Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Hell's Kitchen Werewolf

Options
1…2122242627…77

Comments

  • Options
    #692
    Phil WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,818 ✭✭✭Phil WW


    Doris WW wrote: »
    I gave my reasoning at lunchtime.

    I'm unsure if you're a very helpful wolf or an NRV.

    A lot has happened on the thread since lunchtime. We should be reconsidering and reevaluating as the time goes on.


  • Options
    #693
    Phil WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,818 ✭✭✭Phil WW


    Mary WW wrote: »
    I can change from my earlier decision

    You can. What caused the change? Any posts in particular?


  • Options
    #694
    Oisin WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 1,133 ✭✭✭Oisin WW


    Conor, are you still 90 percent on Mary?

    What do you make of her FFA?


  • Options
    #695
    Conor WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 4,972 ✭✭✭Conor WW


    Oisin WW wrote: »
    On Lucy after our last interaction.

    May switch to Orla again as I feel they are benfitting from out of sight out of mind Regan too.

    I feel Marys FFA is weak , seems lazy. Villagers can be lazy too

    Cool.

    I’m staying on Lucy too.

    I’m not at all happy with how she tried to instantly jump on saving Angus, and I hate the genie act today, AND the FFA so heavily focused on an OMGUS response. That’s not “lazy”.

    But I feel I’m hovering on the chopping block and don’t want to panic :pac:


  • Options
    #696
    Doris WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,158 ✭✭✭Doris WW


    Nigel WW wrote: »
    I may have used less words to say why I'm voting for you and you can spin that as flimsy if you like, but I feel the strongest about you being bad (and if you turn out not to be, I apologise) and have to go with that at this stage.

    Additionally if you flip as a Wolf (hopefully we'll have an autopriest) that would make me more confident in my theories on Conor too.

    You may not like it, but there's nothing wrong with that reasoning for a Day 1 lynch and I think you know that too.

    Like reading the transcript of a Trump speech.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #697
    Mary WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,752 ✭✭✭Mary WW


    Phil WW wrote: »
    Thank you Ewan, I was just about to call this.
    My vote on Mary is now cemented.

    And you, vote now gone in for Phil even though I did not FFA you, have no real reason but you vote me so I vote you, simple as that day 1 for me

    I would like to stay to continue cooking to help the village


  • Options
    #698
    Jake WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,202 ✭✭✭Jake WW


    Doris WW wrote: »
    Everyone mentioned in this post is a wolf.
    Doris WW wrote: »
    Oh look, the most defensive person...
    Doris WW wrote: »
    Obviously.
    Doris WW wrote: »
    I entered dessert
    Doris WW wrote: »
    I gave my reasoning at lunchtime.

    I'm unsure if you're a very helpful wolf or an NRV.

    eh, no, you didn't.

    No mention of me before this FFA. Maybe you gave the other wolves your reasoning in the wolf room, but not here.


  • Options
    #699
    Oisin WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 1,133 ✭✭✭Oisin WW


    Why are people OMGUS voting.

    This tit for tat is weak as hell


  • Options
    #700
    Doris WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,158 ✭✭✭Doris WW


    Phil WW wrote: »
    A lot has happened on the thread since lunchtime. We should be reconsidering and reevaluating as the time goes on.

    I have a theory and I'm sticking to it until it proves flawed.


  • Options
    #701
    Phil WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,818 ✭✭✭Phil WW


    Mary WW wrote: »
    And you, vote now gone in for Phil even though I did not FFA you, have no real reason but you vote me so I vote you, simple as that day 1 for me

    I would like to stay to continue cooking to help the village

    Your FFA wasn't standing up to scrutiny so you vote me because I am voting you? Great village move there...


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #702
    Abigail WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,789 ✭✭✭Abigail WW


    This is great, maybe not for tonights lynch but there's loads of info here and lines to be drawn.

    Some weak as piss reasoning tonight which will be very useful when looking back at flips


  • Options
    #703
    Conor WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 4,972 ✭✭✭Conor WW


    Oisin WW wrote: »
    What do you make of her FFA?

    There’s a variety of people who I feel have done enough to survive night one, and a variety of people who I feel haven’t.

    I’ve not seen enough from Mary today to make me think she deserves to go tonight. It feels like a weak push onto a player who hasn’t posted much today, rather than a strong push for a specific reason.

    I’d rather vote for someone whose behaviour I feel was wolf is today.


  • Options
    #704
    Doris WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,158 ✭✭✭Doris WW


    Jake WW wrote: »
    eh, no, you didn't.

    No mention of me before this FFA. Maybe you gave the other wolves your reasoning in the wolf room, but not here.

    So because I've put you on my FFA I'm a wolf?

    How childish.


  • Options
    #705
    Mary WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,752 ✭✭✭Mary WW


    Oisin WW wrote: »
    What made you chnage your opinion?

    I am torn on Ewan but this is running in mind still so undecided
    Alpha Wolf - Big and bad with balls of brass, the alpha will square up to anyone including Gordon Ramsey. You'd better not be up against them in a showdown! This alpha also appears as good to the seer on first look

    Day 1 is hard to get a read on anyone just going on gut


  • Options
    #706
    Conor WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 4,972 ✭✭✭Conor WW


    Abigail WW wrote: »
    This is great, maybe not for tonights lynch but there's loads of info here and lines to be drawn.

    Some weak as piss reasoning tonight which will be very useful when looking back at flips

    You’re not wrong.

    Where’s your vote Abi?


  • Options
    #707
    Jake WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,202 ✭✭✭Jake WW


    Switching my vote to Doris.


    as mentioned in 698 they said they gave reasoing for ffa at lunchtime, i posted there lunchtime posts.

    They don't add up.


  • Options
    #708
    Doris WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,158 ✭✭✭Doris WW


    Oisin WW wrote: »
    Why are people OMGUS voting.

    This tit for tat is weak as hell

    Weak sauce indeed.


  • Options
    #709
    Oisin WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 1,133 ✭✭✭Oisin WW


    Conor WW wrote: »
    There’s a variety of people who I feel have done enough to survive night one, and a variety of people who I feel haven’t.

    I’ve not seen enough from Mary today to make me think she deserves to go tonight. It feels like a weak push onto a player who hasn’t posted much today, rather than a strong push for a specific reason.

    I’d rather vote for someone whose behaviour I feel was wolf is today.

    What do you think of her FFA though. Why wont you commit to answering that?


  • Options
    #710
    Abigail WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,789 ✭✭✭Abigail WW


    Conor WW wrote: »
    You’re not wrong.

    Where’s your vote Abi?

    I'm just catching up now, but my vote is on Liam from this morning as. I could be tempted by a move to Oisin or Orla.

    Ewan
    Mary
    Doris all setting the senses tingling now aswell.


  • Options
    #711
    Jake WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,202 ✭✭✭Jake WW


    Doris WW wrote: »
    So because I've put you on my FFA I'm a wolf?

    How childish.

    no, i asked why, and you said you gave the reasoning at lunchtime, i went and looked up your lunchtime posts and there is nothing there about me.
    So, you are caught out in a lie about giving your reasons about me at lunchtime.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #712
    Conor WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 4,972 ✭✭✭Conor WW


    Oisin WW wrote: »
    What do you think of her FFA though. Why wont you commit to answering that?

    It’s not great.
    It’s not enough for me to vote for her tonight.


  • Options
    #713
    Mary WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,752 ✭✭✭Mary WW


    67173565.jpg

    This my sauce


  • Options
    #714
    Nigel WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,600 ✭✭✭Nigel WW


    Jesus, Mary!

    giphy.gif


  • Options
    #715
    Abigail WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,789 ✭✭✭Abigail WW


    Conor WW wrote: »
    It’s not great.
    It’s not enough for me to vote for her tonight.

    Who are you on?


  • Options
    #716
    Doris WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,158 ✭✭✭Doris WW


    Jake WW wrote: »
    Switching my vote to Doris.


    as mentioned in 698 they said they gave reasoing for ffa at lunchtime, i posted there lunchtime posts.

    They don't add up.

    My reasoning is quite simple and is literally the first post you quoted.

    I believe all the wolves were mentioned in the quoted post.


    But you've given me all I'm looking for. Amazing what a simple FFA can do.

    shaking-tree.gif


  • Options
    #717
    Lucy WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 1,394 ✭✭✭Lucy WW


    Conor WW wrote: »
    Cool.

    I’m staying on Lucy too.

    I’m not at all happy with how she tried to instantly jump on saving Angus, and I hate the genie act today, AND the FFA so heavily focused on an OMGUS response. That’s not “lazy”.

    But I feel I’m hovering on the chopping block and don’t want to panic :pac:

    Thats handy for you two boys, one of you is getting played


  • Options
    #718
    Lucy WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 1,394 ✭✭✭Lucy WW


    Conor WW wrote: »
    Barely anyone doing FFAs, barely anyone saying what way they are voting. Really not great.

    Says the guy with no FFA


  • Options
    #719
    Nigel WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,600 ✭✭✭Nigel WW


    Lucy WW wrote: »
    Says the guy with no FFA

    To be fair, I think he had one of the first FFA's this afternoon.


  • Options
    #720
    Conor WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 4,972 ✭✭✭Conor WW


    Abigail WW wrote: »
    Who are you on?

    Lucy
    Don’t like her entire day.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #721
    Lucy WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 1,394 ✭✭✭Lucy WW


    Barbara WW wrote: »
    I haven't given any FFA. I'm not great at day 1 reads. Gut says Doris. I really didn't like Liam's posts earlier but they didn't scream wolf to me. Ewan's slip up earlier with the conferring felt genuine to me. Gut feel says Abigail is village also.

    We have a lot of people on the low posting end (myself partially included) which makes it easy for wolves to coast, but the coasting players are all on the red team, which doesn't correspond with my belief that there's more wolves on the blue team.

    I likely won't have an FFA before 9 but I'll try.

    I agree with this but wolves can slip too, so yes it was a slip but absolutely irrelevant in whether he is a wolf or not IMO, definitely wouldn't be clearing him on the basis of it


Advertisement