FE1 Exam Thread (Read 1st post!) No trading

fe12020grad

I haven't even finished my exams yet but I'm already wondering when results will be out. Does any know roughly when they are usually released after the March sitting? Were ye long waiting for them after November?

FE1new

Lawlz wrote: »

How did everyone find contract? 7 PQs was a shocker!

Saw a comment about the question with the exclusion clause that there was misrep in it aswel. What was the misrep?! Fear I missed that.

Also did half offer/ acceptance, a touch on SOGA and then did misrep for question 1. Did anyone do misrep for q 1?!

Hope it went well for everyone.

I might be wrong!!! I thought Tom's statement to Sarah that the computers would run the program was a Misrepresentation as thats what induced her to sign the contract.

Lawlz

FE1new wrote: »

I might be wrong!!! I thought Tom's statement to Sarah that the computers would run the program was a Misrepresentation as thats what induced her to sign the contract.

Omg that’s it! Cheers. Completely missed that! Gutted!

Did you do misrep for q 1 by any chance?! Along with o+a?

murray132

ElMo7 wrote: »

Can I ask what you are you using this case for? Are you inserting it into an answer for Institutions (court of justice)? I have no case law for Institutions and am now freaking out

Any answers I’ve seen have no case law for institutions so I wouldn’t be worried

Law101

T.Chunter164 wrote: »

I talked about offer and acceptance, specifically counter offers and invitation to treat. (I also made the same mistake of wasting time discussing consumer protection when it was a private sale ) BUT I mentioned some misrepresentation of fact and honestly held misrepresentation so hopefully I won’t get grilled for it

I said o and a, inv to treat and counte offer. The second part I said it could be misrep but that he could try argue only sales puff and due diligence was done with the car test. I forgot about consumer protection

murray132

fe12020grad wrote: »

I haven't even finished my exams yet but I'm already wondering when results will be out. Does any know roughly when they are usually released after the March sitting? Were ye long waiting for them after November?

November results were out the 14th of January

nmurphy1441

fe12020grad wrote: »

I haven't even finished my exams yet but I'm already wondering when results will be out. Does any know roughly when they are usually released after the March sitting? Were ye long waiting for them after November?

Exams at the start of March were normally the start /mid May so the fact that exams were end of March this sitting, I would imagine that start of June might be reasonable!

FE1new

Lawlz wrote: »

Omg that’s it! Cheers. Completely missed that! Gutted!

Did you do misrep for q 1 by any chance?! Along with o+a?

No I didn't do it there as I said excellent quality for second hand is different then with a new car and Bernstien v Pamson said that driving safely was good enough. I also mention 14(2)(b) that he drove it but I'm second guessing myself.

I know I'm wrong now as its a private sale.....so many PQ!!!!!

Law101

Anyone do the question about reasonable notice?

AA21

Does anyone have a sample answer on registered and unregistered land for property? At this stage seems like the only one i have chance of passing 🀣

lsheehaneire

nmurphy1441 wrote: »

Exams at the start of March were normally the start /mid May so the fact that exams were end of March this sitting, I would imagine that start of June might be reasonable!

In pre-covid it was normally 6 weeks from the last exam which would be mid may but for November results it was around 8 weeks!!

RebeccaM90

Anyone got any ideas for reform of adverse possession ? See it was asked ...

law987

RebeccaM90 wrote: »

Anyone got any ideas for reform of adverse possession ? See it was asked ...

- ECHR: JA Pye case, shows our system is at the edge of what's acceptable
- Constitution: right to own property, without excessive encroachment
- clarify law: what constitutes active possession, if intentions are relevant
- unfair on paper title holders, no positive action required of squatters

- LRC Report 2004: squatter must apply for court order, gives owner chance to intervene

Lawlz

FE1new wrote: »

No I didn't do it there as I said excellent quality for second hand is different then with a new car and Bernstien v Pamson said that driving safely was good enough. I also mention 14(2)(b) that he drove it but I'm second guessing myself.

I know I'm wrong now as its a private sale.....so many PQ!!!!!

Ya all the problems questions were hard! Difficult to pick out every topic in every single one of them. I find them especially difficult when they’re online!! Having to scroll up to the q and the small answer box is not ideal.

awsah

Lawlz wrote: »

How did everyone find contract? 7 PQs was a shocker!

Saw a comment about the question with the exclusion clause that there was misrep in it aswel. What was the misrep?! Fear I missed that.

Also did half offer/ acceptance, a touch on SOGA and then did misrep for question 1. Did anyone do misrep for q 1?!

Hope it went well for everyone.

Yes I only answered Sam's part in Misrepresentation I did consumer question with exclusion clauses in another one

Lawwww2020

awsah wrote: »

Yes I only answered Sam's part in Misrepresentation I did consumer question with exclusion clauses in another one

I did it one part on merchantable quality; one part on fitness for purpose - relying on Sam’s assurance and then exemption clause part!

Found that paper super stressful

awsah

FE1new wrote: »

I might be wrong!!! I thought Tom's statement to Sarah that the computers would run the program was a Misrepresentation as thats what induced her to sign the contract.

I said that that showed that he knew the intended purpose and so it would probably be unfair to allow him to contract out of s.14. But I was reading her reports this morning and she said she gives marks where people argue their points with case law so im not too worried if it was misrep!

RebeccaM90

law987 wrote: »

- ECHR: JA Pye case, shows our system is at the edge of what's acceptable
- Constitution: right to own property, without excessive encroachment
- clarify law: what constitutes active possession, if intentions are relevant
- unfair on paper title holders, no positive action required of squatters

- LRC Report 2004: squatter must apply for court order, gives owner chance to intervene

That' so helpful thank you! I can see Ireland was brought in as Third party to Pye v United Kingdom case so will mention that also. Thanks again

awsah

Lawwww2020 wrote: »

I did it one part on merchantable quality; one part on fitness for purpose - relying on Sam’s assurance and then exemption clause part!

Found that paper super stressful

That's exactly what I did except I just put fit for purpose and consumer protection jn the one heading

I didnt get time to read over or spell check so I know its a complete disaster and my mistak essay was about 2 paragraphs. It's going to be a miracle to pass!!

KMPT

Lawlz wrote: »

Ya all the problems questions were hard! Difficult to pick out every topic in every single one of them. I find them especially difficult when they’re online!! Having to scroll up to the q and the small answer box is not ideal.

I don't mind it being online but not being able to scribble on paper is well missed. The note box isn't the same. Wish they'd let us have one sheet of paper to jot things down. Took me a while to get into the swing of things. Missed my pen and paper :-)

Lawwww2020

awsah wrote: »

That's exactly what I did except I just put fit for purpose and consumer protection jn the one heading

I didnt get time to read over or spell check so I know its a complete disaster and my mistak essay was about 2 paragraphs. It's going to be a miracle to pass!!

I didn’t get to check over mine either dw!! Just glad that’s over, seven pqs was a shock!

ruby1998

Question - if an amendment is made to the will before it is executed does it have to be signed and witnessed in the same way as original will?

nmurphy1441

ruby1998 wrote: »

Question - if an amendment is made to the will before it is executed does it have to be signed and witnessed in the same way as original will?

Amendments before the will is executed must be done in accordance with s86. If the section isn’t followed, there’s a presumption that the alterations were made after the execution and therefore ineffective

RebeccaM90

ruby1998 wrote: »

Question - if an amendment is made to the will before it is executed does it have to be signed and witnessed in the same way as original will?

I'd presume if the will has been drafted and needs to be amended before being witnessed then the rules under both section 78 and section 86 would apply, look at Re Myles deceased (the amendment wasn't signed or attested by the witnesses and as a consequence the amendment was ineffective)

lawDani

ElMo7 wrote: »

Can I ask what you are you using this case for? Are you inserting it into an answer for Institutions (court of justice)? I have no case law for Institutions and am now freaking out

I could be wrong but think this case is from last year regarding locus standi for judicial review

Diamond_Hands

How does one distinguish between a problem question relating to freedom of services verses freedom of establishment? I'm guessing they're mutually exclusive

Diamond_Hands

FE1Hopefully1 wrote: »

Think freedom of services relates more to providing your service in the member state so like a system based in Ireland running in Spain and freedoms of establishment is the ability to set up a business

My notes says that services relate to activity on a temporary basis while establishment relates to activity on a stable and continuous basis

jjjjjop

Has anyone here applied for jobs with the legal aid board?

Fe1erere

hey everyone,

i hope study is going well for you all. Would any of you kind souls have property past papers of Spring and Autumn 2020?

Mc96

jjjjjop wrote: »

Has anyone here applied for jobs with the legal aid board?

I applied for the paralegal positions they have back in 2018 and was on the panel then got offered it but by that stage I had an offer for something else that I went with instead