Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid 19 Part XXXV-956,720 ROI (5,952 deaths) 452,946 NI (3,002 deaths) (08/01) Read OP

Options
16376386406426431586

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 10,656 ✭✭✭✭Jim_Hodge




  • Registered Users Posts: 827 ✭✭✭HalfAndHalf


    It’s a bit strong to say I’ve got that backwards when I’ve read (and pasted info from one) articles that say exactly the opposite.

    another poster also showed that the HSE now shows their high accuracy.

    the middle ground is the majority of the main manufacturers show high 99% accuracy for negative results.

    that is however if they’re used properly, which as someone who has used around 80 of these tests in the past 4 months is to dig the swabs in as though you’re trying to remove your tonsils and drill your adenoids out, mix well for over a minute in the solution then wait over a minute before applying to the test.

    they’re a great way forward and something we should have been doing for months now.

    if NPHET and the HSE still think they’re so poor why are they now relying on them?



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,355 ✭✭✭✭Vicxas


    Unfortunately i smell another lockdown Christmas coming.



  • Registered Users Posts: 490 ✭✭Nyero


    Ah now Jimmy you know in your heart and soul that this wear a mask to the jacks is pure covid theatre, its not based on science.

    Wear a mask for about 1/60th of the time I spend in a busy pub, absolutely pointless.

    It's merely politicians making it look like they are doing something. They have no scientific report or analysis to rely on.

    If the government order me to wear a mask in this manner I am entitled to seek the science behind the decision.

    Same as their multiple tables of 10, where is the science?



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,581 ✭✭✭Working class heroes


    That's just covid **** up your sense of smell.

    Racism is now hiding behind the cloak of Community activism.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,265 ✭✭✭CruelSummer


    Can you? If they disable Covid Certs? Talk of the ‘unvaccinated’ not being allowed access to so many services, etc - idiots here not seeing they too will soon be ‘unvaccinated’ until they get their boosters like in Israel. Do you agree with this? Do you agree that everyone who took two shots should then be discriminated against if they don’t get the ‘booster’? Of a vaccine so effective that it needs a booster just a few months after the second. ‘Professors’ stating all over 12’s would need it yesterday. They’ve truly lost their moral compass, their medical ethics and their duty of care to the population to make such a false suggestion.

    There is absolutely no evidence that any healthy person under 60 needs a booster.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,426 ✭✭✭lee_baby_simms


    I had to have my son tested yesterday. Both of my kids sent home from crèche on Monday. No symptoms. Was told he had a persistent cough. He doesn’t. They won’t allow both kids back until he gets a negative pcr test. I’m currently on unpaid leave to look after them as I’ve no annual leave left. The delay in getting an appointment and the result is causing chaos in this house. All for nothing.

    Myself and the wife are considering taking them out of crèche permanently as this isn’t sustainable. Madness.



  • Registered Users Posts: 490 ✭✭Nyero


    Absolutely. I took my 2 shots and won't be taking any more.

    It will mean I am restricted to the places that are not enforcing this rubbish.

    It's incredible the way the likes of RTE constantly roll out celebrity medics but never people who challenge it.

    I've said it before but just look at how the swine flu vaccine backfired with law suits in this country.



  • Posts: 4,727 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Had to bring my son to hospital twice now because doctors refused to see him without a negative test even though it was clear he didn’t have Covid.

    Its disgraceful at this point. Any symptom at all and the crèches don’t want them and the doctors won’t see them.

    Society can’t function like this.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,476 ✭✭✭floorpie


    Right exactly, so what would've happened if they instead waited until now to have that "freedom day" like we did? Why would we expect a better result for our winter, versus theirs now? Our vaccination rate isn't that much higher than theirs was during their summer spike in cases



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,426 ✭✭✭lee_baby_simms


    When Holohan listed off those 14 symptoms I knew we were bollixed.

    There’s absolutely zero support for working parents.



  • Registered Users Posts: 490 ✭✭Nyero




  • Registered Users Posts: 5,875 ✭✭✭Russman


    You're right, it can't function like that. But its not going to change, creches aren't going to start magically accepting kids with symptoms anytime soon, nor are doctors going to start seeing patients with cold symptoms. So what's the answer ? Its not going to be let rip and come what may, because creches will still not accept sick kids and GPs still won't see patients with head cold symptoms.

    Maybe its in all our interests to supress it as much as possible while its on its journey to being endemic and that will involve inconviences.



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,906 Mod ✭✭✭✭shesty


    It IS ripping though!Whether it is being let or not doesn't matter, it is everywhere.Have only just heard of a 4th family whose toddler has caught it.I knew nobody with covid til the end of September just gone, and that is 4 families now including my own, where all or almost all members have caught it.In addition to the teachers in our preschool, who also got it (not from the kids, and not passed to the kids).We are all going to catch it, that's just how it is.



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,906 Mod ✭✭✭✭shesty




  • Registered Users Posts: 3,426 ✭✭✭lee_baby_simms


    It’s a bit more than inconveniences. I’m not getting paid this week. And I still have to pay almost €1700 quid a month to the crèche while my kids are at home. I have no annual leave days until next April.

    So it’s actually not sustainable.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,875 ✭✭✭Russman


    It is, you're right, but that's still not going to make businesses or services function and start accepting symptomatic people, and that's going to be inconvenient.



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,906 Mod ✭✭✭✭shesty


    Which is also true,I agree.But part of the key there (to refer to a post I made earlier) is to stop making people wait 24 hours + for results for starters.

    We may apparently not be able to produce ICU beds out of thin air but surely - at this point, all the money and almost 2 years later - shortening the processing of tests should be a possibility..



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,875 ✭✭✭Russman


    I totally agree and absolute sympathy, but what's the answer ? You can't force creches to accept sick kids, so where do we go with this ? I don't know the answer, I doubt anyone does tbh, this is one of the biggest events in our history - of course there have been pandemics before with way more serious illnesses but the impact on our modern world that this one is having is unprecedented.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,875 ✭✭✭Russman


    100% agree. Its shyte all round, I tried to book a test earlier for a relative and there's not one single slot available anywhere in Dublin today, that's pathetic (or a sign that its everywhere).



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,426 ✭✭✭lee_baby_simms


    Some kind of proportionality should be at least considered.

    Every month or so since March this house has been plunged into a quasi lockdown for 3 to 4 days over a 1 year old with a runny nose or a sneeze.

    It’s easy for the crèche. They still get paid. Just send all the kids home.

    It’s easy for the GP. Refer for a covid test every time.

    Its the kids and the parents who are left to shoulder everything.



  • Registered Users Posts: 372 ✭✭Jimi H


    Is there anything being done to increase hospital capacity? So disappointing to hear talk of restrictions being reintroduced. I was listening to Colm Henry earlier. The tone of conversation has changed so much from a couple of months ago when there was optimism and vaccines being a way out to a much more cautious and uncertain attitude. Also, any news on side effects of boosters? I was so fatigued for weeks after my second shot I’d be reluctant to get a third.



  • Registered Users Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Correct. Pre-vax the lag was always like clockwork, 4-12 days after cases started increasing, hospital numbers kicked in.

    Now it's far less certain. Cases have been slowly rising for the last 4-12 days, but hospitals numbers are dropping fast. Down to 460 this morning - a drop of 55 in 48 hours. It's also worth pointing out that yesterday's big case number was at least 30% backlog, about 1,000 cases. So it's not a sudden jump in reality; there's not a big wave of hospitalisations about to hit.

    Overall this is awkward timing for a government who are looking for reasons to extend emergency powers. They could point to the "uncertainty" as their justification, but if discharges were to continue as is, we could be back under 400 cases by the end of next week. Donnelly will keep trying wax on about "hospitals at bursting point" when the data says the exact opposite.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,278 ✭✭✭Cork2021


    Big change in hospital numbers! Was 458 last night only 460 this morning! It’ll be a drop of 33 announced with the case numbers later…

    downward trend continues! We’ve 3 full nights of discharging. Like Seamus said but I think sooner we’ll be below 400 by Saturday morning… optimistic but very possible



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,906 Mod ✭✭✭✭shesty


    It's very hard for them to model because the vaccines have broken links to an extent, but it isn't really a predictable level.

    They might be able to stab at a model of case numbers but I think hospital and ICU numbers are a shot in the dark, off the back of vaccinations.

    I'd be taking any predictions with a pinch of salt tbh.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,543 ✭✭✭Martina1991


    From that same article you took a snip from:

    "In people with confirmed COVID-19, antigen tests correctly identified COVID-19 infection in an average of 72% of people with symptoms, compared to 58% of people without symptoms. Tests were most accurate when used in the first week after symptoms first developed (an average of 78% of confirmed cases had positive antigen tests). This is likely to be because people have the most virus in their system in the first days after they are infected.

    How reliable were the results of the studies?

    [b] Sometimes studies did not perform the test on the people for whom it was intended and did not follow the manufacturers’ instructions for using the test. [/b] Sometimes the tests were not carried out at the point-of-care. Nearly all the studies (97%) relied on a single negative RT-PCR result as evidence of no COVID-19 infection. [b] Results from different test brands varied, and few studies directly compared one test brand with another. Finally, not all studies gave enough information about their participants for us to judge how long they had had symptoms, or even whether or not they had symptoms. [/b]"


    You just picked good results from one device. Which is made in Korea.

    You're assuming the results from that Korean device means the tests in Circle K or Lidl or wherever perform the same. They don't.

    You said another poster showed hse data and yet you didn't see that the manufacturers claimed accuracy is always lower in the real world.

    The hse assessed tests in people with symptoms and the tests were performed by professionals. Again, you're assuming people using them on themselves or with no symptoms are just as accurate. They're not.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,476 ✭✭✭floorpie


    The hse assessed tests in people with symptoms and the tests were performed by professionals. Again, you're assuming people using them on themselves or with no symptoms are just as accurate. They're not.

    The HSE report somewhat goes through this, and shows that the same test was less sensitive when self-collected, albeit, it was self-collected when asymptomatic only. Sensitivity was 51.9% when self collected for 1 brand when asymptomatic, and 78.6% for same brand when symptomatic. That seems like a very promising tool to me for cutting down on transmission from asymptomatic cases.




  • Registered Users Posts: 4,994 ✭✭✭c.p.w.g.w


    Is it just more likely when those people were asymptomatic they had less viral load, and the load increased as the virus progressed and gave symptoms



  • Registered Users Posts: 827 ✭✭✭HalfAndHalf


    That was one article out of over 20 I’ve read.

    you’re obviously the expert on antigen testing so I’ll leave you to advise everyone and steer them in your ‘they’re not reliable’ direction then.

    you should probably get on to NPHET as well so they stop wasting money sending them out to people 👍



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,476 ✭✭✭floorpie


    I don't know, but looking at the table I don't think so. At least, assuming that one accepts cycle threshold as a proxy for severity/viral load:

    It looks like there were asymptomatic and symptomatic cases with CT in the range 25-30, for example. The sensitivity was less in the case of asymptomatic, even with same CT



Advertisement