Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

Options
1113111321134113611371154

Comments

  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,421 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    A schools player is almost always going to be ahead of a club player on the development front at the age that academy spots are given out and that is one of the core problems with expanding the system.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,464 ✭✭✭ulsteru20s


    Yea, making up that gap pre academy selection is the key piece.

    Sometimes i wonder if counter intuitively, investing directly into schools for ulster, connacht and munster would be the most efficient way to do this. Make more private school level teams and expand scholarships. That would be expensive and also extremely tough politically in terms of picking and choosing.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,421 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    In many way I think it could be the most effective, but yeah I think politically (and morally) questionable road to go down.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,334 ✭✭✭✭salmocab


    there’s room to improve coaching from minis upwards, the regional representative teams from u16 are good (I assume it’s not just Leinster that do that) but if the earlier coaching was improved the players could be at a higher level when they arrive at that stage. Underage coaching can be hit and miss, too much riding on having a dad that has a clue helping out.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,910 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    The fee paying schools are an issue but it's access to then that's the issue and not the schools and what they do in rugby themselves. That they're fee paying rules plenty of kids from accessing them which totally reduces the pool of potential pros unless you have the best possible structures for those outside those schools and we are not there yet. Possibly when leister have completed the expansion of their centres of excellence with the next 4 centres matching the Ken Wall in donnybrook and when munster have built there's in the east and west to match whats in Musgrave etcthe gap will close



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,774 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    Leinster is one province, we have four provinces

    The obsession with private school is holding back Irish rugby, people prefer to use them as an excuse than put together solutions. The old throw hands up in air and do nothing is a lot easier




  • Registered Users Posts: 4,774 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    four provinces and we have been told many times that only Leinster have the private schools model

    Munster at the moment probably have the most impressive group of young players

    Ulster have also some cracking players and some before that didn’t progress more to do with coaching post academy it would seem

    Connacht seems to have a few decent ones as well


    If they can identify players now and the system is starting to work better than ever why can’t they expand? Why can’t Connacht get some of those huge GAA player that Mayo constantly produce?



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 35,371 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    Bit of an odd take given that Humphries has just pledged to do that.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,910 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    No people haven't. It's simple fact that schools with big focus on rugby who have fees and associated benefits of that will be able to produce more players than those clubs and schools without those resources.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,774 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    Sounds Very much like throwing hands up in air reading that post


    The private schools have been around a long time, the obsession only recently



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,229 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    not a recent thing at all. the concentration, for want of a better word, of a large number of players coming from two particular schools is a recent thing though



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,774 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    The obsession is very recent, no matter what the topic private school get dragged into it

    They are working at the moment, personally I would think people would be obsessed with the sections of player development not providing as many players as they could.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,494 ✭✭✭ersatz


    Less problematic if there's a focus on non fee paying schools. There are a lot of these schools that have developed rugby teams in the last few decades, Naas CBS among them. It's just one I'm vaguely familiar with. I'm not sure if they have contributed players to the pro game but its definitely helped the game grow in Kildare.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,910 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    Not at all and I've been on this site nearly 14 years.... arguing how the sport needs to do more and work to get a wider development system to find more pros and it has in many areas but it will be always behind the schools.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,774 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    The conversation on this website and other starts at private school and never gets past it

    Stuck in a loop at this stage



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,910 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    I wouldn't agree with saying less problematic. More it's simply better because if you focus on fee paying you cut off a lot of people. Doesn't help the sports image etc. Naast cbs has had past pupils turn pro over last decade or so but it's been more through the work put in by Naast rfc than the school



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,494 ✭✭✭ersatz


    It's less problematic because the IRFU further subsidising what are seen as elite schools is a bad look, and there are mosre kids with likely less rugby resources in these schools.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,016 ✭✭✭OldRio


    I can only speak about the area I live. To compare the facilities that every small GAA club has in tiny Leitrim to the facilities at Carrick on Shannon Rugby club (The only club in the county) is a very bad joke.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,205 ✭✭✭✭phog


    The GAA is an amateur organisation, they can spend their income on facilities, the IRFU have a huge wage bill in comparison to both the GAA and the FAI.

    I'm just back from Northern Italy, the facilities in some tiny mountain villages would put Ireland to shame, while playing rugby in a GAA field isn't great from a spectator point of view, the lack of municipal facilities in Ireland is a huge cost on sporting bodies like the GAA and IRFU, that's money that could be used for player development



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,774 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    THe money the GAA have got invested over the last 100 years compared to rugby is significant, rugby clubs are only now starting to get any small bit of investment and that has to continue



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,016 ✭✭✭OldRio


    Therefore comparing the GAA to Rugby is just silly.



  • Registered Users Posts: 634 ✭✭✭Ben Bailey


    Why is it 'silly' ?.

    There was a time when the GAA didn't exist. It was literally 'wished into existence' by a small, poorly funded, group of enthusiastic amateurs.

    Rugby can take a similar path and become a genuine choice for young people. This journey will take a long time but it starts as all journeys do.

    Privately funded schools in Leinster (and England, South Africa & Australia amongst others) have shown us a working model.

    Because opportunity is predicated on accessibility this system is limited. Add the failure of the State to fund multi sport communal facilities and you've got huge ground to make up.

    But you have to start somewhere and the current public awareness of rugby nationally means now is the time to try (pun intended).



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,016 ✭✭✭OldRio


    I'm not talking about that. Read the original post to see what I am referring to.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    First time we keep the ball we shred them.

    Edit: Obviously wrong thread.

    Post edited by [Deleted User] on


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,855 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    On the bright side, Farrell will be happy enough that the bulk of his squad will be getting an extra week's break before the SA trip.

    With only Henderson and Keenan definitely ruled out (and Ahern as a potential new cap), we won't see too many shocks in the squad on Wednesday. I would like to see a new face at LH prop and second row, at a minimum.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    It’s hard to know who is next up at lock. Ahern & Izuchukwu are both potentially carrying injuries and both look more like 6s. Neither Murray in Connacht looks ready. Doesn’t seem much value in bringing Treadwell but he’s probably likeliest right now even though he had a pretty poor season.

    LHP is even more of a problem - there is absolutely no point in having Healy on the bench in SA. Loughman has to be on the bench. I really hope Jack Boyle plays 15 games for Leinster next season.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,551 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Y’know who’d be handy at lock… 😉



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,421 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I'd be surprised if we don't only see Beirne, Ryan and McCarthy actually playing in South Africa so at least in that sense the lack of an obvious alternative isn't so bad. Might only bring those 3 with Baird as cover. LHP is a bigger problem as you say.

    I really hope POM isn't captain, it's a shame Ahern is out of the tour. Baird is off form. No real idea what they should do at 6.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    6 is the one position where I think we’ve plenty of options at least: Prendergast, McCann, Izuchukwu, Ahern are all viable alternatives to POM and Baird, and a lot of the provinces have guys coming through in that position too I think.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,421 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I just wonder if he'd really plug one of McCann or Izuchukwu straight in, though I'd quite like to see it. Prendergast a bit more of a safe pick but I wouldn't be complaining too much either.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike at


Advertisement