Trump vs Biden 2020, Day 64 of the Pennsylvania count (pt 5) Read OP

eagle eye

robinph wrote:

or the sites disappear. If you remove the protections from the online companies then Trump loses his platform. He may not like Twitter, but if he puts them out of business then what does he do.

Please remove the protections, no where for Trump to post his crap and nowhere for the less intelligent to get drawn into ridiculous stuff.
No social media websites like Facebook and Twitter would make the world a better place I think.

robinph

Thanks, I had remembered the protections the wrong way round in that it would stop platforms moderating content. The end result for Trump though is exactly the same, Twitter would cease to exist and so therefore would Trump.

He's completely oblivious to anything that he does and what impact any choices he might have on anyone else, or even in this case what it would do to him. Someone is doing something he doesn't like, so hit out at the someone whilst ignoring the fact that someone is the reason he exists. Reminds me of the newspaper cartoons of Brexit UK sawing off a tree branch that they are sitting on.

Timberrrrrrrr

Carfacemandog wrote: »

Trump's severe shift on social media (who he has always had issue with but been on an absolute mission against for about a fortnight now) coinciding with the reveal of him possibly wearing a nappy, is about as close to confirmation of the existence of said nappy one could possibly get without video footage.

Look at the 10 second mark onwards, you can clearly see the outline

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jkghtyxZ6r

MeMen2_MoRi_

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

the injecting bleach was the end of april. the woodward interview was March. at what point was he taking it seriously and how did he demonstrate this?

One instance would be that he seemed fine with lockdowns, like I mentioned previous the whole liberate Michigan and the other states then came about..

I'm fine with the listing of his wrongs and they should not be forgotten etc at the same time there has to be instances of him listening to Dr fauci (sp).

Also, I'd retract the "at the start", my timeline of 2020 is fcuked, I even tried to finish work an hour early yesterday lol.. I'd say it was before the whole inject/UV pressing breifing disaster that rocked him to his core of his own stupidity at what he said. After this he completely downed tools, that train wreck is still in motion.

sydthebeat

mcmoustache wrote: »

I don't know if you're aware, but the bit in bold is how you summon a certain poster to this thread, assuming that they aren't threadbanned. Another is by bringing up Trump's mocking of a disabled person. Such summoning will get you massive essays explaining that he didn't use the word bleach or that Trump mimics disabled people all the time.

pretty sure those 2 posters turned out to be the same person

mcmoustache

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

I think you have to say it three times in a row.

If only.

ohnonotgmail

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Look at the 10 second mark onwards, you can clearly see the outline

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jkghtyxZ6r

video doesn't work. is it the wrestling one?

ohnonotgmail

robinph wrote: »

Thanks, I had remembered the protections the wrong way round in that it would stop platforms moderating content. The end result for Trump though is exactly the same, Twitter would cease to exist and so therefore would Trump.

He's completely oblivious to anything that he does and what impact any choices he might have on anyone else, or even in this case what it would do to him. Someone is doing something he doesn't like, so hit out at the someone whilst ignoring the fact that someone is the reason he exists. Reminds me of the newspaper cartoons of Brexit UK sawing off a tree branch that they are sitting on.

i'm not sure twitter would cease to exist entirely but it would certainly be a much worse place than it already is. Can you imagine what this place would like as a free for all? it would be a thousand times worse than that.

robinph

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

i'm not sure twitter would cease to exist entirely but it would certainly be a much worse place than it already is. Can you imagine what this place would like as a free for all? it would be a thousand times worse than that.

If you remove the option for Twitter to moderate content then they will just delete it instead. But if it's also not possible for Twitter to delete content then nobody is going to host content from other people and the internet disappears in a puff of logic. If you can't host other peoples content then everyone has to be their own host, but you also then have the problem of the network itself and if they are to be held responsible for transmitting questionable content and internet service providers also cease to exist if they are going to be held responsible for your content.

ohnonotgmail

robinph wrote: »

If you remove the option for Twitter to moderate content then they will just delete it instead. But if it's also not possible for Twitter to delete content then nobody is going to host content from other people and the internet disappears in a puff of logic. If you can't host other peoples content then everyone has to be their own host, but you also then have the problem of the network itself and if they are to be held responsible for transmitting questionable content and internet service providers also cease to exist if they are going to be held responsible for your content.

well no. If they dont moderate AT ALL they are simply hosts and are not liable for the content cf the Compuserve case. Deleting would count as moderating. If they do moderate then they are responsible for all content as they are then a publisher.

robinph

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

well no. If they dont moderate AT ALL they are simply hosts and are not liable for the content cf the Compuserve case. Deleting would count as moderating. If they do moderate then they are responsible for all content as they are then a publisher.

But he wants them to be liable for the content and at the same time not able to moderate it, which is never going to happen. That is why the regulation allegedly "created" the Internet as it meant people could provide hosting services to others and not be responsible for the content others created (to a certain point).

ohnonotgmail

robinph wrote: »

But he wants them to be liable for the content and at the same time not able to moderate it, which is never going to happen. That is why the regulation allegedly "created" the Internet as it meant people could provide hosting services to others and not be responsible for the content others created (to a certain point).

what trumps wants and reality do not make a Venn diagram or at least one that consists solely of two non-overlapping circles. Section 230 means that they are not liable once they make reasonable efforts to keep harmful content off their services.

everlast75

It is almost as not wearing a mask makes you more likely to catch COVID??

https://twitter.com/jonathanvswan/status/1336349687167717379?s=19

Cody montana

everlast75 wrote: »

It is almost as not wearing a mask makes you more likely to catch COVID??

https://twitter.com/jonathanvswan/status/1336349687167717379?s=19

Pray for....

ohnonotgmail

everlast75 wrote: »

It is almost as not wearing a mask makes you more likely to catch COVID??

https://twitter.com/jonathanvswan/status/1336349687167717379?s=19

thoughts and prayers etc

Timberrrrrrrr

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

video doesn't work. is it the wrestling one?

Yes where he takes down Vincent mcmahon

ohnonotgmail

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Yes where he takes down Vincent mcmahon

yeah it is clearly obvious that he is wearing an adult diaper

ChikiChiki

everlast75 wrote: »

It is almost as not wearing a mask makes you more likely to catch COVID??

https://twitter.com/jonathanvswan/status/1336349687167717379?s=19

Not a surprise by any stretch. Crazy rambling lady Rudy was trying to quieten must have it also.

This must be the 3rd outbreak in the white house.

namloc1980

The White House is absolutely riddled with it.

Inquitus

namloc1980 wrote: »

The White House is absolutely riddled with it.

Riddled with everything from Covid to Incompetence, Fraud to Laziness, Delusion to failing to attend Biden's inauguration. It's an absolute Clusterfúck of the very highest order.

Which state has Trump lost the most times now, Michigan, Georgia?

mcmoustache

Cody montana wrote: »

Pray for....

Do I smell hypocritical, sanctimonious faux outrage off in the distance?

VinLieger

mcmoustache wrote: »

Do I smell hypocritical, sanctimonious faux outrage off in the distance?

The beacons have been lit....

duploelabs

VinLieger wrote: »

The beacons have been lit....

And now our watch begins

drogon.

everlast75 wrote: »

It is almost as not wearing a mask makes you more likely to catch COVID??

https://twitter.com/jonathanvswan/status/1336349687167717379?s=19

will be interesting to see if they chance asking for an extension on the certification based on all their senior legal council is sick !

everlast75

drogon. wrote: »

will be interesting to see if they chance asking for an extension on the certification based on all their senior legal council is sick !

Physically, or....


In other news - MORE winning!!!!



https://twitter.com/KlasfeldReports/status/1336364621331132417?s=19

ohnonotgmail

well that is a bit terse.

Quin_Dub

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

well that is a bit terse.

I think they are getting very close to actually censuring somebody for these law suits..

The judges are getting seriously pi$$ed off with all this spurious crap.

And in other news - Texas is suing the 4 Key "battleground" states claiming that the expansion of mail-in voting etc. is unconstitutional , blah blah blah.

They want the Supreme Court to rule and simply exclude those States from the Electoral college

Oddly though , they aren't suing any of the many other States that made the same changes to their laws..

It's only unconstitutional where Trump lost apparently.

The case was lodged by TX Attorney General Ken Paxton - Who is currently under Federal investigation for Bribery..

Tell me how

At this point, Trumps shenanigans might actually be helping the confidence in Democracy in US. He has tried pushing every angle to undermine mail in ballots, counting, the automatic tallying machines, the certification of results, the authority of state Supreme Courts and the appointment of electors.

In 2 years, 5 years, 10 years, 20 years when people mention fraud in 2020, the quick and obvious retort is that there was none as they did everything to uncover any of it and couldn't do so.

Complete not his intent of course and he will claim until his death that he was robbed.

PropJoe10

I really want a journalist to press the Trump admin on when they're taking lawsuits in the likes of Texas and Florida. Seeing as the voting was apparently fraudulent in states that Trump lost, I assume they'll also be litigating in other states to ensure the sanctity of the election?

Or maybe not.

namloc1980

Supreme Court just gave Trump a big PFO!!! BRILLIANT