Trump v Biden 2020,The insurrection (pt 6) Read OP

ILoveYourVibes

nolivesmatter wrote: »

Where have you encountered them? Alt-rightism isn't very common.

Its apparently fairly common amongst young americans not so much here.

I have encountered them online mostly for that reason.

The odd one in real life.


They seem to be really overly liberal on some social issues. And overly conservative on others. Its extreme either way with them.

They want all the weed ....but no immigrants. Not even a few immigrants.

Legalize prostitution ....but women have too many rights.

Obsessed with Jordan Peterson.

I don't meet too many young genuine conservatives anymore.

Like work hard ...strong patriotism etc. Pay your taxes but not too much taxation ...small govt . That is too boring for alt right hipsters.

duploelabs

nolivesmatter wrote: »

Where have you encountered them? Alt-rightism isn't very common.

Yes they are, sure they even got a mention on the third presidential debate

listermint

ILoveYourVibes wrote: »

Its apparently fairly common amongst young americans not so much here.

I have encountered them online mostly for that reason.

The odd one in real life.


They seem to be really overly liberal on some social issues. And overly conservative on others. Its extreme either way with them.

They want all the weed ....but no immigrants. Not even a few immigrants.

Legalize prostitution ....but women have too many rights.

Obsessed with Jordan Peterson.

I don't meet too many young genuine conservatives anymore.

Like work hard ...strong patriotism etc. Pay your taxes but not too much taxation ...small govt . That is too boring for alt right hipsters.

Might be because the term small government is for morons. You can't have small government in a country of 330plus million.

That's called large chaos not small government

8-10

ILoveYourVibes wrote: »

Obsessed with Jordan Peterson.

And ironically misinterpret Jordan Peterson

Overheal

After 5 days of ruining Christmas and putting millions of families in danger of being evicted, Trump signs the bill without modification.

https://twitter.com/abc/status/1343369860022206464?s=21

No win for Trump: $600 is an insult, $2000 he never fought for (in fact he’s spent the past few days golfing exclusively), and he either adds a trillion to the deficit or evicts millions of Americans. Either way, he ends up being a horrible president.

Deshawn

Overheal wrote: »

No win for Trump: $600 is an insult, $2000 he never fought for (in fact he’s spent the past few days golfing exclusively), and he either adds a trillion to the deficit or evicts millions of Americans. Either way, he ends up being a horrible president.

Damned if he does,damned if he doesn't

Overheal

Deshawn wrote: »

Damned if he does,damned if he doesn't

Indeed, and also entirely avoidable, had he been a part of the legislative process and told lawmakers earlier his desire for $2000 cheques.

nolivesmatter

duploelabs wrote: »

Yes they are, sure they even got a mention on the third presidential debate

That's obviously not proof that it's common.

everlast75

A headline from the RINO. Pinko, lib elite paper.... the New York Ti..

hang on a second - the New York Post???

https://twitter.com/kyledcheney/status/1343394847865122818?s=19

ceannbui

Overheal wrote: »

Indeed, and also entirely avoidable, had he been a part of the legislative process and told lawmakers earlier his desire for $2000 cheques.

trump is an absolute f@cking buffoon, what was he trying to do blocking the 600 covid bill and now not blocking it? he had/has no interest in a 2K bill, if he did, he would have shown interest prior to promising to veto it. Buffoon

Leroy42

Deshawn wrote: »

Damned if he does,damned if he doesn't

Pardon? He is dammed as he didn't bother to get involved in the negotiations, then claimed it was a terrible deal, threatening to refuse to sign, and then simply gave in.

To what end? Yet another failure by Trump. Yet another tantrum thrown which made no difference.

everlast75

Leroy42 wrote: »

Pardon? He is dammed as he didn't bother to get involved in the negotiations, then claimed it was a terrible deal, threatening to refuse to sign, and then simply gave in.

To what end? Yet another failure by Trump. Yet another tantrum thrown which made no difference.

It is incredible the amount of people The Apprentice and The Aart of the deal have fooled into thinking that Trump is some sort of business genius/ master negotiator, rather than allowing them to see an idiot move when he does one. Instead it's "Trump gets blamed regardless" or it's some sort of 4d chess.

duploelabs

nolivesmatter wrote: »

That's obviously not proof that it's common.

It's impossible to discuss anything with you if you're going to ignore basic facts

nolivesmatter

duploelabs wrote: »

It's impossible to discuss anything with you if you're going to ignore basic facts

That kind of passive aggression is what makes discussion impossible.

What basic fact did you present that shows that alt-rightism is common? That the term was mentioned at a debate doesn't prove anything.

duploelabs

nolivesmatter wrote: »

That kind of passive aggression is what makes discussion impossible.

What basic fact did you present that shows that alt-rightism is common? That the term was mentioned at a debate doesn't prove anything.

You initially said the alt-right aren't common, back that fact up with some statistics or publication

nolivesmatter

duploelabs wrote: »

You initially said the alt-right aren't common, back that fact up with some statistics or publication

That's ridiculous. The burden can't be on me to prove something doesn't exist. "Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence".

You accused me of ignoring facts but you haven't presented any.

duploelabs

nolivesmatter wrote: »

That's ridiculous. The burden can't be on me to prove something doesn't exist. "Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence".

You accused me of ignoring facts but you haven't presented any.

You made an assertion, and if you can't back that up with some independent verification than that's your problem, but if you can't back it up then it's assumed to be bull.
I would say that it wouldn't be the realm of niche things to be mentioned in a presidential debate

nolivesmatter

duploelabs wrote: »

You made an assertion, and if you can't back that up with some independent verification than that's your problem, but if you can't back it up then it's assumed to be bull.

So alt-rightism is common in society unless it's proven not to be lol. Seriously?

duploelabs wrote: »

I would say that it wouldn't be the realm of niche things to be mentioned in a presidential debate

Maybe you would say that but it doesn't prove it. That's an assumption you're making.

drogon.

Now that he is gone to Florida for Christmas and New Year, anyone think he will go back to DC ?

Overheal

drogon. wrote: »

Now that he is gone to Florida for Christmas and New Year, anyone think he will go back to DC ?

I would have said no but he's made clear plans to be in DC on January 6 and for people to show up on the 6th. Parlerbots are taking this to mean he needs them there in droves to overthrow the government if Pence has the audacity to adhere to the law and count the electors.

Cody montana

Overheal wrote: »

I would have said no but he's made clear plans to be in DC on January 6 and for people to show up on the 6th. Parlerbots are taking this to mean he needs them there in droves to overthrow the government if Pence has the audacity to adhere to the law and count the electors.

This could end very badly.

Overheal

Cody montana wrote: »

This could end very badly.

Not likely to be charlottesville or anything. And DC has strict enforcement about lawful carry - as in, you can't do it anywhere remotely where it would be an actual threat to the federal government. Also, DC police are armed like a military (as BLM/George Floyd demonstrators learned in June)

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/01/dc-laws-aside-you-still-cant-carry-a-gun-on-the-hill/456129/

I think most of it is talk and while there will surely be Antifa/Proud Boy skirmishes most of us aren't going to notice. Some DC Bars and Hotels are already announcing they will be shutting down sale of alcohol for the 5th and 6th to avoid catering to escalation.

Cody montana

Cody montana wrote: »

This could end very badly.

It won't. Trump and his supporters will continue to claim that the election has been stolen. He'll exit the White House quietly and Biden will take over. I'll be surprised if there is any violence.

extra gravy

Cody montana wrote: »

This could end very badly.

It'll probably just be like the last time his supporters showed up in DC... he'll drive through them and go play golf.

Overheal

extra gravy wrote: »

It'll probably just be like the last time his supporters showed up in DC... he'll drive through them and go play golf.

Watch it be a couple hundred cosplayers on the mall.

Smee_Again

extra gravy wrote: »

It'll probably just be like the last time his supporters showed up in DC... he'll drive through them and go play golf.

More than likely, takes a lot of effort to organise a successful coup.

Trumpet doesn’t do effort.

Dillonb3

Seen a few tweets going around about Louie Gohmert is trying to sue Mike Pence

donspeekinglesh

Dillonb3 wrote: »

Seen a few tweets going around about Louie Gohmert is trying to sue Mike Pence

Yep: https://www.facebook.com/nycjayjay/posts/10157346139035443

(Sorry about the Facebook link, haven't seen it elsewhere yet)

Overheal

Dillonb3 wrote: »

Seen a few tweets going around about Louie Gohmert is trying to sue Mike Pence

He's suing in a federal district court (specifically to a Trump judge) to find that Pence has the power to do something that, even a novice without a JD degree could tell you he does not have the power to do. Essentially, Gohmert wants the court to, in a matter of days, nullify the 1887 Electoral Count Act, which has stood for 133 years.

Not only would such a lawsuit fail immediately on laches (If the law is simply unconstitutional, why wait until after the 2020 election was certified to sue, why wait 133 years even?), but the conclusion sought would be that any Vice President can just, constitutionally, decide "I don't feel like losing the election, so I won't count the vote and I get 4 years. Suck it losers" etc.

It's amazing, the cognitive dissonance going through the minds of these "Patriots" this week, wanting VP to have the powers of a Supreme Chancellor over the election.

Overheal

TX Lt. Governor put up a $1M bounty for evidence of voter fraud. His democratic colleagues in Pennsylvania are demanding their money after providing proof of Pennsylvania Trump voters committing fraud.

https://twitter.com/JohnFetterman/status/1343634682001448961?s=20