Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Slow HDDs

Options
  • 05-12-2020 2:09pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 8,913 ✭✭✭


    Why is every 1tb Hard Disk Drive so damn slow? Brand new laptop, few months old laptop, a year or two old laptop - it makes no difference; they are just pure fcuking junk.


Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 18,706 ✭✭✭✭K.O.Kiki


    Because you should have an SSD instead.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,299 ✭✭✭✭BloodBath


    2.5" 5400rpm HDD's that are used in laptops are just slow. 7200 RPM 3.5" drives are better. SSD's much better again.

    No idea why new laptops are still being sold with those ****ty HDD's though.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    BloodBath wrote: »
    2.5" 5400rpm HDD's that are used in laptops are just slow. 7200 RPM 3.5" drives are better. SSD's much better again.

    No idea why new laptops are still being sold with those ****ty HDD's though.

    Because your average punter who goes into Curry's to get a laptop doesn't have a clue. I know i'm generalising a bit but it is what it is.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,113 ✭✭✭smuggler.ie


    I know i'm generalising a bit but it is what it is.
    Not even a bit, it is what it is.


  • Registered Users Posts: 36,167 ✭✭✭✭ED E


    They're also the worst possible setup. A fast drive like you'll see in a database server form factor will be 10mm and probably have 4 platters, 7mm laptop drives are cramming all their data onto 2 platters. Slower IO by less heads, slower to hit power targets. Slower because read retries happen far more due to cramming data into less area and relying on ECC to sort it.


    As above, like buying a horse and cart for your commute. Just don't.


  • Advertisement
  • Site Banned Posts: 27 Drewgerger


    You bought a laptop with bad cpu also not enough memory also junk the computer seller puts on it you need to download a newvinstal of windows on USB stick from Microsoft and do a new install
    Then you need ssd or nvme drive


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,299 ✭✭✭✭BloodBath


    ED E wrote: »
    They're also the worst possible setup. A fast drive like you'll see in a database server form factor will be 10mm and probably have 4 platters, 7mm laptop drives are cramming all their data onto 2 platters. Slower IO by less heads, slower to hit power targets. Slower because read retries happen far more due to cramming data into less area and relying on ECC to sort it.


    As above, like buying a horse and cart for your commute. Just don't.

    More platters is bad, at least in the desktop space. They only read from 1 head at a time and they are far more prone to failure.

    You want a single platter drive which maxes at 2TB at 3.5" afaik. That also happens to be the best price/performance and size hard drive.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,299 ✭✭✭✭BloodBath


    Drewgerger wrote: »
    You bought a laptop with bad cpu also not enough memory also junk the computer seller puts on it you need to download a newvinstal of windows on USB stick from Microsoft and do a new install
    Then you need ssd or nvme drive

    Get out of here Bobby, where do you get this nonsense?


  • Registered Users Posts: 36,167 ✭✭✭✭ED E


    BloodBath wrote: »
    More platters is bad, at least in the desktop space. They only read from 1 head at a time and they are far more prone to failure.

    You want a single platter drive which maxes at 2TB at 3.5" afaik. That also happens to be the best price/performance and size hard drive.

    Nope. The controller writes sequential blocks on parallel tracks so reading in and out happens concurrently.

    You much rather more platters with larger cells on the surface than one platter with them packed it. Sure look what SMR is doing, they're overlapping your data to squeeeeze it in hammering performance. High density is your enemy.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,299 ✭✭✭✭BloodBath


    ED E wrote: »
    Nope. The controller writes sequential blocks on parallel tracks so reading in and out happens concurrently.

    You much rather more platters with larger cells on the surface than one platter with them packed it. Sure look what SMR is doing, they're overlapping your data to squeeeeze it in hammering performance. High density is your enemy.

    Alright maybe my knowledge (or yours) is a bit outdated here but afaik that only reduces seek times but not by much, reads are still only done 1 head at a time on most consumer HDD's.

    Those are niche examples. I'm talking about your average consumer HDD in a laptop or PC. Multi platter is not the way to go.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,913 ✭✭✭Danno


    Thanks for all the replies folks.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,001 ✭✭✭CoBo55


    After all the waffle,
    Buy an SSD..
    Sorted.


Advertisement