What does the future hold for Donald Trump? - threadbans in OP

Tony EH

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

he will be on trial in the senate for insurrection or some such. I'm not sure where his history of being a massive liar feeds into that.

I'm not sure what the problem is here.

He's being accused of certain things. Certain things he is denying. His accusers "know" he's lying about this. But they have to prove that.

Of course his entire litany of lies won't be the focus. But it plays into the proceedings that are underway.

Knowing that someone is lying about something means nothing really. Proving that they are a liar is the important part, if anything is to be done beyond the accusation.

everlast75

https://twitter.com/mkraju/status/1357391055675621382?s=19

They should taunt him. This might work

https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1357393517610299393?s=19

everlast75

Another big law suit against Trump's minions...

https://twitter.com/carlquintanilla/status/1357389914116141061?s=19

Galwayguy35

Would be gas if he ran as an independant in 2024 and got in.

duploelabs

Galwayguy35 wrote: »

Would be gas if he ran as an independant in 2024 and got in.

Aw bless

everlast75

https://twitter.com/Acosta/status/1357411918919700491?s=19

Not a joke letter... well intentionally anyway.

Petulant little ****.

everlast75

Reminded me of a certain poster on here...

https://twitter.com/sarahnferris/status/1357387418014515203?s=19

TheRepentent

everlast75 wrote: »

https://twitter.com/Acosta/status/1357411918919700491?s=19

Not a joke letter... well intentionally anyway.

Petulant little ****.

Ah so that's why he earned the moniker ManBaby Trump

He really is a fukking idiot.

Galwayguy35

duploelabs wrote: »

Aw bless

People said the same last time, don't write anything off.

PropJoe10

Galwayguy35 wrote: »

Would be gas if he ran as an independant in 2024 and got in.

He'd get about a million votes, straight out of the looney bin.

Tell me how

Galwayguy35 wrote: »

People said the same last time, don't write anything off.

There's been quite a bit of water under the bridge since then don't you think? None of it which makes the thought of him being President again bit more likely.

Tippex

everlast75 wrote: »

https://twitter.com/mkraju/status/1357391055675621382?s=19

They should taunt him. This might work

https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1357393517610299393?s=19

And he has apparently rejected the opportunity to appear.

everlast75

Tippex wrote: »

And he has apparently rejected the opportunity to appear.

His lawyers are doing a good job restraining.

A bit more taunting by the dems during the week and we may have a change of mind...

jimmycrackcorm

Galwayguy35 wrote: »

Would be gas if he ran as an independant in 2024 and got in.

Against a Democratic incumbent and also against a nominated GOP candidate. How?

ohnonotgmail

everlast75 wrote: »

https://twitter.com/Acosta/status/1357411918919700491?s=19

Not a joke letter... well intentionally anyway.

Petulant little ****.

Classy as always.

everlast75

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

Classy as always.

The "you aren't breaking up with me - I'm breaking up with you!" line...

Tell me how

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

Classy as always.

everlast75 wrote: »

The "you aren't breaking up with me - I'm breaking up with you!" line...

Yeah, nothing screams 'I don't care' like going to the effort of writing a letter to someone who is about to cut ties with you.

everlast75

This one has officially drunk the kool aid...

https://twitter.com/PossiblyBanksy/status/1357411759351603201?s=19

briany

There must be a coffee table book to be made out of petty, vindictive written correspondence from Trump (excluding his tweets).

Quin_Dub

Galwayguy35 wrote: »

Would be gas if he ran as an independant in 2024 and got in.

God almighty himself could run as an Independent in the US and he wouldn't crack 20% of the vote.

GOP or DEM those are the choices, end of story.

duploelabs

Galwayguy35 wrote: »

People said the same last time, don't write anything off.

The last time? In 2020? When he got resoundly beaten, even with the backing of a major party? I'm still waiting for this silent majority, are the coming in the next couple of weeks?

Professor Moriarty

everlast75 wrote: »

This one has officially drunk the kool aid...

https://twitter.com/PossiblyBanksy/status/1357411759351603201?s=19

This is a woman who wears a cross around her neck. Wonder what the evangelicals made of that genitalia grab. Come to think of it, if they are happy for The Donald to grab genitalia then they should be happy for Madeline to pretend to grab The Donald's genitalia. I note that she has small hands.

Galwayguy35

jimmycrackcorm wrote: »

Against a Democratic incumbent and also against a nominated GOP candidate. How?

Quin_Dub wrote: »

God almighty himself could run as an Independent in the US and he wouldn't crack 20% of the vote.

GOP or DEM those are the choices, end of story.

duploelabs wrote: »

The last time? In 2020? When he got resoundly beaten, even with the backing of a major party? I'm still waiting for this silent majority, are the coming in the next couple of weeks?

Calm down boys its not likely to happen.

duploelabs

Galwayguy35 wrote: »

Calm down boys its not likely to happen.

So you're talking bollix then in your initial post

Northernlily

Just watched Marjorie Taylor Greenes speech yesterday and some of the comments she previously made.

I can only surmise that these people see an opportunity to profit from broadcasting mistruths. There is money to be made on the grift.

It's uncanny and shameless how far she rolled back yesterday.

everlast75

Northernlily wrote: »

Just watched Marjorie Taylor Greenes speech yesterday and some of the comments she previously made.

I can only surmise that these people see an opportunity to profit from broadcasting mistruths. There is money to be made on the grift.

It's uncanny and shameless how far she rolled back yesterday.

There's a lot of money out there for these lunatics.

Hawley has raised record money since he started acting the a hole.

randd1

Northernlily wrote: »

Just watched Marjorie Taylor Greenes speech yesterday and some of the comments she previously made.

I can only surmise that these people see an opportunity to profit from broadcasting mistruths. There is mone to be made on the grift.

It's uncanny and shameless how far she rolled back yesterday.

And today we have the Republican representative of the present and future!!

A complete conspiracy theory nutbag, fuelled by racist, ultra-religious, anti-science, pseudo (or full) fascist supporting and completely hypocritical and cult like rhetoric. A perfect fit for the Republican party!!

So vote for your Republican today.

And remember, when you vote Republican, you'll receive a free bible and a gun, because to keep America a true America, you either believe what the Bible tells you to believe, or we shoot you until you believe.

Jesus, Guns and the USA.

Chris_Heilong

Time magazine has an article basically admitting that Big tech, activist groups, media groups and democrats' all met up thinking Trump had a really strong chance of winning and so "conspired" to make sure Trump would not win, this included purposely changing voting laws, using left wing protestors strategically and banning certain voices online. It is shocking how Time are laying it all out and naming all those involved like it is a good thing. They frame it as protecting democracy but by reading it the impression I get is anything but. Free and fair election my ass.

https://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/

everlast75

Chris_Heilong wrote: »

Time magazine has an article basically admitting that Big tech, activist groups, media groups and democrats' all met up thinking Trump had a really strong chance of winning and so "conspired" to make sure Trump would not win, this included purposely changing voting laws, using left wing protestors strategically and banning certain voices online. It is shocking how Time are laying it all out and naming all those involved like it is a good thing. They frame it as protecting democracy but by reading it the impression I get is anything but. Free and fair election my ass.

https://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/

Professor Moriarty

Chris_Heilong wrote: »

Time magazine has an article basically admitting that Big tech, activist groups, media groups and democrats' all met up thinking Trump had a really strong chance of winning and so "conspired" to make sure Trump would not win, this included purposely changing voting laws, using left wing protestors strategically and banning certain voices online. It is shocking how Time are laying it all out and naming all those involved like it is a good thing. They frame it as protecting democracy but by reading it the impression I get is anything but. Free and fair election my ass.

https://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/

From the article:


Both sides would come to see it as a sort of implicit bargain–inspired by the summer’s massive, sometimes destructive racial-justice protests–in which the forces of labor came together with the forces of capital to keep the peace and oppose Trump’s assault on democracy. The handshake between business and labor was just one component of a vast, cross-partisan campaign to protect the election–an extraordinary shadow effort dedicated not to winning the vote but to ensuring it would be free and fair, credible and uncorrupted.

And:

For Trump and his allies were running their own campaign to spoil the election. The President spent months insisting that mail ballots were a Democratic plot and the election would be “rigged.” His henchmen at the state level sought to block their use, while his lawyers brought dozens of spurious suits to make it more difficult to vote–an intensification of the GOP’s legacy of suppressive tactics. Before the election, Trump plotted to block a legitimate vote count. And he spent the months following Nov. 3 trying to steal the election he’d lost–with lawsuits and conspiracy theories, pressure on state and local officials, and finally summoning his army of supporters to the Jan. 6 rally that ended in deadly violence at the Capitol.

And:

Bad actors spreading false information is nothing new. For decades, campaigns have grappled with everything from anonymous calls claiming the election has been rescheduled to fliers spreading nasty smears about candidates’ families. But Trump’s lies and conspiracy theories, the viral force of social media and the involvement of foreign meddlers made disinformation a broader, deeper threat to the 2020 vote.

And bipartisanship:

The 22 Democrats and 22 Republicans on the National Council on Election Integrity met on Zoom at least once a week.


Fair play to TIME. They laid out the bipartisan reasons and ways in which a dangerous authoritarian was prevented from destroying democracy in the US. Fair play to you for posting the article.