Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

What does the future hold for Donald Trump? - threadbans in OP

Options
1…169170172174175…1190

Comments

  • Options
    #5132
    Overheal
    Registered Users Posts: 83,033 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    [Deleted User] wrote: »
    Any reason why you're ignoring overheal's query about Gaetz?

    Because he sympathizes with a rotting dead terrorist and doesn’t want to acknowledge the mental incongruities between calling the rotting dead terrorist a 36 year old girl and Matt Gaetz paying for sex with a minor.


  • Options
    #5133
    Penn
    Registered Users Posts: 33,702 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    notobtuse wrote: »
    Are you saying I've learned from the best here?

    I don't know where you've learned what you have. I assume Trump University but I don't think anyone ever learned anything from there.


  • Options
    #5134
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    notobtuse wrote: »
    Are you saying I've learned from the best here?

    Oh I don't think the child at the back of the class with headphones on would learn anything no matter how good the teacher is.


  • Options
    #5135
    Tippex
    Registered Users Posts: 2,918 ✭✭✭Tippex


    I have now decided to just sit back and read the thread while eating popcorn.
    This is getting funnier by the day.
    We should look into making this a coffee table book I feel.


  • Options
    #5136
    notobtuse
    Registered Users Posts: 5,424 ✭✭✭notobtuse


    Tippex wrote: »
    I have now decided to just sit back and read the thread while eating popcorn.
    This is getting funnier by the day.
    We should look into making this a coffee table book I feel.
    I dunno, it seems to fit the charter... not quite lighthearted enough for After Hours, but not debate-worthy enough for the Politics Forum.

    You can ignorantly accuse me of "whataboutism," but what it really is involves identifying similar scenarios in order to see if it holds up when the shoe is on the other foot!



  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #5137
    Overheal
    Registered Users Posts: 83,033 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    notobtuse wrote: »
    I dunno, it seems to fit the charter... not quite lighthearted enough for After Hours, but not debate-worthy enough for the Politics Forum.

    That would require you to argue in good faith


  • Options
    #5138
    everlast75
    Registered Users Posts: 19,682 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    notobtuse wrote: »
    LOL... Congresswoman Liz Cheney (RINO) who was removed from her conference chair by House Republicans, and has an axe to grind against Trump and the GOP, is chosen by Pelosi to be in her witch-hunt investigation. Knock me over with a feather!!!!!

    *adds "use of the term "RINO"" to the list of things that rule out reasonable discussion*

    **then notes the use of the term "witch hunt" and nods understandingly**


  • Options
    #5139
    salmocab
    Registered Users Posts: 11,360 ✭✭✭✭salmocab


    everlast75 wrote: »
    *adds "use of the term "RINO"" to the list of things that rule out reasonable discussion*

    **then notes the use of the term "witch hunt" and nods understandingly**

    Did someone suggest that Liz Cheney is not a real Republican?


  • Options
    #5140
    Overheal
    Registered Users Posts: 83,033 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    salmocab wrote: »
    Did someone suggest that Liz Cheney is not a real Republican?

    Yes, notobtuse did upon learning she would be on the 1/6 committee.


  • Options
    #5141
    salmocab
    Registered Users Posts: 11,360 ✭✭✭✭salmocab


    Overheal wrote: »
    Yes, notobtuse did upon learning she would be on the 1/6 committee.

    Liz Cheney? Really?


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #5142
    TefalBrain
    Registered Users Posts: 710 ✭✭✭TefalBrain


    I think he'll run again next time out and win in a run off with Harris.


  • Options
    #5143
    mcmoustache
    Registered Users Posts: 7,236 ✭✭✭mcmoustache


    Anyone remember Jason Miller? The child-support shirking, abortion-pill slipping comms staffer from the Trump administration?

    He's just started a social media website of his own. The name is very fitting.

    https://twitter.com/DPRK_News/status/1410662749693263881


  • Options
    #5144
    Overheal
    Registered Users Posts: 83,033 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    mcmoustache wrote: »
    Anyone remember Jason Miller? The child-support shirking, abortion-pill slipping comms staffer from the Trump administration?

    He's just started a social media website of his own. The name is very fitting.

    https://twitter.com/DPRK_News/status/1410662749693263881

    Well when that endeavor falls apart and is Done the headline writes itself.


  • Options
    #5145
    pjohnson
    Registered Users Posts: 23,638 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    salmocab wrote: »
    Liz Cheney? Really?

    For some diehards The Republican Party IS The Trump Party.

    If you go against the noble leader you are a traitor.


  • Options
    #5146
    Overheal
    Registered Users Posts: 83,033 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    pjohnson wrote: »
    For some diehards The Republican Party IS The Trump Party.

    If you go against the noble leader you are a traitor.

    You mean to say for them the Party is the Country. Some of these people have gone well into 1984 turf.


  • Options
    #5147
    Igotadose
    Registered Users Posts: 13,518 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    TefalBrain wrote: »
    I think he'll run again next time out and win in a run off with Harris.

    Run off? What's that?


  • Options
    #5148
    Overheal
    Registered Users Posts: 83,033 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Igotadose wrote: »
    Run off? What's that?

    That’s the 2 years of fake recounts they do after Biden wins again


  • Options
    #5149
    notobtuse
    Registered Users Posts: 5,424 ✭✭✭notobtuse


    Mmmm... NY... Forget the Big Apple stuff, it’s where we'll weaponize prosecutorial power to target a hated republican we loath. Hey, if all else fails go with a technical accounting issues about how to classify fringe benefits.


    "One way, or another, I'm gonna find ya
    I'm gonna get ya get ya get ya get ya!"

    You can ignorantly accuse me of "whataboutism," but what it really is involves identifying similar scenarios in order to see if it holds up when the shoe is on the other foot!



  • Options
    #5150
    mcmoustache
    Registered Users Posts: 7,236 ✭✭✭mcmoustache


    notobtuse wrote: »
    Mmmm... NY... Forget the Big Apple stuff, it’s where we'll weaponize prosecutorial power to target a hated republican we loath. Hey, if all else fails go with a technical accounting issues about how to classify fringe benefits.


    "One way, or another, I'm gonna find ya
    I'm gonna get ya get ya get ya get ya!"


    This doesn't seem to have anything to do with Trump himself. He's in the clear, I think. Unindicted Co-conspirator #1, on the other hand, should probably be worried but that could be anyone.


    On or before April 5, 2010, the Trump Corporation, acting through its agent, Unindicted Co-conspirator #1, underreported Allen Weisselberg's taxable income for the tax year 2009.


  • Options
    #5151
    ohnonotgmail
    Registered Users Posts: 40,437 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    notobtuse wrote: »
    Mmmm... NY... Forget the Big Apple stuff, it’s where we'll weaponize prosecutorial power to target a hated republican we loath. Hey, if all else fails go with a technical accounting issues about how to classify fringe benefits.


    "One way, or another, I'm gonna find ya
    I'm gonna get ya get ya get ya get ya!"

    technical accounting issues AKA tax fraud.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #5152
    Overheal
    Registered Users Posts: 83,033 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    notobtuse wrote: »
    Mmmm... NY... Forget the Big Apple stuff, it’s where we'll weaponize prosecutorial power to target a hated republican we loath. Hey, if all else fails go with a technical accounting issues about how to classify fringe benefits.


    "One way, or another, I'm gonna find ya
    I'm gonna get ya get ya get ya get ya!"

    Such melodramatic over reaction. Trump hasn’t been named in the indictment has he?

    Trump set up shop in New York, and his organization and his CFO committed crimes there. So New York is prosecuting. New York has a long history of prosecuting and suing Trump, decades of it, long before he ever called himself a Republican even, and long before most people bothered to like or dislike him. Your faux outrage doesn’t track with reality.


  • Options
    #5153
    ohnonotgmail
    Registered Users Posts: 40,437 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    mcmoustache wrote: »
    This doesn't seem to have anything to do with Trump himself. He's in the clear, I think. Unindicted Co-conspirator #1, on the other hand, should probably be worried but that could be anyone.

    yeah that Unindicted Co-conspirator #1 guy is the one that is really in trouble. I wouldn't like to be that guy.


  • Options
    #5154
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    notobtuse wrote: »
    Mmmm... NY... Forget the Big Apple stuff, it’s where we'll weaponize prosecutorial power to target a hated republican we loath. Hey, if all else fails go with a technical accounting issues about how to classify fringe benefits.


    "One way, or another, I'm gonna find ya
    I'm gonna get ya get ya get ya get ya!"

    Weren't you saying the other day that you were fine with Weisselburg being prosecuted but now cause Trump is implicated, you're annoyed. It's like just want to ignore criminal behavior.


  • Options
    #5155
    Cody montana
    Registered Users Posts: 5,297 ✭✭✭Cody montana


    notobtuse wrote: »
    Mmmm... NY... Forget the Big Apple stuff, it’s where we'll weaponize prosecutorial power to target a hated republican we loath. Hey, if all else fails go with a technical accounting issues about how to classify fringe benefits.


    "One way, or another, I'm gonna find ya
    I'm gonna get ya get ya get ya get ya!"

    Were you not complaining about crime a few days ago?

    Maga: Tough on crime.
    Also maga: No, not that crime, witch-hunt!


  • Options
    #5156
    Faugheen
    Site Banned Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭Faugheen


    Lol, I see this thread continues to go from strength to strength.


  • Options
    #5157
    mcmoustache
    Registered Users Posts: 7,236 ✭✭✭mcmoustache


    Deleted User wrote: »
    Weren't you saying the other day that you were fine with Weisselburg being prosecuted but now cause Trump is implicated, you're annoyed. It's like just want to ignore criminal behavior.


    I don't think he's implicated yet. According to more knowledgeable people than myself, it's Trump org exec Jeff McConney.


  • Options
    #5158
    notobtuse
    Registered Users Posts: 5,424 ✭✭✭notobtuse


    ohnonotgmail wrote: »
    technical accounting issues AKA tax fraud.

    I think it is a common occurrence among most closely held corporations. I have no problem with them going after Trump if they go after the other corporations in their jurisdiction for the same thing. But to target the Trump organization because the Manhattan DA hates Trump with a passion and seemingly has put so much of his offices time and effort targeting him in order to get him any way possible is just wrong.

    You can ignorantly accuse me of "whataboutism," but what it really is involves identifying similar scenarios in order to see if it holds up when the shoe is on the other foot!



  • Options
    #5159
    Overheal
    Registered Users Posts: 83,033 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    notobtuse wrote: »
    I think it is a common occurrence among most closely held corporations. I have no problem with them going after Trump if they go after the other corporations in their jurisdiction for the same thing. But to target the Trump organization because the Manhattan DA hates Trump with a passion and seemingly has put so much of his offices time and effort targeting him in order to get him any way possible is just wrong.

    Good thing that's only happening in your mind.


  • Options
    #5160
    ohnonotgmail
    Registered Users Posts: 40,437 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    notobtuse wrote: »
    I think it is a common occurrence among most closely held corporations. I have no problem with them going after Trump if they go after the other corporations in their jurisdiction for the same thing. But to target the Trump organization because the Manhattan DA hates Trump with a passion and seemingly has put so much of his offices time and effort targeting him in order to get him any way possible is just wrong.

    you think they ignore evidence of tax fraud when they come across it? do you have anything to backup that assertion?


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #5161
    Penn
    Registered Users Posts: 33,702 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    notobtuse wrote: »
    I think it is a common occurrence among most closely held corporations. I have no problem with them going after Trump if they go after the other corporations in their jurisdiction for the same thing. But to target the Trump organization because the Manhattan DA hates Trump with a passion and seemingly has put so much of his offices time and effort targeting him in order to get him any way possible is just wrong.

    Part of the evidence for this case has come from previous investigations into the likes of Michael Cohen and the Trump Foundation. Trump's claims while running for President the first time, including those relating to his payments to the likes of Stormy Daniels, raised reg flags which warranted investigations.

    Trump has, through six degrees of separation, f*cked himself.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement