Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid 19 Part XXXII-215,743 ROI (4,137 deaths)111,166 NI (2,036 deaths)(22/02)Read OP

Options
1222223225227228335

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 1,768 ✭✭✭timsey tiger


    Igotadose wrote: »
    The UK took the decision to ensure no one has to travel more than 10 miles for a vaccine. What's the basis of the planning for the paltry few Irish centers?

    I bet if you go to the highlands in Scotland there is someone who is more than 10 miles from a vaccination center. This is a clue to the answer to your question, see if you can now figure it out yourself.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,977 ✭✭✭TheDoctor


    Have always gotten confused when busy hospitals are given as a reason to lock down here.

    I must have dreamt every winter when hundreds of people were on trolleys in corridors


  • Posts: 220 [Deleted User]


    I bet if you go to the highlands in Scotland there is someone who is more than 10 miles from a vaccination center. This is a clue to the answer to your question, see if you can now figure it out yourself.

    In fact, Scotland is using mobile vaccination centres for remote Highland areas.
    MattS1 wrote: »
    IF everyone is vaccinated by September ( being optimistic ), is it not the end of this thing then? How would it spread or affect our population?

    As soon as everyone gets vaccinated, the goalposts will be shifted again.

    The Government has reneged on every single milestone for reopening and there is no reason to believe that a Taoiseach who will never have to face the electorate again will suddenly become any less authoritarian that he has hitherto been.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,147 ✭✭✭TonyMaloney


    big syke wrote: »
    In fairness we constantly are close to capacity almost 90% so well above 100 is normal.

    http://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/noca-uploads/general/Irish_National_ICU_Audit_Annual_Report_2018_FINAL.pdf

    Did you just try to make a point with a 156 page pdf?

    What was your point?


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,034 ✭✭✭Ficheall


    TheDoctor wrote: »
    Have always gotten confused when busy hospitals are given as a reason to lock down here.

    I must have dreamt every winter when hundreds of people were on trolleys in corridors
    Because we don't want that to become hundreds of people on trolleys in the hospital car park.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 12,658 ✭✭✭✭AdamD


    theballz wrote: »
    The health service is less over run? Where are you reading this?

    It is not normal for the state to have over 100 people in ICU. Right now we have 158 confirmed cases.

    You are miles off.

    Is it not..?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,272 ✭✭✭theballz


    TheDoctor wrote: »
    Have always gotten confused when busy hospitals are given as a reason to lock down here.

    I must have dreamt every winter when hundreds of people were on trolleys in corridors

    You need to change your username with a silly statement like this.


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,599 ✭✭✭✭CIARAN_BOYLE


    TheDoctor wrote: »
    Have always gotten confused when busy hospitals are given as a reason to lock down here.

    I must have dreamt every winter when hundreds of people were on trolleys in corridors

    You can't have covid positive people on corridors without spreading the virus even more.

    We never need the type of mass cancellations of routine health care we have at the moment. We do now.


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,599 ✭✭✭✭CIARAN_BOYLE


    big syke wrote: »
    In fairness we constantly are close to capacity almost 90% so well above 100 is normal.

    http://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/noca-uploads/general/Irish_National_ICU_Audit_Annual_Report_2018_FINAL.pdf

    These people in icu are in addition to normal icu.

    In a normal time I'd imagine about half our icu capacity is taken up looking after people who underwent a serious "elective" procedure that had complications or that has icu time as a part of the recovery plan.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,934 ✭✭✭Storm 10




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 9,454 ✭✭✭mloc123


    Storm 10 wrote: »

    It is interesting to look at the overall worldwide cases now... they have been falling steadily since January. Europe is in lockdown, but nothing has changed in the US and they are falling also.


  • Registered Users Posts: 738 ✭✭✭Whiplash85


    Mmmm its almost as if it is seasonal/


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,792 ✭✭✭Charles Babbage


    TheDoctor wrote: »
    Have always gotten confused when busy hospitals are given as a reason to lock down here.

    I must have dreamt every winter when hundreds of people were on trolleys in corridors

    This is a bit like saying that I don't know why they sorry about a metre of snow when it is cold every winter. What is the point of such a comment?


  • Registered Users Posts: 323 ✭✭SheepsClothing


    Whiplash85 wrote: »
    Mmmm its almost as if it is seasonal/

    There must be no pandemic in South America at the moment.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,588 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    mloc123 wrote: »
    It is interesting to look at the overall worldwide cases now... they have been falling steadily since January. Europe is in lockdown, but nothing has changed in the US and they are falling also.

    A month ago, no one I knew from the US (US expat myself) had been vaccinated. Now, a lot of people I know have received at least the first dose if not second. So the vaccine is getting out there.


  • Registered Users Posts: 18,996 ✭✭✭✭gozunda


    That is not true. The under 65’s do not account for 50% of hospitalisations.

    Poster is not wrong. Hospital figures have been averaging 50% of all of covid related hospitalisations being under 64 and approx 50% over 65 wth some small variations

    From most recent report on Hospitalisation by age current figures show:

    51.29% over 65

    48.62 under 64

    So yeah pretty much what the poster detailed

    https://i.imgflip.com/4y7wwc.jpg

    See column on cases hospitalised (%)

    Source


  • Registered Users Posts: 21,886 ✭✭✭✭Roger_007


    Storm 10 wrote: »

    The only thing that can be concluded from that article is that nobody has the foggiest idea why the infection rate has declined so dramatically in India.
    All the experts have their theories but the truth is they are only guessing. This is also true everywhere else; it’s purely a guessing game.
    It’s fortunate for the experts reputations that variants of the virus have come along; when they make predictions that turn out to be false, they can blame it on the variants.


  • Registered Users Posts: 67 ✭✭HereinBray


    b0nk1e wrote: »
    In fact, Scotland is using mobile vaccination centres for remote Highland areas.



    As soon as everyone gets vaccinated, the goalposts will be shifted again.

    The Government has reneged on every single milestone for reopening and there is no reason to believe that a Taoiseach who will never have to face the electorate again will suddenly become any less authoritarian that he has hitherto been.

    Can I ask why you keep stating the phrase in bold please?


  • Registered Users Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    HereinBray wrote: »
    Can I ask why you keep stating the phrase in bold please?
    There's a cohort of people who believe this is all a precursor to a neverending state of emergency and the replacement of all democracy in Europe with dictatorships.

    Batsh1t crazy nonsense, in other words.


  • Registered Users Posts: 906 ✭✭✭big syke


    Did you just try to make a point with a 156 page pdf?

    What was your point?

    My point was "In fairness we constantly are close to capacity almost 90% so well above 100 is normal"

    The PDF was what some people call proof/back up. Do large documents offend you?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 859 ✭✭✭OwenM


    gozunda wrote: »
    Poster is not wrong. Hospital figures have been averaging 50% of all of covid related hospitalisations being under 64 and approx 50% over 65 wth some small variations

    From most recent report on Hospitalisation by age current figures show:

    51.29% over 65

    48.62 under 64

    So yeah pretty much what the poster detailed

    https://i.imgflip.com/4y7wwc.jpg

    See column on cases hospitalised (%)

    Source


    What's relevant is how many of those under 65 have medical conditions which are risk factors for severe covid because that group are prioritised for vaccination.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,454 ✭✭✭mloc123


    Igotadose wrote: »
    A month ago, no one I knew from the US (US expat myself) had been vaccinated. Now, a lot of people I know have received at least the first dose if not second. So the vaccine is getting out there.

    They have ~40-50 million doses done... but not enough (people and time) to account for the drop in cases


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,005 ✭✭✭✭titan18


    seamus wrote: »
    There's a cohort of people who believe this is all a precursor to a neverending state of emergency and the replacement of all democracy in Europe with dictatorships.

    Batsh1t crazy nonsense, in other words.

    Tbf, Martin would also be 64 by the time of the next election (assuming no government collapse) and seems fairly unlikely to be leading FF into it at this stage so good chance, he's retiring after his term.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,147 ✭✭✭TonyMaloney


    mloc123 wrote: »
    It is interesting to look at the overall worldwide cases now... they have been falling steadily since January. Europe is in lockdown, but nothing has changed in the US and they are falling also.

    India is genuinely hard to explain. The US far less so.
    Some states are under heavy restrictions, others not so much. Collectively though their behaviour is less risky than it has been since the early months of the pandemic.

    My theory on the cases falling globally is that it's not caused by anything to do with the virus itself, but on a massive shared event - Christmas.
    Some countries such as Germany locked down in anticipation of it. Others, as we're all too aware, had a large spike and locked down afterwards.


    543816.png


  • Registered Users Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    mloc123 wrote: »
    It is interesting to look at the overall worldwide cases now... they have been falling steadily since January. Europe is in lockdown, but nothing has changed in the US and they are falling also.
    Most areas in the US still have restrictions of some kind in place. These will all eventually have an effect even when the virus is rampant.

    Thanksgiving and Christmas are now 3 and 2 months out, people are mixing less - both naturally and because of restrictions - so numbers are dropping. It's really that simple.

    It's also known that the virus will eventually "burn out" like the 1917 'flu did, but I think it would be folly to suggest the same is occurring here.


  • Registered Users Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    A survey of researchers by Nature about the future of COVID. They seem to be veering towards endemic but more like other coronaviruses
    far less of a risk.
    In January, Nature asked more than 100 immunologists, infectious-disease researchers and virologists working on the coronavirus whether it could be eradicated. Almost 90% of respondents think that the coronavirus will become endemic — meaning that it will continue to circulate in pockets of the global population for years to come

    https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-00396-2


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,215 ✭✭✭Del Griffith




  • Registered Users Posts: 859 ✭✭✭OwenM


    seamus wrote: »
    There's a cohort of people who believe this is all a precursor to a neverending state of emergency and the replacement of all democracy in Europe with dictatorships.

    Batsh1t crazy nonsense, in other words.

    That is batsh1t, a part driver of that fear is erosion of basic freedoms and civil liberties, leaders and politicians won't say when it will end. Those promoting the theories can validly point to the restrictions. Medical authorities and 'experts' in the media talking about masks until 2022, Christmas cancelled again, masks forever, no foreign travel for 'the foreseeable future'

    Some that don't believe the theories want the theorists to believe and cause mayhem because it's one of the few ways to react and vent anger. Also more sinister, when you remove the right to associate, prevent civil disobedience or demonstrate then anger will surface in other ways eventually, at a micro level we have for instance domestic violence even though it's no excuse.


  • Registered Users Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    seamus wrote: »
    It's also known that the virus will eventually "burn out" like the 1917 'flu did, but I think it would be folly to suggest the same is occurring here.

    This is not known. Some illnesses burnout others do not. It's incredibly difficult to predict which way covid would go. Especially when you have more global mobility than ever before.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 18,996 ✭✭✭✭gozunda


    OwenM wrote: »
    What's relevant is how many of those under 65 have medical conditions which are risk factors for severe covid because that group are prioritised for vaccination.

    The figures detailed are the current age profile for covid related hospital admissions.

    Those getting the vaccines are health care workers and those aged over 85 atm.

    Those under 65 have medical conditions which are risk factors fall into group 7 out of the14 allocated groups. They're not going to be getting the vaccine for some time based on the current schedule

    https://i.imgflip.com/4y7zn0.jpg

    Source


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement