Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Vaccine Megathread - See OP for threadbans
Options
Comments
-
Everyone panicking and calling the astra vaccine ****e and useless need to calm down a bit. Seemingly there's around a one in a million chance of developing a fatal clot from a first dose of the vaccine, which would correspond to maybe one or two people in the entire country considering how much work BioNtech and others are putting up.
Covid has killed thousands in Ireland, and not using these vaccines to save one or two lives will most definitely lead to a greater number of deaths, not to mention the increased economic impact of delaying the rollout.
There's a lot of hyperbole and incorrect statements going around in this thread at the minute, giving out this vaccine as it comes in has a net positive on the number of lives saved overall. If we really wanted to stay somewhat cautious, which we should, giving astra to over 30s or 40s wouldn't affect the rollout time at all, but over 60 seems like overkill0 -
Deleted User wrote: »Whats this now?
No matter how you try to educate the ignorant or clueless they’ll still never get it.0 -
patnor1011 wrote: »I guess that I wil wait for more studies particularly possible long time effect and delayed response. Folks at Harvard and MIT seems to stumbled onto something.
Researchers from Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) are warning that the messenger RNA (mRNA) technology used in Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines” has the capability to forever alter recipients’ genomic DNA, making them more susceptible to disease and death.
Their December preprint paper contains findings about wild coronaviruses that challenge the CDC’s (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) narrative that synthetic mRNA from Chinese virus injections cannot enter cell nuclei where DNA resides. It also questions the CDC claim that cells get rid of this synthetic mRNA “soon after it is finished using the programmed instructions.”
“Under ordinary circumstances, the body makes (‘transcribes’) mRNA from the DNA in a cell’s nucleus. The mRNA then travels out of the nucleus into the cytoplasm, where it provides instructions about which proteins to make,” explains Children’s Health Defense (CHD) about how the process works naturally.
“By comparison, mRNA vaccines send their chemically synthesized mRNA payload (bundled with spike protein-manufacturing instructions) directly into the cytoplasm,” it adds about how the synthetic mRNA found in Wuhan flu shots functions.
Biochemist and molecular biologist Doug Corrigan, PhD, and his team say they were perplexed as to why many people who had already been injected for Chinese germs with synthetic mRNA still tested “positive” for them later on down the road. What they ultimately determined is that mRNA “vaccines” may be permanently altering human DNA through reverse transcription.
Their paper explains that SARS-CoV-2 RNA s “can be reverse transcribed in human cells,” contrary to what the CDC claims. Further, “these DNA sequences can be integrated into the cell genome and subsequently be transcribed,” this being a phenomenon known as “retro-integration.”
n Corrigan’s view, the information contained in his preprint “validates that this is at least plausible, and most likely probable.” The DNA-to-mRNA pathway is not a one-way street like the CDC claims. Reverse transcriptase enzymes do, in fact, have the ability to convert RNA into DNA, which can then integrate back into cell nuclei DNA. More than 40 percent of mammalian genomes, it turns out, comprise the products of reverse transcription.
“The preliminary evidence cited by the Harvard-MIT researchers indicates that endogenous reverse transcriptase enzymes may facilitate reverse transcription of coronavirus RNAs and trigger their integration into the human genome,” CHD explains.
The potential result of this, Corrigan and his team warn, is “a more severe immune response” among the “vaccinated” when they are exposed to wild-type illness – think cytokine storm or autoimmune disease.
https://sciencewithdrdoug.com/2020/11/27/will-an-rna-vaccine-permanently-alter-my-dna/
https://sciencewithdrdoug.com/2021/02/15/breaking-study-sheds-more-light-on-whether-an-rna-vaccine-can-permanently-alter-dna/
Both articles are simply idle speculation. From the second article:
"Again, this is a theoretical exercise I am presenting for consideration. I am not making the claim that an mRNA vaccine will permanently alter your genomic DNA, and I didn’t make this claim in my first article, although it appears that troll sites made the fallacious claim that I did."0 -
adam240610 wrote: »Everyone panicking and calling the astra vaccine ****e and useless need to calm down a bit. Seemingly there's around a one in a million chance of developing a fatal clot from a first dose of the vaccine, which would correspond to maybe one or two people in the entire country considering how much work BioNtech and others are putting up.
Covid has killed thousands in Ireland, and not using these vaccines to save one or two lives will most definitely lead to a greater number of deaths, not to mention the increased economic impact of delaying the rollout.
There's a lot of hyperbole and incorrect statements going around in this thread at the minute, giving out this vaccine as it comes in has a net positive on the number of lives saved overall. If we really wanted to stay somewhat cautious, which we should, giving astra to over 30s or 40s wouldn't affect the rollout time at all, but over 60 seems like overkill
Nonsense, covids mortality rate on under 50s with no underlying conditions is so low that it’s it not worth the risk of taking az0 -
patnor1011 wrote: »I guess that I wil wait for more studies particularly possible long time effect and delayed response. Folks at Harvard and MIT seems to stumbled onto something.
Researchers from Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) are warning that the messenger RNA (mRNA) technology used in Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines” has the capability to forever alter recipients’ genomic DNA, making them more susceptible to disease and death.
Their December preprint paper contains findings about wild coronaviruses that challenge the CDC’s (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) narrative that synthetic mRNA from Chinese virus injections cannot enter cell nuclei where DNA resides. It also questions the CDC claim that cells get rid of this synthetic mRNA “soon after it is finished using the programmed instructions.”
“Under ordinary circumstances, the body makes (‘transcribes’) mRNA from the DNA in a cell’s nucleus. The mRNA then travels out of the nucleus into the cytoplasm, where it provides instructions about which proteins to make,” explains Children’s Health Defense (CHD) about how the process works naturally.
“By comparison, mRNA vaccines send their chemically synthesized mRNA payload (bundled with spike protein-manufacturing instructions) directly into the cytoplasm,” it adds about how the synthetic mRNA found in Wuhan flu shots functions.
Biochemist and molecular biologist Doug Corrigan, PhD, and his team say they were perplexed as to why many people who had already been injected for Chinese germs with synthetic mRNA still tested “positive” for them later on down the road. What they ultimately determined is that mRNA “vaccines” may be permanently altering human DNA through reverse transcription.
Their paper explains that SARS-CoV-2 RNA s “can be reverse transcribed in human cells,” contrary to what the CDC claims. Further, “these DNA sequences can be integrated into the cell genome and subsequently be transcribed,” this being a phenomenon known as “retro-integration.”
n Corrigan’s view, the information contained in his preprint “validates that this is at least plausible, and most likely probable.” The DNA-to-mRNA pathway is not a one-way street like the CDC claims. Reverse transcriptase enzymes do, in fact, have the ability to convert RNA into DNA, which can then integrate back into cell nuclei DNA. More than 40 percent of mammalian genomes, it turns out, comprise the products of reverse transcription.
“The preliminary evidence cited by the Harvard-MIT researchers indicates that endogenous reverse transcriptase enzymes may facilitate reverse transcription of coronavirus RNAs and trigger their integration into the human genome,” CHD explains.
The potential result of this, Corrigan and his team warn, is “a more severe immune response” among the “vaccinated” when they are exposed to wild-type illness – think cytokine storm or autoimmune disease.
https://sciencewithdrdoug.com/2020/11/27/will-an-rna-vaccine-permanently-alter-my-dna/
https://sciencewithdrdoug.com/2021/02/15/breaking-study-sheds-more-light-on-whether-an-rna-vaccine-can-permanently-alter-dna/
What in the feck is this gibberish?0 -
Advertisement
-
patnor1011 wrote: »I guess that I wil wait for more studies particularly possible long time effect and delayed response. Folks at Harvard and MIT seems to stumbled onto something.
Researchers from Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) are warning that the messenger RNA (mRNA) technology used in Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines” has the capability to forever alter recipients’ genomic DNA, making them more susceptible to disease and death.
Their December preprint paper contains findings about wild coronaviruses that challenge the CDC’s (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) narrative that synthetic mRNA from Chinese virus injections cannot enter cell nuclei where DNA resides. It also questions the CDC claim that cells get rid of this synthetic mRNA “soon after it is finished using the programmed instructions.”
“Under ordinary circumstances, the body makes (‘transcribes’) mRNA from the DNA in a cell’s nucleus. The mRNA then travels out of the nucleus into the cytoplasm, where it provides instructions about which proteins to make,” explains Children’s Health Defense (CHD) about how the process works naturally.
“By comparison, mRNA vaccines send their chemically synthesized mRNA payload (bundled with spike protein-manufacturing instructions) directly into the cytoplasm,” it adds about how the synthetic mRNA found in Wuhan flu shots functions.
Biochemist and molecular biologist Doug Corrigan, PhD, and his team say they were perplexed as to why many people who had already been injected for Chinese germs with synthetic mRNA still tested “positive” for them later on down the road. What they ultimately determined is that mRNA “vaccines” may be permanently altering human DNA through reverse transcription.
Their paper explains that SARS-CoV-2 RNA s “can be reverse transcribed in human cells,” contrary to what the CDC claims. Further, “these DNA sequences can be integrated into the cell genome and subsequently be transcribed,” this being a phenomenon known as “retro-integration.”
n Corrigan’s view, the information contained in his preprint “validates that this is at least plausible, and most likely probable.” The DNA-to-mRNA pathway is not a one-way street like the CDC claims. Reverse transcriptase enzymes do, in fact, have the ability to convert RNA into DNA, which can then integrate back into cell nuclei DNA. More than 40 percent of mammalian genomes, it turns out, comprise the products of reverse transcription.
“The preliminary evidence cited by the Harvard-MIT researchers indicates that endogenous reverse transcriptase enzymes may facilitate reverse transcription of coronavirus RNAs and trigger their integration into the human genome,” CHD explains.
The potential result of this, Corrigan and his team warn, is “a more severe immune response” among the “vaccinated” when they are exposed to wild-type illness – think cytokine storm or autoimmune disease.
https://sciencewithdrdoug.com/2020/11/27/will-an-rna-vaccine-permanently-alter-my-dna/
https://sciencewithdrdoug.com/2021/02/15/breaking-study-sheds-more-light-on-whether-an-rna-vaccine-can-permanently-alter-dna/
What an utter load of crap.
Refers to covid vaccines as the "wuhan flu shot" & refers to covid as "Chinese germs"
That whole thing is some pile of anti vax crap.0 -
stephenjmcd wrote: »What an utter load of crap.
Refers to covid vaccines as the "wuhan flu shot" & refers to covid as "Chinese germs"
That whole thing is some pile of anti vax crap.
You mean an article completely lacking citations on a website called science with Dr. Doug isn't legitimate? I need to reevaluate my sources.0 -
Doctor Jimbob wrote: »What in the feck is this gibberish?
I think it’s just some whatsapp template and memo rubbish the anti vaxxers that are sending to each other.0 -
A nice read:
Doug Corrigan pushing bad science and anti-vax tropes about mRNA vaccines
https://www.skepticalraptor.com/skepticalraptorblog.php/doug-corrigan-pushing-bad-science-and-anti-vax-tropes-about-mrna-vaccines/0 -
AZ will finish its work for those already on one shot unless that health issue emerges. The positive from this is that AZ has now been assigned to one age category. We won't get to the 30s and 40s for quite some time, now looking more like July. By then we'll have a lot more Pfizer, J&J, Moderna and probably CureVac.adam240610 wrote: »Everyone panicking and calling the astra vaccine ****e and useless need to calm down a bit. Seemingly there's around a one in a million chance of developing a fatal clot from a first dose of the vaccine, which would correspond to maybe one or two people in the entire country considering how much work BioNtech and others are putting up.
Covid has killed thousands in Ireland, and not using these vaccines to save one or two lives will most definitely lead to a greater number of deaths, not to mention the increased economic impact of delaying the rollout.
There's a lot of hyperbole and incorrect statements going around in this thread at the minute, giving out this vaccine as it comes in has a net positive on the number of lives saved overall. If we really wanted to stay somewhat cautious, which we should, giving astra to over 30s or 40s wouldn't affect the rollout time at all, but over 60 seems like overkill0 -
Advertisement
-
Doctor Jimbob wrote: »You mean an article completely lacking citations on a website called science with Dr. Doug isn't legitimate? I need to reevaluate my sources.
There's a market for science with Doctor Jimbob if you really want to push the boat out0 -
The worst thing about this is the safety overkill from Western regulators is going to damage confidence throughout the world. The Oxford vaccine is the only affordable option for many poorer countries.
There is also Sinopharm although its efficacy is less than AZ.
A relative tested positive for Covid yesterday, 4 weeks after her 2nd Sinopharm dose, quite a common occurrence.
Mild, cold-like symptoms only.0 -
stephenjmcd wrote: »There's a market for science with Doctor Jimbob if you really want to push the baot out
What about me?:pac:
"Pretending to do science with funnydog" sounds quite lovely. I'd read it:o0 -
patnor1011 wrote: »I guess that I wil wait for more studies particularly possible long time effect and delayed response. Folks at Harvard and MIT seems to stumbled onto something.
Researchers from Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) are warning that the messenger RNA (mRNA) technology used in Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines” has the capability to forever alter recipients’ genomic DNA, making them more susceptible to disease and death.
Their December preprint paper contains findings about wild coronaviruses that challenge the CDC’s (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) narrative that synthetic mRNA from Chinese virus injections cannot enter cell nuclei where DNA resides. It also questions the CDC claim that cells get rid of this synthetic mRNA “soon after it is finished using the programmed instructions.”
“Under ordinary circumstances, the body makes (‘transcribes’) mRNA from the DNA in a cell’s nucleus. The mRNA then travels out of the nucleus into the cytoplasm, where it provides instructions about which proteins to make,” explains Children’s Health Defense (CHD) about how the process works naturally.
“By comparison, mRNA vaccines send their chemically synthesized mRNA payload (bundled with spike protein-manufacturing instructions) directly into the cytoplasm,” it adds about how the synthetic mRNA found in Wuhan flu shots functions.
Biochemist and molecular biologist Doug Corrigan, PhD, and his team say they were perplexed as to why many people who had already been injected for Chinese germs with synthetic mRNA still tested “positive” for them later on down the road. What they ultimately determined is that mRNA “vaccines” may be permanently altering human DNA through reverse transcription.
Their paper explains that SARS-CoV-2 RNA s “can be reverse transcribed in human cells,” contrary to what the CDC claims. Further, “these DNA sequences can be integrated into the cell genome and subsequently be transcribed,” this being a phenomenon known as “retro-integration.”
n Corrigan’s view, the information contained in his preprint “validates that this is at least plausible, and most likely probable.” The DNA-to-mRNA pathway is not a one-way street like the CDC claims. Reverse transcriptase enzymes do, in fact, have the ability to convert RNA into DNA, which can then integrate back into cell nuclei DNA. More than 40 percent of mammalian genomes, it turns out, comprise the products of reverse transcription.
“The preliminary evidence cited by the Harvard-MIT researchers indicates that endogenous reverse transcriptase enzymes may facilitate reverse transcription of coronavirus RNAs and trigger their integration into the human genome,” CHD explains.
The potential result of this, Corrigan and his team warn, is “a more severe immune response” among the “vaccinated” when they are exposed to wild-type illness – think cytokine storm or autoimmune disease.
https://sciencewithdrdoug.com/2020/11/27/will-an-rna-vaccine-permanently-alter-my-dna/
https://sciencewithdrdoug.com/2021/02/15/breaking-study-sheds-more-light-on-whether-an-rna-vaccine-can-permanently-alter-dna/
What a load of absolute drivel. Anyone with leaving cert biology can explain the process of reverse transcription and what is required for that process. None of the components of which exist in vaccines or SARS-CoV-2.0 -
Calling him a quack got me :pac:funnydoggy wrote: »A nice read:
Doug Corrigan pushing bad science and anti-vax tropes about mRNA vaccines
https://www.skepticalraptor.com/skepticalraptorblog.php/doug-corrigan-pushing-bad-science-and-anti-vax-tropes-about-mrna-vaccines/0 -
funnydoggy wrote: »What about me?:pac:
"Pretending to do science with funnydog" sounds quite lovely. I'd read it:o
No no, you need to make it sound believable to the average gullible person. Heavy use of capitals and claims to qualifications you may not have would help - for example something like "REAL SCIENCE with Professor funnydog"0 -
patnor1011 wrote: »I guess that I wil wait for more studies particularly possible long time effect and delayed response. Folks at Harvard and MIT seems to stumbled onto something.
Researchers from Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) are warning that the messenger RNA (mRNA) technology used in Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines” has the capability to forever alter recipients’ genomic DNA, making them more susceptible to disease and death.
Their December preprint paper contains findings about wild coronaviruses that challenge the CDC’s (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) narrative that synthetic mRNA from Chinese virus injections cannot enter cell nuclei where DNA resides. It also questions the CDC claim that cells get rid of this synthetic mRNA “soon after it is finished using the programmed instructions.”
“Under ordinary circumstances, the body makes (‘transcribes’) mRNA from the DNA in a cell’s nucleus. The mRNA then travels out of the nucleus into the cytoplasm, where it provides instructions about which proteins to make,” explains Children’s Health Defense (CHD) about how the process works naturally.
“By comparison, mRNA vaccines send their chemically synthesized mRNA payload (bundled with spike protein-manufacturing instructions) directly into the cytoplasm,” it adds about how the synthetic mRNA found in Wuhan flu shots functions.
Biochemist and molecular biologist Doug Corrigan, PhD, and his team say they were perplexed as to why many people who had already been injected for Chinese germs with synthetic mRNA still tested “positive” for them later on down the road. What they ultimately determined is that mRNA “vaccines” may be permanently altering human DNA through reverse transcription.
Their paper explains that SARS-CoV-2 RNA s “can be reverse transcribed in human cells,” contrary to what the CDC claims. Further, “these DNA sequences can be integrated into the cell genome and subsequently be transcribed,” this being a phenomenon known as “retro-integration.”
n Corrigan’s view, the information contained in his preprint “validates that this is at least plausible, and most likely probable.” The DNA-to-mRNA pathway is not a one-way street like the CDC claims. Reverse transcriptase enzymes do, in fact, have the ability to convert RNA into DNA, which can then integrate back into cell nuclei DNA. More than 40 percent of mammalian genomes, it turns out, comprise the products of reverse transcription.
“The preliminary evidence cited by the Harvard-MIT researchers indicates that endogenous reverse transcriptase enzymes may facilitate reverse transcription of coronavirus RNAs and trigger their integration into the human genome,” CHD explains.
The potential result of this, Corrigan and his team warn, is “a more severe immune response” among the “vaccinated” when they are exposed to wild-type illness – think cytokine storm or autoimmune disease.
https://sciencewithdrdoug.com/2020/11/27/will-an-rna-vaccine-permanently-alter-my-dna/
https://sciencewithdrdoug.com/2021/02/15/breaking-study-sheds-more-light-on-whether-an-rna-vaccine-can-permanently-alter-dna/
That's a notorious anti-vax group.0 -
Man, I miss the old vaccines thread0
-
Professor Moriarty wrote: »Both articles are simply idle speculation. From the second article:
"Again, this is a theoretical exercise I am presenting for consideration. I am not making the claim that an mRNA vaccine will permanently alter your genomic DNA, and I didn’t make this claim in my first article, although it appears that troll sites made the fallacious claim that I did."
That is science and how it works. Someone make claim and then others try to disprove it. So far nobody disproved fact that they mRNA may alter or "programming" may go wrong.
Also we based a lot of our responses on idle speculations like how many people would die without lockdowns or how vaccines wil save us and how safe they are and then we have this which is not that "idle speculation" ....
https://medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?TABLE=ON&GROUP1=CAT&EVENTS=ON&VAX=COVID19&VAXTYPES=COVID-19&VAXMAN=PFIZER/BIONTECH0 -
-
Advertisement
-
Is there a point to this or is it just a sneaky way to get CT/anti-vax stuff onto other threads?patnor1011 wrote: »Sure but we based a lot of our responses on idle speculations like how many people would die without lockdowns or how vaccines wil save us and how safe they are and then we have this which is not that "idle speculation" ....
https://medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?TABLE=ON&GROUP1=CAT&EVENTS=ON&VAX=COVID19&VAXTYPES=COVID-19&VAXMAN=PFIZER/BIONTECH0 -
In light of AZ being prescribed for only over 60's, why aren't we giving it to over 70's now? If they can only go to 60 - 69 year old's, many vaccines are going to be left idle when June comes around and the overall vaccine roll out will be delayed.0
-
-
patnor1011 wrote: »That is science and how it works. Someone make claim and then others try to disprove it. So far nobody disproved fact that they mRNA may alter or "programming" may go wrong.
There is a human colony living under the surface of Pluto that was planted there by aliens.
I have no evidence of this, but it is up to you to prove me wrong. That's how it works apparently.0 -
-
Not necessarily, we can't say what will be known about this issue in 3 months and COVAX will happily take what we don't want.SheepsClothing wrote: »In light of AZ being prescribed for only over 60's, why aren't we giving it to over 70's now? If they can only go to 60 - 69 year old's, many vaccines are going to be left idle when June comes around and the overall vaccine roll out will be delayed.0 -
SheepsClothing wrote: »In light of AZ being prescribed for only over 60's, why aren't we giving it to over 70's now? If they can only go to 60 - 69 year old's, many vaccines are going to be left idle when June comes around and the overall vaccine roll out will be delayed.
The vast majority of over 70 have already had one dose of Pfizer .0 -
What about people 60-69 who have medical conditions that put them at high risk of Covid will they be offered rna vaccines or is it literally everyone 60-69 gets AZ?0
-
patnor1011 wrote: »That is science and how it works. Someone make claim and then others try to disprove it. So far nobody disproved fact that they mRNA may alter or "programming" may go wrong.
Also we based a lot of our responses on idle speculations like how many people would die without lockdowns or how vaccines wil save us and how safe they are and then we have this which is not that "idle speculation" ....
https://medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?TABLE=ON&GROUP1=CAT&EVENTS=ON&VAX=COVID19&VAXTYPES=COVID-19&VAXMAN=PFIZER/BIONTECH
That is not how science works. Someone makes a claim, puts forward a hypothesis and tests it, examines the results and publishes them with a conclusion. Others will test the hypothesis, the procedure, the results and if it is replicable.
Science is not some essential oil peddling twat makes outlandish ill informed claims and is right until proven otherwise.0 -
Advertisement
-
patnor1011 wrote: »I guess that I wil wait for more studies particularly possible long time effect and delayed response. Folks at Harvard and MIT seems to stumbled onto something.
Researchers from Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) are warning that the messenger RNA (mRNA) technology used in Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines” has the capability to forever alter recipients’ genomic DNA, making them more susceptible to disease and death.
Their December preprint paper contains findings about wild coronaviruses that challenge the CDC’s (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) narrative that synthetic mRNA from Chinese virus injections cannot enter cell nuclei where DNA resides. It also questions the CDC claim that cells get rid of this synthetic mRNA “soon after it is finished using the programmed instructions.”
“Under ordinary circumstances, the body makes (‘transcribes’) mRNA from the DNA in a cell’s nucleus. The mRNA then travels out of the nucleus into the cytoplasm, where it provides instructions about which proteins to make,” explains Children’s Health Defense (CHD) about how the process works naturally.
“By comparison, mRNA vaccines send their chemically synthesized mRNA payload (bundled with spike protein-manufacturing instructions) directly into the cytoplasm,” it adds about how the synthetic mRNA found in Wuhan flu shots functions.
Biochemist and molecular biologist Doug Corrigan, PhD, and his team say they were perplexed as to why many people who had already been injected for Chinese germs with synthetic mRNA still tested “positive” for them later on down the road. What they ultimately determined is that mRNA “vaccines” may be permanently altering human DNA through reverse transcription.
Their paper explains that SARS-CoV-2 RNA s “can be reverse transcribed in human cells,” contrary to what the CDC claims. Further, “these DNA sequences can be integrated into the cell genome and subsequently be transcribed,” this being a phenomenon known as “retro-integration.”
n Corrigan’s view, the information contained in his preprint “validates that this is at least plausible, and most likely probable.” The DNA-to-mRNA pathway is not a one-way street like the CDC claims. Reverse transcriptase enzymes do, in fact, have the ability to convert RNA into DNA, which can then integrate back into cell nuclei DNA. More than 40 percent of mammalian genomes, it turns out, comprise the products of reverse transcription.
“The preliminary evidence cited by the Harvard-MIT researchers indicates that endogenous reverse transcriptase enzymes may facilitate reverse transcription of coronavirus RNAs and trigger their integration into the human genome,” CHD explains.
The potential result of this, Corrigan and his team warn, is “a more severe immune response” among the “vaccinated” when they are exposed to wild-type illness – think cytokine storm or autoimmune disease.
https://sciencewithdrdoug.com/2020/11/27/will-an-rna-vaccine-permanently-alter-my-dna/
https://sciencewithdrdoug.com/2021/02/15/breaking-study-sheds-more-light-on-whether-an-rna-vaccine-can-permanently-alter-dna/
Seems a legitimate sourceThe Author of Light – Did God Reveal His Identity in the Physics of Light?
New Book by Dr. Doug Corrigan
I have always wondered how it feels to be a patsy for assorted charlatans/anti-vac/ pseudo scientific nut jobs?0
![[Deleted User]](/applications/dashboard/design/images/defaulticon.png)
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement