Trump vs Biden 2020, Day 64 of the Pennsylvania count (pt 5) Read OP

eagle eye

eagle eye wrote: »

Yes, a couple as in two. Looking from the outside, which we all are, girl in relationship with her boss gets promoted twice. If you don't think it can be looked at by many people that way then you are fooling nobody but yourself.

I never said she slept her way to where she is today which is the lie told by your buddy.

So your defence now is that it's ok to make baseless claims about why someone was promoted as long as that person is dating their boss? You don't see any issue with that at all?

duploelabs

eagle eye wrote: »

There is a question mark at the end of the sentence asking if it can't be seen that way?

Oh so you're 'just asking the question' well that's ok then /s

ohnonotgmail

eagle eye wrote: »

There is a question mark at the end of the sentence asking if it can't be seen that way?

JAQing

Quin_Dub

eagle eye wrote: »

Yes, a couple as in two. Looking from the outside, which we all are, girl in relationship with her boss gets promoted twice. If you don't think it can be looked at by many people that way then you are fooling nobody but yourself.

I never said she slept her way to where she is today which is the lie told by your buddy.

And again, this is just dragging us away from the core issue which is another poster telling lies.

My issue is the election is over, Biden has won, he'll do a great job I think. We need to get behind what he wants which is harmony and not this pathetic hate and lies on both sides.

Looking from the outside as we all are , A Father says that he'd like to *date* his daughter if she wasn't his daughter. If you don't think it can be looked at by many people that way then you are fooling nobody but yourself.

eagle eye

Deleted User wrote:

So your defence now is that it's ok to make baseless claims about someone why they were promoted as long as they're dating their boss? You don't see any issue with that at all?

No my claim is that telling lies and putting up unsubstantiated rumours and making up nicknames is wrong. It's like what Trump and his cronies do.
You guys are dragging up old stuff to try and bully me into submission but it won't work.

Timberrrrrrrr

eagle eye wrote: »

No my claim is that telling lies and putting up unsubstantiated rumours and making up nicknames is wrong. It's like what Trump and his cronies do.
You guys are dragging up old stuff to try and bully me into submission but it won't work.

Which is exactly what you have done.

nolivesmatter

It looks like we're effectively watching the left cannibalize itself over the last few pages lol.

ohnonotgmail

eagle eye wrote: »

No my claim is that telling lies and putting up unsubstantiated rumours and making up nicknames is wrong. It's like what Trump and his cronies do.
You guys are dragging up old stuff to try and bully me into submission but it won't work.

it is also exactly what you have done in relation to harris. very hypocricitical of you. careful you don't hurt yourself on the massive fall from the pedestal you put yourself on.

eagle eye

Quin_Dub wrote:

Looking from the outside as we all are , A Father says that he'd like to *date* his daughter if she wasn't his daughter. If you don't think it can be looked at by many people that way then you are fooling nobody but yourself.

There's a big difference between what he said and this

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Trump is on record saying he would bang his own daughter

The above is a lie.

eagle eye

ohnonotgmail wrote:

it is also exactly what you have done in relation to harris. very hypocricitical of you. careful you don't hurt yourself on the massive fall from the pedestal you put yourself on.

Where's the lie?

ohnonotgmail

nolivesmatter wrote: »

It looks like we're effectively watching the left cannibalize itself over the last few pages lol.

who here is on the left? I know i'm not.

ohnonotgmail

eagle eye wrote: »

There's a big difference between what he said and this



The above is a lie.

date and bang are synonyms for trump.

eagle eye

ohnonotgmail wrote:

who here is on the left? I know i'm not.

I'm not either.

ohnonotgmail

eagle eye wrote: »

Where's the lie?

this

putting up unsubstantiated rumours

eagle eye

eagle eye wrote: »

No my claim is that telling lies and putting up unsubstantiated rumours and making up nicknames is wrong. It's like what Trump and his cronies do.
You guys are dragging up old stuff to try and bully me into submission but it won't work.

As others have said, that's exactly what you did.

And would it be a wild theory to suggest she slept her way to a couple of promotions?

All I've gotten from your posts over the last few days is that you hate the type of person you yourself are, nothing more.

eagle eye

What unsubstantiated rumours did I put up?

eagle eye

eagle eye wrote: »

What unsubstantiated rumours did I put up?

In what way is stating this

And would it be a wild theory to suggest she slept her way to a couple of promotions?

not stating an unsubstantiated rumour?

ohnonotgmail

eagle eye wrote: »

What unsubstantiated rumours did I put up?

I'm done with your gaslighting and won't be responding to you further. I imagine anybody who has read your recent posts will feel the same.

eagle eye

Right we can move on.
I'm just sick of people defending a poster acting like Trump and his cronies.

Attacking me as if I'm a liar is despicable behaviour.

I'll continue to pull up anybody telling lies or posting unsubstantiated rumours and making up nicknames.

eagle eye

eagle eye wrote: »

Right we can move on.

You are aware that that's the typical response of someone who knows they've lost the argument right?

eagle eye wrote: »

Attacking me as if I'm a liar is despicable behaviour.

You are a liar. You said you weren't reading my posts, and yet you responded to one of them? There's no "if" about it.

eagle eye wrote: »

I'll continue to pull up anybody telling lies or posting unsubstantiated rumours and making up nicknames.

So are you going to pull up yourself or not?

Timberrrrrrrr

eagle eye wrote: »

Right we can move on.
I'm just sick of people defending a poster acting like Trump and his cronies.

Attacking me as if I'm a liar is despicable behaviour.

I'll continue to pull up anybody telling lies or posting unsubstantiated rumours and making up nicknames.

Maybe take a long look in the mirror first, you have just proven to all here that you are dishonest in your posting.

eagle eye

Joe has a hairline fracture in his foot, got it playing with the dog. Can so easily happen. Looks like he'll have to wear a walking boot for a while.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.rte.ie/amp/1181315/

robinph

eagle eye wrote: »

There's a big difference between what he said and this



The above is a lie.

Trump never said that he was planning to incarcerate Hillary Clinton, or that he'd make the country to the south of the US give payment for a fence or that he'd Make America a bit better Again.

So he's not failed in any of his pre election promises I guess.

eagle eye

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Maybe take a long look in the mirror first, you have just proven to all here that you are dishonest in your posting.

No, you are the liar here.Not me.

eagle eye

eagle eye wrote: »

Joe has a hairline fracture in his foot, got it playing with the dog. Can so easily happen. Looks like he'll have to wear a walking boot for a while.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.rte.ie/amp/1181315/

Lol. You're so so adamant about pulling up people who post unsubstantiated rumours, but when you do it yourself you try to ignore it and change the subject. Pathetic. :rolleyes:

DrumSteve

Can't believe were arguing the semantics of the language of a chap who quite clearly wants to shag his own daughter.

I mean, he's been so open about it.

He's a sick, sick man.

duploelabs

eagle eye wrote: »

No, you are the liar here.Not me.

The last three pages proves this as demonstrably incorrect

eagle eye

duploelabs wrote: »

The last three pages proves this as demonstrably incorrect

More lies.
A question I asked is being used by you as a statement.

trashcan

DrumSteve wrote: »

Can't believe were arguing the semantics of the language of a chap who quite clearly wants to shag his own daughter.

I mean, he's been so open about it.

He's a sick, sick man.

No, no, no. He only wants to “date” her. Which isn’t sick at all

eagle eye

eagle eye wrote: »

More lies.