Forced to work from home

Padre_Pio

Padre_Pio wrote: »

I've calmed down a bit since I started this thread and as another poster said, you have to find the positives.
I think I need to take a look at my own job and see if I can apportion certain tasks to certain in-office days.

Thanks everyone for your feedback, its nice to get a variety of perspectives.

Hi OP. Your attempt to bring this thread to a rational and reasonable conclusion has failed!!

irelandrover

Mrs OBumble wrote: »

It's very well understood.

What many don't understand is the mathematical consequences of shrinking available desks by 60% and mandating 2 days per week in the office for everyone.

If a company does that, then no amount of talking to your manager, HR or even the cleaner will get you a permanent desk.

My company had 60 desks per 90 employees. They were rarely ever full. Between days off, sick days, and people in meetings there was always a free desk. A few people got a permanent desk as they needed specialist chairs/ equipment for health reasons.

CosmicFool

floorpie wrote: »

I'm also hearing rumours of the same thing in my place.

Will I be paid for the company's use of my facilities (room, equipment, electricity, heating etc)? Or is this essentially a permanent pay cut and worse conditions?

I'm especially annoyed that it seems like they'll mandate a day or two in office a week. So not only will the employer get free use of my rented house, but I can't even move to a low cost area of the country.

I'm very annoyed by the whole thing but it seems most people are in favour of WFH.

Would you not save money in travel expenses?

floorpie

CosmicFool wrote: »

Would you not save money in travel expenses?

Why do people keep saying this

I can walk to work or I can hire a limo every day, my company don't need to adjust my wages to account for the way I choose to commute, and it's none of their business. On the other hand, if my company requires that I go to an event in a limo then they should pay for the limo.

In other words, it's irrelevant whether or not I save money by not having to travel. Conversely, if I have to spend money on my employer's behalf to do the work they require then they should reimburse.

Padre_Pio

ineedeuro wrote: »

First post says everyone is hot desk
Then quickly this is confirmed as a quarter of the company will have permanent desks

So if a quarter of the company has permanent desk then just request one. Job done.

Sorry, to clarify again, the point in bold was suggested by us who need more space for test gear and other equipment.

It was rejected.

Calahonda52

CosmicFool wrote: »

Would you not save money in travel expenses?

Yes you will save the costs of going to and from the office which are not allowable as a tax deduction.
More importantly, if you spend 2 hrs each way, even in in floorpie's limo:D, whats the productivity/leisure time cost

I remember as a young employee a more established colleague who worked from home 95% of the time feeling very hard done by when he lost his private, corner desk with a view.

He sat there once a month on average.
He didn't get much sympathy.

ineedeuro

floorpie wrote: »

Why do people keep saying this

I can walk to work or I can hire a limo every day, my company don't need to adjust my wages to account for the way I choose to commute, and it's none of their business. On the other hand, if my company requires that I go to an event in a limo then they should pay for the limo.

In other words, it's irrelevant whether or not I save money by not having to travel. Conversely, if I have to spend money on my employer's behalf to do the work they require then they should reimburse.

If you are required to be in the office then you either have to buy/rent a location close to work or commute to work. This is at your own expense

If you can work from home this means that cost is gone. For me that is a significant reduction on fuel/travel costs every month.

Plus if you don't have to go to office it opens up living further away from office, this can allow cheaper rent or even to buy a house at a cheaper price as outside a main cit. Of course this is all based on working in a city centre and not everyone does.

ineedeuro

Padre_Pio wrote: »

Sorry, to clarify again, the point in bold was suggested by us who need more space for test gear and other equipment.

It was rejected.

Have you personally gone to HR/manager and explained why you want a permanent desk and want to work from the office 5 days a week?

Jim2007

floorpie wrote: »

Yeah, perhaps there'll be extra capacity in the short term, but if the motivation here is to reduce wasted space then I imagine capacity will reduce such that offices are essentially full at all times (likely filled with the people doing their mandatory days).

Mandatory days usually get dropped pretty quickly because companies can’t justify the cost of office space and parking just to bring people in for the sake of bringing them.

Of course the next logical step is to question why you need to continue to even have an office in an expensive part of town or even in the town if there are few or no staff there. When I moved to Zürich in the late 80’s all the major Swiss banks had their HQ down town, today they are somewhere out in the sticks because very few people go there anymore so it is cheaper to locate out of town.

Jim2007

floorpie wrote: »

In other words, it's irrelevant whether or not I save money by not having to travel

It may not be relevant to you, but I don’t know anyone who is not interested in having a couple extra K a year to spend on something else.

And most people don’t incur much by way of additional expense by working from home. Once the kids are old enough to be going out to school the house will be empty for a large part of the day. And pretty much ever house these days have printers, punch and staples.

So while you may get upset by the company not paying you for the use of your stapler most people will not see it that way.

floorpie

Jim2007 wrote: »

It may not be relevant to you, but I don’t know anyone who is not interested in having a couple extra K a year to spend on something else.

It's of course relevant to me, but it's relevant to me only how I use my money in my personal life.

And most people don’t incur much by way of additional expense by working from home. Once the kids are old enough to be going out to school the house will be empty for a large part of the day. And pretty much ever house these days have printers, punch and staples.

So while you may get upset by the company not paying you for the use of your stapler most people will not see it that way.

I'm not talking about 50c worth of staples, I'm talking about, in my case, €1000s in electricity a year, and probably for the average person (1 laptop, 2 monitors running 10 hours a day) at least €400 a year. Multiply by the number of people WFH. Then add heating through winter. Even on the dole you get a fuel allowance I'm not asking to be compensated for, e.g., my work desk being in my bedroom (which imo would also be a reasonable demand, but ignore that for now), I'm talking about direct costs.

What this cost is offset by (how much you're saving on trains, how much you're saving on Starbucks, whatever) is irrelevant to my company. These "savings" can NOT be factored in to the costs that I'm incurring for the company.

Of course the next logical step is to question why you need to continue to even have an office in an expensive part of town or even in the town if there are few or no staff there. When I moved to Zürich in the late 80’s all the major Swiss banks had their HQ down town, today they are somewhere out in the sticks because very few people go there anymore so it is cheaper to locate out of town.

Agreed. Let us WFH from Switzerland or up a mountain in Kerry or wherever we want. Get rid of mandatory office days, if our permanent workspace is to be imposed on our home.

ineedeuro

floorpie wrote: »

It's of course relevant to me, but it's relevant to me only how I use my money in my personal life.



I'm not talking about 50c worth of staples, I'm talking about, in my case, €1000s in electricity a year, and probably for the average person (1 laptop, 2 monitors) at least €400 a year. Multiply by the number of people WFH. Then add heating through winter. Even on the dole you get a fuel allowance

What this cost is offset by (how much you're saving on trains, how much you're saving on Starbucks, whatever) is irrelevant to my company. These "savings" can NOT be factored in to the costs that I'm incurring for the company.


Agreed. Let us WFH from Switzerland or up a mountain in Kerry or wherever we want.

€1,000s in electricity? are you mining bitcoin :P
Laptop will use 300kWh in a year. That's 42 euro for the year. Which I get tax back on. Max with two monitor 100 quid a year

How exactly do you get 1,000s of electricity?

Padre_Pio

ineedeuro wrote: »

Have you personally gone to HR/manager and explained why you want a permanent desk and want to work from the office 5 days a week?

Yes, and I was told that at the moment it's one rule for everyone, no exceptions.
Maybe something will change when everything settles down, but the office layout, desk size, storage etc are all changing to emphasise that the office is a temporary space and encourage people to work from home.

ineedeuro wrote: »

€1,000s in electricity? are you mining bitcoin :P
Laptop will use 300kWh in a year. That's 42 euro for the year. Which I get tax back on. Max with two monitor 100 quid a year

How exactly do you get 1,000s of electricity?

There's an assumption that everyone needs only a laptop and a monitor to do the entirety of their job. This assumption is wrong, especially in the case I described in the OP.
I'm well aware that I personally am in the minority or circumstances when it comes to WFH, that is evidently misunderstood by those who say "sure WHF has been here forever", "sure what more space do you need for a laptop and a screen"

floorpie

ineedeuro wrote: »

€1,000s in electricity? are you mining bitcoin :P
Laptop will use 300kWh in a year. That's 42 euro for the year. Which I get tax back on. Max with two monitor 100 quid a year

How exactly do you get 1,000s of electricity?

My desktop PC has a 1000W PSU and I run GPU jobs for work, then 2 laptops and 2 monitors. My monitors have max power draw 100W and average 60-70W so that's approx €100 each at average cost KWH.

I know this isn't a normal case but I think €400 per year is a reasonable estimate for typical monitors and laptops running 10 hours a day. It's not orders of magnitude off at least.

You get 10% tax back on this.

floorpie

floorpie wrote: »

My desktop PC has a 1000W PSU and I run GPU jobs for work, then 2 laptops and 2 monitors. My monitors have max power draw 100W and average 60-70W so that's approx €100 each at average cost KWH.

I know this isn't a normal case but I think €400 per year is a reasonable estimate for typical monitors and laptops running 10 hours a day. It's not orders of magnitude off at least.

You get 10% tax back on this.

There are solutions for these problems that keep manifesting, your issue appears to be you have no interest in any of them

floorpie

Deleted User wrote: »

There are solutions for these problems that keep manifesting, your issue appears to be you have no interest in any of them

I don't just care about my costs (I'll sort my issues out), I care about yours also Nobody should have their company's office expenditure imposed on them regardless of what you're now saving on coffee and blah blah blah

Clearly everybody disagrees!

ineedeuro

floorpie wrote: »

I don't just care about my costs (I'll sort my issues out), I care about yours also Nobody should have their company's office expenditure imposed on them regardless of what you're now saving on coffee and blah blah blah

Clearly everybody disagrees!

My options
Option 1: Travel to my office, that is either by car/train. I pay for that transport to/from work but I also waste 2-3 hours per day to commute. Then work 8 hours. Even in the case of the train I need to drive to the station. This means I need to pay fuel/insurance/tax etc for the car. But as mentioned already the 2-3 hours are the most important part for me.

Option 2: Work from home, pay some heating/electric. No stress of rush hour traffic. Work 8 hours and have 2-3 hours spare.

Now maybe I am crazy but my preference is option 2.

Young_gunner

ineedeuro wrote: »

My options
Option 1: Travel to my office, that is either by car/train. I pay for that transport to/from work but I also waste 2-3 hours per day to commute. Then work 8 hours. Even in the case of the train I need to drive to the station. This means I need to pay fuel/insurance/tax etc for the car. But as mentioned already the 2-3 hours are the most important part for me.

Option 2: Work from home, pay some heating/electric. No stress of rush hour traffic. Work 8 hours and have 2-3 hours spare.

Now maybe I am crazy but my preference is option 2.

I don't think you're crazy! the time saving alone makes WFH a very sensible option

Calahonda52

floorpie wrote: »

You get 10% tax back on this.

Source?

floorpie

floorpie wrote: »

My desktop PC has a 1000W PSU and I run GPU jobs for work, then 2 laptops and 2 monitors. My monitors have max power draw 100W and average 60-70W so that's approx €100 each at average cost KWH.

I know this isn't a normal case but I think €400 per year is a reasonable estimate for typical monitors and laptops running 10 hours a day. It's not orders of magnitude off at least.

You get 10% tax back on this.

Yeah, that's a lot of kit to have in your own place just for work.

Just Joe Duffy it and you'll all be back in in no time:-)

floorpie

ineedeuro wrote: »

My options
Option 1: Travel to my office, that is either by car/train. I pay for that transport to/from work but I also waste 2-3 hours per day to commute. Then work 8 hours. Even in the case of the train I need to drive to the station. This means I need to pay fuel/insurance/tax etc for the car. But as mentioned already the 2-3 hours are the most important part for me.

Option 2: Work from home, pay some heating/electric. No stress of rush hour traffic. Work 8 hours and have 2-3 hours spare.

Now maybe I am crazy but my preference is option 2.

You forgot from option 2: Must go to the office 2 days a week. Pay for transport. Waste 2-3 hours per office day. Still need a car and fuel/insurance/tax to drive to the station. Stay living within a commute of your office. If your company is in the city and you rent, stay living in costly accommodation and work and sleep from your bedroom.

Option 3: 100% WFH, live wherever you want.

We're talking about option 2 in the thread

floorpie

Calahonda52 wrote: »

Source?

https://www.revenue.ie/en/jobs-and-pensions/eworking/what-costs-can-you-claim-for.aspx

I only learned about this in this thread, I haven't claimed.

jakiah

floorpie wrote: »

I don't just care about my costs (I'll sort my issues out), I care about yours also Nobody should have their company's office expenditure imposed on them regardless of what you're now saving on coffee and blah blah blah

It sounds like you think your role isnt suitable for WFH or Hybrid. You should tell your employer you want a permanent desk. Lots of people do this already. Again, this is not new.

I prefer hybrid, so thats what I arranged with my employer.

floorpie

floorpie wrote: »

I don't just care about my costs (I'll sort my issues out), I care about yours also Nobody should have their company's office expenditure imposed on them regardless of what you're now saving on coffee and blah blah blah

Clearly everybody disagrees!

you can get up to €3.20 per day spent working at home without paying any tax if your employer agrees to that scheme. I also agree that companies should subsidise home offices, i.e. seats and laptop stands for ergonomic purposes. In fact they should do this or they will probably be class action suits in the future.

floorpie

floorpie wrote: »

My desktop PC has a 1000W PSU and I run GPU jobs for work, then 2 laptops and 2 monitors. My monitors have max power draw 100W and average 60-70W so that's approx €100 each at average cost KWH.

I know this isn't a normal case but I think €400 per year is a reasonable estimate for typical monitors and laptops running 10 hours a day. It's not orders of magnitude off at least.

You get 10% tax back on this.

Those monitors sound expensive, are they company issue? Do you need two on for ten hours every day?

Padre_Pio

fvp4 wrote: »

Those monitors sound expensive, are they company issue? Do you need two on for ten hours every day?

I think we're scraping the barrel if we're turning off or turning down the brightness on monitors to save electricity. :pac:

floorpie

fvp4 wrote: »

Those monitors sound expensive, are they company issue? Do you need two on for ten hours every day?

Regular cheap 4K monitors, and that's a normal enough power draw for >26" at daytime brightness I believe. I think everybody needs two, everyone in my place is provided with two, and 10 hours is the normal time you'd have equipment on each day.

The €3.20 per day you mention is a good estimate for the average daily costs we're incurring when WFH, and I'd be happy enough if we're all getting that as standard.

Jim2007

Agreed. Let us WFH from Switzerland or up a mountain in Kerry or wherever we want.

Living abroad is not really possible because there are no permits to cover the remote working concept. Even the EU free movement does not cover it - they assume you are employed in the state, there for family reunion or have retired to that state and your income is not derived from economic activity.

The result is that you don’t have access to services that would allow you to build a permanent life there. Short periods are possible, but that becomes a bit of a pain after a while.

Padre_Pio

Padre_Pio wrote: »

Just got word today that work is downsizing their offices and the COVID work from home policy is going to be a near-permanent WHF policy.

Basically, the new office will only have hot desks, maybe half as many as there are staff. Employees have to book a desk in advance if they need to come into the office, but your permanent desk is expected to be in your own home.

There's uproar from certain people, but the response is basically put up and shut up.
Personally, there's no mention of home working in my contract. I was looking forward to getting back into the office and I barely have the space for a desk where I'm living at the moment, never mind a full setup.

Anyone have any experience of this? Places like Google and Facebook have said they're looking at similar policies. Any ideas how that went down with staff?

It is very hard to work from home if not properly kitted out. Hard to get a quiet area.

PAYE people should get tax credits towards equipping their own home offices.

You need a desk (that you can rise so you can stand), screen, printer, etc

By right an external office.

Rent in a hotpot office should be tax deductible as well.

BonnieSituation

ari101 wrote: »

I want back in office myself. The routine incl. the commute, sociability, leaving work behind where I can't see it, is part of my mental health. I expect I will have that choice though where I am now, but if I move, I'll be looking for a job with 3+ days a week in office.

Hot desking should come with peripherals and a set up you can dock into IMO, if it is to work efficiently. With the need to process and review data, for example, a laptop screen is just not big enough to do it efficiently, a separate screen is really required. With a riser and separate keyboard you can fix some of the ergonomics but the screen is too small far away for ease of sight/use for some work. And then docking stations are brand/laptop specific which makes them a problem to fit for hotdesks if your workforce have varied equipment.

In Dublin commuting requires carrying gear without a car for a lot, which is just not feasible beyond a laptop and charger regularly. It's a mine field.

I do think wfh has perks to offset some of the 'costs' in facility terms (save on the commute cost and time, no buying lunch out or pre preparing it in morn, get short house chores done during day on breaks) but gosh I also want my dining table back. And if you share a home are you expected to work from bedroom or take up shared space forever, or pay rent for an extra room for an office? Business need to consider that just because they want to kick us out doesn't mean we have realistic places to go. For some people it works well, let them stay home.

Couldn't agree with this more.

I'm currently in a 100% WFH setup. I absolutely loathe it.

I know there's a load out there that can't abide the idea of a commute, but Jesus, the idea of leaving work behind or office socialising or even simple progression not being shunted is surely worth an occasional visit to an office?

I'm moving jobs in about 3 weeks time and I made it clear that I want the flexibility of WFH, but don't expect me to avail of it unless it suits me.

There's a lot to be said for decompressing morning coffees etc. These are important little interruptions in your day that I and I know most of my mates are missing.

WFH suits a lot of people, but just because it suits you doesn't mean it suits us all.

As an aside, I did a hdip and am now doing a masters via distance and honestly, it's a right pain in the hole. Our class met up a few weeks back for a meet up and intro session after 4 months and we were all the better for it.

There's a place for remote learning and working, but there's no replacement for face to face interaction, learning and networking.

Addle

BonnieSituation wrote: »

Couldn't agree with this more.

I'm currently in a 100% WFH setup. I absolutely loathe it.

I know there's a load out there that can't abide the idea of a commute, but Jesus, the idea of leaving work behind or office socialising or even simple progression not being shunted is surely worth an occasional visit to an office?

I'm moving jobs in about 3 weeks time and I made it clear that I want the flexibility of WFH, but don't expect me to avail of it unless it suits me.

My employer imposes its decisions on me. I’m surprised how demanding some employees are.
I’d love to stay wfh. No made a decent workspace for myself. But my employer is planning on bringing everyone back to the office.

Wabbit Ears

Addle wrote: »

My employer imposes its decisions on me. I’m surprised how demanding some employees are.
I’d love to stay wfh. No made a decent workspace for myself. But my employer is planning on bringing everyone back to the office.

Not all employers are like that. Time to brush up the CV and see what's out there.

floorpie

Jim2007 wrote: »

Living abroad is not really possible because there are no permits to cover the remote working concept. Even the EU free movement does not cover it - they assume you are employed in the state, there for family reunion or have retired to that state and your income is not derived from economic activity.

The result is that you don’t have access to services that would allow you to build a permanent life there. Short periods are possible, but that becomes a bit of a pain after a while.

Can you choose to be tax resident in Ireland while abroad? Are there any other considerations for an employer along the lines of tax that might prevent an employee moving?

KaneToad

BonnieSituation wrote: »

Couldn't agree with this more.

I'm currently in a 100% WFH setup. I absolutely loathe it.

I know there's a load out there that can't abide the idea of a commute, but Jesus, the idea of leaving work behind or office socialising or even simple progression not being shunted is surely worth an occasional visit to an office?

I'm moving jobs in about 3 weeks time and I made it clear that I want the flexibility of WFH, but don't expect me to avail of it unless it suits me.

There's a lot to be said for decompressing morning coffees etc. These are important little interruptions in your day that I and I know most of my mates are missing.

WFH suits a lot of people, but just because it suits you doesn't mean it suits us all.

As an aside, I did a hdip and am now doing a masters via distance and honestly, it's a right pain in the hole. Our class met up a few weeks back for a meet up and intro session after 4 months and we were all the better for it.

There's a place for remote learning and working, but there's no replacement for face to face interaction, learning and networking.

As you have alluded to, it's different strokes for different folks. I think remote learning/working can definitely replace face to face interaction.

I have zero interest in the social aspects of work/learning. I interact socially with people of my choosing not with people I am randomly thrown together with in a work environment.

floorpie

floorpie wrote: »

Regular cheap 4K monitors, and that's a normal enough power draw for >26" at daytime brightness I believe. I think everybody needs two, everyone in my place is provided with two, and 10 hours is the normal time you'd have equipment on each day.

The €3.20 per day you mention is a good estimate for the average daily costs we're incurring when WFH, and I'd be happy enough if we're all getting that as standard.

you should ask your employer. I get it.

Mic 1972

newuser99999 wrote: »

Sorry I can’t interview every graduate in Ireland for you.

I will assume that most of us don’t enjoy working with people we’ve never met face to face, in house shares or family homes, having hardly any interaction with colleagues.

That’s such a bold claim.

I agree with this.


Also, expecting people to be equipped with a proper home office in order to secure a job is not a fair requirement

Mic 1972

floorpie wrote: »

Can you choose to be tax resident in Ireland while abroad? Are there any other considerations for an employer along the lines of tax that might prevent an employee moving?

No you can't. Living in another country means being a tax payer in that country.

floorpie

Mic 1972 wrote: »

Living in another country means being a tax payer in that country.

According to Ireland or to other countries? I.e. does it depend on the country you move to?

newuser99999

floorpie wrote: »

According to Ireland or to other countries? I.e. does it depend on the country you move to?

If you are in Ireland for 183 days or more you need to pay tax here.

It depends on the country that you move to. Some have agreements with Ireland, some you’d have to pay double taxation.

BonnieSituation

Mic 1972 wrote: »

No you can't. Living in another country means being a tax payer in that country.

I'm currently working and living between two different jurisdictions. It's not at all an issue.

floorpie

newuser99999 wrote: »

If you are in Ireland for 183 days or more you need to pay tax here.

I guess people generally want to not pay tax by being abroad, whereas I'm asking if I can instead choose to pay tax here while abroad

It depends on the country that you move to. Some have agreements with Ireland, some you’d have to pay double taxation.

What if hypothetically if I moved to a zero tax/no tax treaty jurisdiction?

People in work keep mentioning the "tax implications" of moving abroad, so I suppose what I'm asking more generally is if this is any of my employers business (assuming it isn't mentioned in my contract) or is it just a matter for Revenue?

Mrs OBumble

floorpie wrote: »

People in work keep mentioning the "tax implications" of moving abroad, so I suppose what I'm asking more generally is if this is any of my employers business (assuming it isn't mentioned in my contract) or is it just a matter for Revenue?

It's very much your employer's business: if they have an employee who lives in France, for example, then they (the employer) has to comply with the French tax and employment laws for that person. So they automatically have to give you more annual leave, etc .

newuser99999

floorpie wrote: »

People in work keep mentioning the "tax implications" of moving abroad, so I suppose what I'm asking more generally is if this is any of my employers business (assuming it isn't mentioned in my contract) or is it just a matter for Revenue?

Yep it is the employers business. People could actually be in breach of their contract if they haven’t told their employer they’re working abroad.

Data protection issues come into play as well if outside the EEA

Mrs OBumble

[Deleted User] wrote: »

Rent in a hotpot office should be tax deductible as well.

This.

If I rent an office myself, I have to do so out of my after tax earnings. So a 600 PCM office takes 1200 of my gross pay. (Yes, I've priced them).

If my employer does it, it immediately costs them 12.5% less - and they likely have better negotiating power, too.

floorpie

Thanks all.

newuser99999 wrote: »

Yep it is the employers business. People could actually be in breach of their contract if they haven’t told their employer they’re working abroad.

Data protection issues come into play as well if outside the EEA

Mrs OBumble wrote: »

It's very much your employer's business: if they have an employee who lives in France, for example, then they (the employer) has to comply with the French tax and employment laws for that person. So they automatically have to give you more annual leave, etc .

But again, if I'm not asking to be considered an employee elsewhere? I understand the difficulty if I were to tell my employer "I want French working conditions".

I'm confused between the difference in what I've often had to do (work abroad for 3-6 months at a time) and doing this at my discretion. I also have consultants in my family who've worked for abroad for years in a row but were still considered employees in Ireland, paying tax in Ireland, Irish employment conditions etc.

Christy42

floorpie wrote: »

Thanks all.





But again, if I'm not asking to be considered an employee elsewhere? I understand the difficulty if I were to tell my employer "I want French working conditions".

I'm confused between the difference in what I've often had to do (work abroad for 3-6 months at a time) and doing this at my discretion. I also have consultants in my family who've worked for abroad for years in a row but were still considered employees in Ireland, paying tax in Ireland, Irish employment conditions etc.

They need to keep track of how often people are working abroad to make sure they are also complying with residency laws. It can be different for consultants but remember they are paying tax on your behalf for your paycheque. We have been told working abroad for a week or two (it has come up for people spending a week or two with family) is generally fine but to mention it first. You only mention 3-6 months. How does the company know it is only 3-6 months and not 12 if it is at your discretion and you don't tell them?


Imagine sending sensitive working data to China or Russia and having that put into the paper without any nuance? Doesn't matter how you try and explain that logically it will be a black mark against your company. (That is was just sent to a person in Russia or China and not the government will only be for people who read the fine print).


It will be a case by case basis but talk to HR about it if you want to and I am sure they can explain issues better. It will likely be possible in many occasions but it helps for the company to know what is happening.

floorpie

Christy42 wrote: »

Imagine sending sensitive working data to China or Russia and having that put into the paper without any nuance? Doesn't matter how you try and explain that logically it will be a black mark against your company. (That is was just sent to a person in Russia or China and not the government will only be for people who read the fine print).

Yeah this is no doubt an issue.

Thanks

Mrs OBumble

floorpie wrote: »

But again, if I'm not asking to be considered an employee elsewhere? I understand the difficulty if I were to tell my employer "I want French working conditions".

You don't get to contract out of local laws: if you live in France, then French laws apply to you whether you ask for them or not.

If you are working as a self-employed contractor, things are different because you are not an employee.

_Kaiser_

Few points....

- There is an allowance that can be claimed for WFH utility costs. Granted it's not very much, but remember you're also saving on commuting costs, lunches etc, so....

- While not everyone has space for a dedicated home office, savings on commute and other stuff plus certainty of the arrangement can be used to move somewhere bigger/further out if needed

- Most offices will have a hot desk system with monitors, peripherals etc. All you'll need to bring is your work laptop. Even that might not be needed if you connect to the office via a hosted environment like Citrix or Azure

- Many companies have or are looking at other things they need to provide such as chairs, desks etc to home workers. I know of one that has done a deal with Amazon and staff will be able to buy/charge what they need back

- As others have said, you can book a hot desk for the days you want to be in the office in most cases

- I get that the office is a social outlet for some, but in fairness that's not your employer's issue. It's obviously better if you have people you get on with but you are there to work too

- Progression issue etc is bad management and not something that'll change if everyone is at a desk

- Not having a 2+ hour commute every day (as many do) is a huge thing. I didn't realise how much it was taking out of me until I stopped doing it.
Now I'm sleeping better, eating better (not buying takeaways or microwave food late in the evening because I'm too knackered/can't be arsed cooking), and have more time for other things and people in the evening