Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

Options
1182183185187188808

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 5,367 ✭✭✭JimmyVik




  • Registered Users Posts: 4 Frank3.5


    Talk to a Mortgage broker. Market has slowed up last few weeks.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,503 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    No it is not taking nearly 8% out of you income unless you are earning up on a million euro

    At 100k it takes less than 5%

    At 200k it takes 6.4%

    At 500k it takes 7.4%

    Tell me how any government should replace it

    Wealthy people hate it as any time you try to extract wealth from something in the form of dividends, income or even pensions ( income over 60k/ year) it kicked in.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users Posts: 20,047 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Winter, and we are heading into xmas, big surprise. Timing housing is silly, IMO. If you want or need accommodation and can afford it, buy it. I have bought 3 houses, and not once was what the market doing a consideration, other than in terms of lack of availability.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,094 ✭✭✭✭javaboy


    Sorry, meant to say ~7%. My point still stands: it's a punitive tax rate for higher earners.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,367 ✭✭✭JimmyVik


    Speaking just for myself it takes 8% of any overtime or extra income that I earn.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,604 ✭✭✭Amadan Dubh


    It's progressive for sure, but that is only looking at how it is applied. It ignores the "why" it was applied and also fails to put it in a proper context. For example, why not remove tax exemptions for institutional investors in property as demand is so frothy we're told; meaning that they should pay a tax for the privilege of trading in a market where there is so much demand? Why not look at how €4bn can be saved in public spending when seeing how public funds are wasted?

    At a certain point, those who depend on their wages for their living won't be able to live on those wages alone as we are not seeing wages soar along with the cost of living (in particular housing), which has done and will continue to create an extra burden on public funds. This then perpetuates the problem of trying to reform and cut something like USC as it is claimed that the billions need to be made up elsewhere. I do not accept the mentality that public funds are wasted everywhere but I fear this is a collective problem with Irish people, to not have enough self-confidence and respect to expect better bang for their buck - it is why I see the country in real danger of squandering our time in the global spotlight, with our country being seen very much as a liberal, politically stable, open-for-business society - by not seeking to make the economy and all its parts (including the housing market) more sustainable for future expansion and growth this is under threat. I mean, based on incredibly low unemployment rates and phenomenal GDP the last few years, we are still looking at SF getting in to power as an anti-establishment two-fingered gesture - it's not right.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,503 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    And it is ment to be that is what progressive taxation is for. If you pay 7% your income is in the 3-400k bracket. People on incomes of over 100k can use pension contributions and other reliefs to shelter income more than lower paid workers. The whole point of USC is to rebalance this effect.

    The point I make is a lot of lower paid people in the 30-60k bracket are anti USC without know the reality of it. I have heard union representatives on about it and they do not realize what the are looking for.

    Any other tax that replaces it will have more impact on the lower paid

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,094 ✭✭✭✭javaboy


    Totally agree. And I'm generally in favour of a progressive tax system but there's ideology on one hand... and there's my pocket on the other. A balance needs to be struck between progressiveness vs encouraging emigration to countries with lower marginal tax rates.

    I'm well aware that the tax would have to be replaced from somewhere but with a possible populist government on the horizon, hiking the 8% rate is an easy target that won't cost too many votes. I guess what I'm saying is I'm ok paying progressive taxes but not too comfortable with how easy the USC mechanism makes it to make the tax system progressively more progressive 😄



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,503 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    I agree with you when you go beyond an effective marginal rate of 50%(we are at 52%) you are in danger of encouraging migration to more favourable regimes. Higher rates so discourage the wealthy from access money they may have to pay tax on out of company accounts so it's a lose, lose for any government but left wing idealogy fails to allow for that.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 18,503 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Government encouraged institutional investors into the housing system mostly egged on by the more left wing/ socially inclusive lobby. I pointed out here and many did elsewhere that this was not necessarily a Panacea to save the crisis.

    Now you want the government to renege on what it encouraged. I totally disagree with what we did but I am not stupid enough to think we can welsh on committment given to institutional investors because next time we want them they will say ''look Ireland f@@ked us over we will not be caught again''

    Trying to save 4 billion out of our budget would be virtually impossible. I am awaiting the arrival of SF with bated breath and I wonder how long a left wing government made up of SF, social democrat's PBP etc will last. No matter how far left they go it will not be enough for Richard Boyad Barrett, Paul Murphy and Ruth Coppinger

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,139 ✭✭✭reubenreuben


    and me. so much tax goes to this government, What they doing with it?



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,367 ✭✭✭JimmyVik


    They are using it to bid against young people who want to buy houses. Keeping them in the rent trap and raking in half of their rent in tax via the landlord.



  • Registered Users Posts: 20,047 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Giving the civil service a pay rise, of course. They are already one of the highest paid civil services on the planet. Meanwhile there have been patients piled on trolleys at Limerick regional for the last 20 years, at least. I have just paid for a package to be shipped from japan 3 times. It was twice returned to Japan by Anpost. So Irish government deemed taxes and on costs have amounted to 50% - which of course were not knowable at the time of purchase, which was made over 3 months ago.

    The $64 dollar question is; will I still be semi-sane by the time I eventually mange to get the hell out of this hole of a dysfunctional country? Property sale agreed in Jan, unlikely to complete until mid Dec. My son's application for foreign birth registration took 23 months to process. It took 2 years and €5K to sort out an executorship and get a grant of probate.



  • Registered Users Posts: 97 ✭✭IamMe33


    It's a sick joke what this inept government implement for their policy - using taxpayers' money to bid against them driving up the price of housing, which necessitates a greater tax take on the same people to propigate this farcical feedback loop.

    Someone I know was lamenting to me yesterday about this perverse situation and mentioned his sister was outbid by the council in Galway. She went €10k over her mx budget to try to snare the house but the council just bid €15k over straightaway so she had to bow out.

    What surprised me is that he said she is a first time buyer starting out to trying to find a place to live. I was under the impression that the councils were not meant to bid against FTBs.

    Have I got this wrong? I thought FTBs trying to house themselves saved the council having to provide housing therefore the councils aren't supposed to get in the way.

    What's the point in even trying if the government are working against citizens trying not to be a burden?

    Nevermind saving for a house as a young person on a working class wage and putting off starting a family until you're in a finacial postition in your mid-to-late 30s. More sensible now to not work, start having your kids early and the goverment will shove the working fools out of the way to set you up.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,730 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    In my case Ireland's confiscatory personal taxation was the straw that broke the camel's back. I seriously wonder how many jobs have actually left Ireland because the workers in question went overseas and refused to come back.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,503 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    It hard to know seeing as how we has virtually full employment before COVID

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users Posts: 68,666 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Where have you gone that you haven't swapped personal taxation for indirect taxation (e.g. the utopias people mention with lower income tax rates without mentioning 3k+ a year property taxes)?



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,094 ✭✭✭✭javaboy


    You can pay somewhere around 10% less in income tax in California, not to mention much more favourable CGT treatment. It puts a few extra thousand in indirect taxes into perspective.



  • Registered Users Posts: 68,666 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    And pay thousands for health insurance to cover even the most basic treatment / ambulance trips.

    The total taxation take here is not that high by international standards. Most places where its higher have significantly superior services, but go any worthwhile amount lower and you start losing essential services. Or human rights if you go to the Middle East.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 18,503 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    The big one is education costs in the US and Australia at present. In the US college fees start at 20-30k/year and move to 100k/year at what are not very prestigious colleges. 2nd level on in Australia has to be paid for if you want a decent school in cities. The UK is moving that way with its college loan scheme.

    All of that is before you fork out for accomodation and that is not cheap in the US or Australia either.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,450 ✭✭✭fliball123


    depends on how much you earn those earning more pay a lot more and those who earn less pay a lot less the problem with this country is bang for your buck, services are poor and we do pay an lot for a very poor return and instead of trying to stamp out waste every government just want to up taxes. Throwing money at it has not solved it at what point do we say throwing good money after bad? There needs to be a complete rethink of our public sector/services and our welfare system before more taxes are asked for.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,094 ✭✭✭✭javaboy


    Yes, and pay thousands for health insurance. That's just one more thing to be factored into the calculations. Between higher wages, lower taxation, and employer subsidised health insurance, it can work out much better financially. Obviously it depends on each person/family's situation. I know plenty of people who have made this exact change.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,730 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    The £2,000 I now pay in London council tax is more than offset by the €7,000 I am no longer paying in Irish payroll taxes. The £12,300 CGT allowance is also a lot higher than the Irish €1,270, and VAT (20% vs 23%) is lower.

    But at the end of the day higher taxes was the last straw. Dublin's dysfunctional property market was the big factor.



  • Registered Users Posts: 68,666 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    London's property market is no better - I'd argue worse as we only a few high end apartments sitting empty compared to the volume in London.

    And the much higher NI contributions versus PRSI cancel much of the PAYE savings.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,730 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    From first viewing to keys in hand it took me 8 weeks to buy somewhere in London. It has its faults but based on my personal experience of both in the last 2 years I would pick the London property market over Dublin's any day.



  • Registered Users Posts: 68,666 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Conveyancing is faster in the UK, because the process is not as tied up in ridiculous legal structures (you can even self conveyance if you wish; which is not allowable here). That's the only real advantage - it doesn't make their property market less insane than ours.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,604 ✭✭✭Amadan Dubh


    I have to say that the Dublin Inquirer is a decent publication for some property related news. I subscribed recently for €8 per month and they post a monthly magazine out to me with their top stories for that month as part of that. No one comes out of this looking well, neither Owen Keegan and DCC managers nor the Dublin city councilors. If anything, the outrage from the councilors was likely because they had not been given a chance to object to any residential zoning as is typical for the Dublin city councilors.




  • Posts: 1,169 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    On the property price register, what does “Not Full Market Price” mean?

    The council have bought a 3 bed semi a few doors up from me. I know this as the council put up a link on their Facebook page to a list of properties available on their Choice Based Lettings Scheme.

    This house never went on the open market. I do know that originally this house and the semi d attached to it were owned by the same person. I don’t know if the same person have owned both up until the sale. The attached property is long term rented. Whether that’s private or on a long term rent to the council, I don’t know.

    I’m assuming that the sellers approached the council directly but why isn’t the full selling price listed? Could the other property be still in a leasing contract with the council and the council are purchasing it once that’s up?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 995 ✭✭✭iColdFusion


    For everyone on about the government and taxation the Commission on Taxation and Welfare have created a questionnaire portal for people to give their feedback on a range of taxation topics, there is a bit of time in filling it all out that might have been a total waste of my time but complaining on Boards isn't going to have any effect at all so its worth a shot!




Advertisement