Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Not Guilty by reason of Insanity READ OP FIRST

Options
18911131429

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 1,076 ✭✭✭Curse These Metal Hands


    seenitall wrote: »
    Some people in this thread must have forgotten how Alan Howe was eulogised as the pillar of his community at the funeral for himself and the 4 people he killed. Feminine-primary social order, ha.

    That was distasteful for sure. The media, however, made up for with headlines such as "Monster Alan Hawe was cross dressing porn addict."


  • Registered Users Posts: 762 ✭✭✭starkid


    py2006 wrote: »
    This.

    Anybody who even began to question his mental state got absolutely LAMBASTED at the time. He was a monster, simple as. No sympathy or even questions of his mental state were tolerated.

    Faugheens already jumped through hoops explaining the oh so obvious differences...:rolleyes:


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,847 ✭✭✭py2006


    bubblypop wrote: »
    Why?
    It's an anonymous board, there's no reason someone involved in this case isn't reading this thread or posting in it.
    I've posted in threads were I have been involved in the topic being discussed.

    Any member of the legal profession directly involved with a very serious and current case like this would stay well clear of social media commenting on it...even if its anonymous.

    I would have serious reservations about them if they didn't.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,514 ✭✭✭MoonUnit75


    seenitall wrote: »
    Some people in this thread must have forgotten how Alan Howe was eulogised as the pillar of his community at the funeral for himself and the 4 people he killed. Feminine-primary social order, ha.

    No he wasn't. There was the typical comments from locals about how normal both he and the family seemed and how they would never have suspected anything like this. Same happens after lots of heinous crimes 'he/she just seemed so ordinary, he/she raised money for the local wheelchair association' etc. etc.

    Through feminist glasses though, some people could only see people praising this particular killer.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,847 ✭✭✭py2006


    starkid wrote: »
    Faugheens already jumped through hoops explaining the oh so obvious differences...:rolleyes:

    We know the difference...gender


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,817 ✭✭✭Darc19


    It is so sad to see so many uninformed nasty people on here who have no understanding of mental health.

    I really really really genuinely wish that no member of your family or anyone close to you ever suffers from mental illness as you will not give them the support or understanding that they require.

    They also may not open to you and hide it from you, and then one day you may have to ask yourself why.


    It is this type of utter stupid and nasty commentary around mental health that has so many people hiding their issues.


    Just think about what you are saying - you might actually start to understand a little. But if you don't, that's a sad reflection on your own life


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 202 ✭✭Purple is a Fruit


    seenitall wrote: »
    Some people in this thread must have forgotten how Alan Howe was eulogised as the pillar of his community at the funeral for himself and the 4 people he killed.
    That was horrendous.

    It doesn't change that severe mental illness may have caused him to carry out those monstrous acts though.


  • Registered Users Posts: 762 ✭✭✭starkid


    seenitall wrote: »
    Some people in this thread must have forgotten how Alan Howe was eulogised as the pillar of his community at the funeral for himself and the 4 people he killed. Feminine-primary social order, ha.

    that was in his note. wasn't hs body exhumed at the victims familys bequest.

    also theres these -

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/sep/02/reporting-alan-hawe-murder-suicide-family-sympathetic-say-womens-groups-wife-children

    i completely agree he was utter scum. But theres no difference in this case imo. Both are vile acts. Mental health is an easy out.


  • Registered Users Posts: 762 ✭✭✭starkid


    Darc19 wrote: »
    It is so sad to see so many uninformed nasty people on here who have no understanding of mental health.

    I really really really genuinely wish that no member of your family or anyone close to you ever suffers from mental illness as you will not give them the support or understanding that they require.

    They also may not open to you and hide it from you, and then one day you may have to ask yourself why.


    It is this type of utter stupid and nasty commentary around mental health that has so many people hiding their issues.


    Just think about what you are saying - you might actually start to understand a little. But if you don't, that's a sad reflection on your own life

    wil you stop pontificating. Many of us on here have probably been touched by mental health and tragedy. I've been suicidal all my life and was in John of Gods. My daughter attempted suicide quite recently. One of my good friends committed suicide. Most of us respect mental health. But it can't become an excuse for utterly everything. We can accept she had these issues. But so does nearly every criminal or murderer in the World. Nearly every single serial killer has multiple mental health issues. How far do we go like? Some argue Hitler and his regime, and Stalin had many mental disorders. where does it end like? again is it because shes the symbolic figure of a mother that its accepted by some on here? I just don't get it and in many other jurisdications infanticide is treated as it should be.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,722 ✭✭✭seenitall


    That was distasteful for sure. The media, however, made up for with headlines such as "Monster Alan Hawe was cross dressing porn addict."

    That was only after the media sensed which way the wind of anger was blowing. At first, Clodagh wasn’t even being mentioned by name, such was the reverence and wonder about the pillar of the community. It needed a hashtag on social media, hernamewasclodagh.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 202 ✭✭Purple is a Fruit


    Darc19 wrote: »
    It is so sad to see so many uninformed nasty people on here who have no understanding of mental health.

    I really really really genuinely wish that no member of your family or anyone close to you ever suffers from mental illness as you will not give them the support or understanding that they require.

    They also may not open to you and hide it from you, and then one day you may have to ask yourself why.


    It is this type of utter stupid and nasty commentary around mental health that has so many people hiding their issues.


    Just think about what you are saying - you might actually start to understand a little. But if you don't, that's a sad reflection on your own life
    I've had mental health issues since I was 18.

    I can still see why it's hard for people to empathise with someone murdering their children though. Criticising such a person and being baffled at the verdict is hardly the same as having no empathy for people with mental health difficulties.


  • Site Banned Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭Faugheen


    This all started because you couldn't offer reasons why Dr. Kennedy's assessment of Alan Hawe was wrong only "he was just a dick, end of. "

    Sounds like you didn't read up enough as your were clearly unaware of Dr. Kennedy's assessment and now just have your back up. Mental illness can effect anyone regardless of gender, whether you believe it or not.

    Actually I was very aware of Professor Kennedy's assessment (if you're going to act like you know it all, at least use his proper title) but I am also very aware that Prof Kennedy never met, spoke with or treated Alan Hawe which holds a lot of weight in an evidence standpoint. I'm not saying his assessment is wrong, in fact I would believe his assessment. However if Prof Kennedy or anyone under him at the CMH had treated him then it would be a completely different story.

    However there is evidence (and I mean from people who knew him, not what the red-tops are saying) that he had control over his family to the point that Clodagh couldn't go anywhere without him and there were also circumstances that led to him about to have a fall from grace, which were all of his down doing. In my eyes, it's clear he killed them because he didn't want them finding out whatever it was he was hiding.

    There was never any suggestion from anyone, anywhere that this case of Deirdre Morley that she was controlling or about to endure a fall from grace. The only thing that's said here is that she has had a long history of depression and, based on Andrew McGinley's statement, there was more to her mental health problems than he, she or the HSE even knew.


  • Registered Users Posts: 128 ✭✭Taeholic


    Ellie2008 wrote: »
    I can’t link the article but I’m almost certain I have this right.

    *Warning screenshots have distressing details

    These are the parts I struggle with the most. Her own words of what was going through her mind about her eldest son. Horrifically tragic case, my heart goes out to their father and extended family. I'm at a loss for words other than that.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,385 ✭✭✭corner of hells


    Feets wrote: »
    Revenge. Simple.

    Revenge for what ?


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,722 ✭✭✭seenitall


    MoonUnit75 wrote: »
    No he wasn't. There was the typical comments from locals about how normal both he and the family seemed and how they would never have suspected anything like this. Same happens after lots of heinous crimes 'he/she just seemed so ordinary, he/she raised money for the local wheelchair association' etc. etc.

    Through feminist glasses though, some people could only see people praising this particular killer.

    Yes, he was. If that doesn’t sound like a glowing eulogy to you, maybe it’s because some people can only see people hating this particular killer through their misogynistic glasses.

    https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/hawe-family-buried-following-funeral-service-in-cavan-1.2778784%3fmode=amp


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,658 ✭✭✭Nermal


    We cannot reliably tell sane from insane people.

    It's not a scientific concept, it's a social one. The psychiatric evidence is mere opinion.

    The verdict should be guilty, the sentence should be lifelong.

    If some or all of it must be served in the CMH, fine - but all of it should be served.


  • Site Banned Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭Faugheen


    An expert in law but cites The Sun and Irish Mirror as reliable sources. Anyway...

    Where did I cite The Sun or Irish Mirror?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,076 ✭✭✭Curse These Metal Hands


    Faugheen wrote: »
    Actually I was very aware of Professor Kennedy's assessment (if you're going to act like you know it all, at least use his proper title) but I am also very aware that Prof Kennedy never met, spoke with or treated Alan Hawe which holds a lot of weight in an evidence standpoint. I'm not saying his assessment is wrong, in fact I would believe his assessment. However if Prof Kennedy or anyone under him at the CMH had treated him then it would be a completely different story.

    Quite unusual to open with "Alan Hawe was a controlling dick" only to agree he was suffering from severe mental illness much later on in the thread. Not as empathetic as you claim to be perhaps. Could have avoided this entire exchange.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 202 ✭✭Purple is a Fruit


    Feets wrote: »
    Revenge. Simple.
    Oh an intriguing cryptic post. :D

    Wonder whether they'll reply to those who asked for clarification...


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,847 ✭✭✭py2006


    seenitall wrote: »
    Yes, he was. If that doesn’t sound like a glowing eulogy to you, maybe it’s because some people can only see people hating this particular killer through their misogynistic glasses.

    Oh leave the feminist nonsense out of this.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,123 ✭✭✭Ellie2008


    At what point does something become a “mental health issue” that excuses taking a life. I think some cases are very clear cut eg kill your kids as revenge towards a cheating spouse Vs kill your kids because you believe them to be possessed. Many are not.

    Are the expectations of mental health professionals realistic? They cannot read minds. If someone never expresses any desire to kill themselves or others how is that the fault of their doctor.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 877 ✭✭✭jk23


    Taeholic wrote: »
    These are the parts I struggle with the most. Her own words of what was going through her mind about her eldest son. Horrifically tragic case, my heart goes out to their father and extended family. I'm at a loss for words other than that.

    Jesus that's upsetting to read, especially the part of pretending it was a game taping his mouth using his trust in his mother.


  • Registered Users Posts: 43,028 ✭✭✭✭SEPT 23 1989


    Darc19 wrote: »
    It is so sad to see so many uninformed nasty people on here who have no understanding of mental health.

    I really really really genuinely wish that no member of your family or anyone close to you ever suffers from mental illness as you will not give them the support or understanding that they require.

    They also may not open to you and hide it from you, and then one day you may have to ask yourself why.


    It is this type of utter stupid and nasty commentary around mental health that has so many people hiding their issues.


    Just think about what you are saying - you might actually start to understand a little. But if you don't, that's a sad reflection on your own life

    The nasty uniformed people who are angry about the murderer of the three innocent children

    How dare they


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,514 ✭✭✭MoonUnit75


    Faugheen wrote: »
    Actually I was very aware of Professor Kennedy's assessment (if you're going to act like you know it all, at least use his proper title) but I am also very aware that Prof Kennedy never met, spoke with or treated Alan Hawe which holds a lot of weight in an evidence standpoint. I'm not saying his assessment is wrong, in fact I would believe his assessment. However if Prof Kennedy or anyone under him at the CMH had treated him then it would be a completely different story.

    However there is evidence (and I mean from people who knew him, not what the red-tops are saying) that he had control over his family to the point that Clodagh couldn't go anywhere without him and there were also circumstances that led to him about to have a fall from grace, which were all of his down doing. In my eyes, it's clear he killed them because he didn't want them finding out whatever it was he was hiding.

    There was never any suggestion from anyone, anywhere that this case of Deirdre Morley that she was controlling or about to endure a fall from grace. The only thing that's said here is that she has had a long history of depression and, based on Andrew McGinley's statement, there was more to her mental health problems than he, she or the HSE even knew.

    Isn't everything you've claimed about Alan Hawe hearsay, revisionism and gossip though? Before the funerals there was this:
    "Clodagh Hawe’s sister Jacqueline posted a Facebook link to an article on Alan’s mental state and added: ‘A bit of truth at last!’ She also paid a heartfelt tribute to the entire Hawe family, adding: ‘RIP our wonderful Alan, Clodagh, Liam, Niall and Ryan we love you all our angels xxxxxxxx.’"

    "‘Alan and Clodagh were a happy and loving couple and what happened was completely out of character."
    https://evoke.ie/2016/09/02/news/irish-news/clodagh-hawes-sister-explains-pressure-on-father-of-three


  • Posts: 18,749 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    starkid wrote: »
    . But it can't become an excuse for utterly everything. We can accept she had these issues. But so does nearly every criminal or murderer in the World.

    No they dont. Where are you getting that from?


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,847 ✭✭✭py2006


    Taeholic wrote: »
    These are the parts I struggle with the most. Her own words of what was going through her mind about her eldest son. Horrifically tragic case, my heart goes out to their father and extended family. I'm at a loss for words other than that.

    So her attempts to kill herself were to avoid a jail sentence and not out of guilt for multiple murders?


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,811 ✭✭✭joe40


    I've had mental health issues since I was 18.

    I can still see why it's hard for people to empathise with someone murdering their children though. Criticising such a person and being baffled at the verdict is hardly the same as having no empathy for people with mental health difficulties.

    I can understand that up to a point but in this particular case the medical experts for both sides and both legal teams accepted the insanity case.
    I can't believe those experts were hoodwinked or overly influenced by emotion as opposed to psychiatric medicine.
    Even the husband can accept the verdict.
    Each case is different, in this case there seems to be a clear medical consensus.
    As a non medical person I can accept that.

    Emotion, gender all kinds of things can come into wider debate but in that courthouse the only factors were medical and legal.
    Comparisons with other cases is moot. No two are the same.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,722 ✭✭✭seenitall


    py2006 wrote: »
    Oh leave the feminist nonsense out of this.

    I suppose it’s alright for the other poster to accuse anyone of being “feminist” in stating the facts of what happened at Alan Hawe’s funeral and in the immediate aftermath of the murders in the media, however when the word misogyny appears as a retort, we can’t have that nonsense, can we? ;)


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,826 ✭✭✭monkeybutter


    Faugheen wrote: »
    Where did I cite The Sun or Irish Mirror?

    Where are you getting you stories from?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 128 ✭✭Taeholic


    jk23 wrote: »
    Jesus that's upsetting to read, especially the part of pretending it was a game taping his mouth using his trust in his mother.

    Apologies, maybe I should have put a warning on the post. It made me sick to my stomach to read too


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement