Gameweek 14 Match Day thread

dsmythy

dsmythy wrote: »

I dislike El Ghazi.

And breathe.

On the plus side 85 with Chilwell and Taylor subbing in for Lamptey left.

Green&Red

83 with Coufal, Bowen and Chilwell to come.
Very happy

Tiger Roll

Ace2007 wrote:

Your not missing out with DCL, he hasn't scored in the last 3, and only has 1 goal in last 5. Bruno you probably do need to get

Yeah I'm not his biggest fan but he has a few assists lately,won't be going near him . Bruno is obvious but I have Salah, son, Grealish,Kane,Vardy and Wilson. Might look at Bruno

Mr.Prodston

50 points. Will have Justin subbing in with 8 for James if he's out (hopefully he's out ) with Taylor and Werner to play.

If Werner could repay my faith in him with about 5 goals, but I'll accept a hat trick, then that would be great! If I could escape this clusterfeck of a GW without losing all of my previous good work I'd be delighted!

COH

76 with Mendy, Coufal & Chilwell to play. I suppose a drab 0-0 is too mich to ask for tomorrow!

ScummyMan

85 all out.

Very happy with that considering I only had 10 lads tog out. (Thanks reece James and Lamptey)

extra gravy

Green&Red wrote: »

83 with Coufal, Bowen and Chilwell to come.
Very happy

Same but with Soucek instead of Bowen. Hoping for a 0-0!

dahat

82 with 3 to play, a decent week for once.

Unfortunately I'm out with the washing in terms of OR but trying to stay in contention for mini leagues

Jim Gazebo

dahat wrote: »

82 with 3 to play, a decent week for once.

Unfortunately I'm out with the washing in terms of OR but trying to stay in contention for mini leagues

How far behind is considered in contention now? 80 off in my mini league. 422k OR at the moment.

dahat

Jim Gazebo wrote: »

How far behind is considered in contention now? 80 off in my mini league. 422k OR at the moment.

If I can keep the gap at 100 or less by turn of the year I'd be happy but it requires skill to close it as well as all your chips.

siblers

dahat wrote: »

If I can keep the gap at 100 or less by turn of the year I'd be happy but it requires skill to close it as well as all your chips.

I'm in the same boat, hoping gw18 and gw19 will help close the gap

Green&Red

Jim Gazebo wrote: »

How far behind is considered in contention now? 80 off in my mini league. 422k OR at the moment.

I’m 100 points off 100k, I think I can still make it

Ace2007

I think if your chasing someone who is 100 or so points ahead it’s more than doable to catch them. If however you are 100 points behind a leader with 10 others in between - well that’s a whole different ball game.

Similar to trying to break onto top 100k or 10k / there is a lot of variables to consider.

F1ngers

Just the 2 BPS for Bruno.

Bonus points added.

Ace2007

F1ngers wrote: »

Just the 2 BPS for Bruno.

It’s strange that Bruno’s points under the bps system didn’t change after after Leeds scored their second - and hence made him winning goal scorer

Scorpion Sting

Ace2007 wrote: »

It’s strange that Bruno’s points under the bps system didn’t change after after Leeds scored their second - and hence made him winning goal scorer

The winning goal bonus must have been added during the game.

Ace2007

Scorpion Sting wrote: »

The winning goal bonus must have been added as during the game.

But his “points” didn’t change and he wasn’t on the pitch for their goal though? So how was it added?

Scorpion Sting

Ace2007 wrote: »

But his “points” didn’t change and he wasn’t on the pitch for their goal though? So how was it added?

It had already been in place as his BPS points didn’t change since the final whistle.

Scorpion Sting

92 with Chilwell left.

The magical 100 is within reach.

CSF

Scorpion Sting wrote: »

It had already been in place as his BPS points didn’t change since the final whistle.

Think he means after the Dallas goal went in.

Ace2007

CSF wrote: »

Think he means after the Dallas goal went in.

exactly he was on 64 bps when he left the field, so how then does his points not go up when Dallas scores, and his goal becomes the "winning goal", in addition McTominaly's 65 didn't change - so if the winning goal was added during the game- you would expect him to be losing points once Dallas scores.

touts

89 with one to play (Taylor). Best score in a long time and I have a feeling I'll need every point to compete in my mini league as the average will be sky high.

CSF

Ace2007 wrote: »

exactly he was on 64 bps when he left the field, so how then does his points not go up when Dallas scores, and his goal becomes the "winning goal"

I was expecting a later update aswell, but they seem to be final much quicker these days. Was similar with Man City yesterday also.

Scorpion Sting

CSF wrote: »

Think he means after the Dallas goal went in.

Well his BPS points must have included the winning goal as soon as the Dallas goal was added.

Father Hernandez

Ace2007 wrote: »

It’s strange that Bruno’s points under the bps system didn’t change after after Leeds scored their second - and hence made him winning goal scorer

CSF wrote: »

I was expecting a later update aswell, but they seem to be final much quicker these days. Was similar with Man City yesterday also.

Unless he got the 3 bonus for winning goal and then subsequently lost 3 points too.

Would be a mad coincidence but only thing I can think of. Is there anywhere to see a breakdown?

Ace2007

Scorpion Sting wrote: »

Well his BPS points must have included the winning goal as soon as the Dallas goal was added.

But it didn't change, this is what your missing

he left the pitch and was on 64, and Scott was on 65. Dallas scored, and there was no changes and everyone is expecting it to change post match, and they didn't.

so the only way that's possible is for Scott to lose 3, and then somehow get 3 back, and for Bruno to have the 3 added on, and then have 3 taken off

Whatever about it happening to one person - be very big coincidence to happen twice.

CSF

Father Hernandez wrote: »

Unless he got the 3 bonus for winning goal and then subsequently lost 3 points too.

Would be a mad coincidence but only thing I can think of. Is there anywhere to see a breakdown?

Nah I think its pretty tricky to keep track of. Even how quickly they update it can be a little inconsistent.

Scorpion Sting

Ace2007 wrote: »

But it didn't change, this is what your missing

he left the pitch and was on 64, and Scott was on 65. Dallas scored, and there was no changes and everyone is expecting it to change post match, and they didn't.

so the only way that's possible is for Scott to lose 3, and then somehow get 3 back, and for Bruno to have the 3 added on, and then have 3 taken off

Whatever about it happening to one person - be very big coincidence to happen twice.

So McTominay was on 65 BPS points for the last 20 minutes of the game?

F1ngers

Scorpion Sting wrote: »

So McTominay was on 65 BPS points for the last 20 minutes of the game?

Yes.