Hell's Kitchen Werewolf

Isla WW

Jake WW wrote: »

My vote has been submitted on you, as you would not converse with me, even though you said you were voting for me and I asked you to explain your vote on me which went unanswered.

If you are villager, then please talk to me, if you are a wolf, then carry on the way you have been.

I've already conversed with you. You've been posting lies all day to confuse people. I don't see why further explanation is needed.

Mary WW

Necro wrote: »

Representing the RED Team are the following chefs...
Phil WW
Abigail WW
Ewan WW
Senan WW
Clodagh WW
Jake WW
Nigel WW
Doris WW
Orla WW
Gabriel WW
Angus WW

Now investigate dissection time

Nigel WW

For the Red Team Showdown Vote maybe we could keep this updated as more people answer.

I'd be inclined to put people who didn't enter anything at all up for the Showdown if we want a chance of winning challenges (unless of course we had an obvious Wolf/SK that we could get rid of, but at this point in the game I don't think we do)

Representing the RED Team are the following chefs...

Phil WW (entered a Starter)
Abigail WW
Ewan WW (entered an Amuse Bouche ; potentially not counted as already in Showdown for posting on thread)
Senan WW
Clodagh WW
Jake WW
Nigel WW (entered an Entree)
Doris WW
Orla WW (entered a Salad)
Gabriel WW
Angus WW

Abigail WW

Honestly I'm struggling a bit here

Liam - for his earlier cosying up to Angus despite in being a punishment still doesn't sit right with me. Wolf lean

Orla rolled back her thoughts on Liam after Oisin questioned her and was backed up by Emily. It was odd she never checked her own punishment. Wolf lean

Emily herself seems relatively engaged, null read really at the moment.

Oisin - posted a lot, put himself out not to be healed but has as mentioned gone in on Lucy for saying angus should be healed too quickly. I feel like I haven't looked at Angus as hard cause he was poisoned. Wolf lean

Lucy - I kinda see Oisins POV on Lucy but tbf he eliminated the unknown by coming out so neutralish lean here

Angus - one post despite being poisoned is really poor showing.

Ewan- thanking posts when not posting on thread so engaged but not enough to post. The posting of his dish on thread too. Wolf lean

Doris - More active yesterday than today, seems to have been a fall of in activity

Jake - A lot of stuff going from him but nothing that reads too badly on a read back. Tree shaking villager

Conor and Phil are my village leans at this point, loads of rational posting from my reading

A few Wolf leans but from a very shaky base at this point

Abigail WW

I put an Amuse bouche for reds. I had a clear thought that people might go alphabetically. Ie first two would do Amuse bouche and so on, but well your all idiots

Mary WW

Angus WW wrote: »

Morning all, sorry for the late check in. Feeling a bit targeted being poisoned. Must have been the plate of mickey stew served by Oisin.

This is all from Angus not much to go on as he could go out poisoned

Orla WW

Nigel WW wrote: »

For the Red Team Showdown Vote maybe we could keep this updated as more people answer.

I'd be inclined to put people who didn't enter anything at all up for the Showdown if we want a chance of winning challenges (unless of course we had an obvious Wolf/SK that we could get rid of, but at this point in the game I don't think we do)

Representing the RED Team are the following chefs...

Phil WW (entered a Starter)
Abigail WW
Ewan WW (entered an Amuse Bouche ; potentially not counted as already in Showdown for posting on thread)
Senan WW
Clodagh WW
Jake WW
Nigel WW (entered an Entree)
Doris WW
Orla WW (entered a Salad)
Gabriel WW
Angus WW

Hang on a sec, I thought submitting an entry was mandatory?

Could that also be how we lost? That perhaps despite a sabotage and having one less player, that not all of our team submitted a course.

Has anyone interacted with Senan? I haven't and to be honest cannot recall any posts by them.

Ewan WW

Orla WW wrote: »

Hang on a sec, I thought submitting an entry was mandatory?

Could that also be how we lost? That perhaps despite a sabotage and having one less player, that not all of our team submitted a course.

Has anyone interacted with Senan? I haven't and to be honest cannot recall any posts by them.

I had a short back and forth with Senan yesterday about having the same avatar... at least I think it was Senan. Not seen him today ircc

Mary WW

Senan WW wrote: »

It's not the picture that is the problem

Senan WW wrote: »

Another wolf.

:eek:

vom

That's all today from Senan

Nigel WW

Orla WW wrote: »

Hang on a sec, I thought submitting an entry was mandatory?

Could that also be how we lost? That perhaps despite a sabotage and having one less player, that not all of our team submitted a course.

Has anyone interacted with Senan? I haven't and to be honest cannot recall any posts by them.

The Blue team are the ones who were sabotaged and had one less player.

Didn't see anything anywhere that said entering it was mandatory. Someone could have failed to submit something for a variety of reasons, but if we lost the challenge because people didn't enter, that's why it would be the best for the team to get rid of someone who didn't enter if we wish to win future challenges.

Fiona WW

Nigel WW wrote: »

For the Red Team Showdown Vote maybe we could keep this updated as more people answer.

I'd be inclined to put people who didn't enter anything at all up for the Showdown if we want a chance of winning challenges (unless of course we had an obvious Wolf/SK that we could get rid of, but at this point in the game I don't think we do)

Representing the RED Team are the following chefs...

Phil WW (entered a Starter)
Abigail WW
Ewan WW (entered an Amuse Bouche ; potentially not counted as already in Showdown for posting on thread)
Senan WW
Clodagh WW
Jake WW
Nigel WW (entered an Entree)
Doris WW
Orla WW (entered a Salad)
Gabriel WW
Angus WW

i'm not sure what this will achieve. if the sabateur wolf is on the red team they will just say they entered salad or whatever.

Phil WW

Orla WW wrote: »

Hang on a sec, I thought submitting an entry was mandatory?

Could that also be how we lost? That perhaps despite a sabotage and having one less player, that not all of our team submitted a course.

Has anyone interacted with Senan? I haven't and to be honest cannot recall any posts by them.

Senan had 2 posts today. Clodagh has had none.

Nigel WW

Updated to include Abi's response.

Representing the RED Team are the following chefs...

Phil WW (entered a Starter)
Abigail WW (entered an Amuse Bouche)
Ewan WW (entered an Amuse Bouche ; potentially not counted as already in Showdown for posting on thread)
Senan WW
Clodagh WW
Jake WW
Nigel WW (entered an Entree)
Doris WW
Orla WW (entered a Salad)
Gabriel WW
Angus WW

Oisin WW

Abigail WW wrote: »

Honestly I'm struggling a bit here

Liam - for his earlier cosying up to Angus despite in being a punishment still doesn't sit right with me. Wolf lean

Orla rolled back her thoughts on Liam after Oisin questioned her and was backed up by Emily. It was odd she never checked her own punishment. Wolf lean

Emily herself seems relatively engaged, null read really at the moment.

Oisin - posted a lot, put himself out not to be healed but has as mentioned gone in on Lucy for saying angus should be healed too quickly. I feel like I haven't looked at Angus as hard cause he was poisoned. Wolf lean

Lucy - I kinda see Oisins POV on Lucy but tbf he eliminated the unknown by coming out so neutralish lean here

Angus - one post despite being poisoned is really poor showing.

Ewan- thanking posts when not posting on thread so engaged but not enough to post. The posting of his dish on thread too. Wolf lean

Doris - More active yesterday than today, seems to have been a fall of in activity

Jake - A lot of stuff going from him but nothing that reads too badly on a read back. Tree shaking villager

Conor and Phil are my village leans at this point, loads of rational posting from my reading

A few Wolf leans but from a very shaky base at this point

Whos your top three and wheres your vote on right now?

Orla WW

Nigel WW wrote: »

The Blue team are the ones who were sabotaged and had one less player.

Didn't see anything anywhere that said entering it was mandatory. Someone could have failed to submit something for a variety of reasons, but if we lost the challenge because people didn't enter, that's why it would be the best for the team to get rid of someone who didn't enter if we wish to win future challenges.

Sorry, it looks like I left out a sentence and my post didn't make sense, I am aware that the one less player and sabotage was on the Blue team.

Nigel WW

Fiona WW wrote: »

i'm not sure what this will achieve. if the sabateur wolf is on the red team they will just say they entered salad or whatever.

What it achieves is finding out who did or didn't enter the challenge and perhaps uncovering why the Red Team lost, and if a team wants to win challenges its important to know who is or isn't contributing.

It's a separate thing to the lynch.

Oisin WW

Phil WW wrote: »

Senan had 2 posts today. Clodagh has had none.

Why Mary over those 2 for example?

Phil WW

Oisin WW wrote: »

Why Mary over those 2 for example?

It's not Mary over these 2. Mary was the first one based on my first look. Senan's posts now that I have read back are not sitting right with me either. I haven't voted anywhere yet.
But Mary still hasn't done anything to convince me they are village. I don't see what was village in their posts yesterday either.

Orla WW

Phil WW wrote: »

Senan had 2 posts today. Clodagh has had none.

So I think it *might* be safe to assume that Clodagh didn't submit an entry if they had no posts?

I would think that Jake and Doris would have as they were fairly active earlier on.

Doris WW

Nigel WW wrote: »

Updated to include Abi's response.

Representing the RED Team are the following chefs...

Phil WW (entered a Starter)
Abigail WW (entered an Amuse Bouche)
Ewan WW (entered an Amuse Bouche ; potentially not counted as already in Showdown for posting on thread)
Senan WW
Clodagh WW
Jake WW
Nigel WW (entered an Entree)
Doris WW
Orla WW (entered a Salad)
Gabriel WW
Angus WW

I entered dessert

Fiona WW

Nigel WW wrote: »

What it achieves is finding out who did or didn't enter the challenge and perhaps uncovering why the Red Team lost, and if a team wants to win challenges its important to know who is or isn't contributing.

It's a separate thing to the lynch.

Nigel WW wrote: »

Updated to include Abi's response.

Representing the RED Team are the following chefs...

Phil WW (entered a Starter)
Abigail WW (entered an Amuse Bouche)
Ewan WW (entered an Amuse Bouche ; potentially not counted as already in Showdown for posting on thread)
Senan WW
Clodagh WW
Jake WW
Nigel WW (entered an Entree)
Doris WW
Orla WW (entered a Salad)
Gabriel WW
Angus WW

so based on the above, are you saying 1 of the below is the saboteur wolf?

phil
abigail
ewan
nigel
orla

Phil WW

Fiona WW wrote: »

so based on the above, are you saying 1 of the below is the saboteur wolf?

phil
abigail
ewan
nigel
orla

No - anyone can claim anything. They could be lying. But the challenge was a full menu as possible. The sabotage might be a completely different unrelated task.

Abigail WW

This is a bit secondary, im voting Clodagh and Angus or Senan at this stage. They didn't participate on thread at all so happy enough to put them in front of Ramsey

Lynch should be priority at this point, 2 hours to go

Conor WW

Nigel WW wrote: »

What it achieves is finding out who did or didn't enter the challenge and perhaps uncovering why the Red Team lost, and if a team wants to win challenges its important to know who is or isn't contributing.

It's a separate thing to the lynch.

The wolves will say they entered, even if they didn’t though. Your collating information you have no way to check for honesty on.

I’m all for trying to help catch people out in lies, but I see no way you can actually do that. Plus, wolves are usually happy to be active in tasks to try and win prizes and advantages themselves. I doubt that a wolf would admit to not participating and actually not participate.

Nigel WW

Fiona WW wrote: »

so based on the above, are you saying 1 of the below is the saboteur wolf?

phil
abigail
ewan
nigel
orla

First off, I'm waiting for the rest of the Red Team to reply.

Secondly, no idea who the Sabateor Wolf could be. We don't know if they are on the Red Team or the Blue Team. A wolf could also purposely not enter the competitions if they're the Alpha as they seem to have a power in the Showdowns (as per the OP), so someone not entering could just as easily be a wolf as someone entering.

Right now, I'm trying to figure out which two people to nominate for the Showdown from the Red Team, as each Red Team member has been asked to do. You're on the Blue Team so no need for you to worry about it.

I'm also trying to decide where to place my Lynch vote tonight, which is a separate decision altogether.

Conor WW

Abigail WW wrote: »

This is a bit secondary, im voting Clodagh and Angus or Senan at this stage. They didn't participate on thread at all so happy enough to put them in front of Ramsey

Lynch should be priority at this point, 2 hours to go

Think voting in on Angus is a waste if they could possibly die from poison anyway.

I’d be happier hanging someone for what they did do rather than what they didn’t overall though. Always reluctant to lynch people who maybe haven’t contributed much.

But hey, maybe I need to try something different this time round.

I’d be curious to see what way Angus flips, for instance (presuming we have an auto priest). Cause it would give us a read on Lucy.

Ewan WW

Conor WW wrote: »

The wolves will say they entered, even if they didn’t though. Your collating information you have no way to check for honesty on.

I’m all for trying to help catch people out in lies, but I see no way you can actually do that. Plus, wolves are usually happy to be active in tasks to try and win prizes and advantages themselves. I doubt that a wolf would admit to not participating and actually not participate.

Also, we don't have the entries for the blues, so there's nothing to compare it to. I do think those not posting today likely also didn't enter. And we're deducing there's at least one wolf among the red team, OR the split of wolves is not even across the teams and blue has less wolves?!

Mary WW

Ewan WW wrote: »

That pretty much proves that I was a tired muppet and not the sabotage wolf who is clearly on the blue team!

I don't think it proves non wolf

Mary WW

Phil WW wrote: »

It's not Mary over these 2. Mary was the first one based on my first look. Senan's posts now that I have read back are not sitting right with me either. I haven't voted anywhere yet.
But Mary still hasn't done anything to convince me they are village. I don't see what was village in their posts yesterday either.

I could say the same for you or nearly everyone here

Ewan WW

Mary WW wrote: »

I don't think it proves non wolf

You're right, it doesn't. As I've been told in previous games, trust no one!