Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Fly me to the Moon - your 3rd travel Megathread - read OP

Options
19899101103104224

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 10,341 ✭✭✭✭Marcusm


    It doesn't. Not in any way. All persons can enter Ireland and all call leave for essential reasons.

    All are equal. It's not discrimination in any way.

    It may not make sense, it may seem unfair but it's not discrimination

    Ah now; do you believe that? The public health is protected by controlling inward flow but it is outward flow which is subject to an “essential reason” restriction. That’s why it is contrary and arbitrary.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,012 ✭✭✭njburke


    Would you rather they stopped everyone and performed detailed investigations? People have been caught with fakes..

    I'ld rather they scanned it, to authenticate, as it was intended to be by design. I had after all, just paid 100€ for it. Better again would be the provision of a DCC for the two doses of vaccine I have received.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,341 ✭✭✭✭Marcusm


    bubblypop wrote: »
    I'm not sure how restricting movement on public health grounds could be unrelated to the current worldwide pandemic! :D

    Except that the inward flow is where the public health exposure exists and that is not subject to the same restriction. I am now inured to this restriction but at least I can recognise how it is not effective or meeting any public policy objective.


  • Registered Users Posts: 227 ✭✭Meself


    I already pointed out that there is a secondary fine for them.

    Where did you point this out ? I've gone back through ur posts but can't find it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,338 ✭✭✭Bit cynical


    Marcusm wrote: »
    Ah now; do you believe that? The public health is protected by controlling inward flow but it is outward flow which is subject to an “essential reason” restriction. That’s why it is contrary and arbitrary.
    This is the argument I was trying to make. Yes, ultimately, inward flow is also indirectly reduced by the fine on outward travel, but the burden of this measure disproportionately falls on Irish residents. Just because it is Irish residents disadvantaged by the Irish state does not mean it is not discrimination.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 5,369 [Deleted User]


    Marcusm wrote: »
    Ah now; do you believe that? The public health is protected by controlling inward flow but it is outward flow which is subject to an “essential reason” restriction. That’s why it is contrary and arbitrary.

    What are you talking about marcusm? That's not relevant to anything I said.
    This is the argument I was trying to make. Yes, ultimately, inward flow is also indirectly reduced by the fine on outward travel, but the burden of this measure disproportionately falls on Irish residents. Just because it is Irish residents disadvantaged by the Irish state does not mean it is not discrimination.

    It does. It's not discrimination. It's just simple not.

    As I pointed out already, the law is being applied to non nationals in the same way, ergo not discrimination.

    You two need to decide what you actually discussing here. Marcusm is talking about the the actual effect of the restrictions. Cynical is claiming to be making the same argument but keeps claiming discrimination. They aren't the same argument.

    I'm not making any comment on how effective the measures are. In fact, I have questioned the Irish approach on numerous occasions. Doesn't mean you can claim discrimination.


  • Posts: 5,369 [Deleted User]


    They don't, actually

    Garda

    My sincerest typo apologies


  • Posts: 18,749 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    This is the argument I was trying to make. Yes, ultimately, inward flow is also indirectly reduced by the fine on outward travel, but the burden of this measure disproportionately falls on Irish residents. Just because it is Irish residents disadvantaged by the Irish state does not mean it is not discrimination.

    It is not discrimination, because the law says it is not.
    I would think that it is unconstitutional however, because it treats it's own citizens differently. Basically, if you are rich, there is a levy to leave, if however you are poor, then you cannot afford the fine and therefore cannot leave.
    Without anyone challenging it, we won't know.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,672 ✭✭✭54and56


    If I'm reading the essential travel legislation correctly (https://www.citizensinformation.ie/en/travel_and_recreation/travel_abroad/travelling_abroad_during_covid.html) "to go to a funeral" is a one of the permitted reasonable excuses.

    I don't see anything in the legislation setting any criteria or qualifying "to go to a funeral" in any way e.g. that the deceased must be related to you.

    What's stopping people flying to XXX popping along to some randomers funeral service for a minute the day of their arrival in XXX and then staying on for two weeks by the beach?

    If asked by a Guard why you, your partner and your 3 young kids are traveling to sunny XXX for 2 weeks and you say you're going to a funeral can the Guard fine you if he/she doesn't believe you?

    Can the Guard require you to state the name of the person who's funeral you are going to, what your relationship with them is, when the funeral is being held etc?


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    njburke wrote: »
    Just landed a few hours ago in from the Canaries. I went out Monday with an antigen test from gosafe. No issues going through Dublin airport at 4.30am.

    I had a PCR test at 8 AM yesterday and by noon I was emailed an EU digital Covid cert. There's very little detail on it other than the QR code,name, DOB and sample time. No passport number, although passport was required for the Test. The QR is a pointer to the web where the test and data is securely stored.

    The DCC was accepted without hassle at the Dublin immigration desk. No questions were asked this afternoon as to the purpose of my visit to spain, unlike when I returned to Dublin two weeks ago from a similar trip. I was stopped today by Gardai at customs who asked how long I had been away, they x-rayed my luggage. I guess they were looking for cigarette and booze violations, but I had the legal limit.

    That's not an EU Digital Covid cert
    Its just the results of your pcr test you had


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,012 ✭✭✭njburke


    That's not an EU Digital Covid cert
    Its just the results of your pcr test you had

    It has EU Digital Covid Certificate written on the top of it.

    557427.jpg


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,533 ✭✭✭beggars_bush


    bubblypop wrote: »
    It is not discrimination, because the law says it is not.
    I would think that it is unconstitutional however, because it treats it's own citizens differently. Basically, if you are rich, there is a levy to leave, if however you are poor, then you cannot afford the fine and therefore cannot leave.
    Without anyone challenging it, we won't know.

    That's absolute bollocks
    If you can afford to head off on holiday abroad you can afford a test or two


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,638 CMod ✭✭✭✭faceman


    That's absolute bollocks
    If you can afford to head off on holiday abroad you can afford a test or two

    Spoken like a rich man


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,202 ✭✭✭Tazz T


    That's absolute bollocks
    If you can afford to head off on holiday abroad you can afford a test or two

    ... unless you have 15 children


  • Registered Users Posts: 710 ✭✭✭TefalBrain


    That's absolute bollocks
    If you can afford to head off on holiday abroad you can afford a test or two

    Christ on a bike

    Most people scratch and scrimp money together for a holiday. Most do it because it's cheaper than holidaying at home anyway. A family of 5 would have to pay an extra 1000 euro on top of everything because of testing. You think people just have a grand lying about?


  • Registered Users Posts: 246 ✭✭nice bit of green


    Flew last night to Bratislava. Police were just waving thru all the cars on the approach road. None checking inside T1. Nothing to worry about it seems.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,235 ✭✭✭Solobally8


    My daughter and 4 college friends flew Dublin to London this morning. Not a bother on them. No questions asked. Whereas I spent the last few weeks worrying about my trip to Spain next week even though I have a valid reason for traveling. Oh to be young!!


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,638 CMod ✭✭✭✭faceman




  • Registered Users Posts: 5,289 ✭✭✭RoryMac


    "Member States can put their own restrictions on people coming into their countries if they wish, for example, this week Germany initiated some extra restrictions for people coming from Portugal.

    "So the digital COVID cert doesn't give you a free pass into Germany from Portugal, for example."

    This part is very worrying, so we could introduce the DCC on the 19th but could also impose restrictions on top of that to make travel very difficult for most people


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,678 ✭✭✭Multipass


    That's absolute bollocks
    If you can afford to head off on holiday abroad you can afford a test or two

    Do you realise that all travel isn’t holiday, how would you like to fork out an extra hundred or more every time you need to go to a relative.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,432 ✭✭✭SusanC10


    faceman wrote: »

    No mention of the €2,000 fine in that either.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,202 ✭✭✭Tazz T


    SusanC10 wrote: »
    No mention of the €2,000 fine in that either.

    No mention anywhere anymore. It's as if it doesn't exist.


  • Registered Users Posts: 710 ✭✭✭TefalBrain


    Solobally8 wrote: »
    My daughter and 4 college friends flew Dublin to London this morning. Not a bother on them. No questions asked. Whereas I spent the last few weeks worrying about my trip to Spain next week even though I have a valid reason for traveling. Oh to be young!!

    Why are you worried? Stop believing government driven scare tactics. Just tell them any old story and if they issue a fine so be it, nobody is paying it anyway.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,432 ✭✭✭SusanC10


    Tazz T wrote: »
    No mention anywhere anymore. It's as if it doesn't exist.

    And hopefully it will officially lapse on Monday 5th or at worst 19th


  • Registered Users Posts: 710 ✭✭✭TefalBrain


    Flew last night to Bratislava. Police were just waving thru all the cars on the approach road. None checking inside T1. Nothing to worry about it seems.

    This is more or less over in Europe. Yeah few local restrictions here and there but life goes on.

    People aren't scared in Europe anymore.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,677 ✭✭✭Happydays2020


    Anyone flown from Amsterdam recently. What is process and how much time ahead of flight is needed?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,235 ✭✭✭Solobally8


    TefalBrain wrote: »
    Why are you worried? Stop believing government driven scare tactics. Just tell them any old story and if they issue a fine so be it, nobody is paying it anyway.

    I was worried for a few weeks when we decided to book the flights but I’m grand now. I know there will be no problem. I suppose I was just laughing at how a group of 21 year olds can fly off without a care in the world and yet older people like me have wasted all this time worrying because of the hype around fines and cancelled flights.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,535 ✭✭✭johnire


    Are these 21 year olds vaccinated?

    Solobally8 wrote: »
    I was worried for a few weeks when we decided to book the flights but I’m grand now. I know there will be no problem. I suppose I was just laughing at how a group of 21 year olds can fly off without a care in the world and yet older people like me have wasted all this time worrying because of the hype around fines and cancelled flights.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,235 ✭✭✭Solobally8


    johnire wrote: »
    Are these 21 year olds vaccinated?

    Nope


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,535 ✭✭✭johnire


    Ahhhh…… right. And people wonder why we’re in this mess.
    Solobally8 wrote: »
    Nope


Advertisement