Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Werewolf: Stranger Things
Comments
-
Brendan WW wrote: »Obviously I disagree with that being best case
If it is that group, my order of preference for kills would be Fiona, Steve, Brendan - just based on contribution towards finding Demi so far.
I am wondering is there any way killing Liz from they group could have benefitted wolves in any way - and I think if there were wolves in that group, they were better off keeping their group intact just in case? Because whatever group is highlighted, it is bound to be Eleven, lynch, lynch, lynch until Demi is killed? (That's if we don't hit first time). So they would be increasing their chance of being killed off?
(Sorry still trying to make sense of the Liz munch).0 -
Brendan WW wrote: »I feel like you're making my point here
When Angus had the same idea as you and found a near identical timeslot, why did you go for them being village when you've just said yourself they could just as likely be wolf? Kind of reeks of trying to appear village by association
The read was a mind set read, not a read on what they were doing. If someone has the same mindset as me, i feel they are likely of the same affiliation as me.
If you feel that i am wrong doing those type of read, then you have a right to that opinion and i have a right to ignore your opinion and i'll play the game my way and you can play the game your way.0 -
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
Steve post this
Findind it hard to nail down and honest to goodness votes. I'd be on Clodagh now, but they have work so they say so might be unfair on them.
On the whole Clodagh work thing, yes that could indeed be a factor. If my work meant I could not post much or at all till late afternoon I would probably pull myself out of the game. But if I didn't I would post something to make me look ok. Her lack of text makes me think she is not a wolf because she doesn't seem to need to prove herself.
On other matters, my second Covid test was clear. (Woo ****ing Hoo.....all of you are safe from my contamination....)
Still not allowed back to work though.
0 -
-
-
-
-
KathleenGrant wrote: »Steve post this
Findind it hard to nail down and honest to goodness votes. I'd be on Clodagh now, but they have work so they say so might be unfair on them.
On the whole Clodagh work thing, yes that could indeed be a factor. If my work meant I could not post much or at all till late afternoon I would probably pull myself out of the game. But if I didn't I would post something to make me look ok. Her lack of text makes me think she is not a wolf because she doesn't seem to need to prove herself.
On other matters, my second Covid test was clear. (Woo ****ing Hoo.....all of you are safe from my contamination....)
Still not allowed back to work though.
You think a wolf would keep one foot in the game no matter what? It's a bit meta but it makes sense I guess.0 -
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
KathleenGrant wrote: »Steve post this
Findind it hard to nail down and honest to goodness votes. I'd be on Clodagh now, but they have work so they say so might be unfair on them.
On the whole Clodagh work thing, yes that could indeed be a factor. If my work meant I could not post much or at all till late afternoon I would probably pull myself out of the game. But if I didn't I would post something to make me look ok. Her lack of text makes me think she is not a wolf because she doesn't seem to need to prove herself.
On other matters, my second Covid test was clear. (Woo ****ing Hoo.....all of you are safe from my contamination....)
Still not allowed back to work though.You think a wolf would keep one foot in the game no matter what? It's a bit meta but it makes sense I guess.
I think it's a good point too. again, bit meta but we're all playing a game and there's a spirit to it as well as the rules. If you play wolf through silence it's not in the spirit of the game and you should be ashamed of yourself
It does make me lean away from condemning low posters on that fact alone. Low posting is annoying as hell, but I don't think it screams wolf0 -
Brendan WW wrote: »I think it's a good point too. again, bit meta but we're all playing a game and there's a spirit to it as well as the rules. If you play wolf through silence it's not in the spirit of the game and you should be ashamed of yourself
It does make me lean away from condemning low posters on that fact alone. Low posting is annoying as hell, but I don't think it screams wolf
There are different forms of low posting though Brendan. I agree when there is essentially nothing to go on from someone's posts. But, there can be more substance in ten posts from one player than fifty in another.0 -
Brendan WW wrote: »I think it's a good point too. again, bit meta but we're all playing a game and there's a spirit to it as well as the rules. If you play wolf through silence it's not in the spirit of the game and you should be ashamed of yourself
It does make me lean away from condemning low posters on that fact alone. Low posting is annoying as hell, but I don't think it screams wolf
OK I don't understand what meta means. My point is that if you are a wolf you surely don't stay off air for the whole day.
Or maybe you do?0 -
Eva WW wrote:There are different forms of low posting though Brendan. I agree when there is essentially nothing to go on from someone's posts. But, there can be more substance in ten posts from one player than fifty in another.
Heyyyyy
Heeeeeeyyyy
HEEEEYYYYYY
Point taken
:P0 -
-
Agree (he says with his 100th meaningless postThere are different forms of low posting though Brendan. I agree when there is essentially nothing to go on from someone's posts. But, there can be more substance in ten posts from one player than fifty in another.)
Just, for example, I don't think Clodagh being offline means she's a wolf (or that she isn't. In isolation the number of posts means nothing).
Meta as in talking about the fact we're playing a game, rather than playing the game. But I think we're all saying the same thing in different waysKathleenGrant wrote: »OK I don't understand what meta means. My point is that if you are a wolf you surely don't stay off air for the whole day.
Or maybe you do?0 -
Brendan WW wrote: »I think it's a good point too. again, bit meta but we're all playing a game and there's a spirit to it as well as the rules. If you play wolf through silence it's not in the spirit of the game and you should be ashamed of yourself
It does make me lean away from condemning low posters on that fact alone. Low posting is annoying as hell, but I don't think it screams wolf
If there is little else to go on, a good play is peek high, lynch low. End game with potatoes makes for a rubbish end where as end game with peeked active players is preferred. I nkow i'd much prefer someone who has been active all game making the game winning call at final 3, and not somebody who has not even read the thread.
So, if not wolf, its still in village interest to remove flotsam. Even better if you score a wolf in the low posters.0 -
Advertisement
-
Advertisement