Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

The Vaccine

1121315171855

Comments

  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    greenspurs wrote: »
    You use it as a reply to any other questions??
    Not clever really is it.

    Wheres flu gone ??

    There's been a huge degree of care taken by people that would be absent most other years. Eg distancing and masks. On top of that, we barely even have inward travel to the country plus it's less infectious than coronavirus. So all of this adds up to no flu in Ireland. Every country has faced a decrease in flu because of measures.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,725 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    greenspurs wrote: »
    Can you type any other reply ?



    Where has influenza gone ??

    "In Ireland, between 200 and 500 people, mainly older people, die from flu each winter.

    Every year, around the world, flu causes between 3 and 5 million cases of severe disease and up to 646, 000 deaths."
    https://www.hse.ie/eng/health/immunisation/pubinfo/adult/fluva/

    NONE in Ireland this year ! WOW .....
    https://www.thejournal.ie/winter-flu-cases-ireland-2020-5296226-Dec2020/

    "Professor Ian Barr, deputy director of the World Health Organisation’s collaborating centre for reference and research on influenza in Melbourne told The Guardian that flu cases had “fallen off a cliff since March”.

    You mean when social distancing started? When people worked from home instead of packed into offices? When less people used public transport? When less people were out socialising in packed bars and clubs?

    Its almost as if this proves social distancing and lockdowns work.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,769 ✭✭✭✭greenspurs


    King Mob wrote: »
    Only because you guys keep trying to deflect away from it.
    You keep trying to deflect away from it because you can't address it.
    You can't address it because your beliefs aren't true and are based on irrational nonsense.

    If that's not the case, please address the point.


    We can address the point after we address the one that's been left hanging.
    From experience, I know that if I try to address this next point, you guys will likewise ignore the explanation and counter points and try to deflect from that one too.


    The topic of the thread is not the flu, it's the vaccine.
    So, why are you more worried about the vaccine than covid when covid is ten thousand times more dangerous?

    Again, I predict you won't answer and you'll deflect.

    Do you think you are the chairman of Conspiracy Theories ?? :confused: :rolleyes:
    You have some cheek to DEMAND answers, get a grip lad, maybe log out of boards for a while and allow others talk .
    Theres more than your agenda allowed in here !!

    :rolleyes:

    "Bright lights and Thunder .................... " #NoPopcorn



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,725 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    greenspurs wrote: »
    Do you think you are the chairman of Conspiracy Theories ?? :confused: :rolleyes:
    You have some cheek to DEMAND answers, get a grip lad, maybe log out of boards for a while and allow others talk .
    Theres more than your agenda allowed in here !!

    :rolleyes:

    So people should be able to make any ludicrous claim they want and not answer when questions are asked? Is it an echo chamber you want where only people who agree with you post?

    Its never ceases to amaze me how many conspiracy theorists get angry like this when asked to back up thier claims. Why dodge the questions?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 655 ✭✭✭Pablo Escobar


    You mean when social distancing started? When people worked from home instead of packed into offices? When less people used public transport? When less people were out socialising in packed bars and clubs?

    Its almost as if this proves social distancing and lockdowns work.

    It is indeed an incredible co-incidence. :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,625 ✭✭✭fergus1001


    penno wrote:
    It is terrible that anyone who voices their reservations about taking the vaccine are called 'conspiracy theorists' or shot down straight away as having no clue as to how a vaccine works.


    1. because they dont

    2. its usually accompanied by george soros wants to track me (while they are using a phone that is doing that already) spew


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,988 ✭✭✭enno99


    greenspurs wrote: »
    Can you type any other reply ?



    Where has influenza gone ??

    "In Ireland, between 200 and 500 people, mainly older people, die from flu each winter.

    Every year, around the world, flu causes between 3 and 5 million cases of severe disease and up to 646, 000 deaths."
    https://www.hse.ie/eng/health/immunisation/pubinfo/adult/fluva/

    NONE in Ireland this year ! WOW .....
    https://www.thejournal.ie/winter-flu-cases-ireland-2020-5296226-Dec2020/

    "Professor Ian Barr, deputy director of the World Health Organisation’s collaborating centre for reference and research on influenza in Melbourne told The Guardian that flu cases had “fallen off a cliff since March”.

    Not to mention decrease in heart failure and other causes of death


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,799 ✭✭✭✭Ted_YNWA


    greenspurs wrote: »
    Do you think you are the chairman of Conspiracy Theories ?? :confused: :rolleyes:
    You have some cheek to DEMAND answers, get a grip lad, maybe log out of boards for a while and allow others talk .
    Theres more than your agenda allowed in here !!

    :rolleyes:

    Mod

    Everyone is entitled to post here. This is a discussion forum. Regardless what side of the topic you post an opinion on, prepare to DISCUSS it further and expand on it.

    As stated above, this is not a echo chamber for one side of any topic.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,495 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    greenspurs wrote: »
    Do you think you are the chairman of Conspiracy Theories ?? :confused: :rolleyes:
    You have some cheek to DEMAND answers, get a grip lad, maybe log out of boards for a while and allow others talk .
    Theres more than your agenda allowed in here !!
    Sure.
    I'm asking you to elaborate and explain your position.
    You aren't actually doing this for some reason.

    I'm simply asking you to explain why you and other conspiracy theorists are so afraid of the vaccine when it's been shown that covid is far more dangerous.

    To me, this doesn't make sense. So I'm asking you why it makes sense to you.
    For some reason, no one seems to want to answer this (or any question) but they won't explain this reason either.

    Again, I don't understand how "please explain and elaborate on your position" can be taken to be somehow trying to limit or stop those positions being expressed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,220 ✭✭✭✭Lex Luthor


    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    Nope, try again

    so you think its perfectly normal to be sent for a COVID test if you show up at your GP for a skin rash on your leg pre Level 5 lockdown and also having GP's saying they wont see anyone at their surgery without getting a COVID PCR test, but then as soon as L5 hits, the number of tests and people being sent drops significantly?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,495 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    Lex Luthor wrote: »
    so you think its perfectly normal to be sent for a COVID test if you show up at your GP for a skin rash on your leg pre Level 5 lockdown and also having GP's saying they wont see anyone at their surgery without getting a COVID PCR test, but then as soon as L5 hits, the number of tests and people being sent drops significantly?
    What do you believe is the true reason for this?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,243 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Lex Luthor wrote: »
    so you think its perfectly normal to be sent for a COVID test if you show up at your GP for a skin rash on your leg pre Level 5 lockdown and also having GP's saying they wont see anyone at their surgery without getting a COVID PCR test, but then as soon as L5 hits, the number of tests and people being sent drops significantly?

    It's a straightforward question. Why did cases increase in March/April and then decrease just after that?

    If you can't answer, then try this: you're running a country, suddenly a very infectious disease hits, you need to reduce it spreading between everyone, so what do you do? (whilst balancing the economy and other factors)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,842 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    Lex Luthor wrote: »
    so you think its perfectly normal to be sent for a COVID test if you show up at your GP for a skin rash on your leg pre Level 5 lockdown and also having GP's saying they wont see anyone at their surgery without getting a COVID PCR test, but then as soon as L5 hits, the number of tests and people being sent drops significantly?
    So too did the positivity rate.....from over 7 percent to circa 2.5 percent......it's fairly basic matchs here.....
    People's close contacts went down on average over the periods of increased restrictions....less people need to be tested as a result....
    Any btw, doctors requirements did not chance before and during the last set of level 5 restrictions....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,561 ✭✭✭JJayoo


    I have heard that the vaccine will cause reverse anus syndrome??


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,725 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    JJayoo wrote: »
    I have heard that the vaccine will cause reverse anus syndrome??

    Only on the antivaxx arseholes :pac:


  • Registered Users Posts: 938 ✭✭✭Steve012


    So what is the latest conspiracy theory on C19 ?

    It's there we have to deal with it.

    One thing I do remember from back in July, 2 Japanese high up virologists said covid19 couldn't have come from bats to humans, plus one of the worlds best scientists at looking at bat virus's (cause they carry so many) also said it might of come from a bat originally but, it looks very unlikely that this strain came purely from a bat, the non scientific term she used was "far too complicated to have solely come from a bat"

    It certainly isn't too far fetched that something happened in a lab near Wuhan.

    Other than that it's there now, so are vaccines, and if you research and have a good look at the vaccines, they are relatively very safe.


  • Registered Users Posts: 938 ✭✭✭Steve012


    JJayoo wrote: »
    I have heard that the vaccine will cause reverse anus syndrome??

    Fckin hell a reversed arse "didn't some young fella in the sun paper have a reverted arse" he said when he was in hospital he heard in the bed next to him Elvis singing a chorus from "Teddy bear"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,243 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Steve012 wrote: »
    So what is the latest conspiracy theory on C19 ?

    It's there we have to deal with it.

    One thing I do remember from back in July, 2 Japanese high up virologists said covid19 couldn't have come from bats to humans, plus one of the worlds best scientists at looking at bat virus's (cause they carry so many) also said it might of come from a bat originally but, it looks very unlikely that this strain came purely from a bat, the non scientific term she used was "far too complicated to have solely come from a bat"

    The issue with this is there is a overwhelming number of virologists and experts who maintain it made the jump from animals to humans, so much so that it's current consensus


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,692 ✭✭✭storker


    King Mob wrote: »
    Again, I don't understand how "please explain and elaborate on your position" can be taken to be somehow trying to limit or stop those positions being expressed.

    Perhaps because you left out "...if you don't want rational people to assume you're just a crank."

    :)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,243 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    King Mob wrote: »

    Again, I don't understand how "please explain and elaborate on your position" can be taken to be somehow trying to limit or stop those positions being expressed.

    It exposes that the position is baseless, and some people don't like that.

    It's the double-whammy of demonstrating that someone is not just deluding others, but deluding themselves. And in most cases can substitute deluding with "lying to".


  • Registered Users Posts: 938 ✭✭✭Steve012


    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    The issue with this is there is a overwhelming number of virologists and experts who maintain it made the jump from animals to humans, so much so that it's current consensus

    Stand to be corrected that was July info at the time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,220 ✭✭✭✭Lex Luthor


    Luke O'Neill said its easily tweaked to adapt the vaccine for any new strains
    They might have to dump that latest batch they manufactured though


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,453 ✭✭✭EyesClosed


    Lex Luthor wrote: »
    Luke O'Neill said its easily tweaked to adapt the vaccine for any new strains
    They might have to dump that latest batch they manufactured though

    And this is a conspiracy...how?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,495 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    Lex Luthor wrote: »
    Luke O'Neill said its easily tweaked to adapt the vaccine for any new strains
    They might have to dump that latest batch they manufactured though
    No, this is not how a vaccine works.
    The vaccine is still effective for the strain we're dealing with now. It still exists and will still be a problem.
    There's no need for them to get rid of the vaccine they've already made.

    Again, I suspect that you don't actually know how vaccines and viruses work...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,220 ✭✭✭✭Lex Luthor


    EyesClosed wrote: »
    And this is a conspiracy...how?
    I never said it was a conspiracy
    I’m just repeating what he said
    Once I find the clip I’ll post it
    King Mob wrote: »
    No, this is not how a vaccine works.
    The vaccine is still effective for the strain we're dealing with now. It still exists and will still be a problem.
    There's no need for them to get rid of the vaccine they've already made.

    Again, I suspect that you don't actually know how vaccines and viruses work...

    Not my words, his


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,453 ✭✭✭EyesClosed


    Lex Luthor wrote: »
    I never said it was a conspiracy
    I’m just repeating what he said
    Once I find the clip I’ll post it

    Right then why post it here at all? What is the vaccine conspiracy? You have never answered when I asked before


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,495 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    Lex Luthor wrote: »
    Not my words, his
    Ah so why are you repeating his words but not actually giving the source or the quote?
    Last time you did this, it turned out you were telling porkies.

    And I still stand by my statement, given this silly things you've claimed and the nonsense you believe, I don't think you know how vaccines or viruses work.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,646 ✭✭✭silliussoddius


    Lex Luthor wrote: »
    I never said it was a conspiracy
    I’m just repeating what he said
    Once I find the clip I’ll post it


    Not my words, his

    Why do his words need to be posted here? Anything special about him?


  • Registered Users Posts: 285 ✭✭jelem


    King Mob wrote: »
    No, this is not how a vaccine works.
    The vaccine is still effective for the strain we're dealing with now. It still exists and will still be a problem.
    There's no need for them to get rid of the vaccine they've already made.

    Again, I suspect that you don't actually know how vaccines and viruses work...
    And @kingmob Dont seem to know governments make them as weapons.
    china with mainstay dish of pork has been hit with pig virus after pig virus despite their
    best working to halt it.
    trade\war and destroy country just keep introducing virusand virus to remove trade and food item.
    oh its just a coincidence whilst western pharmas give "human error" when revealed a mix of
    " live virus" being transported across europe. Was that the H1N1 LOOK it up yourself if the details
    have not been removed from media.
    im westerner but far from blind - sure this country is riddled with corruption and lies supported by garda
    that do nothing but protect the political and large industry vested interests.
    recent large fine for goog in france (yes again) france has a Working data protection act unlike here
    with a pathetic poem thats a waste of print as
    no criminal charges
    no fines =============== for breaking any part (excepting criminal conviction data).
    may be wild virus but with bankrupt western world with debt that can never be paid. no jobs
    and increasing population with incompetant\ignorant\corrupt and arrogant politicians, it is
    world war or other means and looks like jackboot rule (lockdowns\restrictions) whilst the
    average seems 3% infection rate with expensive vaccine with no track record but pharmas own words
    its coral and bleed for money for profit. this is all that has been seen and points at easy option to
    reduce population and hold power --- man made virus--
    like thw fake "save the children" whilst UN report claims approx 26,000 children killed by
    political correct words of "intervention" in libya.
    the real Perverts rule the roost and fool the majority, the majority of the time due to brainwash media.
    (you prob looked at twitter or faceb__3 or 4 times whilst looking at this).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,495 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    jelem wrote: »
    And @kingmob Dont seem to know governments make them as weapons.
    No the vaccine is not a weapon.
    Your post was odd and rambling and it was impossible to decipher.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 285 ✭✭jelem


    King Mob wrote: »
    No the vaccine is not a weapon.
    Your post was odd and rambling and it was impossible to decipher.
    read line by line and let sink in - oooooooooooops sorry you
    may be recent wave of born humans whom have an attention span of less than 3 seconds and
    show atzheimer symptoms.
    statement with many reasons\assumptions added to support.
    ya not get it oooooooooooooops must be that useless leaving cert "education" showing
    through again.
    1 line you are constantly lied to and fooled by those in positions of authority and power
    which is fact the majority fail to accept as either stupid or do not want to admit they dumb.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,243 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    jelem wrote: »
    read line by line and let sink in - oooooooooooops sorry you
    may be recent wave of born humans whom have an attention span of less than 3 seconds and
    show atzheimer symptoms.
    statement with many reasons\assumptions added to support.
    ya not get it oooooooooooooops must be that useless leaving cert "education" showing
    through again.
    1 line you are constantly lied to and fooled by those in positions of authority and power
    which is fact the majority fail to accept as either stupid or do not want to admit they dumb.

    No offense, but this is pretty unintelligible


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,495 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    jelem wrote: »
    read line by line and let sink in - oooooooooooops sorry you
    may be recent wave of born humans
    No thanks. You post are rambling and devoid of any substance or coherent argument.
    jelem wrote: »
    which is fact the majority fail to accept as either stupid or do not want to admit they dumb.
    They're*


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,646 ✭✭✭silliussoddius


    Wow, some of these posts look like an eye exams.


  • Registered Users Posts: 285 ✭✭jelem


    King Mob wrote: »
    No thanks. You post are rambling and devoid of any substance or coherent argument.


    They're*
    flamer proving ignorant and pathetic. touch type and no time to suit your
    pedantic wish for perfect grammeer grammar gramear - ADD spelling too
    sad fool


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,495 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    jelem wrote: »
    flamer proving ignorant and pathetic. touch type and no time to suit your
    pedantic wish for perfect grammeer grammar gramear - ADD spelling too
    sad fool
    Lol dude if you're going to rant about how much smarter you are than everyone who disagrees with you, maybe up your writing game.

    Also you could try using those superior brains of yours to actually make coherent, supported claims rather than false nonsense.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 655 ✭✭✭Pablo Escobar


    jelem wrote: »
    read line by line and let sink in - oooooooooooops sorry you
    may be recent wave of born humans whom have an attention span of less than 3 seconds and
    show atzheimer symptoms.
    statement with many reasons\assumptions added to support.
    ya not get it oooooooooooooops must be that useless leaving cert "education" showing
    through again.
    1 line you are constantly lied to and fooled by those in positions of authority and power
    which is fact the majority fail to accept as either stupid or do not want to admit they dumb.
    I actually can't make head nor tail of your posts.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,220 ✭✭✭✭Lex Luthor


    https://m.timesofindia.com/world/next-four-to-six-months-could-be-worst-of-pandemic-bill-gates/amp_articleshow/79709807.cms?__twitter_impression=true

    How does a computer geek know so much about a virus?

    Hey king mob and dohnjoe, maybe you could both interrogate him


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,512 ✭✭✭runawaybishop


    Lex Luthor wrote: »
    https://m.timesofindia.com/world/next-four-to-six-months-could-be-worst-of-pandemic-bill-gates/amp_articleshow/79709807.cms?__twitter_impression=true

    How does a computer geek know so much about a virus?

    Hey king mob and dohnjoe, maybe you could both interrogate him

    It looks like Bill can read. Not much of a conspiracy

    The IHME (Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation) forecast shows over 200,000 additional deaths.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,495 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    Lex Luthor wrote: »
    How does a computer geek know so much about a virus?

    Hey king mob and dohnjoe, maybe you could both interrogate him
    Reads books for one.
    Listens to actual experts, not cranks on YouTube and Twitter for two.

    It's not hard to learn more about vaccines and virology. There's tons of resources out there to do it.

    But then you don't get to believe in a fun secret conspiracy you can roleplay resisting against.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,442 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    I see that John Giles will be getting the Vaccine later today. He was on Claire Byrne talking about it yesterday.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,243 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Lex Luthor wrote: »

    There's a documentary on him on Netflix, you'll find out why there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,024 ✭✭✭gar32


    So some studies estimate 35 - 60% of people in the EU have had Covid and just did not know. (They don't need a vaccine.) Less the 1% of people have been worried or sick enough to go for the test. The test inventor said it was not invented to detect Covid. Bill Gates Father was a founding member of the family planning group. (Population control) Bill Gates says in his TED talk about a digital vaccine/Passport. It was later removed but there are still copies of him saying it online.

    Plandemic the movie. HOLD up Movie

    Enjoy


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,495 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    gar32 wrote: »
    Plandemic the movie. HOLD up Movie
    Plandemic is utter bull**** propaganda that has been completely debunked. No one should waste their time with it.

    The virus was not planned. The virus is not artificial.

    The rest of your post is either completely untrue or misrepresentation equally as nonsense.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,799 ✭✭✭✭Ted_YNWA


    jelem wrote: »
    read line by line and let sink in - oooooooooooops sorry you
    may be recent wave of born humans whom have an attention span of less than 3 seconds and
    show atzheimer symptoms.
    statement with many reasons\assumptions added to support.
    ya not get it oooooooooooooops must be that useless leaving cert "education" showing
    through again.

    1 line you are constantly lied to and fooled by those in positions of authority and power
    which is fact the majority fail to accept as either stupid or do not want to admit they dumb.
    jelem wrote: »
    flamer proving ignorant and pathetic. touch type and no time to suit your
    pedantic wish for perfect grammeer grammar gramear - ADD spelling too
    sad fool

    Grammar and spelling mistakes are ok as long as post is readable. You are just throwing random words together.

    I'd suggest slowing down your touch typing & read your input before submitting.

    [This post is made without a Mod hat on. Don't make me put it on]


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,220 ✭✭✭✭Lex Luthor


    gar32 wrote: »
    So some studies estimate 35 - 60% of people in the EU have had Covid and just did not know. (They don't need a vaccine.) Less the 1% of people have been worried or sick enough to go for the test. The test inventor said it was not invented to detect Covid. Bill Gates Father was a founding member of the family planning group. (Population control) Bill Gates says in his TED talk about a digital vaccine/Passport.



    Allowing us to return to our normal way of life
    Allows scanning to protect those around us
    They show an airport terminal gate where you will be scanned to get on the plane
    The colour code system will ALLOW you to go about your daily activities in a safer way
    The idea behind it is to use it for many ways, travel, entertainment, offices, education, construction and MUCH MUCH more
    Reminders will be sent when its time for you to be tested again and again and again
    Your vaccination status can be displayed


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,220 ✭✭✭✭Lex Luthor


    EyesClosed wrote: »
    And this is a conspiracy...how?
    I'll get to that shortly
    King Mob wrote: »
    No, this is not how a vaccine works.
    The vaccine is still effective for the strain we're dealing with now. It still exists and will still be a problem.
    There's no need for them to get rid of the vaccine they've already made.

    Again, I suspect that you don't actually know how vaccines and viruses work...
    you do realise the pfizer & Moderna vaccines are not conventional vaccines

    Check this out
    Once you've watched this clip, you can move onto the next bit
    EyesClosed wrote: »
    Right then why post it here at all? What is the vaccine conspiracy? You have never answered when I asked before
    don't worry I havent forgotten about you
    King Mob wrote: »
    it turned out you were telling porkies.

    afraid to burst your bubble, here's the clip of the slippery snake being interviewed
    You dont have to go too far in to get to the part where he is asked about mutations of the virus
    Answer to Question 1 - "if it does mutate the RNA vaccines can be modified quickly"



    Modified quickly? So there is a necessity then to modify the vaccine if a new strain develops
    If the current vaccine is supposedly effective (95%), then why would he say it can be modified for a new strain?
    Surely he should just say this vaccine works for all strains
    Is the current vaccine 95% effective for the new strain?
    Why do his words need to be posted here? Anything special about him?
    Well he is the face of RTE for all things vaccine & COVID since the beginning of this and Tubbs cant get enough of him
    Wow, some of these posts look like an eye exams.
    for an eye exam you are supposed to open your eyes


    ...............................
    So we now have 2 conflicting approaches from Luke O'Neill and Prof Whitty
    https://www.thejournal.ie/covid-strain-travel-5299901-Dec2020/

    Luke O'Neill has said that if the virus mutates, then the RNA vaccines can be modified quickly
    Prof Whitty has said it would be “surprising” if the vaccines already in development were not effective against it.

    So which is it?

    I would also like to call on our resident virologist expert on here King Mob who has stated that "The vaccine is still effective for the strain we're dealing with now"

    Luke O'Neill basically said that for any new strains the vaccine can be modified quickly which means a new vaccine for a new strain
    Does that mean for the new strain there will be a 2nd vaccine? Whats your opinion?
    If they do need to have a 2nd vaccine, then anyone going for the vaccine would need to get 2 vaccines for the 2 strains that are currently out there, meaning 4 jabs
    And then you would be part of that Phase 4 trial and be a statistic for the safety analysis for the 2nd vaccine aswell as the first vaccine

    He also stated that he doesnt know what long term effects these vaccines will have on the people taking it, but "thats the hope"

    But 1000's of brilliant minds worked on this new vaccine, but here he is, the face of the government & RTE stating that he doesnt know what the long term effects will be
    That doesnt matter though because its got 95% efficacy. To hell with the long term effects

    I would also like to quote Ronan "its too early to tell" Glynn, we cant leave him out of this
    “There’s very little information available on it at the moment and there’s further epidemiological and virological investigation going on by colleagues in the UK."

    Does he not believe what Prof Whitty is saying. Whitty says "there is no evidence the strain is more dangerous or that symptoms are any worse or different"
    How does he know? Its too early to tell they say

    “There’s very little information available on it at the moment"
    "there is no evidence the strain is more dangerous"
    Which is it?

    Just as well they have this information from the "official early warning system with European colleagues and the UK"

    OR, is it just a possibility that this new strain is just a variant of the flu?

    Lads, the wool that is growing on your backs is well & truly being pulled over your eyes


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,495 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    Lex Luthor wrote: »
    you do realise the pfizer & Moderna vaccines are not conventional vaccines
    Yes.
    What's your point. You've failed entirely to detail any rational concerns about them.
    The best you had was they used "nano-" in the name of an ingredient.
    Lex Luthor wrote: »
    Check this out
    Once you've watched this clip, you can move onto the next bit


    afraid to burst your bubble, here's the clip of the slippery snake being interviewed
    You dont have to go too far in to get to the part where he is asked about mutations of the virus
    Answer to Question 1 - "if it does mutate the RNA vaccines can be modified quickly"

    Modified quickly? So there is a necessity then to modify the vaccine if a new strain develops
    If the current vaccine is supposedly effective (95%), then why would he say it can be modified for a new strain?
    Surely he should just say this vaccine works for all strains
    Is the current vaccine 95% effective for the new strain?
    Ok. You're going to have to show that you actually understand at a basic level what vaccines and viruses are. Because I'm now convinced by this ridiculous argument above that you don't know how vaccines and viruses work or what they are..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,453 ✭✭✭EyesClosed


    Lex Luthor wrote: »
    I'll get to that shortly


    you do realise the pfizer & Moderna vaccines are not conventional vaccines

    Check this out
    Once you've watched this clip, you can move onto the next bit


    don't worry I havent forgotten about you



    afraid to burst your bubble, here's the clip of the slippery snake being interviewed
    You dont have to go too far in to get to the part where he is asked about mutations of the virus
    Answer to Question 1 - "if it does mutate the RNA vaccines can be modified quickly"



    Modified quickly? So there is a necessity then to modify the vaccine if a new strain develops
    If the current vaccine is supposedly effective (95%), then why would he say it can be modified for a new strain?
    Surely he should just say this vaccine works for all strains
    Is the current vaccine 95% effective for the new strain?


    Well he is the face of RTE for all things vaccine & COVID since the beginning of this and Tubbs cant get enough of him


    for an eye exam you are supposed to open your eyes


    ...............................
    So we now have 2 conflicting approaches from Luke O'Neill and Prof Whitty
    https://www.thejournal.ie/covid-strain-travel-5299901-Dec2020/

    Luke O'Neill has said that if the virus mutates, then the RNA vaccines can be modified quickly
    Prof Whitty has said it would be “surprising” if the vaccines already in development were not effective against it.

    So which is it?

    I would also like to call on our resident virologist expert on here King Mob who has stated that "The vaccine is still effective for the strain we're dealing with now"

    Luke O'Neill basically said that for any new strains the vaccine can be modified quickly which means a new vaccine for a new strain
    Does that mean for the new strain there will be a 2nd vaccine? Whats your opinion?
    If they do need to have a 2nd vaccine, then anyone going for the vaccine would need to get 2 vaccines for the 2 strains that are currently out there, meaning 4 jabs
    And then you would be part of that Phase 4 trial and be a statistic for the safety analysis for the 2nd vaccine aswell as the first vaccine

    He also stated that he doesnt know what long term effects these vaccines will have on the people taking it, but "thats the hope"

    But 1000's of brilliant minds worked on this new vaccine, but here he is, the face of the government & RTE stating that he doesnt know what the long term effects will be
    That doesnt matter though because its got 95% efficacy. To hell with the long term effects

    I would also like to quote Ronan "its too early to tell" Glynn, we cant leave him out of this
    “There’s very little information available on it at the moment and there’s further epidemiological and virological investigation going on by colleagues in the UK."

    Does he not believe what Prof Whitty is saying. Whitty says "there is no evidence the strain is more dangerous or that symptoms are any worse or different"
    How does he know? Its too early to tell they say

    “There’s very little information available on it at the moment"
    "there is no evidence the strain is more dangerous"
    Which is it?

    Just as well they have this information from the "official early warning system with European colleagues and the UK"

    OR, is it just a possibility that this new strain is just a variant of the flu?

    Lads, the wool that is growing on your backs is well & truly being pulled over your eyes

    ....and for the third time...whats the conspiracy???


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,769 ✭✭✭✭greenspurs


    Ted_YNWA wrote: »
    Grammar and spelling mistakes are ok as long as post is readable. You are just throwing random words together.

    I'd suggest slowing down your touch typing & read your input before submitting.

    [This post is made without a Mod hat on. Don't make me put it on]

    WOW .........

    :eek:

    "Bright lights and Thunder .................... " #NoPopcorn



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement