Mans children removed by Tusla after his video of Gardai went viral

gmisk

[Deleted User] wrote: »

Is that Justin Barrett?

Aye he just turned up in his little wrinkly confirmation suit hoping people would give him some money.

Wombatman

Your man is clearly the worst type of 'nationalist' and on the fringes politically, to put it nicely, but I'd love to know the reasoning behind pulling the kids out of bed to be taken away in the middle of the night by the guards. Were there any social works present? What caused so much immediacy?

Very traumatic for the kids TBF, but absolutely may have been the best course of action in the correct circumstances.

drunkmonkey

bubblypop wrote: »

Seems like you know all the details..............

Just watched the update, it's a domestic, going through a marriage break up, he doesn't know where the kids are but I presume his ex does, they're trying to get infront of a judge this afternoon.
They said the Guards said there was a court sitting on Saturday hence the Guards took the kids but they contacted Tusla and they said there was no court sitting.

HeidiHeidi

So in fact it's nothing to do with gardai in a church being filmed at all.....

drunkmonkey

drunkmonkey wrote: »

Just watched the update, it's a domestic, going through a marriage break up, he doesn't know where the kids are but I presume his ex does, they're trying to get infront of a judge this afternoon.
They said the Guards said there was a court sitting on Saturday hence the Guards took the kids but they contacted Tusla and they said there was no court sitting.

Ah, sorry. I was being sarcastic.
You don't know any details.

Ashbourne hoop

drunkmonkey wrote: »

I assume they can take them straight away using the mental health act like they did in this circumstance.
The Guards took the children not Tusla they must have had power to act under that law.

Gardai have the power, under section 12 of the Child Care Act 1991, to remove a child urgently from a situation for his or her safety and welfare. It's not something they do lightly. 100% there's more to this story.

gmisk

drunkmonkey wrote: »

Just watched the update, it's a domestic, going through a marriage break up, he doesn't know where the kids are but I presume his ex does, they're trying to get infront of a judge this afternoon.
They said the Guards said there was a court sitting on Saturday hence the Guards took the kids but they contacted Tusla and they said there was no court sitting.

So yeah....there is more to it.

It shows people should maybe wait for the full story to come out before jumping to conclusions... especially if the story is being spread by NP, Dee wall and Andy "Dyson" heasman

drunkmonkey

HeidiHeidi wrote: »

So in fact it's nothing to do with gardai in a church being filmed at all.....

I'd assume she used one of the kids being in the church to claim he was mental and they needed to be taken from him.

gmisk

drunkmonkey wrote: »

I'd assume she used one of the kids being in the church to claim he was mental and they needed to be taken from him.

...come on...dig up....

Don't make up more nonsense it doesn't help

drunkmonkey

drunkmonkey wrote: »

I'd assume .

You know what they say about that!

Notmything

Prelude In E Minor wrote: »

You can be imprisoned for 'hate speech' you can lose your job if don't bow to blm and the lgbt brigade. The next step will be taking your children from you.

There was a policeman in Sweden who pointed out most of the violent crime he was investigating was committed by immigrants and the state went after him. Our freedom is being eroded.

Unless you're living in Sweden this isn't relevant

Overheal

Prelude In E Minor wrote: »

You'd be sacked for being a 'racist' or a 'transphobe'. You at what happened to JK Rowling. Imagine if she was a new writer? Her career would be over. And what was her crime?

With the government we have these idiotic hate speech laws where your 'victim' can decide you committed a hate crime just because he decides so. In Scotland they want people to eat on their families.

All very Big Brother.

Sure if you’d be sacked for those why not for putting ketchup on eggs?

Prelude In E Minor

Prelude In E Minor wrote: »

You'd be sacked for being a 'racist' or a 'transphobe'. You at what happened to JK Rowling. Imagine if she was a new writer? Her career would be over. And what was her crime?

With the government we have these idiotic hate speech laws where your 'victim' can decide you committed a hate crime just because he decides so. In Scotland they want people to eat on their families.

All very Big Brother.

All absolute rubbish.

drunkmonkey

gmisk wrote: »

So yeah....there is more to it.

That came from the man himself and Dwyer, there both sitting outside the Garda Station, you can find the video on Dwyer's telegram.

HeidiHeidi

drunkmonkey wrote: »

I'd assume she used one of the kids being in the church to claim he was mental and they needed to be taken from him.

Well you know what they say about assuming.....

You're straying (further) into fantasy land now

Notmything

Abominable Dr. Phibes wrote: »

The idea that the Gardaí would arrive and take away children just because their father filmed them the week before is preposterous. A decision like that involves many state agencies, lots of social workers, and every I dotted and T crossed.

Those heavily edited videos and one-side-of-the- story narratives are designed to outrage.

I also see little Justin Barrett was conveniently in the area at the time.

Gardai have powers to remove children from a family home for very specific reasons and it's not something done willy-nilly.

Tusla have to go through the courts to have a child placed in care.

If either of these actions were taken then there is a lot more going on than simply videoing a Garda.

HeidiHeidi

Notmything wrote: »

Gardai have powers to remove children from a family home for very specific reasons and it's not something done willy-nilly.

Tusla have to go through the courts to have a child placed in care.

If either of these actions were taken then there is a lot more going on than simply videoing a Garda.

I think that theory has been put to bed now.

They've moved to a different conspiracy theory.

Notmything

HeidiHeidi wrote: »

I think that theory has been put to bed now.

They've moved to a different conspiracy theory.

What happens when you point out the obvious flaws in their narrative.

drunkmonkey

HeidiHeidi wrote: »

Well you know what they say about assuming.....

I've mates who went through break ups nothing would shock me at this stage when it comes to crazy accusations, I've seen the guards act on them so it's all perfectly explainable.

Prelude In E Minor

Prelude In E Minor wrote: »

Peter Springare. You know in Sweden they censor the crime stats so the Swedes can't find out how much crime is committed by immigrants?

Not censored. Not important.

Notmything

athlone573 wrote: »

Remind us where it was that the Roma kid was taken away for being blonde?

And?

Oh yeah, so gardai fcuked up so clearly this is another case of them taking kids for no reason.

zerosugarbuzz

Notmything wrote: »

Gardai have powers to remove children from a family home for very specific reasons and it's not something done willy-nilly.

Tusla have to go through the courts to have a child placed in care.

If either of these actions were taken then there is a lot more going on than simply videoing a Garda.

i'd have been inclined to agree with you prior to the Maurice McCabe scandal. That incident changed my opinion of what state agencies will stoop to when they have a mind to.

AndrewJRenko

DerekC16 wrote: »

Tusla will probably hand his kids over to a homosexual couple. Seems to be high on their agenda at the moment.

No, they probably won't. And it's not high on their agenda at the moment.

Why did the police go to his house at 3 am?

[Deleted User]

[Deleted User] wrote: »

Why did the police go to his house at 3 am?

Ah sure, probably just bored, hanging around, nothing better to do.......

Vaccinated30

If the man in question murdered his kids and killed himself wouldn't everyone be crying where is the gardai? Wouldn't everyone be quoting the same act as a reason to take the kids that they're now posting as a reason to be afraid of the gardai? Why do people think they own their children, we don't own our children, we cannot do whatever we want to and around our children.

Guy:Incognito

drunkmonkey wrote: »

That came from the man himself and Dwyer, there both sitting outside the Garda Station, you can find the video on Dwyer's telegram.

And of course it's in their interest to be fully truthful about the whole story to their Twitter followers and not to work the story in their favour or leave out derails.......

Mike Murdock

Overheal wrote: »

Yawn.

Turns out he wasn’t “persecuted” and kept the job for the SEVENTEEN MONTHS after he started posting names of criminal suspects to Facebook and started insinuating conclusions about immigrants WHILE he was the head of preliminary investigations for his precinct. Thirteen months after that reassignment - 30 months after the post, he was paid severance and left.

Far from being “persecuted” he now is a member of government and a media columnist. Received television appearances over it too.

“Persecuted” lol

Thanks for posting that.

A clear case, Overheal, of "facts don't care about the poster's feelings".

Overheal

CHESSMUTANT wrote: »

Does anyone know what this means?

“I know how hard it is, to put food on your family.” - George W Bush.

Beasty

Closing while I look through a large number of reports