Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid 19 Part XXXIV-249,437 ROI(4,906 deaths) 120,195 NI (2,145 deaths)(01/05)Read OP

Options
1195196198200201328

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 2,303 ✭✭✭Cork2021


    NIAC and NPHET are utterly conservative and use the abundance of caution as a stick to beat us with!
    We’re into our 14th month of this and the light at this supposed tunnel is getting darker by the day!!


  • Registered Users Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    marno21 wrote: »
    I was driving yesterday morning. I started the journey with the news from Liverpool. Excited people in the pub, relieved hairdresser, relieved staff at Chester Zoo. Followed by really positive Luke O’Neill. Then I flicked to Radio 1 where Sam McConkey was telling us that we won’t have crowds at events for 3-5 years.
    Time will tell how this goes.

    What I saw were videos of streets and pubs jammed with people who were mostly unvaccinated; be that completely or partially.

    One might say it's morale-boosting, but it's also a massive gamble. They've heralded in the unofficial restart of the highest-risk activities (house parties), at a time when the majority of the population are not yet vaccinated.

    Morale won't be so high if they're back to 10,000 cases a day in 4 weeks time.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,077 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    seamus wrote: »
    Time will tell how this goes.

    What I saw were videos of streets and pubs jammed with people who were mostly unvaccinated; be that completely or partially.

    One might say it's morale-boosting, but it's also a massive gamble. They've heralded in the unofficial restart of the highest-risk activities (house parties), at a time when the majority of the population are not yet vaccinated.

    Morale won't be so high if they're back to 10,000 cases a day in 4 weeks time.

    The UK have taken the grown up approach of acknowledging cases will increase, people will continue to die but vaccination effect should stop hospitals from being overwhelmed and life will go on.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,454 ✭✭✭mloc123


    seamus wrote: »
    Time will tell how this goes.

    What I saw were videos of streets and pubs jammed with people who were mostly unvaccinated; be that completely or partially.

    One might say it's morale-boosting, but it's also a massive gamble. They've heralded in the unofficial restart of the highest-risk activities (house parties), at a time when the majority of the population are not yet vaccinated.

    Morale won't be so high if they're back to 10,000 cases a day in 4 weeks time.

    Their vaccine rollout also seems to be slowing/levelling out?


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,424 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    seamus wrote: »
    Time will tell how this goes.

    What I saw were videos of streets and pubs jammed with people who were mostly unvaccinated; be that completely or partially.

    One might say it's morale-boosting, but it's also a massive gamble. They've heralded in the unofficial restart of the highest-risk activities (house parties), at a time when the majority of the population are not yet vaccinated.

    Morale won't be so high if they're back to 10,000 cases a day in 4 weeks time.

    They seem to be willing to accept 10,000 cases per day though with the level of vaccination they have. Cases will rise as they open up but if the vaccines reduce transmission and significantly reduce hospitalisations/ICU/deaths I don’t see any issues.

    Wall to wall ads on the radio encouraging people to meet outdoors. Outdoor pints. Outdoor gatherings. Anything indoors with a mask on. The reopening they’ve done should be fairly safe if people stick to the rules.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 31,092 ✭✭✭✭Lumen


    mloc123 wrote: »
    Their vaccine rollout also seems to be slowing/levelling out?

    That's largely a function of second doses. Look at the rate of doses administered.

    image.png


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,454 ✭✭✭mloc123


    Lumen wrote: »
    That's largely a function of second doses. Look at the rate of doses administered.

    image.png

    It will be interesting to see how the 12 week plan levels out in the end, all the talk about how quickly they are handling roll out etc... if this is the start of second doses it seems like their overall progress will look much slower for the next 3 months?


  • Registered Users Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    marno21 wrote: »
    They seem to be willing to accept 10,000 cases per day though with the level of vaccination they have. Cases will rise as they open up but if the vaccines reduce transmission and significantly reduce hospitalisations/ICU/deaths I don’t see any issues.
    10,000 cases is a bad number, but it's just the start.

    Problem is when you get to 25k+ cases/day then your fatalities start ratcheting up anyway; in younger people.

    Yes, the goal is protect the most vulnerable, but when you get into huge numbers of infected, a small chance of death turns into a lot of actual deaths.

    It's a gamble. Their easing of restrictions has a considerable amount of finger-crossing going on, not solid data. Less than 50% of the population has received one dose and only 11% are fully vaccinated.


  • Registered Users Posts: 784 ✭✭✭daydorunrun


    We really need to start working towards an opt in system for vaccine roll out where people can decide personally if the risk of infection is worse than the risk of complication. No point in warehousing vaccine at this point.

    I heard a doctor on the radio today saying NIAC changed the guidance on AZ because of a significant risk of complication. Later in the same conversation they listed numbers- one in a million can cause death due to clotting! How 1/1,000,000 significant when the rest of the non covid testing and treatment in out hospital for things like cancer are partially shut down and possibly missing hundred and thousands of early detection which WILL save lives. It is scandalous.

    The Covid Tribunal will go on for many years when it gets to the courts.

    “You tried your best and you failed miserably. The lesson is, never try.” Homer.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,039 ✭✭✭KrustyUCC


    "Dr McCauley told RTÉ's Today with Claire Byrne it was likely that between 200,000 to 400,000 AstraZeneca vaccines out of a total supply of 3.9 million would go unused as a result of the decision."

    https://www.rte.ie/news/coronavirus/2021/0413/1209594-astrazeneca-reaction/

    200,000 to 400,000 doses is 100,000 - 200,000 fully vaccinated people

    We cannot afford to waste that much precious vaccine over NIACs abundance of caution

    That hole in vaccination program will result in longer restrictions too


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 38,582 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    FFS, people going on about how low the risk is.
    If they can find out specifically who is vulnerable then people will be willing to take it. Until that time you'll see lots avoid AZ.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,843 ✭✭✭podgeandrodge


    KrustyUCC wrote: »
    Yes J&J is the real joker

    We need the 605,000 doses to be 605,000 fully vaccinated people

    If NIAC have the same advice as AZ it's going to be a disaster

    They are the same type of vaccines too aren't they? Bit offputting, despite low risk.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,794 ✭✭✭Charles Babbage


    prunudo wrote: »
    Problem is, Nphet don't seem to appreciate this. They have shifted their approach from dealing with the current situation to what may or not happen in the future. We are in a far better place than we were in early February or March yet given the positive circumstances they are painfully slow at opening up businesses and society.
    Hospital numbers are on a constant decline and vaccinations albeit slowly are rising yet both nphet, niac and the government seem to be blinded by fear with a glacial pace of reopening and even more conservative than last year.


    I don't see any point in having a big surge of cases now, with unpredictable effects. We will get out of this because of the vaccines and a slow and steady approach which does not have to be reversed makes a lot of sense.


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,375 ✭✭✭✭Professor Moriarty


    seamus wrote: »
    These stats vary considerably depending on age and gender.

    And at the end of the day, this isn't a long-haul flight, it's a vaccine which is being supplied in the context of something that is necessary for everyone to take.

    If we were saying that everyone in the country was being asked to make two long-haul flights this year in order to end the pandemic, then the issue of DVT would indeed come up.

    As it happens, gender is now being questioned as a factor given the cohorts who were vaccinated first. My point about the long haul flight is simply to show how rare a blood clotting event is when taking a vaccine. Similar examples could be made with contraceptive pills.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    KrustyUCC wrote: »
    "Dr McCauley told RTÉ's Today with Claire Byrne it was likely that between 200,000 to 400,000 AstraZeneca vaccines out of a total supply of 3.9 million would go unused as a result of the decision."

    https://www.rte.ie/news/coronavirus/2021/0413/1209594-astrazeneca-reaction/

    200,000 to 400,000 doses is 100,000 - 200,000 fully vaccinated people

    We cannot afford to waste that much precious vaccine over NIACs abundance of caution

    That hole in vaccination program will result in longer restrictions too

    Probably 1-2 weeks Pfizer supply in Q3.


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,375 ✭✭✭✭Professor Moriarty


    KrustyUCC wrote: »
    "Dr McCauley told RTÉ's Today with Claire Byrne it was likely that between 200,000 to 400,000 AstraZeneca vaccines out of a total supply of 3.9 million would go unused as a result of the decision."

    https://www.rte.ie/news/coronavirus/2021/0413/1209594-astrazeneca-reaction/

    200,000 to 400,000 doses is 100,000 - 200,000 fully vaccinated people

    We cannot afford to waste that much precious vaccine over NIACs abundance of caution

    That hole in vaccination program will result in longer restrictions too

    Perhaps they should offer those AZ vaccines to anyone who wants to take a chance with blood clotting. I'd take it if offered.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,039 ✭✭✭KrustyUCC


    They are the same type of vaccines too aren't they? Bit offputting, despite low risk.

    Yes that's the worry with J&J

    Was listening to RTE radio yesterday

    If J&J runs into same issues and gets same NIAC advice as AZ then that's 35% of total Q2 doses restricted to a 10 Yr cohort from 60-69


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,134 ✭✭✭caveat emptor


    KrustyUCC wrote: »
    Yes that's the worry with J&J

    Was listening to RTE radio yesterday

    If J&J runs into same issues and gets same NIAC advice as AZ then that's 35% of total Q2 doses restricted to a 10 Yr cohort from 60-69

    US is now pausing it FFS.

    https://twitter.com/gavreilly/status/1381926749597020161?s=20


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]



    Meanwhile UK opens up vaccinations to all over 45s - moderna and AZ.


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,376 ✭✭✭✭Vicxas



    Well, thats that then. See you all in 2022


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Maybe we should trade with the UK then. They take our AZ in exchange for giving us their Pfizer on a 1.5:1 basis.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,454 ✭✭✭mloc123


    Meanwhile UK opens up vaccinations to all over 45s - moderna and AZ.

    Is this is a good thing?

    Surely if there are risks reported with a vaccine, it is good practice to pause while they are investigated fully.


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,272 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd



    Up to each state what they want to do.

    The CDC review is tomorrow, expect it to be short lived to be honest.

    Based on the events seen so far in the doses given the likelihood of such events here given the number of J&J expected would be quite frankly negligible. Certainly looks like a lower risk than AZ to start with.

    Let's see where it goes, EMA have been looking at it since last week. It's 1 shot, I highly doubt it gets restricted because of that


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,350 ✭✭✭landofthetree


    Summer 2021 is gone.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,134 ✭✭✭caveat emptor


    Up to each state what they want to do.

    The CDC review is tomorrow, expect it to be short lived to be honest.

    Based on the events seen so far in the doses given the likelihood of such events here given the number of J&J expected would be quite frankly negligible. Certainly looks like a lower risk than AZ to start with.

    Let's see where it goes, EMA have been looking at it since last week. It's 1 shot, I highly doubt it gets restricted because of that

    Yeah hopefully. It really is "an abundance of caution" so they may well declare the tiny risk worth it overall. It's like the opposite of winning the lottery in terms of probability.


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,375 ✭✭✭✭Professor Moriarty


    Summer 2021 is gone.

    That's awful for you. Beautiful day here. Think I'll drive to the beach for a walk.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,905 ✭✭✭Chris_5339762


    mloc123 wrote: »
    Is this is a good thing?

    Surely if there are risks reported with a vaccine, it is good practice to pause while they are investigated fully.


    Yes and no. Its a balance of risks. It seems as if this clot issue does exist, but at such a low level that the damage caused by COVID in the weeks that this delays things, is higher than just allowing the odd clot to happen as a known, justifiable side effect.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,350 ✭✭✭landofthetree


    Probably 1-2 weeks Pfizer supply in Q3.

    Very optimistic to think that will hapoen.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,843 ✭✭✭podgeandrodge


    Yes and no. Its a balance of risks. It seems as if this clot issue does exist, but at such a low level that the damage caused by COVID in the weeks that this delays things, is higher than just allowing the odd clot to happen as a known, justifiable side effect.

    Agreed. But it doesn't look like they are approaching this from a "save thousands of lives, cause small number of deaths" logic. Rather, that the small number of deaths be prevented, even if that reduces lives saved.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 18,492 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    marno21 wrote: »
    Wall to wall ads on the radio encouraging people to meet outdoors. Outdoor pints. Outdoor gatherings. Anything indoors with a mask on. The reopening they’ve done should be fairly safe if people stick to the rules.
    Over here we have TV ads shaming people for the heinous crime of being friendly to somebody in the work canteen, or giving a lift to an old woman with shopping. Images of empty canteens interposed with images of people in ICU beds.

    It is a ****ing disgrace what the media is doing in this country, which I guess makes them a good match to the governing bodies.
    seamus wrote: »
    Maybe we should trade with the UK then. They take our AZ in exchange for giving us their Pfizer on a 1.5:1 basis.

    That would involve Michael Martin actually getting off his arse and doing something proactive.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement