Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid 19 Part XXXII-215,743 ROI (4,137 deaths)111,166 NI (2,036 deaths)(22/02)Read OP

Options
1208209211213214335

Comments

  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    ZX7R wrote: »
    It wouldn't be hard to have 75% of there country open when no one lives in it.

    That's 75% by population. It's 97% by area if you want to be pedantic.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,427 ✭✭✭ZX7R


    That's 75% by population. It's 97% by area if you want to be pedantic.

    Then you should be clearer in what you post.
    So in fact 97% of the country was not locked down because no one lives in.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,748 ✭✭✭degsie


    ZX7R wrote: »
    Then you should be clearer in what you post.
    So in fact 97% of the country was not locked down because no one lives in.

    You lock down people, not fields!


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 23,641 CMod ✭✭✭✭Ten of Swords


    Can we please keep detailed discussions of the vaccine to the vaccine megathread

    https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2058159465


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,845 ✭✭✭redarmy


    BREAKING: 17 deaths and 788 cases of #COVID19 confirmed today


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    That's some stretch to find a difference. Opening when "feasible" is more vague than when cases are at a "low level". You can define one (10 per 100,000 population 14 day rate, low community transmission), not the other - what does feasible really mean?

    If you keep opening when you think it's "feasible" you are in truth just condemning yourself to another lockdown once it is no longer "feasible". You are still arguing that there is some kind of mystical balance that can be struck and maintained. And this is the preferable approach somehow.
    That's a political decision but we know from before Christmas, 100 cases a day is the ballpark that makes it feasible.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,069 ✭✭✭blowitupref


    redarmy wrote: »
    BREAKING: 17 deaths and 788 cases of #COVID19 confirmed today

    7-day average 863 compared to 1024 last Sunday.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,477 ✭✭✭prunudo


    7-day average 863 compared to 1024 last Sunday.

    Thats what you want to see, stops the focus on it allegedly plateauing.


  • Registered Users Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    prunudo wrote: »
    Thats what you want to see, stops the focus on it allegedly plateauing.
    Roll on Tuesday and the new plateau!


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,477 ✭✭✭prunudo


    is_that_so wrote: »
    Roll on Tuesday and the new plateau!

    I think this coming week we will have relatively positive soundings from them. Like covid their good vibes seem to come in waves, we've just had a week of bad news and leaks so hoping for the opposite this week.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,220 ✭✭✭cameramonkey


    More vitamin D good news. A trial in Spain, result indicate that in a treatment group of 5.4% of patients were admitted to ICU, in the control group the number was 21%.

    In terms of deaths the treatment group had a 6.5% death rate while the control grouphad 15%. These were patients that were sick enough to be admitted to hospital. They treatment group were given large does of calcifediol. It seems the calcifediol needs to be administered as soon as the patient is admitted to be of use. If it is administered later it has no effect on outcomes.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calcifediol

    It is encouraging that these studies are pointing out some basic steps that can be taken to improve your chances if you are infected.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oYK9-zvJF_k


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,057 ✭✭✭mcburns07


    7-day average 863 compared to 1024 last Sunday.

    That’s really good to see considering we started testing close contacts again end of last week.


  • Posts: 220 [Deleted User]


    Gruffalux wrote: »
    My God, do you think they might go to 6 days, 7 even ! :eek: The inhumanity!

    The casual dismissal by lockdown fans of the gravity of governments stripping people's civil rights from them really is a terrible worry.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,962 ✭✭✭spookwoman


    Slide1.jpg
    Slide2.jpg
    Slide3.jpg
    Slide4.jpg
    Slide5.jpg
    Slide6.jpg
    Slide7.jpg
    daily-report.jpg
    Slide9.jpg
    Slide10.jpg


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,792 ✭✭✭Charles Babbage


    I'm holding my belief that:

    1) Govt. haven't a clue as it's all down to the manufacturers
    2) Manufacturers will get their acts together in the next month or so
    3) Piles of vaccines will become available
    4) Vaccines to everyone that wants one (75-80% of people?) by June/July.
    5) April/May - outdoor dining/drinks
    6) June/July, open the pubs.
    7) August/September, foreign holidays.

    This is all reasonable. Piles of vaccines being 5 times as many as in January. it will still take 3 months or so to give 2 jabs to most people.
    Foreign holidays will resume with a requirement for vaccination to avoid isolation requirements.
    Universities will require vaccination to attend in September and in due course schools will do likewise.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,610 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    b0nk1e wrote: »
    The casual dismissal by lockdown fans of the gravity of governments stripping people's civil rights from them really is a terrible worry.

    But you don't see the hypocrisy of scorning at a 5 day lockdown when we are two months into a 5 month lockdown?


  • Posts: 220 [Deleted User]


    snotboogie wrote: »
    But you don't see the hypocrisy of scorning at a 5 day lockdown when we are two months into a 5 month lockdown?

    We are moving into the third month of our six-week lockdown because we have a bad government paralysed by fear led by a man who will never have to face the electorate again.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,560 ✭✭✭political analyst


    Does this map indicate that the government's policy on Covid is a failure?

    https://twitter.com/patphelan/status/1360936548087320580


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,477 ✭✭✭prunudo


    Lets do a infographic on what % of delivered available vaccines each country has used.
    The UK had a one month head start on us and the rest of the EU.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,977 ✭✭✭TheDoctor


    Never actually thought about going to a private clinic in the North to get it done..... interesting.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,487 ✭✭✭tigger123


    Does this map indicate that the government's policy on Covid is a failure?

    https://twitter.com/patphelan/status/1360936548087320580

    No. It indicates the UK were able to negotiate quicker access to vaccines than the EU.

    The quality of political analysis in your post is really poor.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,560 ✭✭✭political analyst


    prunudo wrote: »
    Lets do a infographic on what % of delivered available vaccines each country has used.
    The UK had a one month head start on us and the rest of the EU.

    Does it indicate that the European Commission's policy on Covid has failed?

    If the lockdown in the Republic is still in place when restrictions in the UK are lifted then there may be unrest.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,560 ✭✭✭political analyst


    tigger123 wrote: »
    No. It indicates the UK were able to negotiate quicker access to vaccines than the EU.

    The quality of political analysis in your post is really poor.

    I never said I was a professional. Don't judge posters by their usernames.


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,272 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    TheDoctor wrote: »
    Never actually thought about going to a private clinic in the North to get it done..... interesting.

    Except you won't be able to because suppliers aren't doing deals with private companies for vaccines.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,792 ✭✭✭Charles Babbage


    prunudo wrote: »
    Thats what you want to see, stops the focus on it allegedly plateauing.

    The rate of improvement has slowed down a lot. Some explanation would be helpful, testing of contacts perhaps.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,477 ✭✭✭prunudo


    The date of improvement has slowed down a lot. Some explanation would be helpful, testing if contacts perhaps.

    Are they back giving close contacts 2 tests now, initial test and than a referral test after 10 days? Double the chance of picking up the virus in asymptomatic people compared to a few weeks ago maybe.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,677 ✭✭✭Happydays2020


    Last 6 Sunday's

    January 10th - 4842
    January 17th - 3231
    January 24th - 1910
    January 31st - 1414
    February 7th - 1024
    February 14th - 788


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,387 ✭✭✭h2005


    What’s the reasoning behind banning vaccinations in churches/local halls?


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,977 ✭✭✭TheDoctor


    God doesnt believe in man mad medicine


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    TheDoctor wrote: »
    Never actually thought about going to a private clinic in the North to get it done..... interesting.

    Private clinics are reportedly being offered tens of thousand by wealthy people in London trying to get their hands on a vaccine, but to no avail. This isn’t going to be something available privately and even if it were I wouldn’t take it as it will have been procured outside of the official supply chain and god knows what’s in it


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement