Trump vs Biden 2020, Day 64 of the Pennsylvania count (pt 5) Read OP

dloob

robinph wrote: »

Do we have any idea what it is that you get 1000% of when donating? Have they ever made any suggestion of what they are offering with that?

Is it 1000 Democrat tears, 1000 wins, 1001 nights, 1000 miles walked by The Proclaimers?

It's a 1000% match or was at the start.
So if you donate $100, they'll also donate $1000, to themselves.
Although some have noted the terminology has changed from match to 1000% "impact" in recent appeals, which is pretty meaningless.

I have seen some texts offering a free Trump 2021 calendar or "count every legal vote" t-shirt.
You just need to donate at least $30 dollars to claim your "free" gift.

Ronin247

Dillonb3 wrote: »

His new excuse the bookies had him winning at one point

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1336733602902659075

Think a few posters on here were quoting the changing odds on the day after as proof he had indeed won. Think some of them had decent cash out offers that they ignored, despite people explaining what would happen when the postal votes were counted.

dasdog

ChikiChiki wrote: »

He had a "But look over there" tweet today.

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1336678973980487681

The guy he re-tweeted is some Irish lad living in Berlin. He changed his twitter handle to "Trump lost, BIG!!!" today after Trump re-tweeted his original and it started getting attention.

eagle eye

PropJoe10 wrote:

To be honest, I have no sympathy for people donating to Trump. If they're that stupid, then they deserve everything they get.

I think if you thought about that for a while you'd change your mind.
Social media as in Facebook and the likes, and particularly Twitter, are tools that can be used by evil people.
We have the software to track people and find the phrases that attract them and keep them interested.
A less intelligent person hasn't a hope against this stuff. They get drawn in, told they're smart and loved and fall for it.
Sometimes I think the world would be a better place without internet but I realise that's incorrect. I think it would be a better place without large social media sites though.
If you went through all these threads and the amount of twitter links in them. Then find the percentage of them which came from an unbiased source and I think it'd be very small. You are reading what you like to read and it's coming from somebody with an agenda.

Pulling a sizeable portion of these people out of the mire is the big job facing Biden and his team.

I have pity for lots of these people who have been pretty much brainwashed into following evil.

eagle eye

eagle eye wrote: »

I think if you thought about that for a while you'd change your mind.
Social media as in Facebook and the likes, and particularly Twitter, are tools that can be used by evil people.
We have the software to track people and find the phrases that attract them and keep them interested.
A less intelligent person hasn't a hope against this stuff. They get drawn in, told they're smart and loved and fall for it.
Sometimes I think the world would be a better place without internet but I realise that's incorrect. I think it would be a better place without large social media sites though.
If you went through all these threads and the amount of twitter links in them. Then find the percentage of them which came from an unbiased source and I think it'd be very small. You are reading what you like to read and it's coming from somebody with an agenda.

Pulling a sizeable portion of these people out of the mire is the big job facing Biden and his team.

I have pity for lots of these people who have been pretty much brainwashed into following evil.

Sort of like claiming covid is over due to ivermectin based on a non peer reviewed study.

namloc1980

Dillonb3 wrote: »

His new excuse the bookies had him winning at one point

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1336733602902659075

Holy shiit. Was Trump one of those posters on here who was going on about the bookies during the election? Is Trump drunk monkey???

namloc1980

This is insane. Trump has made a personal motion to the Supreme Court asking them to essentially overturn the election in his favour. One of this first claims in the motion is that BS claim about Ohio and Florida:

President Trump prevailed on nearly every historical indicia of success in presidential elections. For example,
he won both Florida and Ohio; no candidate in history—Republican or Democrat—has ever lost the election after winning both States.

This is a verifiable falsehood. Nixon won Florida and Ohio in 1960 but lost the election to JFK. He's now straight up lying to the Supreme Court.

.

eagle eye

DubInMeath wrote: »

Sort of like claiming covid is over due to ivermectin based on a non peer reviewed study.

Yeah, you need to go back and reas my posts on that or my recent ones. I've clearly explained that it's not because if the paper that I'm believing this.

ChikiChiki

Trump intervening means he becomes the plaintiff in the case and therfore it can go back to the lower courts and get rejected again.

He's a right bumbling idiot and it would have been better to leave it as it was.

namloc1980

.

Delicious Trumpist tears!

Quin_Dub

ChikiChiki wrote: »

Trump intervening means he becomes the plaintiff in the case and therfore it can go back to the lower courts and get rejected again.

He's a right bumbling idiot and it would have been better to leave it as it was.

And he has another new Lawyer - John Eastman.

And in news that will shock no one , he's a racist conspiracy theorist!!

As a "Constitutional Law expert" , he believes that the 14th Amendment does NOT guarantee birthright citizenship , so he believes that Kamala Harris is not actually a citizen and therefore can't be VP..

This is because, both her Parents are immigrants , but Ted Cruz who was born in Canada to a Cuban father is A-OK because you know , reasons...

ohnonotgmail

namloc1980 wrote: »

.

Delicious Trumpist tears!

There is no way back for people like that.

DubInMeath

DubInMeath wrote: »

Sort of like claiming covid is over due to ivermectin based on a non peer reviewed study.

I decided to have a quick look at his post history to see what you're referring to.

Wow, just wow.

everlast75

Prescient publication

https://twitter.com/kathrynw5/status/1336479655394623488?s=09

Professor Moriarty

Quin_Dub wrote: »

And he has another new Lawyer - John Eastman.

And in news that will shock no one , he's a racist conspiracy theorist!!

As a "Constitutional Law expert" , he believes that the 14th Amendment does NOT guarantee birthright citizenship , so he believes that Kamala Harris is not actually a citizen and therefore can't be VP..

This is because, both her Parents are immigrants , but Ted Cruz who was born in Canada to a Cuban father is A-OK because you know , reasons...

Trump's mother was a Scot. Scottish Gaelic was her first language. His father's parents were German. Sailing close to the wind.

Grab All Association

https://twitter.com/sundae_gurl/status/1336467842481479681?s=21

How many days/weeks left for the number 1 spot

everlast75

https://twitter.com/EricKleefeld/status/1336805437568593920?s=19

Perfect.


**** off.

I've argued here that those that follow trump should be able to choose to be led by him.

Let them have him.

Let them be marched off the ****ing cliff, into financial ruin.

At this stage, it's the only way they'll learn.

everlast75

They are going to fumigate the place after he leaves lol

https://twitter.com/seungminkim/status/1336843377384493056?s=19

Better get a stock take of the silverware before he goes too...

Cody montana

Alabama has joined 16 other states in support of a lawsuit filed by the state of Texas to challenge Joe Biden’s wins in four swing states – Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.

Former Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore, along with three other constitutional attorneys on Wednesday also filed a brief in support of the Texas lawsuit.

The lawsuit filed Tuesday by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton asks the justices to block the four states from casting their Electoral College votes in favor of Biden and review allegations of irregularities.


Think they have to decide on it by tomorrow.

everlast75

Cody montana wrote: »

Alabama has joined 16 other states in support of a lawsuit filed by the state of Texas to challenge Joe Biden’s wins in four swing states – Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.

Former Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore, along with three other constitutional attorneys on Wednesday also filed a brief in support of the Texas lawsuit.

The lawsuit filed Tuesday by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton asks the justices to block the four states from casting their Electoral College votes in favor of Biden and review allegations of irregularities.


Think they have to decide on it by tomorrow.

the general consensus seems to be that it is a suit comprised of a hodge podge of other suits, the merits of which have been unceremoniously tossed out at a state level.

There is also a strong suspicion that the Texas AG is doing this as he is under investigation and is lining up a pardon.

While those crimes are state level and can't be pardoned, it doesn't mean that a Pres pardon won't do any good for him. It could affect the jury pool, for example.

Cody montana

everlast75 wrote: »

the general consensus seems to be that it is a suit comprised of a hodge podge of other suits, the merits of which have been unceremoniously tossed out at a state level.

There is also a strong suspicion that the Texas AG is doing this as he is under investigation and is lining up a pardon.

While those crimes are state level and can't be pardoned, it doesn't mean that a Pres pardon won't do any good for him. It could affect the jury pool, for example.

Whatever happens the meltdown will be epic.
Think this is their last shot.

The Supreme Court and trumps three picks are about to be labelled the deep state.

duploelabs

These frivolous lawsuits from the trump administration remind of a couple having a baby shower when they're not actually expecting

Smee_Again

eagle eye wrote: »

Yeah, you need to go back and reas my posts on that or my recent ones. I've clearly explained that it's not because if the paper that I'm believing this.

eagle eye wrote: »

Looks like there's no rush to go get a vaccine now. It appears that Ivermectin has us sorted to beat this thing should we contract it.

https://www.healio.com/news/primary-care/20201208/this-was-a-gift-to-us-ivermectin-effective-for-covid19-prophylaxis-treatment

eagle eye wrote: »

Best news this year.

Ivermectin folks.
It's game over, no more lockdowns, no rush to take a vaccine. Sooner we get this out there the better. It's a cheap drug, been on the market for 40 years, FDA approved. It's a medicine not a vaccine with impressive results when you take it for and prior to treatment.

No more lockdowns, back.to normal.

https://www.healio.com/news/primary-care/20201208/this-was-a-gift-to-us-ivermectin-effective-for-covid19-prophylaxis-treatment

eagle eye wrote: »

With the news on Ivermectin I'm in no rush to take a vaccine now. I'm starting to wonder if there's a parasite element to this illness now.

You were very keen to push ivermectin, first 2 posts were posted 2 minutes apart in different threads. People pointed out some issues with the drug and your claim and you posted 7 hours later that you believe it may have some parasitic elements. Did it really take you 7 hours to come up with that post to cover your ass?

Yet more flip flopping from you, just like when you were pushing that Biden has dementia story, Trump will win etc.

Everyone can see you are not a serious poster.

Quin_Dub

Cody montana wrote: »

Whatever happens the meltdown will be epic.
Think this is their last shot.

The Supreme Court and trumps three picks are about to be labelled the deep state.

I wonder will the response be as terse as the one they gave the PA complaint?

I can't see any version where they even entertain this by hearing arguments, so the question will be will they actual hand down a decision (and possibly a dissent) or will they just deny it completely?

Smee_Again

Smee_Again wrote: »

You were very keen to push ivermectin, first 2 posts were posted 2 minutes apart in different threads. People pointed out some issues with the drug and your claim and you posted 7 hours later that you believe it may have some parasitic elements. Did it really take you 7 hours to come up with that post to cover your ass?

Yet more flip flopping from you, just like when you were pushing that Biden has dementia story, Trump will win etc.

Everyone can see you are not a serious poster.

He also tried to start a new thread about Biden because he thought that this thread was poison because people were very insulting.

eagle eye wrote: »

So I started a thread about the President elect. Hopefully that can be a good constructive thread with none of the nasty poison in this one.

Yet his last post in his favourite forum (soccer) is him being carded for calling someone childish and claiming that they can't read.

eagle eye wrote: »

Pointless discussing anything with you if you are going to be childish and so desperately seeking to look smart.

In my opinion that's a really stupid comment. It's like you can't read.

He's also being carded as recently as two days ago in another thread for making a similar comment.

eagle eye wrote: »

Your lack of reading skills comes shining through again. I'm high on the list due to my work. I'm saying I shouldn't be that high because of my work but I should be that high based on my underlying conditions. So no trying to jump the queue.

He's not the beacon of justice and politeness that he seems to think that he is.

Padre_Pio

Grab All Association wrote: »

https://twitter.com/sundae_gurl/status/1336467842481479681?s=21

How many days/weeks left for the number 1 spot

Number 3 spot taken yesterday

valoren

"The constitutional issue is not whether voters committed fraud but whether state officials violated the law by systematically loosening the measures for ballot inquiry so that fraud becomes undetectable” -a.k.a. "I can't prove that fraud happened therefore fraud happened". Imagine going to the Supreme Court and after being asked for evidence you tell them that the evidence exists but it is invisible. It's Judge Judy type stuff.

Necro

Deleted User wrote: »

He also tried to start a new thread about Biden because he thought that this thread was poison because people were very insulting.



Yet his last post in his favourite forum (soccer) is him being carded for calling someone childish and claiming that they can't read.



He's also being carded as recently as two days ago in another thread for making a similar comment.



He's not the beacon of justice and politeness that he seems to think that he is.

Mod:

Do not post in this thread again

PropJoe10

valoren wrote: »

"The constitutional issue is not whether voters committed fraud but whether state officials violated the law by systematically loosening the measures for ballot inquiry so that fraud becomes undetectable” -a.k.a. "I can't prove that fraud happened therefore fraud happened". Imagine going to the Supreme Court and after being asked for evidence you tell them that the evidence exists but it is invisible. It's Judge Judy type stuff.

If they're asking the US Supreme Court to invalidate tens of millions of ballots based on that, then they are even more deluded than I thought.

Quin_Dub

valoren wrote: »

"The constitutional issue is not whether voters committed fraud but whether state officials violated the law by systematically loosening the measures for ballot inquiry so that fraud becomes undetectable” -a.k.a. "I can't prove that fraud happened therefore fraud happened". Imagine going to the Supreme Court and after being asked for evidence you tell them that the evidence exists but it is invisible. It's Judge Judy type stuff.

And also claiming that despite multiple other States introducing the same kinds of changes in the same kinds of ways , the only ones that you are concerned about are the ones where your guy lost.

Pathetically transparent.