Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

COVID-19: Vaccine and testing procedures Megathread Part 2 [Mod Warning - Post #1]

Options
1181182184186187331

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 3,465 ✭✭✭celt262


    A lot of conflicting information in that article, coupled with conjecture would lead me to believe that it is something of a headline-grabbing exercise. Statements such as "it APPEARS that the protection offered by the first dose is less effective than we had thought" and "MAY not protect against new strains of the virus" are not exactly conclusive.

    In any case, are "data" from the first dose that significant? We all know that we need the second dose and if that is as efficacious as we are told (plus the added benefit of reduced transmission), we are in a good position. Let's see how the data looks after the second doses have been administered before jumping to conclusions. But, as others have frequently remarked on here, some posters seem to relish the prospect of the vaccine failing..

    Was Israel not reporting great news on the vacine in the last day or two I'm sure I read it somewhere?


  • Registered Users Posts: 473 ✭✭Gile_na_gile


    A lot of conflicting information in that article, coupled with conjecture would lead me to believe that it is something of a headline-grabbing exercise. Statements such as "it APPEARS that the protection offered by the first dose is less effective than we had thought" and "MAY not protect against new strains of the virus" are not exactly conclusive.

    In any case, are "data" from the first dose that significant? We all know that we need the second dose and if that is as efficacious as we are told (plus the added benefit of reduced transmission), we are in a good position. Let's see how the data looks after the second doses have been administered before jumping to conclusions. But, as others have frequently remarked on here, some posters seem to relish the prospect of the vaccine failing..

    Well we could have a thread on positive vibes if you prefer, chillwave vaccine tidbits. I agree we need to wait for clearer data but it is possible that we may need to tweak vaccines before the year is out.


  • Registered Users Posts: 16,555 ✭✭✭✭Galwayguy35


    Someone from Denmark was interviewed on The Last Word and the Danes are going to have a population of 5.8 million jabbed by the end of June.

    And we probably won't have all the people here done by the end of the year.

    The question is why can't we do the same?


  • Registered Users Posts: 21,429 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    Someone from Denmark was interviewed on The Last Word and the Danes are going to have a population of 5.8 million jabbed by the end of June.

    And we probably won't have all the people here done by the end of the year.

    The question is why can't we do the same?

    We'll have it done if we have a vaccine supply.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,493 ✭✭✭irishgeo


    Someone from Denmark was interviewed on The Last Word and the Danes are going to have a population of 5.8 million jabbed by the end of June.

    And we probably won't have all the people here done by the end of the year.

    The question is why can't we do the same?

    how do you we won't?

    They are saying once Oxford is available we could do a 100k a week.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,435 ✭✭✭TiGeR KiNgS


    Sorry, I havent bothered reading this thread as its too long.

    But when will the mass population (outside of the vulnerble) be ready for vaccination ?


  • Registered Users Posts: 480 ✭✭jace_da_face


    Any up to date stats available on Covid deaths by age group?


  • Registered Users Posts: 16,555 ✭✭✭✭Galwayguy35


    Yevon wrote: »
    What are you basing this on?

    Helen McEntee said it recently.

    Donnelly estimates it will be 4 million by Sept.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,768 ✭✭✭timsey tiger


    irishgeo wrote: »
    how do you we won't?

    They are saying once Oxford is available we could do a 100k a week.

    100k doses a week means about two years to get the job done.


  • Registered Users Posts: 16,555 ✭✭✭✭Galwayguy35


    Water John wrote: »
    We'll have it done if we have a vaccine supply.
    irishgeo wrote: »
    how do you we won't?

    They are saying once Oxford is available we could do a 100k a week.

    Thats the point I'm making, if the Danes can do it we should be able to.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 21,429 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    We'll need to hit 200k/wk. GPs and Pharmacists will do 50% of that. The rest will be in vaccination centres.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,021 ✭✭✭lbj666


    Someone from Denmark was interviewed on The Last Word and the Danes are going to have a population of 5.8 million jabbed by the end of June.

    And we probably won't have all the people here done by the end of the year.

    The question is why can't we do the same?

    We are no different than Denmark regarding supply, so if they want to be done by June end they need all vacines in the pipeline approved and distribution in full flow in order to do that. That means Astra Z, JJ, novavax curevac.
    Ireland's projections at the minute are based on Az getting approved so far. Timelines will be brought forward the more vacines that are approved.

    Also no jab is approved on kids yet and not likely for a while, I am curious did you actually hear their full population or everyone over 18.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,493 ✭✭✭irishgeo


    lbj666 wrote: »
    We are no different than Denmark regarding supply, so if they want to be done by June end they need all vacines in the pipeline approved and distribution in full flow in order to do that. That means Astra Z, JJ, novavax curevac.
    Ireland's projections at the minute are based on Az getting approved so far. Timelines will be brought forward the more vacines that are approved.

    Also no jab is approved on kids yet and not likely for a while, I am curious did you actually hear their full population or everyone over 18.

    They said the population of Denmark was 5.8million so including everyone.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,276 ✭✭✭IRISHSPORTSGUY


    In and out of lockdowns if we don't get the most vulnerable vaccinated first :(
    There is concern in Brussels whether the AstraZeneca vaccine will also be approved for people over 55 years of age. If the approval does not come quickly, the Chancellor's patience will break, he says


    Every week counts, emphasized Federal Chancellor Sebastian Kurz (ÖVP) after a video conference with the so-called "first mover" countries on Monday. That is why the approval of the vaccine from Astra Zeneca cannot go fast enough.

    Together with Denmark and Greece, Austria wants to urge the EU for the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to approve the vaccine quickly and unbureaucratically. In an interview with Puls 4, Kurz became even clearer: If a quick approval does not succeed, "he would lose patience at some point," the broadcaster quoted the Chancellor in a broadcast. Kurz also admitted that, in retrospect, other countries were faster with their orders than Austria, which had joined the common EU vaccine strategy.

    But there is concern in the background when it comes to the approval and availability of Covid vaccines. As DER STANDARD learned, it is currently questionable whether the long-awaited vaccine from Astra Zeneca can actually get full approval. Its effectiveness in older people should not be fully clarified even shortly before the EMA's decision.



    Concern about Astra Zeneca approval

    As for the vaccine from Astra Zeneca - the vaccine that the Chancellor wants to approve as quickly as possible - representatives from science and politics in Brussels as well as in Vienna are racking their brains about its effectiveness in older people. The British-Swedish company's application for approval for the vaccine against Covid-19 developed at Oxford University was received by the EMA last Tuesday. There are high hopes that the vaccine will bring the pandemic, which has been raging for almost a year, under control.



    The vaccine with the designation AZD1222 is intended to be used by the general public and is well suited for this: The vaccines from Biontech / Pfizer and Moderna, which have been approved in the EU up to now, need deep freezing at temperatures as low as minus 70 degrees - AZD1222, on the other hand, can be kept for a long time at refrigerator temperatures. In addition, the Astra-Zeneca vaccine is much cheaper than the other two substances.

    But that is currently pending. In Brussels there are concerns that there could be problems with the EU approval of the third Covid-19 vaccine planned for January 29th. The next EU summit of heads of state and government will take place on Thursday, which will exclusively deal with the situation of the corona pandemic via video conference. It is questionable whether the vaccine can get full approval.

    The reason for this is an evidence problem. For some EMA experts, who have to make decisions independently of politics, the data from the series of tests in autumn are not sufficient for the time being. For those over 65 years of age, the effectiveness was not convincingly clarified, unlike the products from Biontech and Moderna, which were able to demonstrate over 90 percent effectiveness.

    Good values in comparison

    Overall, the Astra-Zeneca vaccine has an effectiveness of 70 percent, which is a very good value compared to flu vaccines. But the 90 percent effectiveness of Biontech has set new standards.

    The STANDARD was confirmed by a high-ranking expert who is involved in the implementation of the European vaccination strategy that there is a "big headache everywhere" in this regard. Astra Zeneca has deficiencies in the "verifiable effectiveness" in people over 65. This does not have to be associated with a higher risk of vaccination, but the protection against corona infection may be lower.

    Expert Nicolodi: Too little evidence

    The independent Austrian vaccine expert Christina Nicolodi is not surprised by these problems. Evaluations of Astra Zeneca, which consider certain subgroups - for example based on age - are still pending. In the STANDARD conversation, Nicolodi specifies that the age limit of 55 years is generally relevant for vaccinations. From this age onwards, the immune system changes and reacts differently to immunizations than in younger people.

    From the phase III tests of the vaccine, to the best of her knowledge, there is only data on "1,000 to 1,500" people in this age group out of a total of around 11,000 test subjects. That is not enough to really assess the effect on the elderly.

    "Breakdown" during testing

    It is also unclear what role older people played in the "breakdown" that led to a retesting of the vaccinated vaccine doses: after the Astra-Zeneca vaccine had shown an immunization level of around 70 percent after two equally large partial vaccinations After a dosage error, it turns out that a first vaccination of half a dose and a second vaccination of a whole dose provide 90 percent protection.

    How the EMA's decision will turn out is open at the moment. A political problem would arise for the heads of government and the President of the Commission if they were only partially approved. For one, Astra Zeneca's vaccine plays a major role in the EU vaccination strategy. On August 27, 2020, the Commission already bought 400 million doses for all 27 member countries - the first sales contract for Covid 19 vaccines in the EU out of a total of seven.

    Approved for everyone in the UK

    To be on the safe side, consideration is being given to only approving the Astra-Zeneca vaccine in the age category up to 55 years if it is approved by the EMA. In the case of partial approval, however, it would be difficult to explain to the general public that there are vaccines of different quality, according to the STANDARD from government circles in Vienna.

    This could also raise questions, because in the UK, for example, AZD1222 is used in all age groups as part of an emergency approval.

    Rethink vaccination plans

    Should it come to the restricted EMA approval, there would probably have to be a shift in the vaccination plans in the EU. Over 55-year-olds would then have to be vaccinated with the available doses from Biontech and Moderna. If there is no approval of the Astra-Zeneca vaccine for over 55-year-olds or for over 65-year-olds (a decision is pending), this could mean that the ordered vaccine will first be used in younger people, according to the council.

    That would not change anything about the Austrian vaccination strategy, said Health Minister Rudolf Anschober (Greens) on Friday. The older groups would be vaccinated in the initial phase anyway. At the press conference, Anschober also made it clear that the decision as to which vaccine should be approved is not a political one.

    On Monday, a spokesman from the Ministry of Health made this more concrete: Thanks to the doses from Pfizer and Moderna, you have a "buffer", but "if Astra Zeneca is approved, it will of course be faster". However, it is also pointed out that the ongoing vaccinations in Great Britain are gaining live experience, which could improve the data situation.

    Admission can be postponed

    It is also conceivable that the EMA will postpone the approval decision at the end of January until Astra Zeneca provides more data. The company has been asked to provide additional data - and has agreed to do so. A broad study is also underway in the USA.

    In response to a STANDARD request, Astra Zeneca said that the company's Phase III registration study published in the "Lancet" journal included people of all ages over 18 years. "All currently available safety and efficacy data for the whole population have been submitted to the EMA," said Astra Zenecas Medical Director in Austria, Botond Ponner.

    According to Astra Zeneca "robust immune responses"

    In addition, the results of the phase II / III study with AZD1222 also published in "Lancet" had shown that the vaccine "elicited similarly robust immune responses to Sars-CoV-2 in all age groups, with older adults (56 to 70 years old) even there were fewer and fewer local and systemic reactions ".


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,021 ✭✭✭lbj666


    irishgeo wrote: »
    They said the population of Denmark was 5.8million so including everyone.

    Nearly everything has to fall into place so. Not even the UK with their head start is making those sorts of predictions.


  • Registered Users Posts: 21,429 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    I'd be happy if all the major groups up to Group 12 I think were done by end of Summer. That would be those under 18 and pregnant women not done at that point. But I think those too will be done once the go ahead for them is given.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,004 ✭✭✭Hmmzis


    True. I meant the link in previous post from Hmmzis.

    For me the most baffling thing about the serum assay results is the seemingly narrow, almost needle like, antibody respose against the S protein. There are about 6 nAB epitopes on the RBD alone, a couple in the S2 domain and then a couple between the NTD and the cleavage site. For most people the whole polyclonal response seems to be directed at just one or two epitopes - the RBM in the RBD and a small section in the NTD. Somehow the virus is throwing off the peptide sequencing and B cell functions. I've read about the predominantly extrafollicular B cell responses and that might partly explain this but the lack of available (non glycan shielded) epitope targetting nABs might maybe hint at some dendritic cell shennanigans as well, thogh I haven't come across anything about that in the published literature.

    Basically, the loss of a nAB epitope or two should not normally lead to dramatic changes in neutralization by polyclonal antibodies. There are measles genotypes in Africa that have 3 out of 6 nAB epitopes mutated away and it has very limited effect on polyclonal serum activity.


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,264 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    In and out of lockdowns if we don't get the most vulnerable vaccinated first :(

    If its under 55s then that's fine realistically.

    It's always been said that if one was to be used only for certain ages then other groups will get the other. Likewise if required they would swap the groups around and the young would get vaccinated first should a reduction in transmission be proven.

    I.e under 55 to get AstraZeneca and most at risk Pfizer or Moderna. Wouldn't be a worry to be honest if that happened. Realistically its probably the way it'll go anyway


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,113 ✭✭✭✭Gael23




  • Registered Users Posts: 2,293 ✭✭✭Cork2021


    Donnelly on prime time again saying he’s trying to get the AstraZeneca vaccine in as early as possible.
    Why will we not get any delivery until the middle of February and why would we need EU approval to start vaccinating if we do get it early and has already been authorised by the EMA and European Commission??


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 721 ✭✭✭Cushtie


    Apologies. I haven't had time to read everything in the thread. Can anybody advise if there has been any update on the proposal to have a large amount of doses of AZ vaccine in the country, and ready to go should the EMA give the expected approval on the 29th?


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,408 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    If the AstraZeneca vaccine has a better response in younger people then that's ok, continue using the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines for the older cohorts and start vaccinating the younger strata with the AZ vaccine. You're going to have longer restrictions due to the vulnerable taking longer to get vaccinated but vaccinating the younger people has benefits also, if the AZ vaccine stops transmission in younger people it'll help reduce overall infection rates and the R0 number.

    Even if AZ is only approved for those under 55, a significant cohort of education workers, healthcare workers, those under 65 with underlying conditions, those in crowded accomodation, and other key workers who are in groups ahead of wide scale vaccination can use the AZ vaccine.


  • Registered Users Posts: 700 ✭✭✭nommm


    Not surprised at the EMA not wanting to approve it in older people. The lack of data in older groups was also mentioned in the UKs MHRA report. It is best to err on the side of caution.

    I’ve no doubt that scientifcally illiterate politicians will be putting a lot of pressure on the EMA.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,235 ✭✭✭lucernarian


    nommm wrote: »
    Not surprised at the EMA not wanting to approve it in older people. The lack of data in older groups was also mentioned in the UKs MHRA report. It is best to err on the side of caution.

    I’ve no doubt that scientifcally illiterate politicians will be putting a lot of pressure on the EMA.

    What was the UK MHRA's verdict on approving it for use in older people?


  • Registered Users Posts: 20,991 ✭✭✭✭Stark


    Cork2021 wrote: »
    Donnelly on prime time again saying he’s trying to get the AstraZeneca vaccine in as early as possible.
    Why will we not get any delivery until the middle of February and why would we need EU approval to start vaccinating if we do get it early and has already been authorised by the EMA and European Commission??

    He mentioned something about mid-February being the delivery date in the contract with AZ.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,021 ✭✭✭lbj666


    Guys this is very significant development if it comes to pass and i think ye are downplaying it.

    I always though that astra zeneca would have a major part to play in older groups, along with pfizer and moderna pending on peoples state of health. The GPs/Pharmacist are getting trained in it as we speak, mainly to be ready for group 3 onward. Have i totally misunderstood this?

    55 and over, is 1.1million people , how fast can we get 2.2 Pfizer/Moderna doses into the country? and then administer them given how difficult they are to handle.


  • Registered Users Posts: 20,991 ✭✭✭✭Stark


    Astrazenaca ran more trials since the MHRA approval. I haven't seen any mention of those in that article. Hopefully they included more older people in the new trials.

    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-astrazeneca-vaccin/astrazeneca-u-s-covid-19-vaccine-trial-results-likely-in-late-january-says-health-official-idUSKBN28C349

    Not sure is data gathered from the current rollout of AZ to elderly people in the UK admissable.

    Even if it only works in under-55s, that could make a big difference if it reduces transmission imo. Could help bring the pandemic under control with much less severe restrictions and buy the elderly more time to get their Pfizer/Moderna shots.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,021 ✭✭✭lbj666


    What was the UK MHRA's verdict on approving it for use in older people?

    https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/949772/UKPAR_COVID_19_Vaccine_AstraZeneca_05.01.2021.pdf

    Page 53 at the bottom
    "As good efficacy has been demonstrated in subjects with comorbidities and immunogenicity
    results in the elderly population are broadly comparable to those of younger adults, there is
    currently no indication of a significant loss of efficacy in this population."


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,695 ✭✭✭Charles Babbage


    lbj666 wrote: »
    We are no different than Denmark regarding supply, so if they want to be done by June end they need all vacines in the pipeline approved and distribution in full flow in order to do that. That means Astra Z, JJ, novavax curevac.
    Ireland's projections at the minute are based on Az getting approved so far. Timelines will be brought forward the more vacines that are approved.


    It has been suggested that some EU nations e.g. Bulgaria are unwilling to fork out for the Pfizer or even more the Moderna vaccine, and they prefer to wait for AZ or perhaps Janssen. So other EU countries can snag the Moderna stocks if they are willing to fund it. This seems an admirable opportunity for the likes of Denmark or Ireland that have vaccination well underway for these vaccines. The difference in cost between AZ and Moderna would be more than covered by paying one week less PUP payment by getting things open sooner.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 9,235 ✭✭✭lucernarian


    lbj666 wrote: »
    https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/949772/UKPAR_COVID_19_Vaccine_AstraZeneca_05.01.2021.pdf

    Page 53 at the bottom
    "As good efficacy has been demonstrated in subjects with comorbidities and immunogenicity
    results in the elderly population are broadly comparable to those of younger adults, there is
    currently no indication of a significant loss of efficacy in this population."
    Thank you, I've been reading it for the past 15 minutes. That seems like a very upbeat assessment of its protective value in the elderly population


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement