Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

Options
1798799800801802804»

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 3,687 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    I'd argue that this is already happening. No one with any sense is holding a large amount of cash for any length of time because they know inflation is eating the value.

    Personally speaking, I'd be happy to paid in silver coins….or MTG cards



  • Registered Users Posts: 983 ✭✭✭Greyian


    Saying it took hundreds of years to get to 17 trillion, but has nearly doubled ten years later is fairly meaningless though.

    Between 2014 and 2023, there was a jump from 17,824 billion to 33,167 billion. 86% increase in 9 years.
    If we compare 9 year periods going back (each time from the beginning of the following period, so 2005 - 2014, 1996 - 2005), 86% increase over 9 years is by no means an outlier.

    Start Year

    End Year

    Start Value

    End Value

    % Growth

    Annualised %

    2014

    2023

    17824

    33167

    86.08%

    7.14%

    2005

    2014

    7933

    17824

    124.68%

    9.41%

    1996

    2005

    5225

    7933

    51.83%

    4.75%

    1987

    1996

    2350

    5225

    122.34%

    9.28%

    1978

    1987

    772

    2350

    204.40%

    13.17%

    1969

    1978

    354

    772

    118.08%

    9.05%

    1960

    1969

    286

    354

    23.78%

    2.40%

    1951

    1960

    255

    286

    12.16%

    1.28%

    1942

    1951

    72

    255

    254.17%

    15.09%

    1933

    1942

    23

    72

    213.04%

    13.52%

    I've only gone back to 1933, as the data in your link only went back to 1929, so we can't go back another 9 years.
    So of the ten 9-year periods, 2014 to 2023 would be the 4th lowest for % growth.

    Edit: Posted before being finished.

    To link all this back to the property market, this all really indicates that with a long term outlook in mind buying as soon as possible is the best option, as the cost and value of your debt will decline over time while the nominal price of property will increase.

    Post edited by Greyian on


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,512 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    my point is that a large majority of that debt relates to the grossing out of the balance sheet due to QE and this portion is meaningless (I.e gov owes itself this debt)

    Technically all QE is a maturity swap from long term cash to short term cash which results in the equivalent of a interest rate cut and stimulates the economy…..overstimulate and you have inflation under stimulate and you have a recession.

    The only extra cash that makes its way into the real economy is what was spent by way of fiscal spending whether it be investment in infrastructure etc or stimulus cheques. I’m not saying this aspect is meaningless but the numbers are a lot smaller and not as sensational.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,613 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Trump promising to cut corporation tax to 15% if elected. source twitter

    Might want to work on new competitive advantages like, maybe, housing



  • Registered Users Posts: 139 ✭✭SpoonyMcSpoon


    House prices up more than 8% in the 12 months to May 2024;

    https://www.irishtimes.com/business/2024/07/17/house-price-inflation-jumps-to-82/

    Mahklouf doing exactly as he is supposed to with his looser borrowing policies for home buyers. It seems counter intuitive to allow for such inflation while there is a broader fight against inflation going on in the Eurozone. As inflation in the wider economy cools, housing is inflating to levels which become more unsustainable the more inflation cools. Unsustainable because it means that, as salaries don’t rise as much, people can’t borrow as much and therefore further growth in house prices can only be sustained with more leverage and that is of course a dangerous game. It seems we are at the point that house prices are only climbing because of more leverage being introduced to the market and that is not a good policy which we already know.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,480 ✭✭✭floorpie


    Unsustainable because it means that, as salaries don’t rise as much, people can’t borrow as much and therefore further growth in house prices can only be sustained with more leverage and that is of course a dangerous game.

    Speaking of leverage, on Morning Ireland yesterday an interviewee spoke about earnings multipliers for mortgages, who said that the rules are bent at a bank's discretion under certain conditions. The LTI criteria seem to be bent for high earners where bonuses and other income sources apply over a certain number of years.

    Naturally enough banks would be aware of the risk profile of an income stream, but nevertheless it seems irrational to me to have more permissive lending based on historical high earnings, where that historical period spans a stock market boom.

    Looking at a Central Bank report from 2016, it seems to show a significant increase in defaults as LTI increases: https://www.centralbank.ie/docs/default-source/financial-system/financial-stability/macroprudential-policy/policy-documents/2016-review-of-residential-mortgage-lending-requirements.pdf?sfvrsn=86c4da1d_12

    Does anyone have any insight on these practices? For example, what sources of income and collateral apply here to increase LTI (I hope the answer isn't 'rental income' and 'properties'), or, are there any breakdowns from the Central Bank on lending by LTI?



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,049 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    The risk profile of buy to let makes it a very poor investment. Add on the eye watering interest rates for a BTL and it very quickly becomes not worthwhile. Much better returns elsewhere



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,610 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    If you are borrowing money for it, then you need to compare like with like. i.e. compare the interest rate for a BTL mortgage with the rate you'll get for a personal loan to buy the alternative (or even secured against that alternative).

    For someone who has the cash - then yes, put it in a diversified portfolio. But if all you have is 100k, and the choice is between buying a BTL with a mortgage, and investing that 100k today in something else …… do you think you'll be able to buy that house in 20 years with the proceeds from your 100k invested into something else? (at the future price of course). Bear in mind too that you will have some additional CGT from you other investments that you won't have with your property.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,613 ✭✭✭Villa05


    What the government is doing is the main driver of house prices. The majority of ftb are buying 2nd hand homes. The driver of prices is new builds, this is where the majority of market interference is



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,168 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio


    The majority of FTBs buy second hand homes, but also I believe the majority of new homes are bought by FTB to benefit from HTB.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,901 ✭✭✭amacca


    I believe I'm not informed enough to fully understand some of this post

    Just by way of clarification..does this mean that a large majority of govt debt is a direct result of quantitave easing...because in order to introduce more liquidity to the system govt bonds (debt) have been purchased from itself...or EU doing it for countries in EU?

    Therefore its introduced more money but just by borrowing from its future self?

    And a lot of this extra money doesn't make its way into the real Joe bloggs economy because its spent on investment in infrastructure etc so it doesn't have nearly as big an effect on inflation as people think?

    Something along those lines?

    Just to argue for the sake of it (i might learn something)...does it not mean that govts don't really have to tighten their belts due to the put it on the never never aspect of it....or at least prolonging the day of reckoning indefinitely...and that has a big influence on inflation as they will only squeeze majority of voters out of necessity......but at some stage the piper will have to be paid?



Advertisement