • Registered Users Posts: 40,425 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Mic 1972 wrote: »
    There is plenty of witnesses and dont forget the video where you can see the boxes being pulled from under the table with ballots that were counted after the witnesses were asked to leave
    Yes, stolen election indeed

    funny how none of that "evidence" convinced a single judge.


  • Registered Users Posts: 18,242 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    Trump supporters never get tired of lying it seems. Even when cases are being thrown out of court across the land they still believe every word the Dear Leader says. It truly is a cult.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,213 ✭✭✭Mic 1972


    namloc1980 wrote: »
    Except they weren't and no amount of crying about it like Trump will make it true.


    You are making case against trump, anything goes as long as he's out of the White House.
    I make a case against election irregularities, which should apply to everyone


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,213 ✭✭✭Mic 1972


    namloc1980 wrote: »
    Trump supporters never get tired of lying it seems. Even when cases are being thrown out of court across the land they still believe every word the Dear Leader says. It truly is a cult.


    Trump here, Trump there... making people become obsessed with trump is how they stole the election it appears


Advertisement