Trump v Biden 2020,The insurrection (pt 6) Read OP

namloc1980

martingriff wrote: »

'Who are the two who keep deferring anyway

They are managing the debate time for each side. Jordan for the Reps and Nadler for the Dems.

everlast75

https://twitter.com/pattonoswalt/status/1349446779268333568?s=19

namloc1980

namloc1980 wrote: »

They are managing the debate time for each side. Jordan for the Reps and Nadler for the Dems.

I like the fact that there are really tight time limits. Makes people get straight to the point. But on the other hand, it’s not a debate.....just a series of statements. Don’t understand why they don’t just go straight to the vote, as these sound bites won’t persuade anyone to change their position

Is this the way all ‘debates’ work in the House of Representatives?

embraer170

Not impeaching Trump will likely come back to bite the Republican Party in 2024.

Cody montana

Ivanka Trump is not expected to attend Biden’s inauguration next week, according to a WH official.
While she respects his transition to power, according to this official, the official notes children of outgoing president’s do not traditionally attend.

sydthebeat

Cody montana wrote: »

Ivanka Trump is not expected to attend Biden’s inauguration next week, according to a WH official.
While she respects his transition to power, according to this official, the official notes children of outgoing president’s do not traditionally attend.

Translation

She wasn't invited.

ohnonotgmail

Cody montana wrote: »

Ivanka Trump is not expected to attend Biden’s inauguration next week, according to a WH official.
While she respects his transition to power, according to this official, the official notes children of outgoing president’s do not traditionally attend.

dont you have to be invited first before you say you are not attending?

briany

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

dont you have to be invited first before you say you are not attending?

Not in Ivanka's world, you don't.

Overheal

https://twitter.com/mmpadellan/status/1349453986227744771?s=20

martingriff

embraer170 wrote: »

Not impeaching Trump will likely come back to bite the Republican Party in 2024.

I would doubt it. Democrats will make a big deal but they will come out will changed and focus on what has happened under Biden. The 2022 election will be the ones to watch

jill_valentine

Cody montana wrote: »

Ivanka Trump is not expected to attend Biden’s inauguration next week, according to a WH official.
While she respects his transition to power, according to this official, the official notes children of outgoing president’s do not traditionally attend.

Honestly I'd have half preferred if she went, I'd feel like the mob would be less inclined to try a second time.

martingriff

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

dont you have to be invited first before you say you are not attending?

Didn't Trump uninvited a team from the NBA when they said they will not attend after been invited

tayto lover

theguzman wrote: »

Ted Cruz is a US Senator, it is astonishing at how poor the knowledge of US politics is here other than Orange man = bad.

Orange Man is now a Bitter Orange Man.

Hoyer speaking well. Using the correct language and reaching to both sides.

Tell me how

'We don't know that Trumps words were responsible for what happened' say some.

Meanwhile...

https://twitter.com/drewharwell/status/1349436733889404928

namloc1980

Republican just standing there in silence. Pathetic.

JeffKenna

Is there a time set for the vote?

Overheal

JeffKenna wrote: »

Is there a time set for the vote?

When they're out of floor time. Very soon.

Smee_Again

Impeachment could well be successful, McConnell is open to convicting Trump.

while the press has been full of speculation, I have not made a final decision on how I will vote and I intend to listen to the legal arguments when they are presented to the Senate.

Overheal

namloc1980 wrote: »

Republican just standing there in silence. Pathetic.

And because he thought nobody would say Trump sent them

See the post above yours

Tony EH

everlast75 wrote: »

https://twitter.com/pattonoswalt/status/1349446779268333568?s=19

Shapiro is the epitome of this nouveaux American right winger crowd. EVERYTHING is a lie, or a fudge, or a deliberate disinformation effort. It's a badge of honour to be disingenuous at all times and to continually fool the people you want to appeal to.

An absolutely loathsome individual.

alchemist33

Smee_Again wrote: »

Impeachment could well be successful, McConnell is open to convicting Trump.

He's lying, giving a thin veneer of decency before he says he's heard the arguments and can't see enough evidence.

Tony EH

embraer170 wrote: »

Not impeaching Trump will likely come back to bite the Republican Party in 2024.

It won't even be remembered.

Republican voters will have a new messiah presented to them just before election time and Trump will be forgotten pretty quickly.

Is it 2/3 majority they need?

Smee_Again

alchemist33 wrote: »

He's lying, giving a thin veneer of decency before he says he's heard the arguments and can't see enough evidence.

That’s possible.

It may embolden other Reps though.

namloc1980

Deleted User wrote: »

Is it 2/3 majority they need?

Simple majority for impeachment.

Overheal

Here comes that vote on HR 24, Impeaching Trump for inciting an insurrection. https://www.congress.gov/117/bills/hres24/BILLS-117hres24ih.pdf

Too late to Nixon his way out now.

Billy Mays

everlast75 wrote: »

https://twitter.com/pattonoswalt/status/1349446779268333568?s=19

That's one of the greatest things I've ever read

Overheal

Chuck Todd: 'already, more of the President's own party are on the record voting to impeach him than there was for Bill Clinton or Andrew Johnson.'

rockatansky

What's the outcome for Trump on this if he's impeached here but survives the Senate trial vote?