Considering giving up main job for side hustle.

Mimon

Health11 wrote: »

What is sad about that?

Exactly. When I was mid 20s and still buff as hell I would have been selling the **** out of myself if it existed then

Swaine

Had a nose through the famous Irish OF'er Niamh O'Connor's Instagram today, all I can say she seems to be spending her money wisely.

She bought herself a new arse recently, literally.

BorneTobyWilde

floorpie wrote: »

Lastly, I also noticed that a large number of people on it are 18.

In a small country where the display of porn is considered obscene and is censored, I really can't imagine that OF wont be regulated heavily in the medium term. Imo it wont stand that Irish 17 year olds are let be groomed to produce and distribute hardcore porn the day they hit 18.

So many on there are 12-17 with fake IDs to sign up, a bbc investigation reported, OF's take no responsibility though.

It's a bit like entering an adult website it simply asks, ''are you 18 or over'' click, and they are legally covered, even though we all know every teenager with a smart phone is looking at those site.

Timmyr

If you just send a link to someone on this thread you can prove you're not full of ****

BorneTobyWilde

Wasn't there a guy on Claire Byrne lately, and he said he was making 30k a month, an ex barber, now aka Thomas The **** Engine.
I guess if he can do it the OP could be.

Eircom_Sucks

has anybody here seen op onlyfans ????

how do we know it's not jabba the hut

Sleeper12

Eircom_Sucks wrote:

how do we know it's not jabba the hut

People pay for that too

YellowLead

Eircom_Sucks wrote: »

has anybody here seen op onlyfans ????

how do we know it's not jabba the hut

People have just said she PMs looking for email or Snapchat sign up.

floorpie

BorneTobyWilde wrote: »

So many on there are 12-17 with fake IDs to sign up, a bbc investigation reported, OF's take no responsibility though.

It's a bit like entering an adult website it simply asks, ''are you 18 or over'' click, and they are legally covered, even though we all know every teenager with a smart phone is looking at those site.

Right. It's also impossible to know the status of the person too, whether they're coerced, whether a 'pimp' is involved, whether they're trafficked etc (these are all issues for cam sites and no doubt for OF too). The liability for distribution of illegal material lies with the uploader currently but OF and Snapchat will have to take responsibility for all of this stuff before long. I don't see it lasting from the platform side.

Maybe licenses will be required to make porn? Mandatory health screenings like in the US given that many accounts do involve hardcore porn? But if this happens OF will lose the standing it has in its current social grey area, i.e., the vibe surrounding OF is that it's a harmless way to make some extra money, but if you were to rightly call the high earners professional porn stars, and if they required a production license + health screenings then a lot wouldn't enter the space.

Eircom_Sucks

YellowLead wrote: »

People have just said she PMs looking for email or Snapchat sign up.

so she's not making what she said she is , if she's trying to drum up attention on boards

" irish girl on onlyfans " like it or not , people would sign up to see if they know her etc or just the novelty of an irish bird on it

partyguinness

OP,

Will you not get bored silly if you give up the day job? You will get sick enough online quick enough- sitting in front of a screen in your underwear all day..that will get very very tedious very quick.

Cazale

partyguinness wrote:

You will get sick enough online quick enough- sitting in front of a screen in your underwear all day..that will get very very tedious very quick.

I've done that every day for the past 20 years.

Creamy Goodness

partyguinness wrote: »

OP,

Will you not get bored silly if you give up the day job? You will get sick enough online quick enough- sitting in front of a screen in your underwear all day..that will get very very tedious very quick.

That's pretty much 80% of boards users :pac:

Health11

YellowLead wrote: »

People have just said she PMs looking for email or Snapchat sign up.

You have nearly 20 posts on this thread. Grow up.

YellowLead

Health11 wrote: »

You have nearly 20 posts on this thread. Grow up.

There’s not a lot to do in lockdown...........
Also - you counted? Lol Though clearly you are good with numbers.....

Health11

YellowLead wrote: »

There’s not a lot to do in lockdown...........
Also - you counted? Lol Though clearly you are good with numbers.....

I'm guessing, you're every second reply.

Sleeper12

Ah, you two need to get a room I think

YellowLead

Sleeper12 wrote: »

Ah, you two need to get a room I think

In your dreams
Or should I say...fantasy!

FrankieB29

FrankieB29 wrote: »

No link to back it up?

Of course she’s not going to dox herself.

rom

12k a month is good after tax but work out what you will have to give the taxman as you will be shocked which is about 70k of that as you are already earning as a nurse. OF is like being soccer player. Very short time in it and the structure of nursing/working is probably better than doing 1 hr of work a day. It's good a the moment but it more likely to dry up than increase in the long term. Best of luck but think why professional rugby players are always doing some study for when they retire from the game.

Wallet Inspector

Furze99 wrote: »

Has to be a piss take - funny how people when want to believe something, they take at face value. No wonder some get suckered into spam and scams.

I find it difficult to believe because if her employer the HSE found out (and likely would - this is a tiny country) she would be fired. You'd have to be exceptionally stupid to risk a pensionable public sector job. I know it's difficult to be fired from a public sector job but it's not impossible, and soft porn obviously crosses the line. Someone displaying their bits on the web, then administering care in a hospital? Ah here...

Also, at present for obvious reasons, I doubt they'd have the spare time or energy.

It's nothing to do with jealousy or begrudgery ffs - if someone wants to earn money through OnlyFans, that's their business.

Finding a claim dubious is a different matter though.

Sleeper12

Wallet Inspector wrote:

I find it difficult to believe because if her employer the HSE found out (and likely would - this is a tiny country) she would be fired. You'd have to be exceptionally stupid to risk a pensionable public sector job. I know it's difficult to be fired from a public sector job but it's not impossible, and soft porn obviously crosses the line. Someone displaying their bits on the web, then administering care in a hospital? Ah here...

Huh? Fired for what exactly? I see massive payout in the Labour court if fired for doing something not against any law in Ireland. If it doesn't effect her work then they have no grounds for dismissal

YellowLead

Sleeper12 wrote: »

Huh? Fired for what exactly? I see massive payout in the Labour court if fired for doing something not against any law in Ireland. If it doesn't effect her work then they have no grounds for dismissal

I have no idea what nursing contracts are like so can’t speculate. But in my role for example it is in my contract that I cannot take on any additional work while I do that my current role. Conflicts of interest etc.
It’s not down to whether or not it’s legal, it’s down to whether or not there are certain clauses in the contract.

FutureGuy

Health11 wrote: »

Hi there, I am currently working as a nurse earning 32500 a year.
Five months ago I started an OnlyFans account. I have built up a decent following on it, and I am currently earning circa 12k a month. The OF work itself takes maximum an hour a day and I enjoy it.

I am strongly considering giving up my main job and focusing on OnlyFans. The only thing stopping me is the fear that OF may be temporary/disappear overnight for some reason.

Should I just take the chance and quit my job?

P.S I have no dependants and rent with others for 800 a month in Dublin

My thoughts.

I would continue to do both unless you hate your main job.

OF is not going away. You are in early. Scale your business, get your name out there and 10k/month will be peanuts.

What people need to realise is that the traditional "career" as a way of making money is outdated. There are many other ways now.

Best of luck with it.

Sleeper12

YellowLead wrote:

I have no idea what nursing contracts are like so can’t speculate. But in my role for example it is in my contract that I cannot take on any additional work while I do that my current role. Conflicts of interest etc. It’s not down to whether or not it’s legal, it’s down to whether or not there are certain clauses in the contract.

Definitely not in nursing contract.

Wallet Inspector

Sleeper12 wrote: »

Huh? Fired for what exactly? I see massive payout in the Labour court if fired for doing something not against any law in Ireland. If it doesn't effect her work then they have no grounds for dismissal

Yeah right. Your employer finds out you moonlight on a soft porn site and you get to keep your job? Particularly when you're representing the national health service.

Health11

Wallet Inspector wrote: »

Yeah right. Your employer finds out you moonlight on a soft porn site and you get to keep your job? Particularly when you're representing the national health service.

And I am sure you have multiple examples to evidence this?

floorpie

Wallet Inspector wrote: »

Yeah right. Your employer finds out you moonlight on a soft porn site and you get to keep your job? Particularly when you're representing the national health service.

It isn't just soft porn. They allow any legal porn, with "legal" being poorly defined in their TOC, but at the least they do allow hardcore porn.

Doing this would be highly inappropriate in my job also, and if I can't be fired for moonlighting, I at least wont have my contract renewed for whatever reason they can find.

Health11 wrote: »

And I am sure you have multiple examples to evidence this?

It's common sense to expect this may affect your career. You don't work in a nightclub, you're in a Garda vetted, responsible, position. It has requirements for character and professionalism, and codes of conduct. These requirements extend to your life outside of work, specifically in this case, use of social media.

Wallet Inspector

floorpie wrote: »

It isn't just soft porn. They allow any legal porn, with "legal" being poorly defined in their TOC, but at the least they do allow hardcore porn.

Doing this would be highly inappropriate in my job also, and if I can't be fired for moonlighting, I at least wont have my contract renewed for whatever reason they can find.



It's common sense to expect this may affect your career. You don't work in a nightclub, you're in a Garda vetted, responsible, position. It has requirements for character and professionalism, and codes of conduct. These requirements extend to your life outside of work, specifically in this case, use of social media.

Bingo. Blows my mind that people won't acknowledge it.

Stuff like this however causes people to bend over backwards to show how liberal they are, throwing sense and logic out the window. Particularly some men when it's a woman acting sexy I'm afraid (as can be seen here) - lol at the "Well done" stuff.

If someone wants to make money solely from OnlyFans and similar for the limited number of years that they can do so, all the best to them. If you've a good body, I don't see anything wrong with making money from it.

If it's a side number though to a more conservative career and could affect career advancement or even job security, it's incredibly stupid.

floorpie

Wallet Inspector wrote: »

Bingo. Blows my mind that people won't acknowledge it.

Stuff like this however causes people to bend over backwards to show how liberal they are, throwing sense and logic out the window. Particularly some men when it's a woman acting sexy I'm afraid (as can be seen here) - lol at the "Well done" stuff.

Yeah, just look at this thread. We have potentially a 15 year old advertising and selling porn to users, dozens of guys asking how to get it, and nobody is questioning it? If I made a thread promoting a productivity app I'd made it'd be spam, but this is getting cheered on?

If someone wants to make money solely from OnlyFans and similar for the limited number of years that they can do so, all the best to them.

If it's a side number to a more conservative career and could affect career advancement or even job security, it's incredibly stupid.

I don't care less what people do once it's legal, but I find it so strange that users of a JOBS board (including public sector employees) are advising someone to quit a permanent career for something that may only last another few months and which may drastically affect your future.

Wallet Inspector

Yup, they should stop drooling like eejits and cop on.

85603

Eircom_Sucks wrote: »

so she's not making what she said she is , if she's trying to drum up attention on boards

" irish girl on onlyfans " like it or not , people would sign up to see if they know her etc or just the novelty of an irish bird on it

its bollocks.

extraordinary claim with no evidence.

anyone whos actually ever found themselves in an extraordinary situation in reality and has wanted to tell others about it knows in advance that they better bring some proof.

something to separate you from the endless lines of bullshtters.

op came in with no such proof up front. just a wild claim.

85603

Swaine wrote: »

Had a nose through the famous Irish OF'er Niamh O'Connor's Instagram today, all I can say she seems to be spending her money wisely.

She bought herself a new arse recently, literally.

sure she could have had some of mine for free.

cee_jay

https://www.hse.ie/eng/staff/resources/disciplinaryprocedure.pdf
Page 7 - outlines examples of serious misconduct for HSE employees. This includes:

• Downloading/disseminating pornographic material from the internet
• Circulation of offensive, obscene or indecent e-mails or text messages

Depending on the account, it could be argued by HSE HR that it falls under disseminating pornographic material.

AndrewJRenko

Wallet Inspector wrote: »

Yeah right. Your employer finds out you moonlight on a soft porn site and you get to keep your job? Particularly when you're representing the national health service.

What employer policy would she be breaching? We're not back in the 1960s.

floorpie

AndrewJRenko wrote: »

What employer policy would she be breaching? We're not back in the 1960s.

The nursing board of Ireland mandates professional conduct on social media. Employer policy is posted above. These are in 2021.

AndrewJRenko

cee_jay wrote: »

https://www.hse.ie/eng/staff/resources/disciplinaryprocedure.pdf
Page 7 - outlines examples of serious misconduct for HSE employees. This includes:

• Downloading/disseminating pornographic material from the internet
• Circulation of offensive, obscene or indecent e-mails or text messages

Depending on the account, it could be argued by HSE HR that it falls under disseminating pornographic material.

This would clearly be in the context of workplace activity. The HSE aren't going to fire someone for downloading porn in their own time at home on their personal device.

They would find it very difficult to fire someone for creating porn on their own time.

Wallet Inspector

The way posts are skipped over to post an inane "Gotcha".

Yeah the web didn't exist in the 1960s indeed.

AndrewJRenko

floorpie wrote: »

The nursing board of Ireland mandates professional conduct on social media. Employer policy is posted above. These are in 2021.

What is unprofessional about generating porn?

AndrewJRenko

floorpie wrote: »

The nursing board of Ireland mandates professional conduct on social media. Employer policy is posted above. These are in 2021.

It actually says "You should be aware of your professional responsibility when using social media".

Sleeper12

cee_jay wrote: »

https://www.hse.ie/eng/staff/resources/disciplinaryprocedure.pdf
Page 7 - outlines examples of serious misconduct for HSE employees. This includes:

• Downloading/disseminating pornographic material from the internet
• Circulation of offensive, obscene or indecent e-mails or text messages

Depending on the account, it could be argued by HSE HR that it falls under disseminating pornographic material.

In labour court it would be argued that she is a model & an actress. I've heard people call the Board Gas add with the Ronny Drew singing offensive & obscene I heard one caller claim that Poxy & Jax in the same add offensive. HSE would want to cross its Ts & dot its I's before accusing someone of offensive, obscene or indecent behavior or they could end up with a slander suit aswell as an unfair dismissal

floorpie

floorpie wrote: »

Yeah, just look at this thread. We have potentially a 15 year old advertising and selling porn to users, dozens of guys asking how to get it, and nobody is questioning it? If I made a thread promoting a productivity app I'd made it'd be spam, but this is getting cheered on?



I don't care less what people do once it's legal, but I find it so strange that users of a JOBS board (including public sector employees) are advising someone to quit a permanent career for something that may only last another few months and which may drastically affect your future.

Where did 15 come from?

Most of the people who asked for PMs were claiming to disbelieve her. And when they didn’t get a link they went a bit crazy.

Did anybody tell her to quit her job? Except those who said she might have to worry about her contract.

Very few people are discussing the tax implications. Some are.

There have been some claims that she’s pming people. That’s not allowed but it’s not visible on the thread.

85603

85603 wrote: »

its bollocks.

extraordinary claim with no evidence.

anyone whos actually ever found themselves in an extraordinary situation in reality and has wanted to tell others about it knows in advance that they better bring some proof.

something to separate you from the endless lines of bullshtters.

op came in with no such proof up front. just a wild claim.

Very few people need to prove their employment status on this forum. It’s generally taken that they aren’t lying. I would have assumed that demands to reveal personal info are discouraged sitewide.

Wallet Inspector

AndrewJRenko wrote: »

What is unprofessional about generating porn?

Up to the HSE, which would likely consider getting one's tits out to be so.

No point in pretending that a state body wouldn't think along those lines, whether it's conservative or not.

markad1

On the mobile......21 pages in, no link...... and keep seeing ads for bacon fries....
Don't know which I want now...... to see the OP or a packet bacon fries.

Sleeper12

Wallet Inspector wrote:

Up to the HSE, which would likely consider getting one's tits out to be so.

Don't they encourage getting one's tits out as you say. They spend enough money promoting breastfeeding.

Can i just point out that op hasn't actually said what she does in the hour she dedicates to her modelling career. I have no idea if she is nude, in undies or fully clothed. Without knowing any of this posters are implying it is porn. Worse still posters are trying to get her to identify herself by calling for proof.

Sleeper12

markad1 wrote:

On the mobile......21 pages in, no link...... and keep seeing ads for bacon fries.... Don't know which I want now...... to see the OP or a packet bacon fries.

I'm not a mod & I'm not directing how others should post but I do know that asking for proof that could identify a poster & posting links that promote your business services is against just about every forum rules on boards. OP can NOT post a link & I assume most asking her to do so know full well she can't even if she wanted to

floorpie

Sleeper12 wrote: »

Don't they encourage getting one's tits out as you say. They spend enough money promoting breastfeeding.

Can i just point out that op hasn't actually said what she does in the hour she dedicates to her modelling career. I have no idea if she is nude, in undies or fully clothed. Without knowing any of this posters are implying it is porn. Worse still posters are trying to get her to identify herself by calling for proof.

She implied that she makes more than others because her content is explicit and shows her face.

Sleeper12

floorpie wrote:

She implied that she makes more than others because her content is explicit and shows her face.

Implied or stated as fact?

Sleeper12

floorpie wrote:

She implied that she makes more than others because her content is explicit and shows her face.

What she actually said:

Health11 wrote:

The lower side of things are heavily skewed by a)guys and b)those without social media c)those who dont post explicit content/don't show their face.

I don't see any implying in the above statement. If you believe that she is implying explicit content and showing her face then she could equally be implying that (a) she is a guy?