Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

Options
1435436438440441809

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 398 ✭✭jimmybobbyschweiz


    HAP is a two birds with one stone policy for the government; it puts a very high floor under the rental market which we know by know inflates the whole property market and it also appears to deal with the populist-termed homelessness problem.

    It is ultimately a hugely expensive demand-side expenditure that does not increase supply. If rents only fell to 80/85% of their current levels, they would still be unsustainably high which is why I think there is scope, based on a simple measurement against what wages are in this country, for a more significant correction. Then the state (IE the taxpayer) will be on the hook for above market rents for institutionals when the correction occurs - it's ridiculous.



  • Registered Users Posts: 123 ✭✭LJ12345


    yes when you look at the micro perspective but when you pan out and look for the domino effect and where it could start, it’s probable the imploding Chinese property market and its economy will be the final straw when it becomes visible that the debt is being called in, the interconnected global web of reits and funds and lending practices is probably going to end up as movie material one day. China is an incredibly dubious player to have as one of the worlds leading economies.


    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-08-24/blackrock-ubs-among-funds-slashing-exposure-to-china-property



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,480 ✭✭✭✭Dav010


    And the alternative to Government support for Hap recipients?

    Complaining about HAP while failing to understand why it is necessary shows a lack of understanding. Homelessness isn’t a “populist termed problem”, perhaps you should ask families living in hotels if it is real, or just a catchphrase.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,501 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    Hotels and hostels are practically full now so would be lucky to be housed anywhere at this stage and it’s meant to get worse over the winter.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,480 ✭✭✭✭Dav010


    I could be wrong but it seems that our Swiss resident thinks eviction of HAP recipients is a price worth paying for lowering of rents for private tenants.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,501 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    China is an insulated economy with an artificial exchange rate and trillions of USD and other hard currencies They may burn investors to teach a lesson but there won’t be a major collapse as they have the resources to refinance the economy and are not reliant on international bond holders to bail them out. Let’s not forget that they introduced the 3 red lines policy to control the property market and orchestrate what’s happening.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,501 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    Think it’s more a case of burn the economy…set fire to everything!!!!! I won’t be impacted and will still have my job and level of pay so will be better off than I am now… make people sleep under bridges I don’t care as long as I can buy cheap.



  • Registered Users Posts: 123 ✭✭LJ12345


    The Chinese govt are not propping up the Chinese developers or their property market. The 3 red lines were brought in to bring developers back in to line that attempted to dictate to their govt and to speed up the inevitable fallout from their obvious bubble. What matters here is the global funds and Chinese funds which invested globally. The sell off from that debt being called in will satiate demand for the remaining solvent funds. This could be the reason Irish developers are reporting their intention to scale back.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,501 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    Never said they were propping up developers said the deliberately introduced policy and it is engineered and If it gets to a stage of contagion they will step in bail out banks etc or take over developers companies and turn them into state assets. The last thing they want is social unrest so they will only let it go so far.

    Irish developers are scaling back because they no longer can guarantee that it will cost x to build.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,603 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Is it common to hang out the person that was calling the scam for years prior to the bust or is this just an Irish phenomenon



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,839 ✭✭✭mcsean2163


    His response is that it was meant to be a guarantee limited by time. I think the limitation is easier said than done.... however, probably wasn't the worst to have the IMF come in rather than the government digging an even bigger hole. The bank guarantee (total cost 42 billion https://pai.ie/bank-bailout-costs-state-nearly-e42-billion/) didn't cost that much in comparison to the day to day running of the country (national debt 37.6bn (2007) 241bn (2022)). NTMA don't care about hundreds of millions anymore....😂 , so 241 -38 -42 =161

    161 billion to pay government salaries, unemployment, etc. Crazy where we've ended up in 15 years. People to continue to shout for more spending on this thread saying GNI matters not gross national debt😝



  • Registered Users Posts: 123 ✭✭LJ12345


    I was filling you in and elaborating on my earlier post, as you took what I said on a different tangent to what was intended. I’m referring to the fallout of reits and funds.

    irish developers are reporting handsome profits. In a market which is allegedly so short on supply with so much demand and materials likely to drop in price (demand for building supplies slowing globally as many more countries appear poised to begin a downward spiral), it seems unusual they would put any halt on construction. Perhaps they believe a hard recession is inbound, perhaps they’re attempting to blackmail the govt for more incentives or maybe they’re trying to scare people into buying. Either way, what they say and what the situation is doesn’t corroborate well.



  • Registered Users Posts: 398 ✭✭jimmybobbyschweiz


    Of course it was and is FG policy for the market to rise! Here is Noonan back in 2014 talking about it https://m.independent.ie/life/home-garden/homes/michael-noonan-wants-house-prices-to-rise-further-30192456.html

    And getting into bed with the institutionals is not a big shock when we know FG are all about the big corporates. Here are a few examples;

    - Owen Keegan of DCC is former Davy and Davy have done so many deals with DCC via their controlled entities to get on board with these social housing long term leases. I don't think this is a coincidence when these have been consistently described as being poor value for the State and not assisting with the delivery of more supply of homes.

    - We had a 4% RPZ rental increase limit imposed a few years ago. Firstly, it was odd that it was not a rental freeze as even 4% rent increases per year far outmeasured inflation. However, institutionals have their targeted yields and the 4% p.a. increases align with those targets so that clearly seemed to be institutional driven.

    - Pat Farrel is head of Irish Institutional Property, which is the largest real estate institutional investor lobby group in ireland. He is paid for this role. What are his qualifications? Former FF, with plenty of political contacts which of course are valuable, hence why is leading the lobby group.

    - The housing charities, AKA the NGOs that FG love to hide behind, typically have an institutional investor representative involved with them. For example, look at the tentacles of institutional investors on the board of Cluid https://www.cluid.ie/our-board/ these housing charities allow for indirect lobbying of the government by institutionals.

    The housing market in Ireland is ridiculously manipulated and not for the long term sustainability interests of most people, but instead to enrich a select few. It is a pyramid scheme where good quality State cash is being siphoned off and put into the pockets of property owners where it dies essentially; it requires constantly growing cash piles of State cash to keep increasing in value as the State is the whale in the market, blowing up the bubble.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,501 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    it was his idea and he was unable to see the knock on impacts… how is that hanging him out…wouldn’t trust him with my piggy bank not to mention my pension



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,501 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    How long does it take to break ground and build and then sell? Unless all delivery’s and machinery run on Air costs have gone through the room.

    if you wanted an extension built and the builder couldn’t say how much it would cost would you go ahead and give it the green light or wait till



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,480 ✭✭✭✭Dav010


    You are misrepresenting the context of the discussion. The discussion took place in 2014 when prices were 50% below peak and developers were unwilling to build because there was no profit in selling houses. He was stating that if the necessary houses were to be built, prices would have to rise. Also, a considerable number of people were in negative equity, unable to sell properties with high mortgages and low value.

    You are taking a myopic view of certain parts of the market, using them to suit your narrative without any understanding of how the multiple parts fit together. It was at least as important for property prices to rise at that time as it now for them to fall. The construction sector was at a standstill as Ireland was emerging from recession.

    As devastating as poorly thought out RPZ legislation has been on the the rental sector, a rent freeze, which commentators have said would be constitutionally challenging, would have obliterated it as LLs would flee the market in even greater numbers. The emergency legislation enacted during Covid escaped close scrutiny simply because of the unchartered waters the country found itself in, but the legality of a total and lasting rent freeze would undoubtedly be challenged as LLs ignored it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 192 ✭✭IWW2900


    More fed rate hikes today. Looking forward to the ECB update in a few weeks.

    When the price dropping starts to really kick into gear, the hysteria by people who bought at the top of this cycle is going to be sad. Some Countries are going to see spectacular drops. But, it is necessary.



  • Registered Users Posts: 123 ✭✭LJ12345


    Developers are in business to build and the increase in materials price has been the main excuse for putting up their asking prices and subsequent huge profits. Assuming we are genuinely in need of supply the top down control of Irelands housing supply needs a serious shake up. Perhaps that’ll happen if overseas developers short on work head this way and employ all the staff our current lot aren’t using because the price of materials ‘might’ go up.



  • Registered Users Posts: 192 ✭✭IWW2900


    New Zealand already dropping at quickest rate on record. But property there has a long way to go yet.



  • Registered Users Posts: 983 ✭✭✭greenfield21


    And the fed pivot going further away...fun times.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 14,480 ✭✭✭✭Dav010


    Just to provide some perspective on this, the average house price in New Zealand nationally currently stands at just under $1m, and in August the national average house price fell by 1.8%. They have two of the most expensive cities in the world to live in/buy property, I’m not sure why you think that is related to Irelands market, this article says there is a small pool of buyers there.

    https://amp.theguardian.com/world/2022/sep/01/new-zealand-house-prices-continue-to-plunge-as-national-average-falls-below-1m



  • Registered Users Posts: 192 ✭✭IWW2900


    Of course the more speculative and over leveraged markets will see biggest drops. I'm just highlighting that property everywhere has gone up due to low rates. The reverse will be true.

    Its important for people to understand the effect of globalization on even little old Ireland.



  • Registered Users Posts: 123 ✭✭LJ12345


    i think there’s a poster or 2 with some skin in the game!



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,480 ✭✭✭✭Dav010


    Are there limits on borrowing like the type imposed here? And as you will see from the article the expectation is that borrowers will be able to absorb the rate rises, New Zealand has some of the highest average personal wealth in the world, a lower rate of ownership and unlike Ireland, a small pool of prospective buyers.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,480 ✭✭✭✭Dav010


    Are you surprised that in a discussion like this, there will be owners, buyers, renters, LLs and HAP recipients, everyone has skin in the game.



  • Registered Users Posts: 949 ✭✭✭Ozark707


    Re the small pool of buyers...does the article not infer it is due to credit restrictions?


    “With the evidence of market downturn clear in every corner of the country, the already-smaller pool of would-be buyers – due to tighter, more expensive credit – are happy to bide their time in the falling market,” Goodall said.



  • Registered Users Posts: 123 ✭✭LJ12345




  • Registered Users Posts: 14,480 ✭✭✭✭Dav010


    I had a quick search for lending rules in NZ and couldn’t find any on a par without our limits related to income, but I’ll admit I only went through a few pages on google.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,480 ✭✭✭✭Dav010




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 20,038 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    those that tend to shout loudest are hopeful buyers who expect the impending financial Armageddon that they predict to impact everyone but themselves ….



Advertisement