Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Biden/Harris Presidency Discussion Thread

1252628303135

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,121 ✭✭✭TomOnBoard


    Sadly, the ISIS-K rear-guard action that was greatly feared over the past week has now begun. Yesterday's action at the airport is just the beginning of what could become a bloody couple of days as these lunatics try for martyrdom. Anyone at the airport, regardless of nationality (and including Talibs) will be seen as legitimate targets, just by virtue of being there. If the ISIS-K soldiers can get to take out even a single American, they won't care if they take out a hundred, or a thousand locals in the.process.

    This is the ultimate point of a failed policy, and a.shocking defeat after 20 years of war. Afghanistan falls back to 2001, but with horrendously more weaponry. The one-winged chickens are truly coming home to roost!

    As for Biden's political future, once the dust settles, the current knee-jerk screeching will all blow over! Anybody with a titter of wit knows this was not going to end well, and the end was always going to be messy. The needle of support for or against Biden won't move an inch among either the staunch Dem or staunch GOP supporters. Their respective levels of support for their side will only deepen and become more entrenched. As always, it will depend on how the middle ground react, once the thing is done and dusted. And that could go either way!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,633 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    Americans don't care about the loss of life. All you have to look at is their reaction to their covid death toll. They didn't care. They will say a lot of prayers.

    Even after the disaster of Iraq, America re elected George Bush in 2004.

    So Biden will escape this chaos and the poor Afghans will be left to pick up the pieces.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,312 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    There is more to life than US electoral politics.


    There are many certainly delighting in Biden's mess but there exact opposites are pretending it is not a mess, that leaving it to the last minute was the only option.


    It's a big boost for the Islamic State,who look like the only effective opposition to the Taliban and team left fighting Satan etc.


    The Islamic State holding ground in Afghanistan, it and the Taliban using the country to spread Jihadism.


    Neither being able to stop runaway Afghani population growth which makes the country certain to fail even more.


    Yet what is the answer. You can't force the Afghanis to think different to the Taliban, can't force them to view women different.


    That was tried for 20 years, it's failed.


    This will be a running wound in the region for many years to come, a problem and threat for Europe as well.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,165 ✭✭✭✭Rjd2


    No matter your opinion on the rights and wrongs of Biden's actions, this won't matter much long term politically.

    American public want out and have for a long time simple as that.

    Those in the GOP who think this will do wonders for them when it comes to voting still haven't learned from Trump . A huge draw when it came to Trump was he talked about the folly of forever war and teased similar withdrawals. He obviously did not follow through by hiring hawks galore!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,231 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    I think in a few months time this won't be an election issue unless American hostages are taken if they don't get everyone out.

    Do people really think that Biden is going for a second term? He looks and speaks like a very old man. Trump for all his fault never sounded so weak. I think the bigger issue for Democrats is that Harris has become as anonymous as Al Gore was years ago as VP.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,312 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    Trump was popular and in many ways equally despised for disengaging US forces from the never ending adventurism of the previous 30 years.


    The problem for Biden is his administration have acted as if they had no idea there was a withdrawal date. Not that they withdrew.


    It was the lack of planning.


    There is about 1500 US citizens left behind, if some of them start appearing in Isis videos, that will do significant harm to him.


    It is not something that will blow over in 6 months, it could very well define his Presidency.


    In wider geo politics it shows that America is very beatable when you have the population behind you, the effects of having a quasi failed Jihadi State in the region is one to watch as well.


    It's all much bigger than poor old Joe or Donald.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,312 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    Harris is keeping low so as not to be tainted by the problems of the pandemic and Afghanistan.


    When the economic bounce comes she'll come to the fore.


    Which is completely understandable and advisable. Let the one term President be the public face of the crappy times.


    There May be 1k to 1500 US citizens left behind.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,633 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    US Vice Presidents ly low because they have little constitutional power. They are largely irrelevant. Many in America regularly have no idea who the Vice President is at a particular time.



  • Registered Users Posts: 336 ✭✭NaFirinne


    The US is a fallen nation at this stage, and China is well on it's way of replacing them really soon as the number 1 world power in every way.

    The Current administration have so far greatly weakend the US and Strenghtend China.

    Did they do it on purpose or is it just complete incompentence.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,121 ✭✭✭TomOnBoard


    I reckon the U.S. has done a deal with the Taliban that anyone left behind after 31st who want to leave, will be allowed leave on commercial flights. It'll probably mean paying over or releasing a couple of hundred million bucks, and committing to not bombing the **** out of stuff left behind, but that's small beer in the scheme of things. If anyone stays, once offered a way out, then they'll be on their own.

    The Taliban had better make absolutely sure that ISIS-K don't get their hands on those who want to leave but who are still there after next week, 'coz if ISIS start beheading U.S. people on their way out (which is their main aim at the moment) its going to be carnage!

    As for Afghans who can't get out by next week, may their God help them!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,121 ✭✭✭TomOnBoard


    This is reductionist blather that adds absolutely nothing to debate or discussion in this thread. The US was never the No 1 world power 'in every way', and anyone who understands the totality of what comprises a world power would never consider China is replacing them in that context.

    The US may well be the no 1 world power in terms of military capability; China is not even close.

    The US stinks in terms of social justice and has done since forever. Sweden or Ireland would be much closer to no 1 in that trgard, and China's record in that regard is appalling.

    US healthcare is a basket case, and never was considered no 1. Give that perhaps to the French or Canadians.

    US environmental record is dreadful, but China's is thousands of times worse. I'll give that sector's No 1 spot to Scandanavian countries by and large.

    etc.

    So, while the premise that the US is a 'falling nation' as distinct from a 'fallen nation' may have some merit, it is falling from a not very great height, and that decline certainly didn't just begin 6 or 7 months ago.

    From the perspective of this thread, Biden inherited a bag of shite from Trump, deliberately seeded with countless booby traps and is attempting (sometimes poorly it must he said) to wipe off the worst of the excrement from a whole bunch of turds, before he even begins to try to polish them!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,312 ✭✭✭✭Danzy




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,633 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    The patriotic rubbish that most Americans engage with and are excited by, disguises the many many flaws of US culture and society.

    They are served by the worst news media in the world which is exclusively driven by ratings. CNN showed a concert the other night. A news channel showing a concert.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,121 ✭✭✭TomOnBoard


    Absolutely! We all assess and indeed judge, through our own prisms. That's why facts are so important, and are the foundation of assessment and judgement. So, while our assessments and judgements may differ, our set of facts should not! If they do differ, either one of us is wrong or we both are..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,036 ✭✭✭pearcider


    The sheer incompetence of the Biden administration knows no bounds. This wokepocalypse is only getting started for the United States.

    https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/erik-prince-responds-psakis-comments-issues-dire-warning-kabul

    He criticized Washington "who decided to give up Bagram, our largest airbase in the region - which is actually defendable - to say we're gonna do our final staging out of Kabul, an airport in the middle of a city of four and a half million surrounded on hills by three sides, where just ten guys, with a couple of motor tubes can shut the whole place down and destroy billions of dollars of U.S. aircraft and kill 1000s of people on those aircraft, and that's what I'm afraid we're in store for over the next few days, a few hours." 



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,586 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Harris will not be a Democratic nominee. She performed abysmally in the Primaries. I personally can't stand her, find her extremely insincere and her record in public office is terrible imo.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,252 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    That would be the opinions of Erik Prince , owner of Blackwater , that most notorious Military contracting company aka Mercenaries , who is currently running a human trafficking operation out of Kabul charging people 6 grand a head on the promise that he'll fly them out.

    Maybe they should be machine gunning civilians to keep things in line at the gates??



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,760 ✭✭✭✭duploelabs


    This is the same guy who wanted to charge £6500 per seat on humanitarian flights


    https://www.forbes.com/sites/andrewsolender/2021/08/25/white-house-bashes-erik-princes-6500-evacuation-flights-efforts-to-profit-off-peoples-agony-and-pain/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,036 ✭✭✭pearcider


    6500 is a bargain in the circumstances. I suppose you work for free in your own life?

    The Big Mans administration is so incompetent they literally abandoned tens of thousands to their fate with absolutely no planning whatsoever.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,706 ✭✭✭Celticfire


    Of course a government rendering humanitarian aid would never ever think of engaging in these human trafficking practices of looking for payment.

    Flight Costs: Repatriation flights are not free, and passengers will be required to sign a promissory loan agreement and may not be eligible to renew their U.S. passports until the loan is repaid. The cost may be $2,000USD or more per person.

    This was posted 14th August on the OSAC website and only after huge blowback did the US government say it wouldn't pursue for the money.

    Security Alert: Afghanistan, Repatriation Assistance for U.S. Citizens (osac.gov)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,085 ✭✭✭relax carry on


    No issue with profiteering off the suffering of others. Interesting outlook on life you have there.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,036 ✭✭✭pearcider


    Everything we have from our food supply to your iPhone is predicated on profiteering from the “suffering” of others. Maybe read Adam Smith The Wealth of Nations and come back to me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,036 ✭✭✭pearcider


    A chartered flight out of a war zone with private security detail. Sure you could spend 6 grand inter railing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,457 ✭✭✭Suckler


    Comparing escaping a war zone with inter-railing.......



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,165 ✭✭✭✭Rjd2


    She dropped out before the primary got to her home state because she couldn't face the humiliation of losing it, all this despite having the backing of the corporate media democrat machine from the day she declared.

    Maybe if they have a really bad mid terms, and Biden indicate he won't run, and concerns remain over the popularity regarding Harris, they may have to for a celeb?

    Not impossible someone like the Rock is tapped up then, he'd win easily.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,417 ✭✭✭✭salmocab


    The last thing that country needs is another celebrity in charge. It needs a steady hand to get it back on course, unfortunately it also needs the GOP to come back from the edge.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    This isn't the first time I've seen The Rock mentioned for political office, and I gotta ask: is there any truth in this, or sense then man actually wants to take a swing at a position? Obviously we have had plenty of Hollywood stars stand in or win elections and yes, Ronald Reagan was himself a former star but he still started as Governor (of California funnily enough). The Rock jumping straight into the presidency feels outlandish, while the man himself as struck as apolitical in his media presence.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,165 ✭✭✭✭Rjd2



    He endorsed Biden last time and he has teased it previously. I know the National Review wrote an article he retweeted approvingly about running a few years ago so its something that he is clearly considering.

    I can't pretend to know his politics in depth, but I suspect he'd run as a moderate Democrat closer to the Biden wing rather than the Bernie crew if pushed.

    A lot would need to go wrong though for him to run, dire mid terms, Biden not running and Trump also not running!

    Obviously the Harris scenario is very messy, how do you persuade her to step aside? And if you do, can it really be for a white man?

    He's run the score up if he ran. The charisma he has is insane and he is popular with both sides which in this era is remarkable.

    He'd also stop making **** movies as well.😀



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,586 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    I hate that we have to ensure this idea of politics by quota. Shouldn't matter what sex or colour a candidate. I want one who'll actually deliver on important measures. I'd hoped Biden could manage a few, but it seems that likelihood is rapidly diminishing



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,909 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Well, Obama did not a lot to advance the lot of minorities. Thatcher did nothing to advance the lot of women - it could actually be said she put the plight of women back by a decade. It was President LB Johnson who did most for the African-Americans through legislating for them.

    Biden has a year to tackle voter suppression, the imbalance in the Supreme Court, and the GOP advantage in the Senate. His chance of success is close to nil on all of them, but he might succeed with one or perhaps two. If he could increase the number of SC judges by four or five, that might wo of the three. Making Washington a State and also Puerto Rica a state would increase the Senate to 104, with the extra ones likely being Dems. If he gets those two, then the SC could tackle voter suppression.

    As I say, a single one would be fantastic. Democracy coming to the USA.

    Post edited by Sam Russell on


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 21,625 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    Biden has been President for 7 months, during a pandemic, and you’re ready to right him off. It’s almost as if you were never actually ready to give him a chance.

    they/them/theirs


    And so on, and so on …. - Slavoj Žižek




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,586 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Sure Brian, lets pretend that the Democrats haven't shown themselves repeatedly incapable of getting out of their own way. Lets pretend that the likelihood isn't that the Republicans retake one or both Houses. Your inability to accept criticisms of Biden is puzzling.



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 21,625 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    I’ll accept plenty of criticism of Biden. He was flat wrong to support Israel recently for example.


    I'm taking issue with the hyperbole though. You’re writing off Biden’s presidency 7 months in. You’re constantly attacking him for not doing things he either never said he’d do or can’t so. I find it puzzling that you haven’t acknowledged a single good thing he’s done, he’s done a few.

    they/them/theirs


    And so on, and so on …. - Slavoj Žižek




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,586 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    You could read back a few pages to see me praising him for pulling out of Afghanistan. He hasn't delivered on most of what he ran on, and given the inability of the Senate Democrats to get their **** together, he's unlikely to. There's very high chance that the Republicans retake the Senate and possibly the House, in which case that's all she wrote for policy ideas.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,909 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    I was disappointed to hear Mark Little say when he interviewed Biden, he had to just listen to Biden, and Biden never listened to him. He said Biden does not listen - and that is very serious for a President that he does not listen.

    To me, that is an appalling vista.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,121 ✭✭✭TomOnBoard


    Predictably, the squawking and caterwauling from the GQP continued apace on the US Sunday shows today, with greasy Lady Graham heading up the mob lambasting Biden for the state of world affairs in Afghanistan. His intellectual toadying & dishonesty gets worse day by day.

    Perhaps, alternative viewpoints are not getting sufficiently well-aired by the Administration, as it is still deep in the mire of a 20-years deluge of excrement and trying to manage its country out of that sewer. Pending Congressional hearings to try to make sense of all that (if that's even possible), this opinion piece from USA Today may offer some sense in the interim. Not that any such attempt at sense will ever make the oleaginous Lady G appear to be anything other than a slieveen of low standards. ( BTW, I can't wait for the Q-crowd to publish the Lady G photos, when its his turn to become another speed bump for buses!)

    https://amp.usatoday.com/amp/5639051001?__twitter_impression=true



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,252 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


     He hasn't delivered on most of what he ran on

    Again - He's in Office 7 Months!!!!

    Lots to criticize him on without question , but complaining that " He hasn't delivered on most of what he ran on" is beyond disingenuous after being in office for 7 months out of the 48 of his full tenure.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Yeah, I don't think Biden has set the world alight (though there's a fair argument that this wasn't the appeal of his candidature in the first place), but judging his administration after 7 months seems premature. The midterms is the earliest IMO.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,670 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    The same people screaming

    "He hasn't delivered on most of what he ran on"

    will also gloss over the fact that TFG and indeed most presidents rarely get to deliver on most of the promises they make in the run up to being elected.


    Wether that's down to not having control of the houses or just the sheer impossibility of getting it done is a moot point to them.


    I'm still waiting for Trump to announce his healthcare plan, you know, the one he promised would be out in 2 weeks......back in 2016 sometime.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,121 ✭✭✭TomOnBoard


    Apart from simply not being Trump, one of Biden's main claims to the 'throne' was his skill in bi-partisan negotiations. Sadly, he has largely been unable to practice those skills, as Q has taken over the Former GOP, and they are in scorched earth mode to try and claw power back in 2022.

    ALL pre-election 'promises' are largely moot at this stage, as the political landscape has become so toxic since Insurrection Day. Its now down to a battle for survival, with only a couple of meaningful issues that he needs to focus on:

    1. Get the Dems in line

    2. Voting Rights

    3. Supreme Court

    4. Covid

    5. The Economy



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,586 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Saying it's unfair to criticize Biden ignores the reality of what he faces. Covid has obviously consumed the majority of his bandwidth to date, however the messagiyhas been clear from all parties in the Senate as to what the future holds. Sinema and Manchin will not support getting rid of the filibuster. Therefore efforts at electoral reform are dead. Healthcare reform, likely dead. Environmental action perhaps, but unlikely given the overall position of Republicans.


    Are expecting some sea change in Republican sentiment? They have clearly stated they will not work with Biden, as they refused to do with Obama. So that being the case, it's hardly precipitous to state that his agenda is a wash.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,252 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    No one is saying it's unfair to criticize him , far from it.

    But claiming that he's failing because he hasn't implemented a majority of his campaign promises is rightly being called out as disingenuous.

    Your points about the challenges he faces are well made , but they are challenges to be faced not ones already lost beyond recovery.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,586 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    If you acknowledge the general truth of the timeline with respect to elections and such, how is it disingenuous say that his policy efforts face failure? What do you see changing that would lead to success?

    I very much hope that isn't the case. I don't have any confidence that Biden and the Democrats can deliver.



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 21,625 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    This is a mustard suit level scandal. Impeachment time.

    they/them/theirs


    And so on, and so on …. - Slavoj Žižek




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,121 ✭✭✭TomOnBoard


    Is a Mustard suit level higher or lower than a Tan suit level?

    Asking for a friend...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,121 ✭✭✭TomOnBoard


    Well, they're out! a day ahead of schedule, and over 114,000 evacuated PLUS thousands of US troops and hundreds of diplomats...

    Oh, and one utter gobshite and his 101 dalmations (or whatever the mutts are...)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,121 ✭✭✭TomOnBoard


    Oh, and the 'apparent glancing' did NOT occur DURING the ceremony... An automatic, reflexive and very momentary gesture occurred immediately AFTER the ceremony was over... But why let a non-event fact get in the way of a mountainous sQueak..

    Sad!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,121 ✭✭✭TomOnBoard


    Now that the U.S. presence at the airport is no more, I wonder will Eric now re-start his 'cheap as chips' $6,500 per person 'humanitarian flights' (a.k.a. 'Inter-Railing') from Kabul?

    Gap in the market now Eric!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,994 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    This is what is across the ballot in terms of choice for American voters.

    No evidence, 60 odd cases thrown out, apologies and retractions from those who made such claims and lawsuits against them for doing so and still they go on with pedalling these falsehoods to pander to radicalised people. Less than 12 months after uncovered plots against state Governors to murder them, insurrection attempts at the Capitol and bomb scares, an elected representative is coming out with this type of nonsense.

    The Democrats should have a media strategist to coordinate the responses to these events and not just leave them to journalists to flag.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement