The 2020 U.S. Election Irregularities.

King Mob

enno99 wrote: »

This is my last reply to you I will be posting here things i find interesting to the thread
I will try to avoid any input form you

Thanks have a nice day

That's not going to be very different from what you have been doing to be honest.

It's not that different from what most of the Trump conspiracy theorists have been doing here.
Spamming links, dumping propaganda from crank websites, then running away from any questions or points or fact checks.

enno99

enno99 wrote: »

He has a video with 2 other data experts
you can probably find it on his twitter

i will be honest a lot of it went over my head
but im sure others that understand this stuff will scrutinize it

I see a 1 hour and 10 minute video. All he has to do is upload the data and code/scripts they used and anyone can have a look at it.

enno99

Deleted User wrote: »

I was being generous. He's a discredited intelligent troll. Good night.

The world is full of them LOL

enno99

Deleted User wrote: »

I see a 1 hour and 10 minute video. All he has to do is upload the data and code/scripts they used and anyone can have a look at it.

You could ask him ? email or twitter

enno99

HUGE: Analysis Finds Over 10,000 Dead People Returned Mail-In Ballots in Michigan


An analysis of votes in Michigan has found that over 10,000 dead people returned mail-in ballots in the state.
The study was conducted by Richard Baris, the director of Big Data Poll.

“About 9,500 voters confirmed dead through the Social Security Death Index (SSDI) are marked in the state’s mail voting database as having returned ballots. Another nearly 2,000 are 100 years old or more and aren’t listed as known living centenarians,” the Epoch Times reports.

According to Baris, some of the people may not be dead — instead, they may have been made up entirely.


guess what twitter just banned him his wife and his company


https://twitter.com/nguyenthevote/status/1326674713050017797



https://twitter.com/nguyenthevote/status/1326678061551673345

Big Tech censoring anyone that disagrees with the narrative

What are they afraid of ?

King Mob

enno99 wrote: »

Big Tech censoring anyone that disagrees with the narrative

What are they afraid of ?

Big tech not allowing obvious lies and disinformation on their platform.

Again like all the previous points this comes from a suspect source and neither you nor the source can explain how this claim can fit in the larger narrative.
In the case of the source they do not do so so they don't have to make more claims they can't support. In your case it's because you didn't bother to critically think about it.

enno99

https://twitter.com/megynkelly/status/1325995003714342918


We should trust the media right

enno99

What I find odd Big Tech who are totally in the tank for Biden has wizards on computers or Dem statisticians

Yet they are no counter arguments to all these MIT guys and others using Benfords Law and other tools to come up with these
claims, anomalies

enno99

enno99 wrote: »

What I find odd Big Tech who are totally in the tank for Biden has wizards on computers or Dem statisticians

Yet they are no counter arguments to all these MIT guys and others using Benfords Law and other tools to come up with these
claims, anomalies

Was wondering if the Benford's Law claim would come up. Here's a simple dimissal.

EDIT: I actually give this guy my money on Patreon as it happens so I already watched his video, in case you're wondering if I had time to watch it since you posted. :pac: The fact that these guys are using unsuitable tools (and unsuitable in a way that's stated near the start of any explanation of it) makes me even less inclined to watch a 1 hour + video on Twitter.
Also I'm currently doing a Masters which has a large data manipulation/analysis element so I'm gonna make a wild assumption that a lot of what else they're doing is over-fitting data. It's fun to show correlations between things that have no reason to exist.

King Mob

enno99 wrote: »

Yet they are no counter arguments to all these MIT guys and others using Benfords Law and other tools to come up with these
claims, anomalies

Well since we've just seen they are counter arguments, let's look the other way.

How do these MIT guys explain the anomlies? What was the conspiracy behind the fraud doing to cause that anomaly? Surely they could use their evidence and big brains to work out how they were trying to cheat and they investigate that.

How then does this fit into the wider conspiracy? How was this pulled off on a nationwide scale with no evidence beyond a statistical quirk?

If they were cheating and altering the vote, why did they not also cheat for the senate and Congress votes? Why did they allow the presidential vote to be so close?
It can't be that they were concerned that it wouldn't look real, as your argument is that it doesn't look real.

Again I don't think any of the Trump conspiracy theorists can answer these questions.
This is just another case of cranks and propagandists finding a nice big technical term that their audience won't understand, but will use as a buzzword.

enno99

Deleted User wrote: »

Was wondering if the Benford's Law claim would come up. Here's a simple dimissal.

EDIT: I actually give this guy my money on Patreon as it happens so I already watched his video, in case you're wondering if I had time to watch it since you posted. :pac: The fact that these guys are using unsuitable tools (and unsuitable in a way that's stated near the start of any explanation of it) makes me even less inclined to watch a 1 hour + video on Twitter.
Also I'm currently doing a Masters which has a large data manipulation/analysis element so I'm gonna make a wild assumption that a lot of what else they're doing is over-fitting data. It's fun to show correlations between things that have no reason to exist.

No idea what any of it means to be honest can barely add and subtract
more interested if the Dems take up his offer to check his claims

enno99

Baris Account reinstated
cant have been lies and disinformation so

enno99

enno99 wrote: »

No idea what any of it means to be honest can barely add and subtract
more interested if the Dems take up his offer to check his claims

Why would they? All it would do is give more oxygen to it.
I'll make this simple for you. With huge datasets you can find "patterns" to suit anything you want to say by cherry-picking and over-fitting.
The Benford's law one has been debunked in a video really designed for teenagers.
Here's a fun site. https://www.tylervigen.com/spurious-correlations

Dohnjoe

Chris_Heilong wrote: »

Strange this is in conspiracy theories, can we have a thread on how Joe Biden is the most popular candidate America has ever had? As that sounds like a real conspiracy theory right there.

Okay, so you are suggesting Biden didn't get 77 million votes and that there's some conspiracy?

Dohnjoe

enno99 wrote: »

HUGE: Analysis Finds Over 10,000 Dead People Returned Mail-In Ballots in Michigan

And here's a fact-check of that claim

https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/11/08/fact-check-false-claim-14-k-dead-people-voted-michigan/6201900002/

The claim that 14,000 dead people in Wayne County, Michigan, voted in the 2020 election is FALSE, based on our research. The list has been investigated and it was found that some individuals on the list were either still alive, or not living in Michigan. Other examples cited were the result of date of birth errors. Ballots cast by dead people in Michigan are rejected and there is no evidence of fraud.

Dohnjoe

enno99 wrote: »

edited my answer I misread your earlier post

Biden has won nothing

They are still counting the final votes, but it's a formality at this stage. There will be recounts, but we know from basic maths and election history that it's highly unlikely for a deficit of e.g. 10k votes to be flipped, and even more unlikely for that to happen across multiple states - the modern vote counting process is pretty vigorous

If you can't grasp this concept (or don't want to) go look up the betting odds for Trump winning the election right now

Guy:Incognito

enno99 wrote: »

According to crazy nutters online and corrupt news media

google how presidents are elected (tip news channels dont decide)

And you can ask until our blue in the face not interested in your games
I can quote you if you like
on your response to avoiding questions

So is trump a crazy nutter for declaring himself a winner not only this time, but before the electoral college cast their votes last time?

Guy:Incognito

https://twitter.com/Fahrenthold/status/1326662707756544004?s=19

Guy:Incognito

This the USPS guy they were on about before?

https://www.thedailybeast.com/usps-staffer-richard-hopkins-told-agents-project-veritas-penned-his-ballot-tampering-claim?ref=home

The Nal

Guy:Incognito wrote: »

This the USPS guy they were on about before?

https://www.thedailybeast.com/usps-staffer-richard-hopkins-told-agents-project-veritas-penned-his-ballot-tampering-claim?ref=home

Yep.

All Trumps legal battles are getting thrown out.

The only single one hes got through is for observers to stand a few feet closer to election counters in Philadelphia.

Thats it. lol.

enno99

The Nal wrote: »

Yep.

All Trumps legal battles are getting thrown out.

The only single one hes got through is for observers to stand a few feet closer to election counters in Philadelphia.

Thats it. lol.

https://mobile.twitter.com/tedcruz/status/1326974546747027467

Did the courts over step also ?

King Mob

enno99 wrote: »

https://mobile.twitter.com/tedcruz/status/1326974546747027467

And zero evidence of fraud there.

You Trump supporters are getting very desperate.

enno99

Guy:Incognito wrote: »

So is trump a crazy nutter for declaring himself a winner not only this time, but before the electoral college cast their votes last time?

LOL
The crooked hag conceded

King Mob

enno99 wrote: »

LOL
The crooked hag conceded

Lol careful. Mask is slipping there.

V8 Interceptor

enno99

Dohnjoe wrote: »

They are still counting the final votes, but it's a formality at this stage. There will be recounts, but we know from basic maths and election history that it's highly unlikely for a deficit of e.g. 10k votes to be flipped, and even more unlikely for that to happen across multiple states - the modern vote counting process is pretty vigorous

If you can't grasp this concept (or don't want to) go look up the betting odds for Trump winning the election right now

Georgia to audit election, plans full hand recount

https://www.arkansasonline.com/news/2020/nov/12/georgia-to-audit-election-plans-full-hand-recount/?news

BREAKING: Michigan GOP state senators demand full audit of 2020 election results

https://thepostmillennial.com/breaking-michigan-state-senators-demand-full-audit-of-2020-election-results

A full audit is a little more than a recount

V8 Interceptor

Dohnjoe wrote: »

They are still counting the final votes, but it's a formality at this stage. There will be recounts, but we know from basic maths and election history that it's highly unlikely for a deficit of e.g. 10k votes to be flipped, and even more unlikely for that to happen across multiple states - the modern vote counting process is pretty vigorous

If you can't grasp this concept (or don't want to) go look up the betting odds for Trump winning the election right now

Its not that. Its the claim that thousands of votes were illegally cast after the day of the election when the results flipped towards Biden. If they were to be overturned then entire States would flip.

I'm not saying its true but I listened to Guilianni and that seemed to be their main line of attack.

enno99

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tjmiyZVEECU

A short video for anyone interested

11.11 mins

enno99

Dohnjoe wrote: »

And here's a fact-check of that claim

https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/11/08/fact-check-false-claim-14-k-dead-people-voted-michigan/6201900002/

Fact checkers
I think ill pass


It’s no wonder that the public has so little faith in the fact-checkers. A 2016 Rasmussen poll found that an astonishing 62% of American voters think the fact-check-ers are biased.

https://www.newsbusters.org/fact-checkers

enno99

V8 Interceptor wrote: »

Its not that. Its the claim that thousands of votes were illegally cast after the day of the election when the results flipped towards Biden. If they were to be overturned then entire States would flip.

I'm not saying its true but I listened to Guilianni and that seemed to be their main line of attack.

Its why Ted Cruz said its an important legal victory

Did the court overstep the mark by allowing ballots after closing on election day ?