Hell's Kitchen Werewolf

Ectoplasm

Two chefs snuck into Hell's Kitchen after close for a late night snack.

Both Angus WW and Oisin WW gorged on some leftover artichokes from the previous night's dinner service.

But a certain maître'd had predicted there would be some greedy pigs and had switched one out for something that could prove to be fatal... there is no way of knowing which one was switched though, so I guess we will find out later....





Angus WW and Oisin WW have been poisoned.

One is fake, one is real.

Unless healed one will die after the lynch tonight.

Ewan WW

:eek:

Oh damn! Didn't think there were any actions until tonight!!!

How do we heal them?!

Ectoplasm

Lynch form is open

https://forms.gle/HoD7ymzMbWrQZXdL6

Regan WW

Ewan WW wrote: »

:eek:

Oh damn! Didn't think there were any actions until tonight!!!

How do we heal them?!

I would say Jack of all Trades, or else the bodyguard (but I think it may be Jack because bodyguard usually protects against lynches or munches, right?)

Ewan WW

Regan WW wrote: »

I would say Jack of all Trades, or else the bodyguard (but I think it may be Jack because bodyguard usually protects against lynches or munches, right?)

That sounds about right! Hopefully!

Oisin WW

Ewan WW wrote: »

:eek:

Oh damn! Didn't think there were any actions until tonight!!!

How do we heal them?!

I dont need saving. Angus may be roled, Im not. Save him

Abigail WW

Ectoplasm wrote: »

Two chefs snuck into Hell's Kitchen after close for a late night snack.

Both Angus WW and Oisin WW gorged on some leftover artichokes from the previous night's dinner service.

But a certain maître'd had predicted there would be some greedy pigs and had switched one out for something that could prove to be fatal... there is no way of knowing which one was switched though, so I guess we will find out later....





Angus WW and Oisin WW have been poisoned.

One is fake, one is real.

Unless healed one will die after the lynch tonight.

SK? I thought first action would be tonight. Oisin getting punished by Ramsey and now potentially poisoned, what you get for dining in the chipper:pac:! Obviously a healer in play somewhere. Interesting to see can they heal the actually poisoned one or is it a shot of saving one not knowing which one is real poisoned?

Abigail WW

Oisin WW wrote: »

Evening all.

My signature dish...




Wont be back on here until the sunshines done.

Oisin WW wrote: »

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

Actually in the chipper now. Hope all you feckers are jealous.

Oisin WW wrote: »

Who said I havent had a truck load of gargle?

I need some alcoholic sustenance to put up with you lot.

All of Oisins posts

Zero posts from Angus - Interesting choices.

Regan WW

Ewan WW wrote: »

That sounds about right! Hopefully!

But they have to pick the right person to cure!

Gonna have a read through now just to see if there’s any reason why those two were picked.

And, in other news, vaccination was a breeze. Was a one shot, so I can go back to licking lamposts in 2 weeks!

Oisin WW

Abigail WW wrote: »

All of Oisins posts

Zero posts from Angus - Interesting choices.

My guess is the poisoner may be a villager and may be targeting me and Angus to get us active. Thats my theory.

Oisin WW

Regan WW wrote: »

But they have to pick the right person to cure!

Gonna have a read through now just to see if there’s any reason why those two were picked.

And, in other news, vaccination was a breeze. Was a one shot, so I can go back to licking lamposts in 2 weeks!

If you had the antidote, who would you heal?

Abigail WW

Oisin WW wrote: »

My guess is the poisoner may be a villager and may be targeting me and Angus to get us active. Thats my theory.

Doubtful, I rarely read much into flavour but Maitre'D did the poisoning apparently. Id say its the SK role hunting IMO

Ewan WW

Regan WW wrote: »

But they have to pick the right person to cure!

Gonna have a read through now just to see if there’s any reason why those two were picked.

And, in other news, vaccination was a breeze. Was a one shot, so I can go back to licking lamposts in 2 weeks!

I totally read it as healing both, but picking between them will make it a 50:50, and more interesting!

Don't think I noticed Angus posting at all yesterday, and Oisin had that *ahem* delightful looking plate

Abigail WW

Ewan WW wrote: »

I totally read it as healing both, but picking between them will make it a 50:50, and more interesting!

Don't think I noticed Angus posting at all yesterday, and Oisin had that *ahem* delightful looking plate

Angus hasnt posted, I said it above about 3 posts up!

Wheres your head Ewan on the poisoning?

Lucy WW

Oisin had been straight up about not being roled so I would advise the healer to heal Angus

The odds are that it’s two villagers that have been targeted so we want to save both IMO

Regan WW

Oisin WW wrote: »

If you had the antidote, who would you heal?

Probably you. But that’s because I played as evil before and coasted through by not posting much. Which is less fun for everybody.

Saying that, it’s really just Day 1 now, and we have time. Hopefully they’ll post more later.

Oisin WW

Abigail WW wrote: »

Doubtful, I rarely read much into flavour but Maitre'D did the poisoning apparently. Id say its the SK role hunting IMO

Actually this a fair point considering the flavour.

Abigail WW

Lucy WW wrote: »

Oisin had been straight up about not being roled so I would advise the healer to heal Angus

The odds are that it’s two villagers that have been targeted so we want to save both IMO

Agreed but lets wait for Angus to appear. I liked Oisin saying that initially however I would prefer if villagers dont start dropping "I am not roled" into conversation if this is going to be a daily situation, it simply narrows the pool of players for wolves/sk to target

Oisin WW

Lucy WW wrote: »

Oisin had been straight up about not being roled so I would advise the healer to heal Angus

The odds are that it’s two villagers that have been targeted so we want to save both IMO

We can presumably rule out myself and Angus as SK then. So straight off the bat we have some info.

.

Oisin WW

Abigail WW wrote: »

Agreed but lets wait for Angus to appear. I liked Oisin saying that initially however I would prefer if villagers dont start dropping "I am not roled" into conversation if this is going to be a daily situation, it simply narrows the pool of players for wolves/sk to target

I agree, but fact is Ive been thrown into this situation and I believe its best to tell you I am expendable in this scenario.

Hopefully Angus can provide their thoughts soon enough.

Orla WW

Regan WW wrote: »

And, in other news, vaccination was a breeze. Was a one shot, so I can go back to licking lamposts in 2 weeks!

Congrats Regan. You're a better (wo)man than me, I'm dreading my call up. If only another method other than needles can be used to deliver vaccines

Abigail WW

Oisin WW wrote: »

We can presumably rule out myself and Angus as SK then. So straight off the bat we have some info.

.

Not sure on that, odds would suggest so but could the SK have taken the fake poison themselves? Its been a while since this kinda mechanic has been used.

Oisin WW

Regan WW wrote: »

Probably you. But that’s because I played as evil before and coasted through by not posting much. Which is less fun for everybody.

Saying that, it’s really just Day 1 now, and we have time. Hopefully they’ll post more later.

Well we should park the "who should we save" convo until later, we still have someone to lynch and we should get solving?

Now tell me why I shouldn't think this is a pocket attempt ??? You trying to get on my good side?

I wouldnt be able to choose between anyone to save thus yet (like if it was between Abigail and Angus for example). So wy would you save me?

Im slightly suspicious of this.

Orla WW

Abigail WW wrote: »

Agreed but lets wait for Angus to appear. I liked Oisin saying that initially however I would prefer if villagers dont start dropping "I am not roled" into conversation if this is going to be a daily situation, it simply narrows the pool of players for wolves/sk to target

I am thinking that you're the SK because you started an FFA yesterday and that is sometimes a first day task for SK but you're on my team so now I'm conflicted

Oisin WW

Abigail WW wrote: »

Not sure on that, odds would suggest so but could the SK have taken the fake poison themselves? Its been a while since this kinda mechanic has been used.

I hadnt considered that.

Ewan WW

Abigail WW wrote: »

Angus hasnt posted, I said it above about 3 posts up!

Wheres your head Ewan on the poisoning?

I think Oisin claiming NRV immediately either means he is, or he's playing a very clever double bluff and is SK with a fake poison, which would mean Angus is the real poison...

I'd rather wait until Angus is on and we can maybe figure it out better.

Abigail WW

Orla WW wrote: »

I am thinking that you're the SK because you started an FFA yesterday and that is sometimes a first day task for SK but you're on my team so now I'm conflicted

When have SKs had tasks bar the MU game? Also, you put Pineapple on a pizza, if there is ever a reason for someone to be deserving to be on an FFA, there it is right there :pac:

Oisin WW

Orla WW wrote: »

I am thinking that you're the SK because you started an FFA yesterday and that is sometimes a first day task for SK but you're on my team so now I'm conflicted

Thats possible.

Are we sure tasks are a thing? I know I was punished, but I see no mention of tasks in OP. So in the absence of any mention of tasks, we shouldnt get sidetracked looking for tasks that may not exist.

Orla WW

Oisin WW wrote: »

Well we should park the "who should we save" convo until later, we still have someone to lynch and we should get solving?

Have many people not yet posted do you know?

Oisin WW

Abigail WW wrote: »

When have SKs had tasks bar the MU game? Also, you put Pineapple on a pizza, if there is ever a reason for someone to be deserving to be on an FFA, there it is right there :pac:

Anyone can have a task if tasks are present in a game.

But again, lets not get sidetracked on tasks that may not be present.

Thats me dismissing the idea of tasks to be clear.