Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

COVID-19: Vaccine and testing procedures Megathread Part 3 - Read OP

Options
1281282284286287328

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Leo is talking about a green passport for those fully vaccinated. I assume fully vaccinated means two jabs of the Pfizer or AZ.

    Unfortunately the time between vaccinations for the AZ vaccine is up to 4 months wait. Long time to wait for your "passport".
    The EU are working on it and Spain seem to think it will be ready in June so it's to give the impression of working on it too.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,677 ✭✭✭PhoenixParker


    Leo is talking about a green passport for those fully vaccinated. I assume fully vaccinated means two jabs of the Pfizer or AZ.

    Unfortunately the time between vaccinations for the AZ vaccine is up to 4 months wait. Long time to wait for your "passport".

    You can get a passport if you get a negative test too, presumably it's a temporary passport of some description so not being fully vaccinated isn't a barrier to travel.

    I think they'll start from the position that two jabs are necessary but very quickly be forced to move to the position that being two weeks out from your first jab is enough. Reality is you're well protected at that point and there'll have to be some mechanism to issue temporary passports (based on negative tests), so issuing a short validity passport on a single jab should be feasible too.


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,075 ✭✭✭✭vienne86


    Jane1012 wrote: »
    Would a certain amount of those not have been covered in cohort 1 in nursing homes? So maybe reducing the figure by 80k? (I’ve made that number up, but just to show an example)

    For sure......I would have thought 25K in congregated settings......just guessing.


  • Registered Users Posts: 523 ✭✭✭Mark1916




  • Registered Users Posts: 3,155 ✭✭✭Rebelbrowser


    I think conversations like this is another plus point to the age-based approach. There'll be less "what about that subsection of a priority group. surely they don't merit special treatment."

    100%. It's why they changed the order. By category 13, before the mega 16 to 54 cohort, you had a sweep up category of people in jobs important to society's functioning or something like that. How the hell do you decide who goes in there? It would certainly have included lawyers (some of whom have unavoidable contact work as part of litigation, litigation being an essential service - but most of whom are completely desk bound) and other equally "popular" professions. Government saw there was a ****fest coming and did the right thing in moving to a 100% transparent (age based) system.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Mark1916 wrote: »
    But still projections contingent on supply. We still need to see what this quarter brings, including curveballs.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,307 ✭✭✭Irish Stones


    is_that_so wrote: »
    Rates of vaccination are expected to increase substantially.


    This has been said for a few months now. Productions will ramp up, vaccination rates are expected to increase, an so on, and after over 3 months we're still at 5%.
    End of January it was 0.5% on EU average.
    End of February it was 2.2%.
    End of March it was 4.5%.
    End of April it may be 6.5-7.0%.

    Well, I don't see this improvement :D


  • Registered Users Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    This has been said for a few months now. Productions will ramp up, vaccination rates are expected to increase, an so on, and after over 3 months we're still at 5%.
    End of January it was 0.5% on EU average.
    End of February it was 2.2%.
    End of March it was 4.5%.
    End of April it may be 6.5-7.0%.

    Well, I don't see this improvement :D
    Nobody really does, this month is where it supposedly starts. It'll be good news for everyone if/when it does.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,580 ✭✭✭JDD


    Just wondering, weren't we supposed to get a massive delivery of vaccines on 31 March, or a day or two after that? I remember both Paul Reid and Stephen Donnelly mentioning it at the end of February. Has that large delivery arrived?


  • Registered Users Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    JDD wrote: »
    Just wondering, weren't we supposed to get a massive delivery of vaccines on 31 March, or a day or two after that? I remember both Paul Reid and Stephen Donnelly mentioning it at the end of February. Has that large delivery arrived?
    Yeah, about 100K of it - last Thursday I believe.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,914 ✭✭✭✭josip


    JDD wrote: »
    Just wondering, weren't we supposed to get a massive delivery of vaccines on 31 March, or a day or two after that? I remember both Paul Reid and Stephen Donnelly mentioning it at the end of February. Has that large delivery arrived?


    Yes they arrived, the revised AZ Q1 doses.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,580 ✭✭✭JDD


    is_that_so wrote: »
    Yeah, about 100K of it - last Thursday I believe.

    Jesus, that's a massive drop on what he told the JOC back at the start of March. He said that we were expecting 175,000 doses. Do we know when the remaining 75,000 is due to arrive, or is that just gone now? Do we know why we only got about 60% of what we expected?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1 viruxc


    Mark1916 wrote: »


    RE: 'EU reportedly may hit vaccination target by the end of June, much earlier than projected'

    I thought this has been known for a while? Ireland's goal is to hit 80% of adults by June.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,461 ✭✭✭Bubbaclaus


    JDD wrote: »
    Jesus, that's a massive drop on what he told the JOC back at the start of March. He said that we were expecting 175,000 doses. Do we know when the remaining 75,000 is due to arrive, or is that just gone now? Do we know why we only got about 60% of what we expected?

    Over 200k doses were received into the country in the period 27 March to 31 March, meaning there was at least 1.187m doses in the country by month end as I understand it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,100 ✭✭✭ectoraige


    seamus wrote: »
    I agree with all of this, though I am disappointed that Gardai appear to be left out of the loop on the planning and will have to wait for the main cohorts.

    The same argument can apply - are they more at risk? But given that paramedics and fire stations are being covered, it seems logical that Gardai should be on the list. The former attend medical emergencies which is why they're on the list, but do Gardai not also attend medical emergencies on occasion?

    There aren't that many Gardai and their movements are well controlled, they could all be done inside a week. It seems bizarre that they've basically been ignored.

    Absolutely. Gardaí do attend medical emergencies and sometimes travel in the back of the ambulance to ensure the paramedics' safety. It's a small space with no social distancing, and one can easily be in there for over an hour.

    It's also worth pointing out that the emergency services work in uncontrolled environments. Shops, schools, GPs and even hospitals have a variety of measures they can put in place to reduce the risks, but the emergency services could literally be anywhere, among any number of people. Vaccination is one of the few controls that can be reliably put in place.

    Gardaí are also the only people with the powers to enforce quarantine. If you're COVID-positive and decide to go around licking, spitting, and coughing in on people, the Gardaí are the people society relies upon to stop you.

    While the statistical risk for Gardaí may be low, they do need to have confidence for their own safety in a way few other workers do.

    It's galling to hear teacher unions describe themselves as essential frontline workers when schools have been closed for so much of this pandemic.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,173 ✭✭✭1huge1




  • Registered Users Posts: 893 ✭✭✭higster


    Bubbaclaus wrote: »
    Over 200k doses were received into the country in the period 27 March to 31 March, meaning there was at least 1.187m doses in the country by month end as I understand it.

    All 200k AZ?


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,100 ✭✭✭ectoraige


    plodder wrote: »
    Pragmatic decisions have to be made to make the vaccination proceed efficiently. Teachers and gardai are easily identifiable as groups whereas supermarket workers and other essential retail workers, though just as deserving, are not easily identifiable. Hospitalisations are still dropping. So, hopefully the question is moot. But, if they take off as a result of cases originating in schools (or the re-opening is delayed to prevent that), then it might not have been the right course to take.

    It's pretty easy to identify the supermarket workers - they are the ones you actually see working with the public throughout this pandemic.

    Cases increasing with school reopenings appear to be as a result of increased mobility among adults rather than spreading among children.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,205 ✭✭✭Lucas Hood


    Those numbers for Saturday are somewhat disappointing.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,461 ✭✭✭Bubbaclaus


    higster wrote: »
    All 200k AZ?

    I've no idea what the breakdown between the vaccines was, just that they had 855k delivered by 26 March and stated they had met a target of 1,187k doses delivered by end of month.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 9,771 ✭✭✭hynesie08


    Those Saturday numbers should be revised upwards over the next few days, as gps upload their data today because of the bank holiday.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]




  • Registered Users Posts: 2,100 ✭✭✭ectoraige


    I think you've hit the nail on the head here. The public will not row in behind teachers, so special school staff, SNAs etc get tarred with this brush also. I can't understand the lack of outcry to have other sectors such as carers and childminders vaccinated though. They are more at risk, with less mitigating factors open to them than the general populace.

    Childminders probably aren't at that high an actual risk since children don't harbour and spread the virus as effectively as adults, but the perception of risk should certainly be no different to the risk the teacher unions claim. The lack of outcry is down to not having unions pushing their agenda.


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,261 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    Act on what?

    Just because there's a link doesn't mean they pause or even consider or recommend a pause. All vaccines come with the caveat of potentially rare side effects.

    The benefits will continue to outweigh the risks I would think


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,580 ✭✭✭JDD


    Bubbaclaus wrote: »
    Over 200k doses were received into the country in the period 27 March to 31 March, meaning there was at least 1.187m doses in the country by month end as I understand it.

    Oh so there was more received in the few days before 31 March? So in fact around 300k doses received between 26 March and 31 March (855k to 1.187m)?

    That's really good to know. So if we plug in last week's vaccinations (how many did we do, about 70-80k?) we should actually be ramping up massively this week? I mean, I can understand that they didn't want to book people in until they got the vaccines on to Irish soil, but we should have lots more appointments this week right? I mean, we should probably be vaccinating 200,000 people over the next seven days? Isn't that they way they said it would work - that once we got the supply we had the personnel to ramp up the vaccinations?

    Do we know how many vaccines are due to be delivered this week, or do they publish vaccine delivery data anywhere?


  • Registered Users Posts: 110 ✭✭Deenie78


    I had a quick question about the second dose of Pfizer - does anyone know someone who has had their second jab and if so, was there any ill effects? My Dad's due to get his on Thursday and is only just out of hospital after having an infection, I'm hoping it doesn't set him back. Thanks in advance


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,461 ✭✭✭Bubbaclaus


    JDD wrote: »
    Oh so there was more received in the few days before 31 March? So in fact around 300k doses received between 26 March and 31 March (855k to 1.187m)?

    That's really good to know. So if we plug in last week's vaccinations (how many did we do, about 70-80k?) we should actually be ramping up massively this week? I mean, I can understand that they didn't want to book people in until they got the vaccines on to Irish soil, but we should have lots more appointments this week right? I mean, we should probably be vaccinating 200,000 people over the next seven days? Isn't that they way they said it would work - that once we got the supply we had the personnel to ramp up the vaccinations?

    Do we know how many vaccines are due to be delivered this week, or do they publish vaccine delivery data anywhere?

    Pretty sure we have broken 125k vaccinations in each of the last 2 weeks. Well over 70-80k anyway.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,580 ✭✭✭JDD


    Bubbaclaus wrote: »
    Pretty sure we have broken 125k vaccinations in each of the last 2 weeks. Well over 70-80k anyway.

    Brilliant. Is there a tracker somewhere? We should definitely have the remainder of doses delivered last week gone in the next ten days so.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,152 ✭✭✭opinionated3


    Deenie78 wrote: »
    I had a quick question about the second dose of Pfizer - does anyone know someone who has had their second jab and if so, was there any ill effects? My Dad's due to get his on Thursday and is only just out of hospital after having an infection, I'm hoping it doesn't set him back. Thanks in advance

    For what it's worth my 84 yr old uncle had his second jab last Saturday week. No ill effects whatsoever. My best friends 82 yr old mother had hers just last Friday. Got it in the a.m but had a pretty nasty headache in the evening. She was all good Saturday morning. I read somewhere before that a slight reaction when receiving the second dose is fairly common, the first dose is providing protection and might think the second dose is an attacker so to speak and reacts to this foreign entity before calming down again.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,100 ✭✭✭ectoraige


    Deenie78 wrote: »
    I had a quick question about the second dose of Pfizer - does anyone know someone who has had their second jab and if so, was there any ill effects? My Dad's due to get his on Thursday and is only just out of hospital after having an infection, I'm hoping it doesn't set him back. Thanks in advance

    I received both with no side effect. A number of colleagues did experience a temperature spike and felt crappy for a day after their second dose. He should speak to his GP about his concerns, they might defer it for a week if he's still under the weather, but I wouldn't be worried about a major setback. Hope he does well.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement