Harry and Meghan - OP updated with Threadbanned Users 4/5/21

Leg End Reject

anewme wrote: »

Not sure what you mean?

It was not me who declared I was out but could not resist a dig?

See? You even edited the post to add "Getting a dig in".

anewme

Leg End Reject wrote: »

No, but you seem obsessed about others getting digs in.

Not obsessed with anything.?

Im pointing out obvious hypocrisy.

Declaring I'm out, but returning to get one more dig in is sad and should be pointed out. If you are gone, then bye bye. You dont need to announce your departure and then come back to whinge more.:rolleyes:

Are you out or in:rolleyes:ot?

JoChervil

anewme wrote: »

Ok, call it what you like. I'm stating facts based on what you said.

you were done...but still returned after that? Reads as if you couldn't resist another dig.

You are repeating this dig towards me for the 4th time. What is your problem?

Is it forbidden to return to a conversation? It looks it's you who has to constantly dig at people.

Is your post above about Harry and Meghan or me?

Leg End Reject

anewme wrote: »

Not obsessed with anything.?

Im pointing out obvious hypocrisy.

Declaring I'm out, but returning to get one more dig in is sad and should be pointed out. If you are gone, then bye bye. You dont need to announce your departure and then come back to whinge more.:rolleyes:

Are you out or in:rolleyes:ot?

"Dig in" again!

This is like your obsession with "Blue-haired lesbians".

Augme

retro:electro wrote: »

That’s a bit odd. I’ve no interest in sport and I can think of nothing worse than going over to the soccer forum and reading comments about a sport I’ve zero interest in. But I guess its your time to waste. Thanks for calling us interesting though.

You should try it. The soccer forum is far more entertaining because of the posters than the actual football. Like this thread really.

cnocbui

JoChervil wrote: »

So returning to my hate pet: manipulation.

You quoted 3 times that her outfit suggested, that she was pregnant, so she provoked such question.

Archie was born at the beginning of May, wedding was at the beginning of October. So two months pregnant woman needs to have her coat unbuttoned. Really? Or maybe her bump on its own wouldn't be big enough to ask such question?

And who dressed her in such a give away way?

All other managed without coats.

Leg End Reject wrote: »

She hardly did it for attention? :eek:

ETA: That photo looks like she's giving William a filthy look!

JoChervil wrote: »

In the world, when even earrings talk, such ostentation was screaming.

JoChervil wrote: »

I only base my judgement on facts. She wore the coat, which according to all your quoted people made it obvious that she was pregnant. So she could have been sure, that this news will be for sure the main topic talked at the wedding as well as it will be main thing in press next day.

I assume she chose her outfit, so for sure it was her "fault". Especially actress knows well how tell things using visual ways.

The last your sentence shows your level of the dispute.

JoChervil wrote: »

As I said I was here because of my pet hate: manipulation.

It is not a dig. Manipulation is the best conquered by bared facts.

JoChervil wrote: »

Well, all given quotes showed that an unbuttoned in waist area coat talked.

Heard about but never watched this film, so can't discuss.

MoonUnit75 wrote: »

That is absolutely hilarious! Must. Wear. Big. Long. Coat. In May. But sooooooo haaard to get the rest of these buttons done. Thank god the top two aren’t fit to burst though 😂

ceadaoin. wrote: »

She wore an obvious maternity coat, when there was no need for that at the stage of pregnancy she was at. Obviously people were going to ask. Even the headlines on the day were speculation about her being pregnant because of the coat. Talk about stealing the limelight.

It's just a coat, ffs!



Yep, no need to try and hide anything at 11+ weeks.

Of course she could have not worn a coat, but then it would still be her fault for flaunting it when she could have just worn a coat.

I just checked, Meghan still has a pulse, so, yep, its her fault.

Leg End Reject

Do you think every bump develops at the same rate?

That the weight of the mother pre-pregnancy, or whether she had children before, has no impact on the size of the bump?

Some women look heavily pregnant early in a pregnancy, some have a small bump at their due date.

Leg End Reject

https://diaryofafitmommy.com/pregnancy-11-weeks-bump-update/

There's an 11 week "bump" of a fit mother. Spot the difference?

retro:electro

Why are you posting pictures of some random woman’s pregnant belly lol

cnocbui

Leg End Reject wrote: »

Do you think every bump develops at the same rate?

That the weight of the mother pre-pregnancy, or whether she had children before, has no impact on the size of the bump?

Some women look heavily pregnant early in a pregnancy, some have a small bump at their due date.

Would you like me to play violin as your leaky specious attempt at reasonining sadly sinks beneath the SALTY waves of reality?

JoChervil

cnocbui wrote: »

It's just a coat, ffs!



Yep, no need to try and hide anything at 11+ weeks.

Of course she could have not worn a coat, but then it would still be her fault for flaunting it when she could have just worn a coat.

I just checked, Meghan still has a pulse, so, yep, its her fault.

Tell about obsession. I was never quoted so many times.

Just read the link you posted few pages ago:
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-new...dding-13406945

Few days earlier she was in a teal outfit revealing nothing.

Why someone's else bump should be a proof?

cnocbui

retro:electro wrote: »

Why are you posting pictures of some random woman’s pregnant belly lol

Quick!, look over there, I think there's a sad attempt at distraction.

Leg End Reject

cnocbui wrote: »

Would you like me to play violin as your leaky specious attempt at reasonining sadly sinks beneath the SALTY waves of reality?

No thanks, I've already posted another link to an 11 week pregnant stomach.

retro:electro

cnocbui wrote: »

Would you like me to play violin as your leaky specious attempt at reasonining sadly sinks beneath the SALTY waves of reality?

Why so argumentative? You’ve been reading too much CelebBitchy!

cnocbui

Would you people like some more salt while you flail about, clutching at straws?

Leg End Reject

cnocbui wrote: »

Would you people like some more salt while you flail about, clutching at straws?

You're the one flailing, you've ignored the posts refuting your claim that all bumps look the same for each week of pregnancy.

Masala

Jaysus.... someone pm me when this thread comes back to normality

Leg End Reject

Masala wrote: »

Jaysus.... someone pm me when this thread comes back to normality

I suspect that ship has sailed and come a cropper. :pac:

anewme

Leg End Reject wrote: »

"Dig in" again!

This is like your obsession with "Blue-haired lesbians".

No obsession, just happy to speak out against bias, sexism and misogyny.

As a woman, I will highlight when blue hair or blue haired lesbian is as used to demean women and shut them down.

It was used as an insult as recently as yesterday to stop women speaking out and I pointed it out too. Do you have an issue with that? I was in the thread about women speaking about harassment in the light of Sarah Everard's murder.

Every time I see it, I will highlight it as disrespectful and ignorant and a term to shut down womens' voices.

If you have an issue with ne highlighting hate against women, so what, bring it on.

This is the wording used ;

Its all subjective experience, two women could have the same thing happen and only the blue haired one would think it's harassment

retro:electro

A week before Eugenie’s wedding. Wow look at that bump you guys!



And in leather too, which is most unforgiving even on non pregnant people

anewme

Leg End Reject wrote: »

I suspect that ship has sailed and come a cropper. :pac:

All out of step except my Johnny :rolleyes:

Princess Calla

I would have thought wearing a coat in October would be more the norm than exception.

The Queen is wearing one, doubt she was pregnant.

Storm Callum was also predicted to hit the morning of the wedding.

The weather forecast was pretty grim for the day.

If you look at other pictures you will see them all clinging to their hats for dear life. Anyone wearing a floaty style dress the dress is welded onto their legs as they walk (by the wind)

Not wearing a coat seems a little silly given the storm warnings.

Leg End Reject

anewme wrote: »

All out of step except my Johnny :rolleyes:

Is that a dig at me?

JoChervil

Princess Calla wrote: »

I would have thought wearing a coat in October would be more the norm than exception.

The Queen is wearing one, doubt she was pregnant.

Storm Callum was also predicted to hit the morning of the wedding.

The weather forecast was pretty grim for the day.

If you look at other pictures you will see them all clinging to their hats for dear life. Anyone wearing a floaty style dress the dress is welded onto their legs as they walk (by the wind)

Not wearing a coat seems a little silly given the storm warnings.

So here they are 4 days after this wedding in Australia. No need to button it up.

Huge bump.

Leg End Reject

Quick!

Has anyone any salt for cnocbui?

anewme

Leg End Reject wrote: »

Is that a dig at me?

You made the blue haired dig at me and I’ve kicked it back at you.

Do you think it’s ok that women who highlight harassment should be labelled blue haired lesbians?

Because you seem to have more of an issue with the term being objected to, as opposed to term being used to belittle women.

I gave you an example from yesterday or the day before, as a real life example.

And yes, I highlighted it yesterday, if that’s ok with you.

anewme

JoChervil wrote: »

You are repeating this dig towards me for the 4th time. What is your problem?

Is it forbidden to return to a conversation? It looks it's you who has to constantly dig at people.

Is your post above about Harry and Meghan or me?

Ahh stop, riding off on your high horse as you hate manipulation but climbing down 2 mins later for a last kick.

At least be consistent.

And stop switching it to me.

I did not dramatically declare I was done with the thread only to appear back whinging 2 mins later. Bye bye bye.

cnocbui

JoChervil wrote: »

So here they are 4 days after this wedding in Australia. No need to button it up.

Huge bump.

18th Oct

Yeah, totally invisible.

retro:electro

I guess it depends on the angle. Where did you get that photo? I don’t remember that dress being so form fitting

kowloon

Hope the UK eventually gets a democracy and is rid of them all. That includes MM and Harry.