The 2020 U.S. Election Irregularities.

The Raging Bile Duct

enno99 wrote: »

I dont know for the last time

Why cancel remember Hillary canceled her fireworks
Maybe more Trump supporters would turn up than his 80 million loyal fans

People can cancel things for different reasons. I didn't cancel my doctor's appointment last week because Trump might secretly have won the election.

enno99

Ted_YNWA wrote: »

Mod - You'll also get banned from here if you don't up the posting style to be a bit respectful.

No disrespect intended

I apologise


But i was answering a question like you should log off and read my posts
Also republican objectors being called Seditious i was pointing out Dems have objected before

Being called a liar here constantly makes you a bit sarcastic again I apologise

enno99

enno99 wrote: »

I dont know for the last time

Why cancel remember Hillary canceled her fireworks
Maybe more Trump supporters would turn up than his 80 million loyal fans

Well, there's a pandemic so I'd hope he doesn't have crowds for his inauguration tbh. Now in relation to the other stuff you posted, this is a thread about election fraud, no?

ohnonotgmail

enno99 wrote: »

Sure can't post links now. But its easy to find

2.5 hours to go through 20 binders.

nothing stop you posting a link to a source. I'll wait. I'm sure it will be worth waiting for.

biko

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

source?

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/congress-prayer-cleaver-amen-awoman-b1781843.html
https://twitter.com/repcleaver/status/1345803579207127041?s=20

Dohnjoe

enno99 wrote: »

Jesus for the last time i dont trust any of them GOP or DEMs
There are few GOP one that seem legit but that remains to be seen
the rest is political theatre

You repeatedly demonstrate you trust Trump (and his baseless accusations), who you clearly see as some sort of "telling it how it is" maverick instead of the systematic liar he is.

All of which is thinly veiled under a veneer of "you can't trust any of them", which is always the defense used when something is indefensible.

There's on coherent conspiracy in this thread because there's no coherent conspiracy. Just a whole bunch of weak muck-spreading in the hopes something, anything, will vaguely stick.

ohnonotgmail

enno99 wrote: »

I hear Biden cancelled his inauguration parade
and Nancy dragged 3 covid positive congress critters of their sick bed to vote for her

And finished the parayer with Amen and Awoman
you think they dhould have googled what Amen means lol

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

source?

biko wrote: »

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/congress-prayer-cleaver-amen-awoman-b1781843.html
https://twitter.com/repcleaver/status/1345803579207127041?s=20

thank for the link. not sure what the connection with pelosi is.

Timberrrrrrrr

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

thank for the link. not sure what the connection with pelosi is.

The pastor is a Democrat and therefore must have been ordered by Pelosi to say it. This is what happens when the elite inject you with a vaccine* thats full of Bill Gates microchips.




*Not sure if the pastor has actually been vaccinated, maybe they used a Ray gun to shoot thoughts into his brain?

Dohnjoe

Pretty extraordinary times we live in, a first world leader unable to accept a comprehensive election defeat due to a very public and very extreme narcissistic personality disorder whereby he can't "accept" defeat.

enno99

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

thank for the link. not sure what the connection with pelosi is.

The point being that Nancy dragged 3 Covid positive Congress critters out of quarantine to vote inside and would have had to travel etc

Biden cancels parade which would be outside in the fresh air and Covid will be the excuse
not the fear that very few will turn up like his rallys
And those that do would be outnumbered by Trump supporters

enno99

enno99 wrote: »

The point being that Nancy dragged 3 Covid positive Congress critters out of quarantine to vote inside and would have had to travel etc

Biden cancels parade which would be outside in the fresh air and Covid will be the excuse
not the fear that very few will turn up like his rallys
And those that do would be outnumbered by Trump supporters

Isn't this thread about election fraud? Trump supporters at rallies aren't an election result...

enno99

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

The pastor is a Democrat and therefore must have been ordered by Pelosi to say it. This is what happens when the elite inject you with a vaccine* thats full of Bill Gates microchips.




*Not sure if the pastor has actually been vaccinated, maybe they used a Ray gun to shoot thoughts into his brain?

But the new rules will be. No Father, Mother, grandmother etc.

Except on Pelosis twitter account

ohnonotgmail

enno99 wrote: »

The point being that Nancy dragged 3 Covid positive Congress critters out of quarantine to vote inside and would have had to travel etc

perhaps you might like to try again. Pelosi didn't drag 3 covid positive congresspeople in. 3 congresspeople (2 dems, 1 gop) who were quarantining but had not tested positive were in congress today. they were not dragged in. another dem had tested positive previously but had finished 2 weeks of quarantine. unlike you I can actually source what I say. https://www.politico.com/news/2021/01/03/new-congress-begins-coronavirus-453060

enno99 wrote: »

Biden cancels parade which would be outside in the fresh air and Covid will be the excuse
not the fear that very few will turn up like his rallys
And those that do would be outnumbered by Trump supporters

irrelevant nonsense.

ohnonotgmail

enno99 wrote: »

But the new rules will be. No Father, Mother, grandmother etc.

Except on Pelosis twitter account

can you try that again but this time in words that make sense?

Timberrrrrrrr

enno99 wrote: »

But the new rules will be. No Father, Mother, grandmother etc.

Except on Pelosis twitter account

:rolleyes:

What does any of this have to do with the thread topic?

Are you just attempting to muddy the waters so people won't talk about Trump's blatant attempt to steal the election?

enno99

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

can you try that again but this time in words that make sense?

New rules of Congress. Can't use the terms so I believe

Trigger

Mod: this will be my very last request to get back on topic, this is not the place for airing your thoughts on a political party or person. This is to discuss the 2020 Election irregularities and the conspiracy theories surrounding that.

Any more off topic nonsense will result in harsher moderation

enno99

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

:rolleyes:

What does any of this have to do with the thread topic?

Are you just attempting to muddy the waters so people won't talk about Trump's blatant attempt to steal the election?

I'm answering questions stop asking if you don't want answers

Dohnjoe

enno99 wrote: »

I'm answering questions stop asking if you don't want answers

You are blindly dismissing anything that contradicts your narratives, making quips, ignoring facts, peddling baseless nonsense

Still waiting for proper details and evidence of the election conspiracy..

Anyway, this is actually one of those rare occasions where a conspiracy is confirmed. Trump and other members of the GOP conspired to undermine a democratic election and attempted to get the Georgia Secretary of State to change an election result. I'd also be surprised if he was the only Secretary of State that they targeted.

ohnonotgmail

Deleted User wrote: »

Anyway, this is actually one of those rare occasions where a conspiracy is confirmed. Trump and other members of the GOP conspired to undermine a democratic election and attempted to get the Georgia Secretary of State to change an election result. I'd also be surprised if he was the only Secretary of State that they targeted.

Finally a conspiracy theory on the election there is actual evidence for. Hallelu-, Hallale-, thank god.

Overheal

Even if Wednesday becomes theatrical, and, somehow, some way, we end up without a candidate having 270 votes, then, Trump still loses:

In that case,
The House votes for the President by State Delegation: "a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice." - at least 17 Democratic States simply leave the chamber, and the vote never happens.
The Senate votes for the Vice President: "a quorum for the purpose shall consist of two-thirds of the whole number of Senators, and a majority of the whole number shall be necessary to a choice." Almost half the chamber, Democrats, simply leave the chamber, and the vote never happens.
The stalemate continues to noon on January 20th. Cue Amendment XX, which cues 3 US Code § 19; tl;dr - that makes Speaker Pelosi resign her seat and become the President. Though, realistically, the Senate vote would go to Harris, easily, with just a couple blue-collar Republican Senators (and even easier if the Runoff on Wednesday gives the Democrats the seats needed for a majority).

Even if you believe all the conspiracies are true, and that Congress can null and void the general election for the President, then, Trump still loses.

ohnonotgmail

Overheal wrote: »

Even if Wednesday becomes theatrical, and, somehow, some way, we end up without a candidate having 270 votes, then, Trump still loses:

In that case,
The House votes for the President by State Delegation: "a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice." - at least 17 Democratic States simply leave the chamber, and the vote never happens.
The Senate votes for the Vice President: "a quorum for the purpose shall consist of two-thirds of the whole number of Senators, and a majority of the whole number shall be necessary to a choice." Almost half the chamber, Democrats, simply leave the chamber, and the vote never happens.
The stalemate continues to noon on January 20th. Cue Amendment XX, which cues 3 US Code § 19; tl;dr - that makes Speaker Pelosi resign her seat and become the President. Though, realistically, the Senate vote would go to Harris, easily, with just a couple blue-collar Republican Senators (and even easier if the Runoff on Wednesday gives the Democrats the seats needed for a majority).

Even if you believe all the conspiracies are true, and that Congress can null and void the general election for the President, then, Trump still loses.

so what you are saying, and I hope I am understanding you correctly, is that Trump is a loser? Do I have that right?

Dohnjoe

Fact-check board from Georgia secretary of state

King Mob

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hn_9fQRiK9Q

Here's a good break down of the specifics of the laws that Trump might have broken.

TLDW: There's a lot he might have broken, but it comes down to whether or not he was intentionally doing them via implication of threats and rewards or if he was dumb, didn't realise what he was doing and genuinely believes all the false things he's claiming.
Either way, his behavior is impeachable. Again.

In the video it's pointed out that Trump claims he won every single state. So I think he might be in the crazy true believer catagory.

ohnonotgmail

King Mob wrote: »

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hn_9fQRiK9Q

Here's a good break down of the specifics of the laws that Trump might have broken.

TLDW: There's a lot he might have broken, but it comes down to whether or not he was intentionally doing them via implication of threats and rewards or if he was dumb, didn't realise what he was doing and genuinely believes all the false things he's claiming.
Either way, his behavior is impeachable. Again.

In the video it's pointed out that Trump claims he won every single state. So I think he might be in the crazy true believer catagory.

Good thread on the part in bold for those interested. His behaviour is not just impeachable it is indictable.
https://twitter.com/SethAbramson/status/1345958947090550786

Overheal

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

Good thread on the part in bold for those interested. His behaviour is not just impeachable it is indictable.
https://twitter.com/SethAbramson/status/1345958947090550786

Trump: "Well, I don’t want to know who it is. You guys can do it very confidentially. You can sign a confidentiality agreement. That’s okay. I don’t need to know names."

sabat

Well, this is it. 5 minutes until we get to see either one of the most dramatic moments in American history or if it was all a load of bollocks...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKy84YmL-sU

^^^^ watched a bit. Better YouTube to watch out there Tonite.

whoa

https://www.independent.ie/news/us-capitol-building-breached-as-pro-trump-demonstrators-storm-capitol-hill-39940223.html

silliussoddius

Well this is strange.
https://twitter.com/rothschildmd/status/1346912424838852609

enno99

https://twitter.com/renovate8/status/1346925379739533312

Easy to see whats going on here

ohnonotgmail

enno99 wrote: »

https://twitter.com/renovate8/status/1346925379739533312

Easy to see whats going on here

LOL

enno99

https://twitter.com/RealMattCouch/status/1346923121220190208

Prayers for the woman that was shot in capital building hope she survives

enno99

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

LOL

Glad you find it all amusing one person already fighting for their life

Timberrrrrrrr

enno99 wrote: »

Glad you find it all amusing one person already fighting for their life

If you were so concerned you wouldn't have posted the idiotic tweet first.

ohnonotgmail

enno99 wrote: »

Glad you find it all amusing one person already fighting for their life

perhaps dont mix your faux concern with idiotic tweets.

silliussoddius

enno99 wrote: »

Glad you find it all amusing one person already fighting for their life

Yes, all because of Antifa, and not the members of an online idiocracy cult that have been waiting for their enemies to be executed for the last three years.

King Mob

So the conspiracy is that all of these people storming the Capital are all fake Trump supporters.

Enno, get a grip man. That's a desperately silly notion.

silliussoddius

King Mob wrote: »

So the conspiracy is that all of these people storming the Capital are all fake Trump supporters.

Enno, get a grip man. That's a desperately silly notion.

You have to appreciate the consistency.

King Mob

silliussoddius wrote: »

You have to appreciate the consistency.

I dunno. The idea feels like a new low in desperation.

rtron

enno99 wrote: »

Prayers for the woman that was shot in capital building hope she survives

Is it known if that woman was of color?

Timberrrrrrrr

News breaking that she has died, was one of the first group to storm the building and was shot by police.

Ted_YNWA

Mod

This is not the time or place to make 'wisecrack' one-liners about someone reportedly dying.

Posts deleted.

aido79

rtron wrote: »

Is it known if that woman was of color?

She was white

https://www.stripes.com/news/us/report-woman-shot-killed-at-us-capitol-was-air-force-veteran-1.657655

sydthebeat

We are seeing in America right now the damage that conspiracy theories can do.

I think some posters need to be mindful of this when they put something out onto the Web which they claim as truth without knowing for real..... Or even something as simple as passing the lie on....

greenspurs

sydthebeat wrote: »

We are seeing in America right now the damage that conspiracy theories can do.

I think some posters need to be mindful of this when they put something out onto the Web which they claim as truth without knowing for real..... Or even something as simple as passing the lie on....

:D:D:D:D:D

Are you serious??

Do americans read boards?

Your 'truths' are ok though ?

ohnonotgmail

greenspurs wrote: »

:D:D:D:D:D

Are you serious??

Do americans read boards?

Your 'truths' are ok though ?

I didnt realise boards was the sole source of conspiracy theories.

greenspurs

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

I didnt realise boards was the sole source of conspiracy theories.

No,
But Syd intimated in his post that "conspiracy theorists" should be careful what they post on the net , that he meant on Boards??!
Why else would he post it on Boards ?

ohnonotgmail

greenspurs wrote: »

No,
But Syd intimated in his post that "conspiracy theorists" should be careful what they post on the net , that he meant on Boards??!
Why else would he post it on Boards ?

"on the net" is a general term. I have no idea why you thought they meant boards specifically.