Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid 19 Part XXXII-215,743 ROI (4,137 deaths)111,166 NI (2,036 deaths)(22/02)Read OP

Options
1248249251253254335

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 7,448 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    Because there is no such thing as a hard close. See what I said above about the things that are really essential and cant just be left alone for 2 weeks.

    Granted some of the things going on aren't strictly speaking essential, but its actually been proven by study that anything after hospitality like non essential retail, outdoor activities, 5km, curfews never made any real difference. It's just for the message and the shock effect, we had a European health minister openly admitting as much.

    I know exactly what you are saying.

    How did we get the numbers down to single digits last April if its the same lockdown as now?


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,450 ✭✭✭boardise


    shinzon wrote: »
    Is that the normal Thursday Briefing or Meehole at the Podium job

    Shin

    Why not toon in and fine doubt ?:D

    Boar


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,634 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti


    I know exactly what you are saying.

    How did we get the numbers down to single digits last April if its the same lockdown as now?

    I could make a lot of money if I knew that.

    I think to a large extent the situation a year ago is not comparable with now. But when it comes down to it I'd say a year ago we missed an unbelievable amount of positives whereas now we're only missing a large amount of positives.

    Its also quite possible that there actually is a seasonal element to this. And we entered the covid game last year at the tail end of the season. Whereas this time we got the full of it. Who knows.

    Just keep in mind the WHO thinks that the real number of positives is ten times higher than the reported cases globally. Its not like we may have missed 20% of the positives or so. Its more like orders of magnitude stuff.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I could make a lot of money if I knew that.

    I think to a large extent the situation a year ago is not comparable with now. But when it comes down to it I'd say a year ago we missed an unbelievable amount of positives whereas now we're only missing a large amount of positives.

    Its also quite possible that there actually is a seasonal element to this. And we entered the covid game last year at the tail end of the season. Whereas this time we got the full of it. Who knows.

    Just keep in mind the WHO thinks that the real numbers of positives is ten times higher than the reported cases globally. Its not like we may have missed 20% of the positives or so. Its more like orders of magnitude stuff.

    Globally. Probably about 3x in Ireland. Based in death rates. Many places have not tested near the numbers we have


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,961 ✭✭✭spookwoman


    Slide1.jpg
    daily-report.jpg
    Slide3.jpg
    Slide4.jpg
    Slide5.jpg
    Slide6.jpg
    Slide7.jpg
    Slide8.jpg
    Slide9.jpg
    Slide10.jpg


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,634 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti


    Globally. Probably about 3x in Ireland. Based in death rates. Many places have not tested near the numbers we have

    Probably? Possibly?

    You might as well roll some dice in my opinion.

    Since we stubbornly refuse to do regular representative testing we will never know.

    Even the death rates wont tell us anything. There is from covid and with covid, there is the effect of lockdown on other deaths. The flu has miraculously disappeared. So many factors at play. Who knows.


  • Registered Users Posts: 378 ✭✭brookers


    shinzon wrote: »
    Is that the normal Thursday Briefing or Meehole at the Podium job

    Shin

    "Meehole", it is about as funny as the bread jokes when there is talk of snow.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Probably? Possibly?

    You might as well roll some dice in my opinion.

    Since we stubbornly refuse to do regular representative testing we will never know.

    Even the death rates wont tell us anything. There is from covid and with covid, there is the effect of lockdown on other deaths. The flu has miraculously disappeared. So many factors at play. Who knows.

    0.6%. That’s where all the studies in western societies trend towards. As for the from Covid with Covid sh*te


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,991 ✭✭✭Ohmeha


    Dublin LEA numbers demonstrating identical socio-economic patterns from the previous Level 5 lockdown seen between late October to end of November. Incidence currently 6 times higher in Ballymun-Finglas compared to the Blackrock/Dun Laoghaire corner of the city

    BALLYMUN-FINGLAS LEA-6, DUBLIN 02/02/21 to 15/02/21 451 11.36% 819.9 269.3 55,010
    BLANCHARDSTOWN-MULHUDDART LEA-5, DUBLIN 02/02/21 to 15/02/21 214 -19.85% 606.1 269.3 35,307
    TALLAGHT SOUTH LEA-5, DUBLIN 02/02/21 to 15/02/21 184 10.84% 518.8 269.3 35,465
    BALLYFERMOT-DRIMNAGH LEA-5, DUBLIN 02/02/21 to 15/02/21 228 -4.60% 494.9 269.3 46,068
    ARTANE-WHITEHALL LEA-6, DUBLIN 02/02/21 to 15/02/21 245 -3.16% 478.9 269.3 51,156
    PALMERSTOWN-FONTHILL LEA-5, DUBLIN 02/02/21 to 15/02/21 174 -23.35% 457.5 269.3 38,035
    NORTH INNER CITY LEA-7, DUBLIN 02/02/21 to 15/02/21 284 -19.77% 446.5 269.3 63,612
    LUCAN LEA-5, DUBLIN 02/02/21 to 15/02/21 147 -20.54% 439.8 269.3 33,421
    TALLAGHT CENTRAL LEA-6, DUBLIN 02/02/21 to 15/02/21 186 6.29% 430.4 269.3 43,215
    SWORDS LEA-7, DUBLIN 02/02/21 to 15/02/21 206 5.64% 401.0 269.3 51,370
    CLONDALKIN LEA-7, DUBLIN 02/02/21 to 15/02/21 185 14.91% 397.7 269.3 46,520
    KIMMAGE-RATHMINES LEA-6, DUBLIN 02/02/21 to 15/02/21 215 18.78% 384.9 269.3 55,861
    SOUTH WEST INNER CITY LEA-5, DUBLIN 02/02/21 to 15/02/21 157 -6.55% 370.8 269.3 42,344
    ONGAR LEA-5, DUBLIN 02/02/21 to 15/02/21 132 6.45% 368.4 269.3 35,834
    CABRA-GLASNEVIN LEA-7, DUBLIN 02/02/21 to 15/02/21 212 -8.62% 361.5 269.3 58,652
    BALBRIGGAN LEA-5, DUBLIN 02/02/21 to 15/02/21 129 -17.31% 352.7 269.3 36,570
    DONAGHMEDE LEA-5, DUBLIN 02/02/21 to 15/02/21 145 -17.14% 348.6 269.3 41,593
    FIRHOUSE-BOHERNABREENA LEA-5, DUBLIN 02/02/21 to 15/02/21 115 -7.26% 336.2 269.3 34,202
    CLONTARF LEA-6, DUBLIN 02/02/21 to 15/02/21 160 1.91% 295.3 269.3 54,182
    RUSH-LUSK LEA-5, DUBLIN 02/02/21 to 15/02/21 101 -15.83% 291.3 269.3 34,674
    KILLINEY-SHANKILL LEA-7, DUBLIN 02/02/21 to 15/02/21 107 10.31% 281.0 269.3 38,082
    SOUTH EAST INNER CITY LEA-5, DUBLIN 02/02/21 to 15/02/21 113 -20.42% 278.3 269.3 40,603
    CASTLEKNOCK LEA-6, DUBLIN 02/02/21 to 15/02/21 127 -8.63% 275.3 269.3 46,126
    HOWTH-MALAHIDE LEA-7, DUBLIN 02/02/21 to 15/02/21 126 -11.89% 224.4 269.3 56,139
    DUNDRUM LEA-7, DUBLIN 02/02/21 to 15/02/21 74 -1.33% 197.6 269.3 37,452
    RATHFARNHAM-TEMPLEOGUE LEA-7, DUBLIN 02/02/21 to 15/02/21 93 -17.70% 194.1 269.3 47,909
    STILLORGAN LEA-6, DUBLIN 02/02/21 to 15/02/21 53 -19.70% 173.7 269.3 30,508
    PEMBROKE LEA-5, DUBLIN 02/02/21 to 15/02/21 77 -25.96% 169.3 269.3 45,473
    GLENCULLEN-SANDYFORD LEA-7, DUBLIN 02/02/21 to 15/02/21 62 -7.46% 169.3 269.3 36,622
    DÚN LAOGHAIRE LEA-7, DUBLIN 02/02/21 to 15/02/21 56 -61.64% 134.5 269.3 41,627
    BLACKROCK LEA-6, DUBLIN 02/02/21 to 15/02/21 45 -48.28% 133.4 269.3 33,727


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,858 ✭✭✭✭Jim_Hodge


    brookers wrote: »
    "Meehole", it is about as funny as the bread jokes when there is talk of snow.

    And as funny as constantly referring to him as, "Meehole".


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 23,752 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Jim_Hodge wrote: »
    And as funny as constantly referring to him as, "Meehole".

    I just thought it was dyslexia or some other issue causing that. Is it meant to be a joke?


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,527 ✭✭✭✭Arghus


    There's still an ongoing improvement, but the rate of decline is definitely slowing is the nutshell summation of what Nolan is saying.


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 51,688 Mod ✭✭✭✭Stheno




  • Registered Users Posts: 23,752 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Stheno wrote: »

    Its universities causing outbreaks moreso than schools.


  • Registered Users Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    Nolan said they're now projecting 200-300 cases per day by Mid March.


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,819 ✭✭✭✭peasant


    This week compared to last week

    252 less cases
    627 less positive swabs
    39 less reported deaths
    213 less in hospital


    last week: British variant B.1.1.7 at 70% of cases
    this week: B.1.1.7at 90%

    Variant B.1.1.7 potentially 56% more infective and 65% more deadly than the the initial form of the virus.

    Make another mistake of opening too much / too soon like at Christmas (where B.1.1.7. was estimated to be at < 20%) and we could be in big trouble.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,018 ✭✭✭✭JRant



    What exactly does he want?
    If he expects any government, elected by the citizens to look after that countries best interests, to give away vaccines for their own people then he's smoking crack.

    Europe is one of the richest regions on the planet and even we can't get enough vaccines for our most vulnerable at the moment. We've also agreed to send vaccines to developing nations as they become available but that should not come at the expenses of european citizens. As a block we've ponied up a truly eye watering amount of money to find development and production of many vaccines.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,172 ✭✭✭wadacrack


    at this rate any with compliance likely to decline each week, we need seasonality to play a role


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,634 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti


    0.6%. That’s where all the studies in western societies trend towards. As for the from Covid with Covid sh*te

    Hold on a sec. I didnt mean from/with in a covid-denier kind of way.

    I do understand with covid. When you have someone very old and/or with co-morbidities there probably is no clear cut death cause. So they decided to overreport rather than underreport. No issue with that.

    But within all that how do you keep it all apart and make any kind of interpolations from the death numbers? I know mentioning from/with is frowned upon but it is a very real thing all the same and it has an influence on your numbers and statistics. Again then there is the disappearance of the flu.

    So many factors at play...


  • Registered Users Posts: 21,039 ✭✭✭✭retro:electro


    ...Hello Hynesie08

    just to reply to your accusations that I was lying. I cannot pick up the 2 quotes but No 1. was that I said I had travelled from Louth to Limerick plenty of times and told the Gardai at any checkpoint I met why. Each time I was wished well and waved through to continue on my journey. This is the truth.

    No 2. another poster asked if I had seen my siblings through this time when I was saying I hadn't (based on my trips to Limerick to see my daughter). No I didn't, this is also the truth.

    My daughter in Limerick had a premature delivery of her 2nd baby along with post natal depression after it. She also had an 18 month old at the time. A month before the birth they all got Covid 19. So yes I was allowed visit her, she was in my bubble, she was a vulnerable family member and I was helping with my 2 grandchildren.

    I did not see any of my 6 siblings and have not since last year. Its been a long time. I can visit my daughter because she is in my bubble. I cannot visit my siblings as they all live too far away.
    This is all stuff I shouldn't even have to defend here, it derails threads and take time to try and find those posts you even referred to.





    To be honest I find it disturbing and bizarre that someone would trawl through my posting history to accuse me of lying???? Is this because I said things are much more open in New York? That's wasn't a lie either. I don't tell lies. What is the point, I'm not trying to impress anyone?

    You really don't know the state of mind or anyone who is posting here. You post in such a bitter way, accusing a total random poster of lying. Boards is a toxic place to be these days. I hope its only a sign of the stress people are under and I would appeal for people to be kinder to each other. People should be able to have different opinions without being called liars.

    I just don't get it, I have had a pretty bad week (my 86 year old mother has Covid in her nursing home) . It took me the afternoon and a swim in the sea to feel right again.

    I hope you have a nice evening and you were just having a bad day.

    You shouldn’t even have to defend yourself sweetmaggie. It’s actually shocking that you feel you have to and I think most reasonable people will agree. I actually feel like screenshotting your post just to show people in a few years time the lengths people had to go to in order to defend such natural behaviours. The post your quoting and the lengths you’ve gone to defend yourself will serve as evidence of how people completely lost their minds when it came to this.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    wadacrack wrote: »
    at this rate any with compliance likely to decline each week, we need seasonality to play a role

    Very little to suggest seasonality has an impact on this virus. Hopefully vaccination can pick up the slack and provide the necessary boost.


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,005 ✭✭✭✭titan18



    Ya, I disagree. More deaths in the richer countries, it's had a larger effect here and our taxes would be paying for the vaccines for poorer countries so they can wait.

    If people want to virtue signal on vaccines, they can opt out


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,527 ✭✭✭✭Arghus


    peasant wrote: »
    last week: British variant B.1.1.7 at 70% of cases
    this week: B.1.1.7at 90%

    Variant B.1.1.7 potentially 56% more infective and 65% more deadly than the the initial form of the virus.

    Make another mistake of opening too much / too soon like at Christmas (where B.1.1.7. was estimated to be at < 20%) and we could be in big trouble.

    The penny still hasn't dropped for many that the relative increased infectiousness of the B.1.1.7. makes the prospect of opening up far riskier than what we were dealing with prior to January.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,172 ✭✭✭wadacrack


    I'm not sure we can really do anything regarding restrictions with this new variant until a large proportion are vaccinated.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,147 ✭✭✭TonyMaloney


    wadacrack wrote: »
    I'm not sure we can really do anything regarding restrictions with this new variant until a large proportion are vaccinated.

    We've three options as I see it

    1. Continue as we are (or very close to it) until vaccines start making a huge dent in the numbers

    2. Toughen restrictions somehow

    3. Slowly open up anyways. Risk another hospital crisis.

    It looks like no.2 isn't being countenanced.

    I reckon we'll try for 1 but end up with 3


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 130 ✭✭Boggerman12


    titan18 wrote: »
    Ya, I disagree. More deaths in the richer countries, it's had a larger effect here and our taxes would be paying for the vaccines for poorer countries so they can wait.

    If people want to virtue signal on vaccines, they can opt out

    When gene Kerrigan is promoting this then I’m out.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,977 ✭✭✭TheDoctor


    Turtwig wrote: »
    Very little to suggest seasonality has an impact on this virus. Hopefully vaccination can pick up the slack and provide the necessary boost.

    What?

    Loads suggests seasonality has an effect


  • Registered Users Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    We've three options as I see it

    1. Continue as we are (or very close to it) until vaccines start making a huge dent in the numbers

    2. Toughen restrictions somehow

    3. Slowly open up anyways. Risk another hospital crisis.

    It looks like no.2 isn't being countenanced.

    I reckon we'll try for 1 but end up with 3
    Two will not work now, as it depends on continued compliance which just cannot be taken for granted. 1&3 would be more likely options.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,116 ✭✭✭bazermc


    Very late for briefing to be on.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    bazermc wrote: »
    Very late for briefing to be on.

    It's the preshow before Percy. :D


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement