FF/FG/Green Government - Part 3 - Threadbanned User List in OP

FullyComp

RandomViewer wrote: »

Do the lifts still work?

Yes but even if they didn't it would hardly be a slum.

The Provos really are a cancer on our country

RandomViewer

FullyComp wrote: »

Yes but even if they didn't it would hardly be a slum.

The Provos really are a cancer on our country

87 floors, who's going to climb that many stairs, only people who can't afford anywhere else, tenements aren't coming back no matter what
Second part of your comment suggests you've been hanging out with Eoghan Barbara Harris too much,

skimpydoo

FG giving us one more reason not to vote for them.

https://twitter.com/Tupp_Ed/status/1396154782080028672?s=20

blanch152

skimpydoo wrote: »

FG giving us one more reason not to vote for them.

https://twitter.com/Tupp_Ed/status/1396154782080028672?s=20

Seems that once again, you are out of step with the rest of the country.

https://www.rte.ie/news/politics/2021/0522/1223336-poll-politics/

Government is at 55%, up 7% since the general election. Seems like the voters think they are doing a good job overall.

FrancieBrady

blanch152 wrote: »

Seems that once again, you are out of step with the rest of the country.

https://www.rte.ie/news/politics/2021/0522/1223336-poll-politics/

Government is at 55%, up 7% since the general election. Seems like the voters think they are doing a good job overall.

:D:D A brave face. Well done

blanch152

FrancieBrady wrote: »

:D:D A brave face. Well done

Are you arguing with the numbers again?

skimpydoo

blanch152 wrote: »

Are you arguing with the numbers again?

The ones that state SF have the most votes

Ramasun

Only 4% of housing in Ireland is apartments/flats compared to the EU average of 42%.

Ubbquittious

Ramasun wrote: »

Only 4% of housing in Ireland is apartments/flats compared to the EU average of 42%.

Great! Who wants to live in one of those depressing yokes?

Bubbaclaus

People being gleeful at 1,000 apartments in our city centre being refused, in a location that suits it, is just bizarre. Do we need more places for people to live or not?

Let's just continue with the ridiculous urban sprawl instead I suppose.

Jinglejangle69

skimpydoo wrote: »

FG giving us one more reason not to vote for them.

https://twitter.com/Tupp_Ed/status/1396154782080028672?s=20

Ah here ffs.

Twitter is a cesspit.

skimpydoo

skimpydoo wrote: »

FG giving us one more reason not to vote for them.

https://twitter.com/Tupp_Ed/status/1396154782080028672?s=20

Did he nip in to Penney's for a shirt on the way?

mattser

blanch152 wrote: »

Seems that once again, you are out of step with the rest of the country.

https://www.rte.ie/news/politics/2021/0522/1223336-poll-politics/

Government is at 55%, up 7% since the general election. Seems like the voters think they are doing a good job overall.

Tell me why I don't like Sundays. Shinners take on the old Rats hit. :D

skimpydoo

skimpydoo wrote: »

FG giving us one more reason not to vote for them.

https://twitter.com/Tupp_Ed/status/1396154782080028672?s=20

What really gets me about that photo is that the shirt was worn straight from the packet without being ironed.

RandomViewer

[Deleted User] wrote: »

What really gets me about that photo is that the shirt was worn straight from the packet without being ironed.

It was him and Simon Harris, would you trust either of them with an iron?

Jinglejangle69

[Deleted User] wrote: »

What really gets me about that photo is that the shirt was worn straight from the packet without being ironed.

The witty comments like a blueshirt wearing a blueshirt.

Like a bunch of 6 year olds.

FrancieBrady

That photo and the fact that it was retweeted by party members does point to an arrogant and uncaring blindness in FG.
That they wouldn't see the issue tells us more about them than anything else.

RandomViewer

Jinglejangle69 wrote: »

The witty comments like a blueshirt wearing a blueshirt.

Like a bunch of 6 year olds.

The shirt was obviously bought for the photo and the beggar was centre of the image, we may laugh but it's likely this is the image they wanted to convey,

Jinglejangle69

RandomViewer wrote: »

The shirt was obviously bought for the photo and the beggar was centre of the image, we may laugh but it's likely this is the image they wanted to convey,

Ever hear of professional beggars?

Noone knows any of the details of the beggar if they even were one.

Social media and its merryband of followers love spreading fake news for political purposes

It's a cesspit.

RandomViewer

Jinglejangle69 wrote: »

Ever hear of professional beggars?

Noone knows any of the details of the beggar if they even were one.

Social media and its merrybound of followers love spreading fake news for political purposes

It's a cesspit.

Are you saying they paid the beggar to be in the photo?

McMurphy

Jinglejangle69 wrote: »

Ever hear of professional beggars?

Noone knows any of the details of the beggar if they even were one.

Social media and its merrybound of followers love spreading fake news for political purposes

It's a cesspit.

You do realise you're using social media to complain about people using social media?

Jinglejangle69

RandomViewer wrote: »

Are you saying they paid the beggar to be in the photo?

No.

And you know I'm not.

Jinglejangle69

McMurphy wrote: »

You do realise you're using social media to complain about people using social media?

I'm talking about twitter, Facebook, Instagram etc.

Not a discussion board.

RandomViewer

Jinglejangle69 wrote: »

No.

And you know I'm not.

Do I? FG mantra is Greed is Good, F##k everyone else,
I get the notion this was staged to appeal to their neo-Thatcherite core

McMurphy

Jinglejangle69 wrote: »

I'm talking about twitter, Facebook, Instagram etc.

Not a discussion board.

This is still social media, as is Facebook and Twitter etc.

The only difference is this one is more heavily moderated than the likes of Twitter and Facebook, but they too have "threads" where people discuss things, more often than not they're echo chambers with folk all shouting the same sentiments, but they're still a form of discussion boards in their own rights too.

skimpydoo

Jinglejangle69 wrote: »

I'm talking about twitter, Facebook, Instagram etc.

Not a discussion board.

I think the lady doth protest too much.

He is not used to views opposite to his own being debated rationally.

Jinglejangle69

RandomViewer wrote: »

Do I? FG mantra is Greed is Good, F##k everyone else,
I get the notion this was staged to appeal to their neo-Thatcherite core

So you think they put a beggar deliberately in this photo to appeal to FG voters because they like seeing people begging on the streets?

FG really have got into SF lads heads reincarnated as the devil!!

****en laughable.

Jinglejangle69

skimpydoo wrote: »

I think the lady doth protest too much.

He is not used to views opposite to his own being debated rationally.

Sorry you're saying twitter is where views are debated rationally and I'm not used to that???

Twitter? Really?

UDAWINNER

https://twitter.com/patphelan/status/1396435573007650818


Wonder how many others in FF have this conflict of interest, the party for everyone mehole

Jinglejangle69

McMurphy wrote: »

This is still social media, as is Facebook and Twitter etc.

The only difference is this one is more heavily moderated than the likes of Twitter and Facebook, but they too have "threads" where people discuss things, more often than not they're echo chambers with folk all shouting the same sentiments, but they're still a form of discussion boards in their own rights too.

Right OK.

Then twitter, facebook etc are cesspits. As you say at least boards is moderated to call out fake news and lies and nonsense.