Trump vs Biden 2020, Day 64 of the Pennsylvania count (pt 5) Read OP

Kermit.de.frog

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1325891490636320768

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1325896369534607360


It's over Donald. Time for your meds.

briany

NaFirinne wrote: »

I do think it's very suspect that Joe Biden actually recieved 75+ million legal votes.

I do think that Trump is right to question votes that are suspect and to ensure that the vote count has indeed been carried out fairly and accurately.

There is a lot of alleged iregulaties in a number of states that should be investigated

If everything is proven to be above board then Trump should concede to Biden.

Imagine you were a complete outsider to this election, for a moment, i.e. hadn't been following it whatsoever...

1. Biden had been constantly leading in polls for months

2. Biden won the election

3. Biden did not win it by margins as big as most polls suggested

From this, you would conclude that if there was fraud to be found, it would probably be found on the Trump side rather than Biden's. And, we do know, for example that fake drop-off boxes were set up in California, and that, per Trump's attempts to interfere with the mail, 100,000s of ballots might not even make it in to be counted. So, on the Trump side, all you have is a hunch, and on the Biden side, you can make a proper case of how Trump and his supporters were directly trying to mess with the election.

There isn't any particular statistical evidence to suggest that a massive voter fraud conspiracy took place against Trump. Even Giuliani was having trouble making a convincing case, talking about how Joe Biden could have voted 50 times by mail, we just don't know...

Except if it were that easy to commit mail-in voter fraud, it would happen on an untenably large-scale in every single U.S. Presidential election. It's not as if absentee/postal ballots are even a new thing. 33 million of them were cast in 2016. With the presidency being such a coveted position, there's plenty of scope in so many millions of postal ballots being cast for the kind of skulduggery that Trump and his supporters are now alleging, but the only time I heard of massive voter fraud in 2016 was from, you guessed it, Trump, because he claimed he won the popular vote. This was never investigated by his administration, of course.

The current bleating about massive-scale postal vote fraud is nothing more than an attempt to keep the base angry for another 4 years. Trump and his team knew that postal ballots were going to be overwhelmingly Democrat, and that's the only reason they're trying to undermine them.

namloc1980

Kermit.de.frog wrote: »

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1325891490636320768

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1325896369534607360


It's over Donald. Time for your meds.

Dangerous man. His enablers are still supporting him. They'll try anything to steal the election. What they are doing is the ultimate projection.

Smee_Again

Kermit.de.frog wrote: »

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1325891490636320768

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1325896369534607360


It's over Donald. Time for your meds.

A recount in Wisconsin will cost $3M and so far Donnie hasn’t paid the deposit and there won’t be a recount until he does.

MeMen2_MoRi_

Foxtrol wrote: »

Standard problem in that tweet making huge leaps and confusing correlation vs causation.

You'd rightly question me if I claimed Biden won the dem primary because he was against M4A and Bernie was for it. You're doing the same here, there is so much more that goes into who wins or loses, especially when you're talking about completely different districts.



Stop playing the victim. Progressives have been pointing plenty of fingers the last few days, you just shared a post pointing fingers.

Everyone is at it and it needs to stop.



Because republican attack ads hit you on what most crazy sh1t your party says and their most offensive people. I'm in a heavily blue state and even I've faced months of attack ads about 'socialism', 'jobs not mobs', 'far left agenda'. Like GOP candidates had to waste their time distancing themselves from Trump, moderate Dem candidates have to waste time distancing themselves from stuff 'the squad' come out with.

Yeah probably just a coincidence, I'm interested to see how the party goes from here. Can the gap that is absolutely there be lessened, can deals be brokered, if not the party may well see itself up sh!t creek come next election.

I think a lot of finger pointing has come from pelosi breaking with tradition and backing a challenger against an incumbent. All because that incumbent is a progressive. And the seeds of pointing fingers is still growing, I agree it has stop!!

Not a fan of the squad?

Tchaikovsky

He's gonna provide proof of the "froid" in this press conference. No really.

namloc1980

Tchaikovsky wrote: »

He's gonna provide proof of the "froid" in this press conference. No really.

About time!

briany

Kermit.de.frog wrote: »

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1325891490636320768

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1325896369534607360

NaFirinne

briany wrote: »

Imagine you were a complete outsider to this election, for a moment, i.e. hadn't been following it whatsoever...

1. Biden had been constantly leading in polls for months

2. Biden won the election

3. Biden did not win it by margins as big as most polls suggested

From this, you would conclude that if there was fraud to be found, it would probably be found on the Trump side rather than Biden's. And, we do know, for example that fake drop-off boxes were set up in California, and that, per Trump's attempts to interfere with the mail, 100,000s of ballots might not even make it in to be counted. So, on the Trump side, all you have is a hunch, and on the Biden side, you can make a proper case of how Trump and his supporters were directly trying to mess with the election.

There isn't any particular statistical evidence to suggest that a massive voter fraud conspiracy took place against Trump. Even Giuliani was having trouble making a convincing case, talking about how Joe Biden could have voted 50 times by mail, we just don't know...

Except if it were that easy to commit mail-in voter fraud, it would happen on an untenably large-scale in every single U.S. Presidential election. It's not as if absentee/postal ballots are even a new thing. 33 million of them were cast in 2016. With the presidency being such a coveted position, there's plenty of scope in so many millions of postal ballots being cast for the kind of skulduggery that Trump and his supporters are now alleging, but the only time I heard of massive voter fraud in 2016 was from, you guessed it, Trump, because he claimed he won the popular vote. This was never investigated by his administration, of course.

The current bleating about massive-scale postal vote fraud is nothing more than an attempt to keep the base angry for another 4 years. Trump and his team knew that postal ballots were going to be overwhelmingly Democrat, and that's the only reason they're trying to undermine them.

The polls have been proven to be totally wrong, so I don't think you can make any conclusions at all from polls as to who was actually wining the election.

Biden has been declared the winner by the media giants however yet has to be certified the winner from my understandings.

Let's see how this plays out in the courts...time will tell if your correct.


Here's what Rudy Giuliani had to say not long ago.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RSQ6bt7OibQ&ab_channel=NewsmaxTV


Also can you tell me who was the last person to recieve over 70+ million votes in US elections?

DeanAustin

It beggars belief that intelligent people are buying his nonsense.

In this country, you hear stories of dead people voting or ballots going to old addresses and all that stuff. Logistically, an election is very difficult to administer, lots of people are lazy about updating the register so you will always have cases of that sort of stuff. We have 4.5m people. In the US, they have 320m people so you will get a lot more cases of these sorts of errors.

Trump and his people seem to be trying to find things like this and spinning it so that "well if the process is not perfect, it must be absolutely flawed" and then taken it up a notch to say "it's flawed because the Democrats have rigged it".

It flies in the face of all common sense and anyone buying it for minute needs to have a word with themselves. If you want to see what a rigged election looks like, go to Belarus or Mali. The US election has not been rigged.

drunkmonkey

NaFirinne wrote: »

Let's see how this plays out in the courts

Exactly, it ain't over until it's over..


https://twitter.com/Mike_Pence/status/1325871164443545600?s=20

vojiwox

Kayleigh press conference now!

No way she believes any of this. Can't believe they seem to be sticking with him on this.

DeanAustin

I think Trump is just trolling everyone at this stage with all these tweets. That's about the best explanation amongst a lot of bad ones. If he is, I'll give him a bit of credit.

I can imagine he's sitting back in the Oval Office saying "ah f**k it, I lost, let's see how many replies I can get and how many people I can wind up" while he sips champagne and snorts coke off Melania's arse.

Akrasia

drunkmonkey wrote: »

It would be blindingly obvious if they did that, at the moment it's just obvious.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/it-defies-logic-scientist-finds-telltale-signs-election-fraud-after-analyzing-mail-ballot

What really ‘defies logic’ is that anyone would believe a single word posted on ZeroHedge

Kermit.de.frog

Kayleigh McEnany speaking now.

Low intelligence, high maintenance.

Strumms

namloc1980 wrote: »

Dangerous man. His enablers are still supporting him. They'll try anything to steal the election. What they are doing is the ultimate projection.

He’s fuùcked in the head .

We are sitting here tonight, in the midst of a global pandemic and an outgoing US president who is crazy, batshît crazy not willing to give up the presidency quietly or at all for that matter... mad world.

namloc1980

She's lying her ass off here.

froog

this is embarrassing. but very funny. thanks kayleigh.

I see sheep

drunkmonkey wrote: »

Exactly, it ain't over until it's over..


https://twitter.com/Mike_Pence/status/1325871164443545600?s=20

It was over a few days ago mate, try to keep up.

Akrasia

NaFirinne wrote: »

Also can you tell me who was the last person to recieve over 70+ million votes in US elections?

Um, Joe Biden??

gmisk

drunkmonkey wrote: »

Exactly, it ain't over until it's over..


https://twitter.com/Mike_Pence/status/1325871164443545600?s=20

Mike Pence might be better to concentrate on the covid taskforce which he is meant to be the head off....that meets a grand total of....once a week.
Trump hasn't been at one in several months....
Clown car.

Gervais08

This press conference is both hilarious and mortifying!!!!

froog

it's looks so cheap. they really have no money left.

vojiwox

froog wrote: »

it's looks so cheap. they really have no money left.

Why don't they use the white house briefing room?

cnocbui

Kermit.de.frog wrote: »

Buy gold!

Or Bitcoin.

American billionaire Stanley Druckenmiller has changed course on Bitcoin, saying it has the potential to store value for future generations.

Speaking on CNBC today, Druckenmiller said that, although he was still more heavily invested in gold than crypto, he had purchased at least some Bitcoin (BTC). He did not specify how much.

“I own many many more times gold than I own Bitcoin. But frankly if the gold bet works, the Bitcoin bet will probably work better because it's thinner, more illiquid and has a lot more beta to it."

weisses

NaFirinne wrote: »

Also can you tell me who was the last person to recieve over 70+ million votes in US elections?

Biden ....

ohnonotgmail

DeanAustin wrote: »

I think Trump is just trolling everyone at this stage with all these tweets. That's about the best explanation amongst a lot of bad ones. If he is, I'll give him a bit of credit.

I can imagine he's sitting back in the Oval Office saying "ah f**k it, I lost, let's see how many replies I can get and how many people I can wind up" while he sips champagne and snorts coke off Melania's arse.

more likely trying to grift as many donations as he can to pay off his campaign debts.

froog

there are just 43,000 watching this on trump's youtube channel. this is more pathetic than the four seasons landscaping clown show.

namloc1980

vojiwox wrote: »

Why don't they use the white house briefing room?

Not allowed as this is a campaign event not government business.....not that that didn't stop them before.

py2006

As much as we joke about it and can't believe that these idiots are claiming evidence for rigging and fraud...


When you think about it, America simply couldn't afford to have that imbecile representing their country any longer. As much as I doubt it, if I am being honest, it wouldn't surprise me.....100%

...or is that the 2nd bottle of beer I cracked open talkin?