Trump v Biden 2020,The insurrection (pt 6) Read OP

Tell me how

For those who try to excuse the President in his role in what happened on Wednesday.

https://twitter.com/ForTheRuleOfLaw/status/1347642999736586243

It should be unconscionable to GOP leaders to allow him to see out his term after this. Anyone arguing for it is aware of their own role in this event and are giving tacit agreement that it can happen again in future.

francois

jill_valentine wrote: »

Speaking of bearskin guy, I would be real interested to know what that big block tattoo in the shape of Thor's hammer is covering.

The far right have a hard on for nordic symbols for some reason

Muahahaha

Foxtrol wrote: »

Yeah, the cop is having a great time, they really protected him well. Good to see police being injured doesn't disturb you.

Im wondering how long it might take the QAnon crowd to claim that the police officer getting crushed in that video was really a 'crisis actor' in the Antifa led plot?

Kaybaykwah

Gradius wrote: »

Pure, unaulterated bias. Do people like you actually read back what you've written?

Does it sound realistic to you? "Everyone on the other team is bad and everything they say is bad" ergo by extension "everyone on my team is good and everything they do is good".

It's so, so stupid. And it is this stupidity, cheerleading biased censorship, that does severe damage to society. Like throwing buckets of petrol on a fire to burn the neighbours house, while abjectly failing to recognise that they live next door.

Whaddyamean censorship?

Wake up. He is the president of the US. He has plenty of platforms. The press is aching to know how he "feels" right about now. G'wan.

Kaybaykwah

francois wrote: »

The far right have a hard on for nordic symbols for some reason

Because their fashion sense stopped at the Viking invasion.

Tell me how

Tell me how wrote: »

For those who try to excuse the President in his role in what happened on Wednesday.

https://twitter.com/ForTheRuleOfLaw/status/1347642999736586243

It should be unconscionable to GOP leaders to allow him to see out his term after this. Anyone arguing for it is aware of their own role in this event and are giving tacit agreement that it can happen again in future.

The reality is every member of congress and the VP could have been killed and the building burned to the ground. Sounds far fetched you would think?? Well I think I've heard all of the above desires be spouted from the mouths of the mob.

Unthinkable situation.

Tell me how

Gradius wrote: »

Pure, unaulterated bias. Do people like you actually read back what you've written?

Does it sound realistic to you? "Everyone on the other team is bad and everything they say is bad" ergo by extension "everyone on my team is good and everything they do is good".

It's so, so stupid. And it is this stupidity, cheerleading biased censorship, that does severe damage to society. Like throwing buckets of petrol on a fire to burn the neighbours house, while abjectly failing to recognise that they live next door.

Absolutely turgid nonsense.

The guy literally has a press room in his house and a press office to help communicate any message he wishes to be heard.

Tell us why you think he is doing neither right now.

Dressoutlet

Sorry it wasn't the guy in Pelosis office with his feet on the table it was another one called Baked alaska that was positive

Stark

Dressoutlet wrote: »

Sorry it wasn't the guy in Pelosis office with his feet on the table it was another one called Baked alaska that was positive

Fecking loopers.

Foxtrol

Muahahaha wrote: »

Im wondering how long it might take the QAnon crowd to claim that the police officer getting crushed in that video was really a 'crisis actor' in the Antifa led plot?

Sure they already disavowed the woman that died trying a suicide run through the window, despite years of her pushing Q conspiracies. Imagine giving your life for a cult and within hours they say you were the enemy.

Rudy believes that MAGA supporters are too weak/fat/dumb to be able to climb a wall. To be fair, this guy probably shouldn't have attempted it

https://twitter.com/RexChapman/status/1347718251825016838?s=20

namloc1980

Muahahaha wrote: »

Im wondering how long it might take the QAnon crowd to claim that the police officer getting crushed in that video was really a 'crisis actor' in the Antifa led plot?

They'll also claim that the officer who was bludgeoned to death with a fire extinguisher just had an unfortunate accident.

Gradius

Kaybaykwah wrote: »

Whaddyamean censorship?

Wake up. He is the president of the US. He has plenty of platforms. The press is aching to know how he "feels" right about now. G'wan.

So its no big deal if twitter just ban Biden too, right?

He has plenty of other platforms after all.

Unless you want to change your argument to "he broke the rules", in which case why haven't umpteen other influential users of twitter been banned too?

How backed up into the corner do you need to be before you accept the reality that this is selective and therefore biased?

MeMen2_MoRi_

She ain't holding back..

https://twitter.com/AOC/status/1347978647454576642?s=19

She ain't wrong, the GOP need to stand up WITH the Dems that's how things become unifying, but they're terrified of don, they know he can do them damage and are in fear of the terror in can unlease on them.

Brussels Sprout

francois wrote: »

The far right have a hard on for nordic symbols for some reason

I think it's something to do with white ethnic purity. Interesting thing is that a lot of those Trump rioters were very sallow - probably Italian, Greek and Spanish influence in their genes.

tigger123

Gradius wrote: »

So its no big deal if twitter just ban Biden too, right?

He has plenty of other platforms after all.

Unless you want to change your argument to "he broke the rules", in which case why haven't umpteen other influential users of twitter been banned too?

How backed up into the corner do you need to be before you accept the reality that this is selective and therefore biased?

Really can't see Biden tweeting anything that would lead to a ban.

Gradius

Tell me how wrote: »

Absolutely turgid nonsense.

The guy literally has a press room in his house and a press office to help communicate any message he wishes to be heard.

Tell us why you think he is doing neither right now.

So its no big deal if twitter just ban Biden too, right?

He has plenty of other platforms after all, including a press office etc.

Unless you want to change your argument to "he broke the rules", in which case why haven't umpteen other influential users of twitter been banned too?

Like the other one, how backed up into the corner do you need to be before you accept the reality that this is selective and therefore biased?

runawaybishop

Gradius wrote: »

So its no big deal if twitter just ban Biden too, right?

He has plenty of other platforms after all.

Unless you want to change your argument to "he broke the rules", in which case why haven't umpteen other influential users of twitter been banned too?

How backed up into the corner do you need to be before you accept the reality that this is selective and therefore biased?

The only bias from Twitter was not banning him sooner. He was inviting violence, as he has been for some time. Twitter are partially responsible by not sticking to their own rules and banning him ages ago. And that goes for anyone else on their platform they allow to violate the rules.

namloc1980

Gradius wrote: »

So its no big deal if twitter just ban Biden too, right?

Yeah Biden should be banned for all that violence and insurrection he incited......oh.

The attempts at equivocating and both-sidesing are utterly pathetic.

jill_valentine

francois wrote: »

The far right have a hard on for nordic symbols for some reason

Yeah but the hammer usually has a load of swirly line work in it. He just has a big blocky silhouette, I guarantee you it's a coverup.

Billy Mays

Dressoutlet wrote: »

Sorry it wasn't the guy in Pelosis office with his feet on the table it was another one called Baked alaska that was positive

Baked Allaska of Charlottesville fame

Dressoutlet

I looked under the #trump2020 tag on Parler and there is legitimate Child Porn! Not hardcore but IDGAF I feel SICK.

Gradius

tigger123 wrote: »

Really can't see Biden tweeting anything that would lead to a ban.

The argument of the other two users doesn't even mention the "why's", just simply that there's plenty of choice and it's no big deal if he can't use twitter.

Overheal

MeMen2_MoRi_ wrote: »

She ain't holding back..

https://twitter.com/AOC/status/1347978647454576642?s=19

She ain't wrong, the GOP need to stand up WITH the Dems that's how things become unifying, but they're terrified of don, they know he can do them damage and are in fear of the terror in can unlease on them.

Republicans are a minority party with a gerrymandered presence. That’s why they invited the tea party back under their tent. That’s why they invited Trump. Because they don’t have the numbers to challenge the Democratic Party otherwise.

Stand up with the Democrats? Hell no they won’t. Their party would be in the minority for the next 20 years if they actually stood for their conservative principles.

francois

Cosplay wannabe cable tie guy caught

https://twitter.com/sparrowmedia/status/1347773862050754562?s=19

Kaybaykwah

Gradius wrote: »

So its no big deal if twitter just ban Biden too, right?

He has plenty of other platforms after all.

Unless you want to change your argument to "he broke the rules", in which case why haven't umpteen other influential users of twitter been banned too?

How backed up into the corner do you need to be before you accept the reality that this is selective and therefore biased?

Maybe, if you turn your switch to on, you will begin to fathom the reason why a president cannot be inciting seditious acts, knowing full well his power over stoked, ignorant people he claims to love.

You would probably let your daughter be sucked up by a cult on account of freedom, bravo. It's your call Gradius Maximus.

ohnonotgmail

Dressoutlet wrote: »

Sorry it wasn't the guy in Pelosis office with his feet on the table it was another one called Baked alaska that was positive

the guy who was in her office has already been arrested.

Gradius

runawaybishop wrote: »

The only bias from Twitter was not banning him sooner. He was inviting violence, as he has been for some time. Twitter are partially responsible by not sticking to their own rules and banning him ages ago. And that goes for anyone else on their platform they allow to violate the rules.

And the malaysian politician that stated Muslims have a right to kill french people, was he inciting violence?

Rules for thee are not for me. That's what happens when a private company accepts no responsibility, despite having the influence to change opinions through manipulation on country-level scales.

Law of unintended consequences will happen over these companies being allowed do whatever suits. And the cheerleaders probably won't be so cheery about it.

ohnonotgmail

Foxtrol wrote: »

Sure they already disavowed the woman that died trying a suicide run through the window, despite years of her pushing Q conspiracies. Imagine giving your life for a cult and within hours they say you were the enemy.

Rudy believes that MAGA supporters are too weak/fat/dumb to be able to climb a wall. To be fair, this guy probably shouldn't have attempted it

https://twitter.com/RexChapman/status/1347718251825016838?s=20

https://twitter.com/90sWWE/status/1347621993345114114

Overheal

Kaybaykwah wrote: »

Maybe, if you turn your switch to on, you will begin to fathom the reason why a president cannot be inciting seditious acts, knowing full well his power over stoked, ignorant people he claims to love.

You would probably let your daughter be sucked up by a cult on account of freedom, bravo. It's your call Gradius Maximus.

So when Chancellor Hitler signed the Reichstag fire decree it wasn’t a coup I guess? Is that what you are saying?

Gradius

Gradius wrote: »

So its no big deal if twitter just ban Biden too, right?

He has plenty of other platforms after all.

Unless you want to change your argument to "he broke the rules", in which case why haven't umpteen other influential users of twitter been banned too?

How backed up into the corner do you need to be before you accept the reality that this is selective and therefore biased?

If Biden was inciting violence I'm sure Twitter would ban him and most sane people would be in support of that.

Trump should have in my mind been banned a long time ago. For me, his LIBERATE Michigan!!! tweets was that point.

Gunmen subsequently gathered in the halls of the Michigan State Capitol and a cohesive plan found to kidnap the state Governor.

That for me was the point he had gone to far.