Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Cyclists, insurance and road tax

15960616264

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,713 ✭✭✭BabysCoffee


    carfinder wrote: »
    My own opinion is that many cyclists get a smug superiority complex once they get on a bike. It gets very Orwellian - "two wheels good, four wheels bad" territory. And many cyclists seem to conflate defensive cycling with aggressive cycling.
    My own experience as a road user is that you must adapt your behaviour in line with the conditions e.g. on a hot summer day, expect lots of traffic - cars, pedestrians cyclists etc and expect the unexpected - kids running out on the road, cars parallel parking, etc. Most responsible road users adapt to the conditions. Notably, many cyclists that I observe do not.

    Cant comment on your wife's experience but lets not get in the way of your strawman:rolleyes:
    If your experience as a cyclist is soo poor, maybe you should limit yourself to segregated cycle tracks where you will feel safer

    That may be your opinion but I can tell you that I don't get a smug superiority complex once I get on a bike. I just want to get to work and back safely on my fold up bike.

    I can also tell you that my 70 yr old mother also does not have a smug superiority complex once on her bike. She just wants to safely get down and back from the local shops.

    Can I clarify if you think a 12 yr old kid cycling to school has a smug superiority complex? Or maybe it is the mum cycling her children to school in her cargo bike that has the smug superiority complex?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 358 ✭✭carfinder


    Trekker09 wrote: »
    Well I commute approximately 60 - 80km a day depending on the route, so am more likely to encounter near misses. The vast majority I just shrug my shoulders and accept it as this is par for the course here in Ireland, not so in other countries. If it is serious enough and I can make contact with the driver then of course I will have words with the driver. In most of these exchanges the driver acknowledges their mistake and it's a civil exchange. Usually when it gets heated, it's the driver that gets aggressive first because they won't accept responsibility. I'm quite a laid back person, even on the bike, but when my welfare is put in jeopardy I respond, as most people would. If you saw a driver put one of your kids at risk and you caught up with them, what would you do?
    I tend not to catch up with, or engage with other road users at all - you don't know what kind of person you could be engaging with. From the way you phrased your post, it sounds like this is a regular occurance for you - it sounds like an aggressive and potentially dangerous way to behave!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22 CHESSMUTANT


    carfinder wrote: »
    It gets very Orwellian
    Can confirm. My four year old recently learned to ride her first pedal bike and now refuses to eat her broccoli, claiming that it's double plus ungood.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,668 ✭✭✭Trekker09


    carfinder wrote: »
    I tend not to catch up with, or engage with other road users at all - you don't know what kind of person you could be engaging with. From the way you phrased your post, it sounds like this is a regular occurance for you - it sounds like an aggressive and potentially dangerous way to behave!

    Only if you engage with them in an aggressive manner 1st ;) Have you commuted on a regular basis?

    What is a regular occurance is motorists putting me at risk through their lack of consideration/judgement and more often than not breaking the rules of the road. Should I just be passive and accept the behaviour?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,623 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio


    I cannot believe there are nearly 2000 posts of circular arguments on this thread.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,507 ✭✭✭Fighting Tao


    Padre_Pio wrote: »
    I cannot believe there are nearly 2000 posts of circular arguments on this thread.

    You’d have to be a saint to read the same crap put forward over and over. :pac:


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 53,181 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    Padre_Pio wrote: »
    I cannot believe there are nearly 2000 posts of circular arguments on this thread.
    too many possible puns.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 53,181 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    Hurrache wrote: »
    Not sure you understand Orwell
    maybe (s)he was referring to the cycling club.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 358 ✭✭carfinder


    Can confirm. My four year old recently learned to ride her first pedal bike and now refuses to eat her broccoli, claiming that it's double plus ungood.

    Get her in to counselling as soon as possible - sounds fairly serious, the poor thing!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,315 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    carfinder wrote: »
    you know the type - self righteous all the way to the end - and meets trouble half way and gets in to plenty of arguments with motorists - especially elderly ones that cant defend themselves

    What are the 'plenty of arguments' about?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 358 ✭✭carfinder


    Trekker09 wrote: »
    Only if you engage with them in an aggressive manner 1st ;) Have you commuted on a regular basis?

    What is a regular occurance is motorists putting me at risk through their lack of consideration/judgement and more often than not breaking the rules of the road. Should I just be passive and accept the behaviour?

    You obviously lack the self awareness to understand that catching up to remonstrate with the "offending" motorist is, in and of itself, aggressive and could easily be viewed as a breach of the peace. Report your near misses to the gardai. Any motorist you remonstrate with could react to your aggression, aggressively! But you're so full of your own self righteousness that you proclaim your right to police the roads and right whatever wrong inflicted on you. I hope you don't meet a violent aggressive motorist but you are stacking the odds firmly in favour of it happening to you:eek:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 358 ✭✭carfinder


    What are the 'plenty of arguments' about?

    ask Trekker09 - its his thing, apparently


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,507 ✭✭✭Fighting Tao


    Avoiding all questions about how someone cycling along minding their own business is aggressive carfinder, and if you are referencing peoples reaction when someone endangers their lives?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,668 ✭✭✭Trekker09


    carfinder wrote: »
    You obviously lack the self awareness to understand that catching up to remonstrate with the "offending" motorist is, in and of itself, aggressive and could easily be viewed as a breach of the peace. Report your near misses to the gardai. Any motorist you remonstrate with could react to your aggression, aggressively! But you're so full of your own self righteousness that you proclaim your right to police the roads and right whatever wrong inflicted on you. I hope you don't meet a violent aggressive motorist but you are stacking the odds firmly in favour of it happening to you:eek:

    :D

    I hope your driving skills are better than your comprehension skills :confused:

    I don't 'catch up' to remonstrate with anybody, but if it's serious enough and the opportunity arises then I will say it to them, even if it's to let them know that I'll be reporting them the Guards. This has occurred twice in all my years cycling and on the last occasion the driver was well over the limit.

    You mistake self righteousness for self preservation. Your rant indicates that you form your opinions based on hearsay and certainly not facts. How would you react if a cyclist indicated to you that your driving put them at risk and they have the video footage to prove it?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,315 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    carfinder wrote: »
    ask Trekker09 - its his thing, apparently

    You said 'you know the type'. So for the types of cyclists that you know that have plenty of arguments with motorists, what are these arguments generally about?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 358 ✭✭carfinder


    Trekker09 wrote: »
    :D

    I hope your driving skills are better than your comprehension skills :confused:

    I don't 'catch up' to remonstrate with anybody, but if it's serious enough and the opportunity arises then I will say it to them, even if it's to let them know that I'll be reporting them the Guards. This has occurred twice in all my years cycling and on the last occasion the driver was well over the limit.

    You mistake self righteousness for self preservation. Your rant indicates that you form your opinions based on hearsay and certainly not facts. How would you react if a cyclist indicated to you that your driving put them at risk and they have the video footage to prove it?

    You have amply demonstrated your behaviour via your numerous posts on this thread. I really hope you don't meet the kind of trouble you're inviting upon yourself. It's laughable that you try to change your story when I point out your aggression. You should go back and edit your earlier posts as your credibility is shot to bits:eek:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,395 ✭✭✭✭Hurrache


    carfinder wrote: »
    You have amply demonstrated your behaviour via your numerous posts on this thread. I really hope you don't meet the kind of trouble you're inviting upon yourself. It's laughable that you try to change your story when I point out your aggression. You should go back and edit your earlier posts as your credibility is shot to bits:eek:

    I think you need to give up, you're only digging yourself deeper.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,668 ✭✭✭Trekker09


    carfinder wrote: »
    You have amply demonstrated your behaviour via your numerous posts on this thread. I really hope you don't meet the kind of trouble you're inviting upon yourself. It's laughable that you try to change your story when I point out your aggression. You should go back and edit your earlier posts as your credibility is shot to bits:eek:

    Oh dear :D Think it's a bit early to be on the grog pal, sleep it off ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 358 ✭✭carfinder


    You said 'you know the type'. So for the types of cyclists that you know that have plenty of arguments with motorists, what are these arguments generally about?

    Generally aggressive exchanges like the one I witnessed on Saturday where a cyclist on the footpath starting banging on a car exiting a Service station. He thought better of it when the drivers boyfriend/husband jumped out of the passenger seat and the cyclist retreated like the coward he is.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 358 ✭✭carfinder


    Trekker09 wrote: »
    Oh dear :D Think it's a bit early to be on the grog pal, sleep it off ;)

    Poor response - but I am tiring of playing with you. You make it too easy;)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,668 ✭✭✭Trekker09


    carfinder wrote: »


    Generally aggressive exchanges like the one I witnessed on Saturday where a cyclist on the footpath starting banging on a car exiting a Service station. He thought better of it when the drivers boyfriend/husband jumped out of the passenger seat and retreated like the coward he is.

    So you're applauding aggression on behalf of the driver here then and yet you dare mention credibility :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,668 ✭✭✭Trekker09


    carfinder wrote: »
    Poor response - but I am tiring of playing with you. You make it too easy;)

    You're out of your depth and making an absolute fool out of yourself. :D

    Too much pent up aggression, think you need to take up a hobby ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,713 ✭✭✭BabysCoffee


    carfinder wrote: »


    Generally aggressive exchanges like the one I witnessed on Saturday where a cyclist on the footpath starting banging on a car exiting a Service station. He thought better of it when the drivers boyfriend/husband jumped out of the passenger seat and the cyclist retreated like the coward he is.

    I've no idea what your point is here and in your other posts.

    You seem to be calling the cyclist cowardly in this instance for engaging with the driver.

    But then in other posts you give out about cyclists being "aggressive" for engaging with drivers and tell them to only report issues to the guards.

    I'm confused. Is the cyclist in this one of your stories an "aggressive coward" :confused:

    What point are you trying to make about cyclists?? I think there is some serious generalizations being made. You don't know me, my mother and my sister. We are all cyclists but I wouldn't describe any of us as being a coward or being aggressive. We are just regular people doing what we do on bikes....or sometimes on buses and trains......and sometimes cars too (except my mother who doesn't drive - but my Dad does......oh and he cycles too, from time to time, as a 76 yr old).

    I guess you could say we are a bit of a cycling family......but definitely not aggressive cycling cowards.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,029 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    carfinder wrote: »
    My own opinion is that many cyclists get a smug superiority complex once they get on a bike. It gets very Orwellian - "two wheels good, four wheels bad" territory.

    This is entirely in your own head.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22 CHESSMUTANT


    Trekker09 wrote: »
    I call bull**** on you being a cyclist.
    Ditto for his claims of being a motorcyclist. His tonedeaf ****aboutery in the Motorbike forum doesn't support his claim.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 358 ✭✭carfinder


    Trekker09 wrote: »
    You're out of your depth and making an absolute fool out of yourself. :D

    Too much pent up aggression, think you need to take up a hobby ;)

    Getting even lamer - take your beating and stop making a fool of yourself


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 358 ✭✭carfinder


    I've no idea what your point is here and in your other posts.

    You seem to be calling the cyclist cowardly in this instance for engaging with the driver.

    But then in other posts you give out about cyclists being "aggressive" for engaging with drivers and tell them to only report issues to the guards.

    I'm confused. Is the cyclist in this one of your stories an "aggressive coward" :confused:

    What point are you trying to make about cyclists?? I think there is some serious generalizations being made. You don't know me, my mother and my sister. We are all cyclists but I wouldn't describe any of us as being a coward or being aggressive. We are just regular people doing what we do on bikes....or sometimes on buses and trains......and sometimes cars too (except my mother who doesn't drive - but my Dad does......oh and he cycles too, from time to time, as a 76 yr old).

    I guess you could say we are a bit of a cycling family......but definitely not aggressive cycling cowards.
    Your family don't interest me in the slightest and you posting about your family here is odd to say the least. I hope you don't feel the urge to detail other aspects of their everyday living :eek:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,668 ✭✭✭Trekker09


    carfinder wrote: »
    Getting even lamer - take your beating and stop making a fool of yourself

    Shouldn't you be getting back to work? I'm sure Quantico are missing their top profiler :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 358 ✭✭carfinder


    Trekker09 wrote: »
    Shouldn't you be getting back to work? I'm sure Quantico are missing their top profiler :D

    I'm sure that sounded funny in your head but you are firmly in the realm of sore loser now :eek:


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 43,339 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    I didn't think it was possible but this thread has managed to become even more stupid.
    It"s way past time for it to be put down!


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement