Joe Biden Presidency thread *Please read OP - Threadbanned Users Added 4/5/21*

Cody montana

Deleted User wrote: »

Just to white republicans, not to actual latinos.

Or anyone else.

Brian?

WhomadeGod wrote: »

https://twitter.com/mdleslie/status/1408195869736722436?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1408195869736722436%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fd-27221779552664336686.ampproject.net%2F2106120107000%2Fframe.html

Hispanic Community not entirely happy with a term President Biden used during his speech yesterday.

The Hispanic community aren't happy? Did you conduct a poll?

What do you think of what he said?

Brian?

biko wrote: »

This person was the physician for Obama, and as you say for Trump.
Are you saying Obama's and Trump's doctor cannot be trusted? Do you have evidence to the contrary?

You're doing the point here. Ronny is a GOP congressman. He is neither impartial or unbiased.

His status as a doctor is pretty irrelevant

Brian?

Cody montana wrote: »

Erm, hello, is Latinx racist?

Nope.

I know a Mexica dude he insists he's not Latino though. He says he's Hispanic because his ancestors were Spanish and not native American.

It's a complete minefield

Manic Moran

Deleted User wrote: »

Just to white republicans, not to actual latinos.

My wife doesn’t think it’s racist. Just stupid. She doesn’t use it; as far as she’s concerned, she’s a proud Latina and sees no reason to “x”ify herself or anyone else. The Wiki article seems to indicate her position is far from a minority.

Our guess it’s a case of anglos attempting to modify a term to simply fit into the construct of a language which does not put genders into the noun.

Manic Moran

Manic Moran wrote: »

My wife doesn’t think it’s racist. Just stupid. She doesn’t use it; as far as she’s concerned, she’s a proud Latina and sees no reason to “x”ify herself or anyone else. The Wiki article seems to indicate her position is far from a minority.

Our guess it’s a case of anglos attempting to modify a term to simply fit into the construct of a language which does not put genders into the noun.

Yeah only 3% of U.S. Hispanics actually use the term.

Still, as you say, it doesn't mean it's an offensive or racist term.

Tony EH

Cody montana wrote: »

Erm, hello, is Latinx racist?

Only to people who are so, SO, desperate to try an pin anything they can on Boring Biden because "their guy" went down harder than a sack of spuds...even if it makes them look completely ridiculous in the process.

duploelabs

Tony EH wrote: »

Only to people who are so, SO, desperate to try an pin anything they can on Boring Biden because "their guy" went down harder than a sack of spuds...even if it makes them look completely ridiculous in the process.

Nah, simply it's accuse other for what you are guilty of yourself

Sweetemotion

At this stage. I think Biden could shoot someone on Fifth Ave and the zealots would still vote for him.

Sweetemotion

Sweetemotion wrote: »

At this stage. I think Biden could shoot someone on Fifth Ave and the zealots would still vote for him.

Care to point to his outrageous behavior? Just seeming like you're perpetually annoyed by anyone who isn't trump.

Brian?

Sweetemotion wrote: »

At this stage. I think Biden could shoot someone on Fifth Ave and the zealots would still vote for him.

Give over. That's a disgraceful attempt.

Professor Moriarty

Trump in 2016:

"I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody, and I wouldn't lose any voters, OK?"

astrofool

Sweetemotion wrote: »

At this stage. I think Biden could shoot someone on Fifth Ave and the zealots would still vote for him.

Do you think he could impersonate a disabled person first, or is it straight from nice competent president to shooting someone?

Cody montana

Sweetemotion wrote: »

At this stage. I think Biden could shoot someone on Fifth Ave and the zealots would still vote for him.

Did you hear he whispers?
Dreadful carry on.
Impeachment?

Sweetemotion

Cody montana wrote: »

Did you hear he whispers?
Dreadful carry on.
Impeachment?

I didn't hear that. what did he whisper?

Smee_Again

Sweetemotion wrote: »

I didn't hear that. what did he whisper?

No one knows, couldn’t hear him.

Sweetemotion

Sweetemotion wrote: »

I didn't hear that. what did he whisper?

"It's me Austin. It was me all along Austin."

I see Joseph is carrying on the proud American tradition of illegally bombing countries.

Igotadose

Economy starting to really hum. Productivity gains, job openings and some real wage growth all taking place. Inflation not a problem. Brilliant stewardship by Biden and his team. All comes down to the reopenings due to the vaccine rollout.

https://slate.com/business/2021/06/economy-optimism-inflation-wages-hiring-jobs.html

mcmoustache

Deleted User wrote: »

I see Joseph is carrying on the proud American tradition of illegally bombing countries.

Bombing countries and unconditional support for Israel are among the few areas in which you'll find bipartisan support. It's shíte all round but not unexpected.

Overheal

Igotadose wrote: »

Economy starting to really hum. Productivity gains, job openings and some real wage growth all taking place. Inflation not a problem. Brilliant stewardship by Biden and his team. All comes down to the reopenings due to the vaccine rollout.

https://slate.com/business/2021/06/economy-optimism-inflation-wages-hiring-jobs.html

Thanks Obama

mcmoustache

mcmoustache wrote: »

Bombing countries and unconditional support for Israel are among the few areas in which you'll find bipartisan support. It's shíte all round but not unexpected.

But that's a red line for me.

That's absolutely inexcusably and seeing as they've abandoned the constitution on everything else, Biden can literally stop it.

extra gravy

[Deleted User] wrote: »

But that's a red line for me.

That's absolutely inexcusably and seeing as they've abandoned the constitution on everything else, Biden can literally stop it.

What's your solution when US forces are attacked? Do nothing?

Overheal

extra gravy wrote: »

What's your solution when US forces are attacked? Do nothing?

And these were, to my knowledge, clean military targets, weapon and drone/drone-control facilities, and they were targeted because they launched attacks from those locations.

Biden complied with AUMF and the War Powers act.

extra gravy

extra gravy wrote: »

What's your solution when US forces are attacked? Do nothing?

When US forces are attacked where?

extra gravy

[Deleted User] wrote: »

When US forces are attacked where?

The latest airstrikes were on facilities used by Iranian backed militia that conducted drone strikes on American forces on Iraq. What do you think Biden should have done?

Overheal

Deleted User wrote: »

When US forces are attacked where?

Attacked wherever they are. If you want to argue the location matters make the argument. I don't see how it does.

extra gravy

extra gravy wrote: »

The latest airstrikes were on facilities used by Iranian backed militia that conducted drone strikes on American forces on Iraq. What do you think Biden should have done?

The United States has zero business in Iraq (or Syria).

mcmoustache

mcmoustache wrote: »

Bombing countries and unconditional support for Israel are among the few areas in which you'll find bipartisan support. It's shíte all round but not unexpected.

Unfortunately not all Boardsies agree, and will justify the massacring of innocent people.

Overheal

Deleted User wrote: »

The United States has zero business in Iraq (or Syria).

Our withdrawal from the former is still in the works.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/united-states-iraq-agree-eventual-withdrawal-u-s-combat-troops-n1263364