Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Let's take a moment to talk about taxation

Options
1234689

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 4,546 ✭✭✭beggars_bush


    wiggle16 wrote: »
    Would you go 'way!

    I find it nigh-on impossible to believe that your farmer friend is unaware of agricultural relief and that therefore the tax bill you say he faces is non-existent

    https://www.revenue.ie/en/tax-professionals/tdm/capital-acquisitions-tax/cat-part11.pdf
    Not true
    They must hold a farming cert or equivalent


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 3,022 Mod ✭✭✭✭wiggle16


    Not true
    They must hold a farming cert or equivalent

    What is not true?

    The cert is explicitly mentioned in the link I included.


  • Registered Users Posts: 789 ✭✭✭jams100


    The deceased doesn't pay anything, the recipient may have to depending on the amount and relation to the deceased. This was covered a few pages back.

    Its the deceased persons money, which they worked for thats being taxed, this is why I'm referring to it as a death tax. Ok the majority won't end up paying it anyway, I just don't think anyone should have to pay this. Even if it doesn't effect me


  • Registered Users Posts: 346 ✭✭kalych


    jams100 wrote: »
    Its the deceased persons money, which they worked for thats being taxed, this is why I'm referring to it as a death tax. Ok the majority won't end up paying it anyway, I just don't think anyone should have to pay this. Even if it doesn't effect me

    It's not though. You can put the estate into an escrow account and say sponsor a sports club with a monthly donation and that will attract no tax. Or build a massive statue to yourself. There could be VAT applied on services, but no 'death tax' to speak of.

    The tax liability comes only at the point of another PERSON inheriting the money. This very clearly shows that why it's not a 'death tax' and saying that is just plain silly.


  • Registered Users Posts: 900 ✭✭✭sameoldname


    jams100 wrote: »
    Its the deceased persons money, which they worked for thats being taxed, this is why I'm referring to it as a death tax. Ok the majority won't end up paying it anyway, I just don't think anyone should have to pay this. Even if it doesn't effect me

    But it isn't a tax on the deceased, it only gets taxed after it becomes someone else's money. There are methods of ensuring you pay zero taxes on passing on any assets after death eg; spreading it around among multiple people to stay within the tax free limits or even giving any amount to charity.

    I can understand why you feel the way you feel but from a societal point of view, somebody passing on a large amount of money to another individual does practically nothing for the country.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 17,853 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    tax-graphic.jpg

    Ireland, a great place to do business! LOL! Rewarding work and the early risers! LoooooooooooooooL!

    Huge amounts of workers paying in virtually nothing in income taxes, way less than other eu countries. Effectively no property tax. I believe POD said we will lose up to 2 billion a year in corporation tax a year due to changes shortly. The farcical handling of covid 19 crisis here, insane levels of debt. Another **** show is around the corner, brought to you once again by FFG... Several magic money trees discovered for covid 19. couldnt reward workers during the boom that ended when covid struck, the last two budgets, one obviously before the election year and during a BOOM they had nothing to give away, due to insane cost of hse blackhole and social housing blackhole etc, cant wait for the next few budgets!!!

    https://www.rte.ie/news/business/2021/0114/1189720-changes-to-corporate-tax-rules-will-reduce-revenue/


  • Posts: 25,611 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    theguzman wrote: »
    I would start with mandatory redundancies of over 100,000 public and civil sector workers, statues do work than most of them.

    Abolish all forms of local government and the senate. Cut bureaucracy in a fire of rules and regulations. I would strengthen law and order and fire every judge and barrister in the country. Every former politician would have his pensions removed. I would immediately stop all payments into the EU, I would expropriate all property and wealth of anyone connected to the FF party, this money would be paid over to the creditors from 2010 and then close the book no more repayment on that.

    All healthcare should be privatised, we don't have healthcare in Ireland only a idealogical dogma masquerading as healthcare.
    Just going to ignore being called out on your made up story about the farm?


  • Registered Users Posts: 900 ✭✭✭sameoldname


    Idbatterim wrote: »
    Ireland, a great place to do business! LOL! Rewarding work and the early risers! LoooooooooooooooL!

    Huge amounts of workers paying in virtually nothing in income taxes, way less than other eu countries. Effectively no property tax. I believe POD said we will lose up to 2 billion a year in corporation tax a year due to changes shortly. The farcical handling of covid 19 crisis here, insane levels of debt. Another **** show is around the corner, brought to you once again by FFG... Several magic money trees discovered for covid 19. couldnt reward workers during the boom that ended when covid struck, the last two budgets, one obviously before the election year and during a BOOM they had nothing to give away, due to insane cost of hse blackhole and social hosing blackhole etc, cant wait for the next few budgets!!!

    https://www.rte.ie/news/business/2021/0114/1189720-changes-to-corporate-tax-rules-will-reduce-revenue/

    Didn't you vote for Sinn Fein because you wanted a cheap house or something?


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,853 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    Didn't you vote for Sinn Fein because you wanted a cheap house or something?

    A " cheap" house! Lol! Listen, have you run a business? We offer generous pay and staff would turn down extra hours due to losing half their pay over the marginal rate. You're either one of those contributing nothing that defends others being fleeced to facilitate it or a ffg troll!

    I did vote sf, my mates who previously voted fg voted sf or have stopped voting. Fg give away free luxury housing paid for by their voters, I sure as fcuk wont qualify for it! Bit of a conundrum isn't it, fg giving nothing to workers, rip off marginal rate to facilitate everybody else getting a ridiculously good deal. Then support rip off housing. At this stage the game is nearly up on the whole sham anyway, nothing left to do but sit back and wait!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 844 ✭✭✭CrazyFather1


    Idbatterim wrote: »
    A " cheap" house! Lol! Listen, have you run a business? We offer generous pay and staff would turn down extra hours due to losing half their pay over the marginal rate. You're either one of those contributing nothing that defends others being fleeced to facilitate it or a ffg troll!

    I did vote sf, my mates who previously voted fg voted sf or have stopped voting. Fg give away free luxury housing paid for by their voters, I sure as fcuk wont qualify for it! Bit of a conundrum isn't it, fg giving nothing to workers, rip off marginal rate to facilitate everybody else getting a ridiculously good deal. Then support rip off housing. At this stage the game is nearly up on the whole sham anyway, nothing left to do but sit back and wait!

    You did read the SF manifesto? they are changing nothing FG or the rest of the parties are doing. Just giving away more free houses and increasing the tax paid by people working to pay for those houses.
    So you are voting to give more of your wages away to the wasters in Ireland. Not sure how that makes sense to anyone with a job? maybe you can explain
    The whole SF manifesto is take money from the worker and give to the waster.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 900 ✭✭✭sameoldname


    Idbatterim wrote: »
    A " cheap" house! Lol! Listen, have you run a business? We offer generous pay and staff would turn down extra hours due to losing half their pay over the marginal rate. You're either one of those contributing nothing that defends others being fleeced to facilitate it or a ffg troll!

    I did vote sf, my mates who previously voted fg voted sf or have stopped voting. Fg give away free luxury housing paid for by their voters, I sure as fcuk wont qualify for it! Bit of a conundrum isn't it, fg giving nothing to workers, rip off marginal rate to facilitate everybody else getting a ridiculously good deal. Then support rip off housing. At this stage the game is nearly up on the whole sham anyway, nothing left to do but sit back and wait!

    You can accuse me of being a troll all you like but here's a link to their proposed budget for this year.
    It's mostly large spending increases on welfare and the public sector. Oh, and people on €100,000 a year will get tax increases for good measure. I didn't vote for any of that and I didn't vote for FF or FG either.
    So based on your complaints above and reading what SF actually want to deliver, who's trolling?


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,853 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    You did read the SF manifesto? they are changing nothing FG or the rest of the parties are doing. Just giving away more free houses and increasing the tax paid by people working to pay for those houses.
    So you are voting to give more of your wages away to the wasters in Ireland. Not sure how that makes sense to anyone with a job? maybe you can explain
    The whole SF manifesto is take money from the worker and give to the waster.

    Just went through it there, yes that seems to be the case. But it's also the policy of ffg, ffg also support RIP off housing. I'd say would try to address the outrageous lack of taxes, some businesses pay here, like the reits. Effective tax on land hoarding. Going after mid income earners, like a couple on 140k and wanting am extra 3 percent from them is ridiculous. Any parties budget should look at wasteful spending etc. Surpise surprise it doesn't!

    Its rock and a hard place, I dont agree with some of what sf ropose. Then again we have years of experience that is the failure of ffg and for all the talk of rewarding workers etc, they have had years in power, boom before covid and... nothing! They pander to the status quo and wasters and they have never and will never receive a vote from them, absolutely incredible!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 844 ✭✭✭CrazyFather1


    Idbatterim wrote: »
    Just went through it there, yes that seems to be the case. But it's also the policy of ffg, ffg also support RIP off housing. I'd say would try to address the outrageous lack of taxes, some businesses pay here, like the reits. Effective tax on land hoarding. Going after mid income earners, like a couple on 140k and wanting am extra 3 percent from them is ridiculous. Any parties budget should look at wasteful spending etc. Surpise surprise it doesn't!

    Its rock and a hard place, I dont agree with some of what sf ropose. Then again we have years of experience that is the failure of ffg and for all the talk of rewarding workers etc, they have had years in power, boom before covid and... nothing! They pander to the status quo and wasters and they have never and will never receive a vote from them, absolutely incredible!

    What is RIP off housing? do you mean over priced houses?

    You can try change the corporate tax rate but then you will end up putting thousands of people out of work, not just the people working for multi nationals but all the suppliers. People working in canteen etc.

    I don't disagree by the way about FF/FG but I question what SF would do? they have a following which in large is the unemployed and they will always look after them first. Every agenda item is to give nothing to the worker. Plus based not he record of SF in the North well I think this says it all

    https://www.belfastlive.co.uk/news/northern-ireland-ranked-among-worst-17670062

    For all the giving out about Ireland:
    https://www.thejournal.ie/ireland-un-human-development-index-2019-5303638-Dec2020/


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,711 ✭✭✭StupidLikeAFox


    Those on 100k a year are not rich

    So what? You said you were going to lower taxes for higher earners and also cut spending on housing associations. This is going to have an impact on homelessness will lead to an increase in homelessness


  • Registered Users Posts: 26,280 ✭✭✭✭Eric Cartman


    So what? You said you were going to lower taxes for higher earners and also cut spending on housing associations. This is going to have an impact on homelessness will lead to an increase in homelessness

    The middle classes will be able to afford homes now with less of a silly tax burden and lower taxes would encourage more landlords into the market.
    Homelessness could be less as more constrained funding would encourage councils to tell people on welfare that they should move to the country and dont deserve a house in dublin


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,853 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    The middle classes will be able to afford homes now with less of a silly tax burden and lower taxes would encourage more landlords into the market.
    Homelessness could be less as more constrained funding would encourage councils to tell people on welfare that they should move to the country and dont deserve a house in dublin

    Actually charge them some rent, actually collect the rent actually provide non rip off social housing solutions, actually collect a proper lpt. But no, just rob the mid to high income earners and rob them on property costs too!

    It might take fg to get in and potential carnage to get a new party to represent the taxpayer to form. Fg sure as hello are not that party, that was clear a few years back !


  • Registered Users Posts: 803 ✭✭✭jcon1913


    To be fair, our GDP figures are meaningless due to the multinationals. You really need to use GNI* as a base to get some meaningful stats and even then it's debatable how accurate that is.

    €59.3 bn tax 2019 source Irish Independent
    €213.7 bn modified GNI 2019 source CSO
    Rate 27.8 %


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,766 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    Having some real fun watching the thread on TWSS tax bills. Maybe people getting paid gross salary and then receiving a tax bill, like they do in Hong Kong, will change some minds about Irish tax levels..


  • Registered Users Posts: 900 ✭✭✭sameoldname


    Idbatterim wrote: »
    Actually charge them some rent, actually collect the rent actually provide non rip off social housing solutions, actually collect a proper lpt. But no, just rob the mid to high income earners and rob them on property costs too!

    It might take fg to get in and potential carnage to get a new party to represent the taxpayer to form. Fg sure as hello are not that party, that was clear a few years back !

    Why do you keep on complaining about something that you actually went out and voted for? It's mind boggling.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,514 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    jcon1913 wrote: »
    €59.3 bn tax 2019 source Irish Independent
    €213.7 bn modified GNI 2019 source CSO
    Rate 27.8 %

    Let us do our own work...........

    https://www.cso.ie/en/statistics/governmentaccounts/

    https://www.cso.ie/en/releasesandpublications/er/gfsa/governmentfinancestatisticsoctober2020/

    2019 GG revenue = 89,135m

    of which

    2019 taxes and soc conts = 80,471m

    of which 2019 tax = 64,625m

    Paper never refused ink, do your own research.


    2019 GNI* = 213,708

    https://www.cso.ie/en/statistics/nationalaccounts/nationalincomeandexpenditureannualresults/


    Note that (tax+PRSI) / GNI* is not necessarily the best measure of taxation

    80,471 / 213,708 = 37.65%


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 26,280 ✭✭✭✭Eric Cartman


    Idbatterim wrote: »

    Can I have my tax bill scrapped too as a self employed person, shocked labour are calling for scrapping tax, they normally love a good tax


  • Registered Users Posts: 900 ✭✭✭sameoldname


    Can I have my tax bill scrapped too as a self employed person, shocked labour are calling for scrapping tax, they normally love a good tax

    Hire a decent accountant, you'd be amazed how much they can save you.

    Have you worked out those figures for us yet?


  • Registered Users Posts: 26,280 ✭✭✭✭Eric Cartman


    Hire a decent accountant, you'd be amazed how much they can save you.

    Have you worked out those figures for us yet?

    https://www.oecd.org/tax/revenue-statistics-ireland.pdf
    539805.jpeg

    Irelands income and corporate taxes are much higher than the OECD average.
    for 2018 we took in 22.9 billion in personal income tax alone plus another 12 billion in PRSI & USC (USC makes up 4 billion of this from : https://www.irishtimes.com/business/economy/plan-to-merge-usc-and-prsi-could-shrink-tax-revenue-by-1bn-plus-report-warns-1.4044322). If we halved income tax receipts (working that out to a higher threshold percentage etc.. isn't going to happen, there would be hours of work in calculating that so we're just going to half the take) and we're going to abolish USC

    so thats 11.5 billion in income tax and 4 billion of USC evaporated , 15.5 billion in tax revenues gone back to the people who earned it.

    now for savings :
    also taking 2018 to make sure everything lines up, only talking about what we'd cut, by categories on the site :

    Social Protection :
    Working aged income supports -
    JSA - 1.84 billion - abolish it completely saving 1.84 billion
    One Parent family allowance - half saving 250 million
    Working age employment supports - Community employment program - 353 million
    Disability allowance - solve the fraud which we'll estimate at 25% - 400 million
    Child benefit - convert to a tax credit which is factored for in the reduction - 2.1 billion
    Rent supplement - 175 million
    free travel - no more working aged non disabled - 87 million halved to save 43.5 million

    Savings so far : 5.16 billion

    Health :
    Admin Sallaries- 30 million , based on that 4 health boards were made 1 we'll assume its overstaffed by 66% so we cut out 2/3rds - 20 million
    We spend 10.7 billion on the HSE, it doesn't break it down too well but lets assume we can make a 10% saving and get a cool billion out - 1 billion

    Savings so far : 6.18 billion

    Justice :
    456 million on 'justice and equality' most of the crap in there is nothing to do with justice - save 300 million

    Savings so far : 6.48 billion

    Agriculture
    Policy and strategy - 370 million of which most of it is grants and hogwash - 300 million savings

    Savings so far : 6.78 billion

    Debt Servicing and EU payments :

    2.58 billion to the EU - Half it saving 1.28 billion
    1.41 billion in non voted expenditure - cut 1 billion of it

    Savings so far : 9.06 billion

    Transport :

    Public service provision payment - 296 million - cut it all
    Tourism Ireland - 15 million - cut it all let failte do it

    Savings so far : 9.38 billion

    Other :

    Foreign affairs - 743 million of which 50 million is relevant to irelands economic growth - saving 693 million
    Broadcasting - 253 million , I think thats all for RTE, cull it all.
    culture, heratige and Gaeltacht - cut 50 million out of all those quangos
    Housing - 1.98 billion , drop it to 1 billion
    Finance - collection of taxes and duties - 425 mil, half it, 212.5 million

    savings : 12.33 billion total.

    so we could scrap USC completely and get most of the way to halfing our income tax take , making the working people of Ireland much happier, and making us a better nation.


  • Registered Users Posts: 900 ✭✭✭sameoldname


    savings : 12.33 billion total.

    so we could scrap USC completely and get most of the way to halfing our income tax take , making the working people of Ireland much happier, and making us a better nation.

    So, 10's of thousands homeless, 10's of thousands out of work, €12 billion in domestic spending gone so the country is in recession and we've been kicked out of the EU so no more multinationals to drag us back out...

    Well, you'll get your cheap housing anyway that's for sure.


  • Registered Users Posts: 26,280 ✭✭✭✭Eric Cartman


    So, 10's of thousands homeless, 10's of thousands out of work, €12 billion in domestic spending gone so the country is in recession and we've been kicked out of the EU so no more multinationals to drag us back out...

    Well, you'll get your cheap housing anyway that's for sure.

    you should get an olympic medal for that jump to conclusions.

    Back up your numbers as to how many additional homeless people we'd have, job losses and how we'd be kicked out of the EU ?

    Also you forget completely that we're putting 12 billion back into taxpayers pockets... are all of them going to just shove it all in a savings account and do nothing with it ? not a chance. They'd spur a much larger spend and boost the economy.


  • Registered Users Posts: 900 ✭✭✭sameoldname


    you should get an olympic medal for that jump to conclusions.

    Back up your numbers as to how many additional homeless people we'd have, job losses and how we'd be kicked out of the EU ?

    Also you forget completely that we're putting 12 billion back into taxpayers pockets... are all of them going to just shove it all in a savings account and do nothing with it ? not a chance. They'd spur a much larger spend and boost the economy.

    Unless you've found a new method of economics where taking away money from the poor, who have to spend basically all of their income to live and instead, giving it to the rich who (might) spend it on discretionary items, will lead to more spending in the overall economy, I'd say that you're talking nonsense.

    Never mind the public service cuts which make up about 60% of your "figures". You took 5 billion from welfare and 7 billion from other services. Let's say only half that figure is wages (it's likely more like 80% in the PS) at an average of €60,000 a year for an average employee, to save 3.5 billion a year is around 58,000 staff. They can't afford their mortgages or rent anymore, where are they supposed to find work quickly when there's that many of them competing against each other in the labour market? Along with the few hundred million you took out of rent supplement it's easily 10's of thousands in jobs and homeless.

    You said you'd halve our EU contributions unilaterally (more scrounging unsurprisingly), that's not an option the other 26 are going to allow hence no more EU membership.


  • Registered Users Posts: 26,280 ✭✭✭✭Eric Cartman


    Unless you've found a new method of economics where taking away money from the poor, who have to spend basically all of their income to live and instead, giving it to the rich who (might) spend it on discretionary items, will lead to more spending in the overall economy, I'd say that you're talking nonsense.

    Never mind the public service cuts which make up about 60% of your "figures". You took 5 billion from welfare and 7 billion from other services. Let's say only half that figure is wages (it's likely more like 80% in the PS) at an average of €60,000 a year for an average employee, to save 3.5 billion a year is around 58,000 staff. They can't afford their mortgages or rent anymore, where are they supposed to find work quickly when there's that many of them competing against each other in the labour market? Along with the few hundred million you took out of rent supplement it's easily 10's of thousands in jobs and homeless.

    You said you'd halve our EU contributions unilaterally (more scrounging unsurprisingly), that's not an option the other 26 are going to allow hence no more EU membership.

    people on welfare even spending 'all their money' are still detractors from the economy, giving that money back to every tax payer in the form of income tax cuts would absolutely lead to more spending, its not like living pay check to pay check just magically dissapears at 30k, we'd enable more people to make investments, to become landlords , to start companies, create jobs etc.. theres probably a balance in there between your doomsday prediction and my bright shiny new world prediction but there is definitely a lot to be said for putting money back in the hands of the working poor (<30k) the middle classes (30-250k) and the rich (250k + )

    every euro you give them back probably has more than a 50/50 chance of generating a job or growing the economy , every euro extra you give the welfare classes and the civil service just drowns that money out of the economy.


  • Registered Users Posts: 900 ✭✭✭sameoldname


    people on welfare even spending 'all their money' are still detractors from the economy, giving that money back to every tax payer in the form of income tax cuts would absolutely lead to more spending, its not like living pay check to pay check just magically dissapears at 30k, we'd enable more people to make investments, to become landlords , to start companies, create jobs etc.. theres probably a balance in there between your doomsday prediction and my bright shiny new world prediction but there is definitely a lot to be said for putting money back in the hands of the working poor (<30k) the middle classes (30-250k) and the rich (250k + )

    every euro you give them back probably has more than a 50/50 chance of generating a job or growing the economy , every euro extra you give the welfare classes and the civil service just drowns that money out of the economy.

    Halfway between those 2 extremes is basically the United States. You might want to look into how the middle class has been doing over there for the past few decades. You might also want to check when the middle class was at its most prosperous and what the highest rate of tax was at that time. It's enlightening.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 26,280 ✭✭✭✭Eric Cartman


    Halfway between those 2 extremes is basically the United States. You might want to look into how the middle class has been doing over there for the past few decades. You might also want to check when the middle class was at its most prosperous and what the highest rate of tax was at that time. It's enlightening.

    I knew eventually somebody would blame/bring up America.

    Ronald Raegans america was its greatest time, deregulation and low taxation.

    Ireland would do well to be more like america than Sweden anyway thats for sure. Not that it should be like either.


Advertisement