Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

When will it all end?

1204205207209210316

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,580 ✭✭✭JDD


    So you think click and collect would encourage someone to see their sister? If someone is determined to see someone not withstanding the absence of Click and Collect they will do it anyways. Sorry your reasons for saying it shouldn't happen yet is completely devoid of logic imo.

    People don't fall into black and white categories Plumbthedepths. There isn't one set of people that are completely adhering to the restrictions, and then a second set that are devil-may-care, I'll see my family whenever I feel like it people. If you give more reasons for people to move around, like click and collect, more people will move around. If more people move around, it is likely that their journey won't be the sole purpose of picking up that pair of shoes or couch. I don't think that's illogical, I think it's just human nature.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    JDD wrote: »
    People don't fall into black and white categories Plumbthedepths. There isn't one set of people that are completely adhering to the restrictions, and then a second set that are devil-may-care, I'll see my family whenever I feel like it people. If you give more reasons for people to move around, like click and collect, more people will move around. If more people move around, it is likely that their journey won't be the sole purpose of picking up that pair of shoes or couch. I don't think that's illogical, I think it's just human nature.

    If you give people more reasons to move around? I haven't stopped working since this crap started last year, the roads are as busy now as they were before the Christmas lockdown. Grocery shopping has to be the new day out.
    Click and collect will give alot of businesses the opportunity to survive and go some way to making a dent in the huge SW bill we are running up.
    Btw you can buy a couch at present even browse the store if you wish as I did last Sunday.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,580 ✭✭✭JDD


    If you give people more reasons to move around? I haven't stopped working since this crap started last year, the roads are as busy now as they were before the Christmas lockdown. Grocery shopping has to be the new day out.
    Click and collect will give alot of businesses the opportunity to survive and go some way to making a dent in the huge SW bill we are running up.
    Btw you can buy a couch at present even browse the store if you wish as I did last Sunday.

    On the whole Plumbthedepths, I don't disagree with you. We've got to prop up the economy where we can.

    I live close to a main road, which was very very busy in normal times. During the first lockdown - deserted. During the summer, fairly busy. During the second lockdown - absolutely no change, fairly busy, but that wasn't a real lockdown. December, no real change, maybe a few more cars. The first three weeks of this lockdown - deserted. Now - definitely busier but nowhere near last October/November, probably since schools were closed and the return-to-the-office creep had reversed.

    I get why they shut click and collect in January. I think it is completely valid to be asking the question now about whether infections have dropped, and enough vaccines have been administered, to a point where we could open click and collect, while bearing in mind that the economic suffering now is worse than it was this time last year. Am I completely convinced that now is the right time to open it? No, but I'm not far off.

    EDIT: Personally, I think it more important for the economy and society as a whole for construction to open in priority to click and collect.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,168 ✭✭✭ypres5


    HBC08 wrote: »
    Who are you blaming for telling lies over how much vaccine they could deliver?
    The government? Not a lot they can do,they were and continue to be shafted by AZ.

    they could take a leaf out of hungary and czechias book and start sourcing vaccines from china and russia but i guess that's too much work


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 860 ✭✭✭OwenM


    ypres5 wrote: »
    they could take a leaf out of hungary and czechias book and start sourcing vaccines from china and russia but i guess that's too much work

    Vaccine availability isn't going to be helped at this stage by sourcing outside the EU program, the HSE and all the other bureaucrats and regulatory hurdles simply cannot react fast enough.

    In a months time the headlines will be all about moving the vaccines from vials into arms and will be the bottleneck IMO and that hapless idiot (Donnelly) will continue to show his form.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,782 ✭✭✭Scotty #


    Scotty # wrote: »
    Pfizer - 95% - £26/dose
    Moderna - 94% - £27/dose
    AstraZeneca - 62% - £3/dose

    I should point out... that 95% efficacy for Pfizer.... that was in UK trials, against variants in the UK environment. The same vaccine had just 22% efficacy in it's South African trials (ie. against the SA variant 501Y.V2).

    Preliminary tests of the AZ vaccine are also showing 22% efficacy against the SA variant.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,628 ✭✭✭Micky 32


    Scotty # wrote: »
    I should point out... that 95% efficacy for Pfizer.... that was in UK trials, against variants in the UK environment. The same vaccine had just 22% efficacy in it's South African trials (ie. against the SA variant 501Y.V2).

    Preliminary tests of the AZ vaccine are also showing 22% efficacy against the SA variant.

    For mild cases but still very effective in preventing hospitalizations and deaths which is the most important part of this.

    Some interesting data regarding variants:

    https://twitter.com/sailorrooscout/status/1369052893718978560?s=21


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,927 ✭✭✭HBC08


    Hooked wrote: »
    But... How many OTHER vaccines are there? 8 is it?

    Our reactive, tunnel-vision attitude to everything the past year is laughable!!!

    Seeing news-bites on social media begging other countries for leftovers?
    Jesus wept! Source OTHER bloody vaccines!!!

    This sort of post frustrates me.
    There's 3 vaccines approved for use in Ireland currently, not 8.
    We are getting as much supply as we can,not much you can do when you make plans and set targets and then the vaccine provider moves the goalposts (Or in the case of AZ outright lies)
    Everybody is sick of it now but the lack of basic comprehension and reasoning skills is astounding.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,858 ✭✭✭robbiezero


    Hooked wrote: »
    A lot are - and who could blame them. 1 on 1 service - with sterlised instruments and both masked up. A total joke to still have them shut when the likes of B@Q, Halfords and supermarkets are packed!

    Don't get me started on the 5km travel restriction. UTTER FÜCK1NG NONSENSE at this stage. What difference does it make if we are outdoors in a packed playground within 5km or in total isolation on a remote beach or off the beaten track.

    I'm happy to adhere to all the "rules" but the 5km restriction is beyond a feckin' joke now... Prisoners in our own country.

    Just ignore it. I have since middle of Feb.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,580 ✭✭✭JDD


    There's 3 vaccines approved for use in Ireland currently, not 8.

    I take your point, and soon to be four vaccines if JandJ are approved in the coming days.

    Now, I don't know if there are other vaccines that are nearly ready to be approved, but is it open to the Irish medicines regulator to approve a vaccine on an emergency basis, like the UK did for the AZ vaccine?

    If, say, the Novartis vaccine was nearly ready for submission, would it be open for us to individually negotiate for more vaccine supply, over and above whatever the EU have agreed to buy (have they agreed to buy anything from Novartis yet?). Or indeed, could we request that the russians submit Sputnik for approval and agree to buy a certain amount from them. Or Sinopharm?

    I'm all for European solidarity, and very much a europhile, but the thing that makes the EU great is also it's biggest failing. When there is a cast of thousands and a decision has to be taken, their process normally means that any risks are minimised and the most sensible solution results. However, this also means that decision making is painfully slow, and in an environment where people are dying and vast swathes have lost their livelihood, the slow pace of decision making simply isn't good enough. In these circumstances, I cannot really see any justification for us not attempting to secure additional supplies outside of the EU joint enterprise.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 977 ✭✭✭CowboyTed


    ujjjjjjjjj wrote: »
    Entire thing will become a joke despite ranting and outrage on RTE - all that will happen is piles of Southern Irish will head North fly off to whichever sun destination is taking vaccinated tourists (Spain and Greece both look likely very soon) and there is sweet FA that the Irish government can do about it.

    If the Irish government had half a brain cell it would immediately be working with the British government to create an identical travel strategy across the UK and Ireland under the CTA. As it stands the UK is honouring the CTA as you can enter the UK unrestricted from Ireland but the Irish government isn't as if you are coming from mainland UK you have to isolate etc. Of course many people who need to travel to Ireland from the UK are just using NI backdoor. This would allow free travel in the CTA with further overseas travel having exactly the same restrictions so if for example Greece takes vaccinated tourists Irish or British people can fly there.

    If the Irish government doesn't do this it gurantees that people will head North to get away. The only way Ireland could ensure independent integrity with it's own travel restrictions is to close the NI border.

    Anything else is a fudge.

    Lets look at this...

    About 85% of UK is going to get the Vaccine and even at that it is going to be 95% effective...

    That will make 20%, 1 in 5 people in UK unprotected... This doesn't take into account mutations in the virus.. Mix that with a bunch of Irish in tight spaces like pubs... Not good...

    Now someone must be explaining this to Boris right now... I say UK could be open to a two island policy for next winter.

    The Government is doing just fine... Before there was rule that we would have to share vaccines with rest of EU... But Austria and Germany (& others) have already looked independently for vaccine... So Ireland is in the clear to get millions...

    21st of June is what Boris is aiming for... Ireland could be looking for a few weeks of Wrexham....

    Boris could do with the same to a few islands and then he comes out a winner..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,927 ✭✭✭HBC08


    JDD wrote: »
    I take your point, and soon to be four vaccines if JandJ are approved in the coming days.

    Now, I don't know if there are other vaccines that are nearly ready to be approved, but is it open to the Irish medicines regulator to approve a vaccine on an emergency basis, like the UK did for the AZ vaccine?

    If, say, the Novartis vaccine was nearly ready for submission, would it be open for us to individually negotiate for more vaccine supply, over and above whatever the EU have agreed to buy (have they agreed to buy anything from Novartis yet?). Or indeed, could we request that the russians submit Sputnik for approval and agree to buy a certain amount from them. Or Sinopharm?

    I'm all for European solidarity, and very much a europhile, but the thing that makes the EU great is also it's biggest failing. When there is a cast of thousands and a decision has to be taken, their process normally means that any risks are minimised and the most sensible solution results. However, this also means that decision making is painfully slow, and in an environment where people are dying and vast swathes have lost their livelihood, the slow pace of decision making simply isn't good enough. In these circumstances, I cannot really see any justification for us not attempting to secure additional supplies outside of the EU joint enterprise.

    I agree with you here.
    I think this is where valid criticism (as opposed the "mehole" twitter/fb outrage) comes into it.
    We have nobody brave enough or dynamic enough come up with or to actually follow through on something like this.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 222 ✭✭Batattackrat


    CowboyTed wrote: »
    Lets look at this...

    About 85% of UK is going to get the Vaccine and even at that it is going to be 95% effective...

    That will make 20%, 1 in 5 people in UK unprotected... This doesn't take into account mutations in the virus.. Mix that with a bunch of Irish in tight spaces like pubs... Not good...

    Now someone must be explaining this to Boris right now... I say UK could be open to a two island policy for next winter.

    The Government is doing just fine... Before there was rule that we would have to share vaccines with rest of EU... But Austria and Germany (& others) have already looked independently for vaccine... So Ireland is in the clear to get millions...

    21st of June is what Boris is aiming for... Ireland could be looking for a few weeks of Wrexham....

    Boris could do with the same to a few islands and then he comes out a winner..

    Once hospitals can manage that's all that matters now. We have to open up sooner rather than later and it will cost a lot of lives but nothing can be done about it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,628 ✭✭✭Micky 32


    CowboyTed wrote: »
    Lets look at this...

    About 85% of UK is going to get the Vaccine and even at that it is going to be 95% effective...

    That will make 20%, 1 in 5 people in UK unprotected... This doesn't take into account mutations in the virus.. Mix that with a bunch of Irish in tight spaces like pubs... Not good...

    Now someone must be explaining this to Boris right now... I say UK could be open to a two island policy for next winter.

    The Government is doing just fine... Before there was rule that we would have to share vaccines with rest of EU... But Austria and Germany (& others) have already looked independently for vaccine... So Ireland is in the clear to get millions...

    21st of June is what Boris is aiming for... Ireland could be looking for a few weeks of Wrexham....

    Boris could do with the same to a few islands and then he comes out a winner..

    Once the critical masses are vaccinated and the hospitals aren’t overrun your 1 in 5 calculations won’t be of concern of normality resuming.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 746 ✭✭✭RGS


    Our biggest problem is the ingrained conservatism in our politicians, which is matched by NPHET.

    We rejected the suggestion for a longer gap between jabs, which appears to be producing good data. We stick to the guidelines from the manufacturers. That's an reasonable approach if no other data is available, yes the UK may have gambled but it appears to be paying off.

    NPHET are still not convince on antigen testing despite evidence that it is another tool in the fight against covid.

    I am beginning to believe nothing of significance will change on the 5 April. Certainly nothing that will provide relief to the majority of the population.

    When is Tony H due back to work?


  • Posts: 2,093 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    RGS wrote: »
    When is Tony H due back to work?

    Good question - they are all afraid to do anything without his stamp of approval. He must have some juicy dirt on the government.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 940 ✭✭✭ujjjjjjjjj


    CowboyTed wrote: »
    Lets look at this...

    About 85% of UK is going to get the Vaccine and even at that it is going to be 95% effective...

    That will make 20%, 1 in 5 people in UK unprotected... This doesn't take into account mutations in the virus.. Mix that with a bunch of Irish in tight spaces like pubs... Not good...

    Now someone must be explaining this to Boris right now... I say UK could be open to a two island policy for next winter.

    The Government is doing just fine... Before there was rule that we would have to share vaccines with rest of EU... But Austria and Germany (& others) have already looked independently for vaccine... So Ireland is in the clear to get millions...

    21st of June is what Boris is aiming for... Ireland could be looking for a few weeks of Wrexham....

    Boris could do with the same to a few islands and then he comes out a winner..

    If 85% of the UK population get the virus the vast bulk of these people won't end up in hospital or dead, yes some may still get mild or very mild symptoms but so what ? - based on polling data that was on the BBC yesterday the percentage of people who don't want the vaccine is tiny in the older at risk groups but does get much higher in the younger age groups who are not at risk.

    So you might see 95-98% vaccine uptake in the over 65's for example and maybe 80% take-up up in the 18-30 age group so this will further reduce hospitalisations and deaths etc as we know these younger age groups are not at risk.

    Bear in mind even with vaccine efficacy not being 100% the remaining people are less likely to end up in hospital etc so whatever way you cut it hospitalisations and deaths are going to be a tiny fraction of what we have had to date.

    Having said all of that the bit that no one in NPHET or our weak politicians has had the balls yet to say is that people are going to keep catching and in some cases dieing from this endemic virus quite possibly indefinitely and there is absolutely nothing we can do about it.

    Everybody out there has to accept this (just like for years we've somehow managed with the flu etc etc and tolerated many diseases caused by lifestyles some infectious, some non infectious and seem to jog on).

    In the UK Boris and his heath tsars have made the mental jump to a society which once largely vaccinated will just have to get on with things.........despite some death and hospitalisations.

    We haven't got there yet here but need to quickly.

    Obsessing about variants is living your life with the what if...........For decades flu has mutated and can do at any point and can get nasty - read about the 1950's and 1960's mutations and outbreaks........but if we spend the rest of lives worrying about what might happen rather than just getting on with life it's daft - it's neurotic.

    But everyone is going to have to stop obsessing about case numbers, face masks, washing hands and get on with life - yes in the background the boffins can keep an eye on hospitalisations and deaths and tweak vaccines just like the seaonal flu vaccine.............the reality is right now Covid is a very low risk to the vast majority of our population and once people are vaccinated it becomes a tiny fraction of this already low risk.

    People need to start now getting into a mental space where they crack on with life. Anyone wanting to keep restrictions of any kind in place once we have the vaccine extensively rolled out in my opinion is neurotic. (and I am not being critical or unsympathetic here as I know the mental bombardment that people have had to endure with covid from the likes of NPHET and the media). But it will be neurotic behaviour in my opinion.

    The government by the way isn't doing fine.....they have done absolutely nothing bar use the EU as an excuse for supply - the infuriating thing is any money spent over the odds acquiring extra vaccine supplies outside of the EU procurement path would have been paid back in spades getting the economy open faster. It would have also shown to people who have been deeply affected financially by this and been prevented from trading, that the government actually had some semblance of understanding what these people have been through.

    By the way more signs tonight in the media of vaccine supply issues.....

    A two island policy is not going to be an option so better to address it now. The NI border won't be closed therefore stop playing games and just get a policy in progress now. Anything else is a fudge and we have had enough of those.


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 11,092 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hellrazer


    ujjjjjjjjj wrote: »

    The government by the way isn't doing fine.....they have done absolutely nothing bar use the EU as an excuse for supply - the infuriating thing is any money spent over the odds acquiring extra vaccine supplies outside of the EU procurement path would have been paid back in spades getting the economy open faster. It would have also shown to people who have been deeply affected financially by this and been prevented from trading, that the government actually had some semblance of understanding what these people have been through.

    By the way more signs tonight in the media of vaccine supply issues.....

    A two island policy is not going to be an option so better to address it now. The NI border won't be closed therefore stop playing games and just get a policy in progress now. Anything else is a fudge and we have had enough of those.

    IBEC estimates this crisis will cost Ireland 50 billion euros.

    We really should have went it alone in purchasing these vaccines direct from manufacturer and not relied on the EU.

    According to this article the most expensive vaccine is around 19 euros.
    https://www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n281

    Lets say we did a deal for double the price we could have bought 10 million does ie enough for the whole country for 380 million instead of pissing away 50 billion on PUP,TWSS,supporting the industries that are closed etc.


    Why they still cant go and do this now is beyond me. They are a useless shower of idiots that couldn't manage a good ****e.

    If we had a leader or health minister who had any cop on he`d be calling all these vaccine manufacturers and offering them double the price with guaranteed delivery times. Its not like we need a few hundred million doses - 10 million would get us out of this. And then vaccinate 24/7 once we get them.
    Drive in vaccine stations,pharmacies,dentists - anyone that can stick a needle in someones arm - even get a few junkies off OConnell street to help!!!!

    This rollout is taking too long and they cant keep blaming suppliers for it. They need to get off their arses and be pro-active about it.

    I was right about this rollout being a joke when I said this back on December 21st.
    Maybe its just the cynic in me but I really fear letting the 3 muppets of the apocalypse anywhere near this roll out.

    We as a country dont usually do things the right way when it comes down to it.

    We can all be as positive as we like but I feel we (the government) will make a balls of this roll out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 940 ✭✭✭ujjjjjjjjj


    Hellrazer wrote: »
    IBEC estimates this crisis will cost Ireland 50 billion euros.

    We really should have went it alone in purchasing these vaccines direct from manufacturer and not relied on the EU.

    According to this article the most expensive vaccine is around 19 euros.
    https://www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n281

    Lets say we did a deal for double the price we could have bought 10 million does ie enough for the whole country for 380 million instead of pissing away 50 billion on PUP,TWSS,supporting the industries that are closed etc.


    Why they still cant go and do this now is beyond me. They are a useless shower of idiots that couldn't manage a good ****e.

    If we had a leader or health minister who had any cop on he`d be calling all these vaccine manufacturers and offering them double the price with guaranteed delivery times. Its not like we need a few hundred million doses - 10 million would get us out of this. And then vaccinate 24/7 once we get them.
    Drive in vaccine stations,pharmacies,dentists - anyone that can stick a needle in someones arm - even get a few junkies off OConnell street to help!!!!

    This rollout is taking too long and they cant keep blaming suppliers for it. They need to get off their arses and be pro-active about it.

    I was right about this rollout being a joke when I said this back on December 21st.

    Good post, I suppose ultimately you have to get into the heads of our politicians, if the vaccine arrives quickly from the EU great they look great, if the vaccine is slow well it is not our fault but we have to be good Europeans and wait our turn.

    In essence they feel they can't lose at the moment.

    If they go it alone and pick up the blower and throw money at the problem it takes some initiative and go forward and taking of responsibility, all these words sit very uneasily with the muppets......

    And sure you can understand their point of view......its not as if they are on 350 euro a week and wondering which bill to pay next......sure that is Joe Citizen's problem.....nothing to do with me.


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 11,092 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hellrazer


    It because the government is weak, spineless and couldn't make a decision if their lives depended on it.

    But you know we`ll vote the same spineless and weak people back in at the next election.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 406 ✭✭E mac


    If the UK was in a position to give us say 2 million doses right now the EU would prob insist on Ireland dispersing them across Europe...Which we'd do of course...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,202 ✭✭✭✭hmmm


    There's lots of chatter amongst US commentators and scientists now that they will be "returning to normal" this year, probably towards the end of Summer. We will still have to be careful, particularly over Winter, but science is getting us out of this. This is happening (in my opinion).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,145 ✭✭✭monkeybutter


    Hellrazer wrote: »
    It because the government is weak, spineless and couldn't make a decision if their lives depended on it.

    But you know we`ll vote the same spineless and weak people back in at the next election.

    its because none of the real rebels will run for office


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,187 ✭✭✭GeorgeBailey


    Good question - they are all afraid to do anything without his stamp of approval. He must have some juicy dirt on the government.

    He does indeed. I have the scoop. But keep it between us. Apparently Tony Holohan knows that the government went against Nphet advice at Christmas time and word on the street is that didn't turn out too well.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 268 ✭✭Monster249


    He does indeed. I have the scoop. But keep it between us. Apparently Tony Holohan knows that the government went against Nphet advice at Christmas time and word on the street is that didn't turn out too well.

    It went as badly as it did BECAUSE they kept such strict restrictions in place for so long. You can't battle against human nature, even with the best of intentions.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,368 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    its because none of the real rebels will run for office

    And whenever one of them does run there is always an excuse NOT to vote for them :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,566 ✭✭✭Risteard81


    Monster249 wrote: »
    It went as badly as it did BECAUSE they kept such strict restrictions in place for so long. You can't battle against human nature, even with the best of intentions.
    Their intentions were very far from pure - in fact they were and are evil.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,145 ✭✭✭monkeybutter


    pjohnson wrote: »
    And whenever one of them does run there is always an excuse NOT to vote for them :pac:

    delusions of grandeur? why did you not vote for Gemma?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,368 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Risteard81 wrote: »
    Their intentions were very far from pure - in fact they were and are evil.

    To what end Richie?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,566 ✭✭✭Risteard81


    pjohnson wrote: »
    To what end Richie?
    Pearse and Tone did not die to create a totalitarian state, nor to be subservient to people sitting in the Belgian capital.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement