The 2020 U.S. Election Irregularities.

2 fast

Mic 1972 wrote: »

it happens all the time, it's the American justice system.
When people have exhausted their financial or psychological resources they may negotiate to plea guilty in exchange for a minor sentenced instead of going through endless trials. You need to consider how powerful the people you are going against are

Plenty of examples, you can look them up

You have to be a troll... you make zero sense and then run away.

I'd have respect if you could back yourself up instead of saying look it up (eye rolls)

Mic 1972

2 fast wrote: »

You have to be a troll... you make zero sense and then run away.

I'd have respect if you could back yourself up instead of saying look it up (eye rolls)

My statement about reasons why people may plead guilty is far from trolling and you know it

King Mob

Mic 1972 wrote: »

My statement about reasons why people may plead guilty is far from trolling and you know it

But it's another empty statement that you aren't actually backing up.
You're not addressing any of the points put to you.

Once again, you've stating falsehoods and then sticking your fingers in your ears and running away.

This is the second time you've done this.

So why are you making this silly claims you know you can't defend?
You're only making yourself and other believers in this conspiracy theory look very bad.
Why do you think your behaviour benefits you?

Mic 1972

King Mob wrote: »

But it's another empty statement that you aren't actually backing up.

It's not and I dont have to back up something that is universally known about the American justice system.

eagle eye

Mic 1972 wrote:

My statement about reasons why people may plead guilty is far from trolling and you know it

You don't plead guilty unless the evidence is stacked against you.

Smee_Again

Mic 1972 wrote: »

so you still believe that Russiangate is true
LOL

Its an established fact at this stage.

Timberrrrrrrr

Mic 1972 wrote: »

it happens all the time, it's the American justice system.
When people have exhausted their financial or psychological resources they may negotiate to plea guilty in exchange for a minor sentenced instead of going through endless trials. You need to consider how powerful the people you are going against are

Plenty of examples, you can look them up

So you are saying that these very rich white guys pled guilty because they preferred jail over fighting to prove thier innocence? :pac:

Mic 1972

eagle eye wrote: »

You don't plead guilty unless the evidence is stacked against you.

In principle yes, reality is another thing

King Mob

Mic 1972 wrote: »

It's not and I dont have to back up something that is universally known about the American justice system.

And now, in addition to all of your other dishonesty you're playing dumb.

Again, who do you think you are tricking with these silly tactics? Who do you believe is that dumb?

You are insinuating that the people convicted after the muler report for thier crimes were forced into pleading guilty for reasons other than them being very guilty.
If this is not what you're insinuating, your point has no connection to the topic at hand and you're just going off on a bizarre meaningless tangent.

But you won't explain what these reasons are. And you sure as hell won't substantiate them.

So again, like the previous claim you are still running away from like a coward, this is also wrong and dishonest.

sydthebeat

Mic 1972 wrote: »

In principle yes, reality is another thing

purporting "reality" on a conspiracy forum thread...


LOLLOLLLLL

eagle eye

Mic 1972 wrote: »

In principle yes, reality is another thing

No that's the reality. One unlucky person might be innocent but have evidence stacked against them. Normally, as in almost always, if the evidence is stacked against you then you are guilty.

The chances that more than one person pleaded guilty over the Muller report and were actually innocent are non-existent.

Mic 1972

I see some posters are still resorting to insults to get attention
That's when you lose credibility

eagle eye

Mic 1972 wrote: »

I see some posters are still resorting to insults to get attention
That's when you lose credibility

Well, in fairness, you are insulting everybody's intelligence with ridiculous claims and then not backing them up.

King Mob

Mic 1972 wrote: »

I see some posters are still resorting to insults to get attention
That's when you lose credibility

Not about getting attention, just calling it for what it is.
You can't support your claims. You are running away and ignoring the point brought up.
This is dishonest and this is cowardly.
What do you call it?

And again, you don't get to judge anyone's credibility given your behaviour.
But I fully expect more offense taking and pearl clutching to cover for yet more avoiding points.

Mic 1972

more insults, great duscussion

EyesClosed

Mic 1972 wrote: »

more insults, great duscussion

Can you back up any of your points?

Mic 1972

EyesClosed wrote: »

Can you back up any of your points?

Do i have to prove that people plea guilty even when innocent because it's a more convenient outcome for them?
There's plenty of people who did that, you can find them in the usual places.


if you dispute that the earth is round I'm not going to pull the evidence for you.

EyesClosed

Mic 1972 wrote: »

Do i have to prove that people plea guilty even when innocent because it's a more convenient outcome for them?
There's plenty of people who did that, you can find them in the usual places.


if you dispute that the earth is round I'm not going to pull the evidence for you.

What about all the other questions and points you have dodged? This is just your latest... You have not backed up anything you have said at all

Mic 1972

since you quoted an article by the Time, you can take a look at The Plot Against the President, it's on Amazon prime

EyesClosed

Mic 1972 wrote: »

since you quoted an article by the Time, you can take a look at The Plot Against the President, it's on Amazon prime

I quoted nothing... So no telling me to watch some random movie is not evidence of anything

Fighting Tao

Mic 1972 wrote: »

more insults, great duscussion

You aren’t having a discussion. You made claims that you aren’t backing up. Therefore, you are deliberately stifling discussion. It takes 2 people to have a discussion and you withdrew yourself after your lies where highlighted.

Timberrrrrrrr

Mic 1972 wrote: »

Do i have to prove that people plea guilty even when innocent because it's a more convenient outcome for them?
There's plenty of people who did that, you can find them in the usual places.


if you dispute that the earth is round I'm not going to pull the evidence for you.

Can you prove anyone convicted after the Mueller report did this?

Mic 1972

You wanted evidence, I posted a link to a valid piece of journalism
Feel free to inform yourself or continue with the personal attacks if it makes you feel better

King Mob

Mic 1972 wrote: »

You wanted evidence, I posted a link to a valid piece of journalism
Feel free to inform yourself or continue with the personal attacks if it makes you feel better

Yes. And we pointed out how that piece of journalism didn't say what you claimed it did.
You lied about what it said, then you ran away when you were called out on this.

You then tried to deflect to a new topic and tried the same dishonest tactics.

And now, rather than address your silly, childish behaviour, you're feigning offense.

Again, you are making yourself and other conspiracy theorists look foolish.

Why are you doing this?
Why do you think it's benefiting you?

Mic 1972

More insults, great stuff guys
You living up to your reputation ;-)

King Mob

Mic 1972 wrote: »

More insults, great stuff guys
You living up to your reputation ;-)

Again, no one is insulting you. We're just accurately discribing how you have acted.
You've made false claims.
You've ignored points and questions and run away from points.

You are now hiding behind your feigned offense.

Again, just level with us. Why do you think this is working?

Mic 1972

Go back to the previous pages and see how many times you have been offensive
Attacking people on a personal level is a standard i dont lower myself to, so good luck with your attitude, you succeeded in spamming a thread

King Mob

Mic 1972 wrote: »

Go back to the previous pages and see how many times you have been offensive
Attacking people on a personal level is a standard i dont lower myself to, so good luck with your attitude, you succeeded in spamming a thread

Feel free to point out where my comments have been "offensive" and where they have been inaccurate.
Perhaps you have much more delicate sensibilities than I do.

But given your track record, you aren't going to back this up either.

And again, we're faced with the absurd notion that things like "please provide the evidence you use to reach your conclusion" and "please explain what you believe" somehow count as "spam."

You made several false claims and then ran away from them when you couldn't support them.
Why did you do this?

Mic 1972

Mic 1972 wrote: »

Go back to the previous pages and see how many times you have been offensive
Attacking people on a personal level is a standard i dont lower myself to, so good luck with your attitude, you succeeded in spamming a thread

So, got any proof that the election was rigged? Also you attacked people by claiming they hadn't read the Time article but won't point to anywhere in the article that backs up what you're claiming...

BiggJim

Don't personally have a dog in the race but apparently Biden was recieving votes from people who were long dead, surely that has to raise some concerns.