What does the future hold for Donald Trump? - threadbans in OP

ohnonotgmail

iagreebut wrote: »

I asked did anyone see the clip ?

It's self explanatory, maybe watch it and your own opinion should be enough

I trust that you have the ability to make up your own mind , after all you're well up in American politics, I'm only an observing layman.

It's hard to make head or tail out of American politics, because both Democrats and Republicans mean well.
But it seems like the Democrats have been influenced by identity politics, liberals and social justice warriors.

A lot of these liberals and SJWs are out to destroy civilization and looking for equal rights and justice for all, but yet they're not willing to help or work for a living.
They wake up wondering how they'll get through the day and get offended.
I know some here in Ireland and they're just sad depressed individuals, white knight types who are not adding anything to society,all they want is to take take take..

And all they need is good therapy an education and a job..

I asked you for your opinion of the clip you dumped. you seem reluctant to provide it for some reason.

iagreebut

iagreebut wrote: »

I asked did anyone see the clip ?

It's self explanatory, maybe watch it and your own opinion should be enough

You dumped a video without explaining what it was or why you dumped it. Would you like to explain what the relevance of the video is to this thread? Have you read the thread title?

francois

iagreebut wrote: »

I asked did anyone see the clip ?

It's self explanatory, maybe watch it and your own opinion should be enough

I trust that you have the ability to make up your own mind , after all you're well up in American politics, I'm only an observing layman.

It's hard to make head or tail out of American politics, because both Democrats and Republicans mean well.
But it seems like the Democrats have been influenced by identity politics, liberals and social justice warriors.

A lot of these liberals and SJWs are out to destroy civilization and looking for equal rights and justice for all, but yet they're not willing to help or work for a living.
They wake up wondering how they'll get through the day and get offended.
I know some here in Ireland and they're just sad depressed individuals, white knight types who are not adding anything to society,all they want is to take take take..

And all they need is good therapy an education and a job..

Alt right bingo buzzwords

joe40

iagreebut wrote: »

I asked did anyone see the clip ?

It's self explanatory, maybe watch it and your own opinion should be enough

I trust that you have the ability to make up your own mind , after all you're well up in American politics, I'm only an observing layman.

It's hard to make head or tail out of American politics, because both Democrats and Republicans mean well.
But it seems like the Democrats have been influenced by identity politics, liberals and social justice warriors.

A lot of these liberals and SJWs are out to destroy civilization and looking for equal rights and justice for all, but yet they're not willing to help or work for a living.
They wake up wondering how they'll get through the day and get offended.
I know some here in Ireland and they're just sad depressed individuals, white knight types who are not adding anything to society,all they want is to take take take..

And all they need is good therapy an education and a job..

"Out to destroy civilisation and looking for equal rights and justice for all"
So equal rights and justice for all is a bad thing...

duploelabs

stefanovich wrote: »

Maybe you guys should stop piling on and insulting and ridiculing people with opinions other than yours. This place is toxic and it's because of that kind of behaviour.

You call me stupid but I feel like I am back in primary school. Grow up.

You state your opinions as 'fact' and then ignore correctional posts or questions debunking them. It's just bad faith and those post will be ridicule until you cite and debate like normal people do

osarusan

stefanovich wrote: »

Graphic designer made an error that just happened to change the date from a year before the capitol attack to days before. Interesting error. I’d like to see the graphic designer in question admit that under oath. All we have to go on at the moment is your guess.

Stefanovich, any response at all to this post of mine?

osarusan wrote: »

This is where you are going wrong. The correct date of the tweet is Jan 03 2021. You can see the original right here - it's still available on twitter and the date and time is at the bottom of the tweet:



https://twitter.com/JenLawrence21/status/1345600194826686464


Trump then retweeted her tweet - his retweet is no longer available as Twitter suspended his account.


She then thanked Trump for his retweet - you can see her second tweet/reply by scrolling down the link i provided above.


It seems you are under the impression that her tweet, Trump's retweet, and her reply, all actually happened in 2020 and the 'falsification' involves the impeachment managers trying to trick people into believing it happened in 2021.


But that is incorrect. the link to her tweet I've provided above makes it clear that her interaction with Trump took place on Jan 03 2021.


In this image: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Et5aedzVkAENZga?format=jpg&name=orig


The only thing that is incorrect is that she should not have a blue tick mark beside her name. The rest - times, dates, years, are all correct.

stefanovich

stefanovich wrote: »

It's always implied or subtle or underhanded. Or they'll pile on and wind you up and then report. It's a tactic. This place is a ****hole.

This seems more like you avoiding answering points in response to you. Basically you're avoiding the discussion and coming out with outlandish claims. When people debunk your points, you ignore the responses and go on rants like the above.

duploelabs

stefanovich wrote: »

Oh no?

Was I addressing you in that post?

Leroy42

Kermit.de.frog wrote: »

Had several US cities not been trashed, behaviour actively abetted by local democrat mayors and institutions, Trump would have been convicted and he would be gone.

As it is now he is still there, he and his supporters are emboldened, and he is going to run.

That's the be all and end all of it.

So you think that possibly the GOP senators thought Trump was guilty but voted against that because Democrats hadn't done enough to quieten the BLM riots?

That is your position?

You do realise that that gives pretty much anybody an excuse to do anything. Hell one could argue that the BLM were perfectly reasonable given the historic racial injustices across USA.

So you are basing your excuse of the GOP on the basis that the Democrats didn't all out, enough for plenty of them did, the protests and riots which under your own moral settings were perfectly justified as they were only doing what others had down before them.

iagreebut

joe40 wrote: »

"Out to destroy civilisation and looking for equal rights and justice for all"
So equal rights and justice for all is a bad thing...

That's your interpretation of my post, so you're putting words into my mouth trying to do my thinking for me.

Equal rights is a good thing, but we all need to contribute to society to our best ability.

Why do you think equal rights and justice for all is a bad thing ???
Is it not a good thing ?

I think you're twisting my post's to suit your story.

Why do you think the liberals and SJWs are burning down cities and people's businesses, they're like packs of dog's roaming around with their anger and frustration.

Have you seen the movie Gang's of New York ?

Well that's what could happen if it gets out of hand, something similar happened already.

A bunch of rag tags and crusty btchs trying to retake the streets, lol and some of them growing a veg patch in their patch for sustainability, no compost and no proper organic matter lol

Come on if that's not dragging the good name of Democracy through the mire, what is ?

You're the one who suggested that justice for all and equal rights is a bad thing, not I

Princess Consuela Bananahammock

iagreebut wrote: »

Why do you think the liberals and SJWs are burning down cities and people's businesses, they're like packs of dog's roaming around with their anger and frustration.

Can you please point out one incident where liberals have burnt down a city? Or SJWs for that matter (and I hate those gob****es as mich as most people)?

And this not twisting your words, it's a direct quote.

joe40

iagreebut wrote: »

That's your interpretation of my post, so you're putting words into my mouth trying to do my thinking for me.

Equal rights is a good thing, but we all need to contribute to society to our best ability.

Why do you think equal rights and justice for all is a bad thing ???
Is it not a good thing ?

I think you're twisting my post's to suit your story.

Why do you think the liberals and SJWs are burning down cities and people's businesses, they're like packs of dog's roaming around with their anger and frustration.

Have you seen the movie Gang's of New York ?

Well that's what could happen if it gets out of hand, something similar happened already.

A bunch of rag tags and crusty btchs trying to retake the streets, lol and some of them growing a veg patch in their patch for sustainability, no compost and no proper organic matter lol

Come on if that's not dragging the good name of Democracy through the mire, what is ?

You're the one who suggested that justice for all and equal rights is a bad thing, not I

"Rag tags and crusty btchs trying to retake the streets lol" and then something about growing vegetables.

I have no intention of engaging with nonsense like that.

I have no problem with a Trump supporter expressing an opinion, that is what this forum is about. But with hate filled bile like that I don't think there is much to discuss.

And no I'm all for equality and justice, by the way. I don't see it as destroying the world.

rossie1977

iagreebut wrote: »

I'm not a Trump or a Biden supporter..

OK

iagreebut wrote: »

But it seems like the Democrats have been influenced by identity politics, liberals and social justice warriors.

A lot of these liberals and SJWs are out to destroy civilization and looking for equal rights and justice for all, but yet they're not willing to help or work for a living.

iagreebut wrote: »

Why do you think the liberals and SJWs are burning down cities and people's businesses, they're like packs of dog's roaming around with their anger and frustration.

Seems to check out..

iagreebut

Princess Consuela Bananahammock wrote: »

Can you please point out one incident where liberals have burnt down a city? Or SJWs for that matter (and I hate those gob****es as mich as most people)?

And this not twisting your words, it's a direct quote.

They didn't burn down a whole city, ok maybe I exaggerated my post too much.

But all those people rioting and damaging people's property in the riots are social justice warriors. And they're all pretending to be Democrats and liberals.

They're pretending they're Democrat supporter's but in reality they're just thugs, pretending it's political.

Like I said before the sooner the Democrats distance themselves from these cretins the better.
Internment should be brought to control violent protester's, whether you're a proud boy, SJW or right wing militia, if you're obstructive to society and culture you're just a piece of sh1t and have nothing to add for the good and all.

Violence and lack of self control is for pussies, responsible women and men don't need to create chaos.

iagreebut

rossie1977 wrote: »

OK








Seems to check out..

Read the above post Rossie, I'm trying to bridge the gap here, I think you have an Idea about bridge's and mileage

everlast75

iagreebut wrote: »

They didn't burn down a whole city, ok maybe I exaggerated my post too much.

But all those people rioting and damaging people's property in the riots are social justice warriors. And they're all pretending to be Democrats and liberals.

They're pretending they're Democrat supporter's but in reality they're just thugs, pretending it's political.

Like I said before the sooner the Democrats distance themselves from these cretins the better.
Internment should be brought to control violent protester's, whether you're a proud boy, SJW or right wing militia, if you're obstructive to society and culture you're just a piece of sh1t and have nothing to add for the good and all.

Violence and lack of self control is for pussies, responsible women and men don't need to create chaos.

I don't agree with rioting for black life injustice, but I sure as **** understand it.

They are told you cannot kneel to protest.

You cannot march.

You cannot have a sit down protest.

You cannot canvas that a company be boycotted.

You are gerrymandered so your vote doesn't count.

You are targeted with voter suppression techniques.

You see people getting brutalised or murdered by cops, and you see those cops walk free.

So, yes - they should not be rioting. But things shouldn't have gotten this bad for them. This didn't happen overnight. There have been decades for the balance to be corrected and nothing has been done. Don't blame the reaction, blame the provocation.

Tell me how

iagreebut wrote: »

They didn't burn down a whole city, ok maybe I exaggerated my post too much.

But all those people rioting and damaging people's property in the riots are social justice warriors. And they're all pretending to be Democrats and liberals.

They're pretending they're Democrat supporter's but in reality they're just thugs, pretending it's political.

Like I said before the sooner the Democrats distance themselves from these cretins the better.
Internment should be brought to control violent protester's, whether you're a proud boy, SJW or right wing militia, if you're obstructive to society and culture you're just a piece of sh1t and have nothing to add for the good and all.

Violence and lack of self control is for pussies, responsible women and men don't need to create chaos.

Note the title of the thread, and what happened on January 6th.

The vast majority of protests related to BLM were peaceful and attended by people sick of the continued disproportionate treatment of one sector of society at the hands of those paid with public money to keep them safe.

There were some people pretending to be liberals responsible for violence all right.

Link

Umbrella Man: Minneapolis police link suspect to white supremacists


Police in Minneapolis say a man known as "Umbrella Man", seen damaging property in the city during the Black Lives Matter protests, has links to white supremacy groups.

iagreebut

Tell me how wrote: »

Note the title of the thread, and what happened on January 6th.

The vast majority of protests related to BLM were peaceful and attended by people sick of the continued disproportionate treatment of one sector of society at the hands of those paid with public money to keep them safe.

There were some people pretending to be liberals responsible for violence all right.

Link

Ok we're getting somewhere now, we all agree that it's the trouble maker's who are responsible for the violence and destruction of people's property and businesses.

Not the people who are having a peaceful protest.

So is it a better solution for the peaceful protestors to distance themselves from the chaos and bad people dragging their cause through the mud.

Good Democrats and Conservative people don't want to hurt others, they just want to get on with their lives, work hard and support their loved ones.

Necro

Mod:

Knock off the bickering, all of you. Standard of posting in here is shocking.

Princess Consuela Bananahammock

iagreebut wrote: »

They didn't burn down a whole city, ok maybe I exaggerated my post too much.

But all those people rioting and damaging people's property in the riots are social justice warriors. And they're all pretending to be Democrats and liberals.

They're pretending they're Democrat supporter's but in reality they're just thugs, pretending it's political.

Like I said before the sooner the Democrats distance themselves from these cretins the better.
Internment should be brought to control violent protester's, whether you're a proud boy, SJW or right wing militia, if you're obstructive to society and culture you're just a piece of sh1t and have nothing to add for the good and all.

Violence and lack of self control is for pussies, responsible women and men don't need to create chaos.

This is my point: you have to exaggerate things in order to make a case.

And you don't even seem to now what "liberal" means - you're lumping in an entire ethos to try and attack one pre-set enemy.

If I said "conservatives are bunring down democracy" would you think it a fair reflection on convservatism?

So suddenly "liberals are burning down cities" looks like a really stupid and ignorant thing to post.

Princess Consuela Bananahammock

iagreebut wrote: »

Ok we're getting somewhere now, we all agree that it's the trouble maker's who are responsible for the violence and destruction of people's property and businesses.

Not the people who are having a peaceful protest.

So is it a better solution for the peaceful protestors to distance themselves from the chaos and bad people dragging their cause through the mud.

Good Democrats and Conservative people don't want to hurt others, they just want to get on with their lives, work hard and support their loved ones.

Now the porblem there is the infiltrators. I agree with you, but there have been proven cases of white supremicists infiltraiting BLM and getting them blame for the violence ("umbrella man"), and accusations of antifa infiltrating the June 6 insurrections.

Another is police bias. There was a much smaller police presence on Jan 6 than on previous demonstrations and some of the accused are memebrs of other police forces and even the milirtary.

partyguinness

Far too much labelling and attempts at pigeonholing going on here...

It is not as neat and tidy as "Liberals v Conservatism"; "Trump v Biden"; "Republican v Democrat; "BLM v Neo Nazis"; "Black v White" or whatever.

Life and social issues are never that clearcut.

partyguinness

partyguinness wrote: »

Far too much labelling and attempts at pigeonholing going on here...

It is not as neat and tidy as "Liberals v Conservatism"; "Trump v Biden"; "Republican v Democrat; "BLM v Neo Nazis"; "Black v White" or whatever.

Life and social issues are never that clearcut.

I actually think Trump was pretty clear cut.... And in relation to comparing BLM to the insurrectionists, it amounts to a false equivocation.

maebee

Necro wrote: »

Mod:

Knock off the bickering, all of you. Standard of posting in here is shocking.

Agreed and unfollowed, for a while.

suicide_circus

Would a successful impeachment have killed off 'trumpism'?

everlast75

https://twitter.com/JakeSherman/status/1361408622870290434?s=19

Looking forward to this...

MisterAnarchy

everlast75 wrote: »

Looking forward to this...

She just cant let it go.

She really gives the Democrats a bad name.

extra gravy

MisterAnarchy wrote: »

She just cant let it go.

She really gives the Democrats a bad name.

The commission has bi-partisan support, guess the Republicans can't let it go either.

Tell me how

MisterAnarchy wrote: »

She just cant let it go.

She really gives the Democrats a bad name.

This is what Mitch McConnell said should happen...

MisterAnarchy

Tell me how wrote: »

This is what Mitch McConnell said should happen...

She is mad for blood and power.

The state of her on Saturday, when the impeachment managers were giving their press conference and she came blazing across the room and started ranting and raving.

https://twitter.com/nbcbayarea/status/1360721683032793088