Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

Options
1235223532355235723583691

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 5,827 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    Wasn't the main aims of the US war in Afghanistan to take out Al-Qaeda and specifically Bin Laden and in Iraq to topple Saddam? They never intended to annex them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,893 ✭✭✭deirdremf


    And do you agree that the US had no business being in either? Because otherwise, someone supporting Russia in Ukraine might point to those actions (and many more like them) by the US as justifying Russia's.

    Ah, and regarding Afghanistan - are you sure it was all about taking out Al Qaida? because they sure stayed there a long time, and if Al Qaida was their objective, it seems to have suffered greatly from mission creep.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,444 ✭✭✭Gerry T


    and 7. While not using a gas chamber Putin looks to wipe out the indigenous Ukrainians with missiles, striking non military targets (housing, energy sources, food supply etc...) without a thought.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,893 ✭✭✭deirdremf


    Unfortunately, if you review your post, you will see that most of your points can be countered by a similar one regarding Zelensky. Who as an actor has charisma, but let's not over-egg the pudding regarding the other qualities you mention.

    The only specific point above I'm going to comment on is no. 1, which is sort of repeated in your last sentence. Because the last time I looked, big Z had made a substantial part of the opposition illegal; some democrat he is. Your other points are so general that every politician in difficulty uses one or more of them to distract public opinion from his problems. For instance, Fianna Fáil politicians used to be really, really worried about the Nationalist minority in the north whenever they got themselves into difficulties.

    What made Hitler different from say, Mussolini, is the way he waged a no holds barred war against the Soviet Union (20 million dead in the USSR; along with 10 million of Hitler's own people) and how he marked various population groups for extermination (Jews, Gypsies etc). Without these actions Hitler would have been no more than a particularly nasty dictator like Franco, Napoleon or Pinochet. So no, your comparison is not a valid one and you do yourself no favours by making it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,217 ✭✭✭✭MadYaker


    The purpose of this is to try and force Ukraine to negotiate, Putin isn’t trying to wipe out all indigenous Ukrainians. Like a lot of the ideas the Russians have had in this conflict it’s mostly counter productive.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,613 ✭✭✭Field east


    Why would send Jews or UKranians to the gas chambers. Are you out of your mind ? Do you not realise the international outcry if he went down that road. Have you any idea of the cost of building a gas chamber ? And if he did build would it be a step too far for the locals and they might rise up and bring him down.

    Putin is achieving the same outcome by landing a missile, a missile there, a bomb here, a bomb there, destroy infrastructure to freeze people to death , etc, etc, etc, etc. he has said that A Ukr is of a lesser species than a Russian.

    the gas chamber strategy is ‘a kind of a mass production system’ - done in bulk to keep down costs ‘ per head’

    Comparing the above to his preferred system of genocide - by stealth, taking out small numbers at a time, laying mines here and there, trickle effect of actions taken, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc. He will get rid of the same number if not more using this approach. He also does not have to round up anybody also. He just kills the ‘subhumans’ in situ



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,613 ✭✭✭Field east



    There is also no smell/stench in the air with his present strategy. And he does not have to do anything re getting rid of the bodies or what remains of them . He leaves that for the living relatives/UKranians to do.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,444 ✭✭✭Gerry T


    Hitler saw Jews etc as inferior and wanted them wiped out. He had a goal and so does Putin, his goal is the taking of Ukraine and to reach that goal he will kill as many civilians as he can, he makes no effort to spare their lives, in fact he goes out of his way to kill them. In my book there is no difference, it's the slaughter of innocent people to get one's way.

    Killing innocent people is an idiots way to get a negotiation, history has shown that will only strengthen Ukrainians resolve. The master strategist strikes again.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,509 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    "What made Hitler different from say, Mussolini, is the way he waged a no holds barred war against the Soviet Union (20 million dead in the USSR; along with 10 million of Hitler's own people) and how he marked various population groups for extermination (Jews, Gypsies etc). Without these actions Hitler would have been no more than a particularly nasty dictator like Franco, Napoleon or Pinochet. So no, your comparison is not a valid one and you do yourself no favours by making it."

    10 million of Hitler's own people needs a reference. Have you got it? German casualties in the entire war are estimated to be below 8 million total, about 5 million military

    And, you're missing the whole 'WWII' part - France invaded, Czechoslovakia annexed, low countries invaded, the Blitz, ... Franco and Pinochet didn't do that. Mussolini's army couldn't defeat the Ethiopians.

    Hitler did more than mark people for extermination. He drove it's implementation by making it palatable for his countryment to accept it. He gets full blame.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,893 ✭✭✭deirdremf


    First, it was Hitler who sent the Jews to gas chambers. I merely said that the comparison between Putin and Hitler was not a valid one.

    You are repeating propaganda. Putin is a b*ll*x, but he has said over and over that the Ukrainians are the same people as the Russians. His war has killed many, but he is not in Hitler's league. He's not in Saudi Arabia's league (in Yemen) or in Israel's league (in Palestine). The US has also killed many many more than he has in Iraq, Afghanistan and many other places. I am concerned about all of these places, whether the aggressor is Russia, the US or anyone else.

    But regarding the Ukraine, I'd like to try to avoid the propaganda and find out what is actually happening. This is very difficult to do with so much disinformation emanating from both sides.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,061 ✭✭✭purplepanda


    Regarding the comparison between Putin & Hitler, didn't the later's military forces, kidnap "Aryan" looking children from occupied territories & attempt to bring them up as Germans.

    Wikipedia says over 200,000 children were removed by the Nazi's, so very similar to Putins forces kidnapping Ukrainian children during the 2022 invasion. .


    Another addition to the long list of war crimes committed by Russia.

    Just waiting now for the denials & or excuses from the usual suspects, the far left & hard right apologists, whatabouters & Putin bots to arrive back on the thread.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,213 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    "In this case, I'm happy to be on neither side."

    So basically, your stance is that as long as it doesn't affect you too much, you don't really care.

    If you have conviction, then you would either view Putin as correct is his anti NATO rhetoric and his historic view of Russian lands or you would view Ukraine correct in defending it's territory.

    To be neither is to be useless and please don't just say I'm neither because I don't like war. That only gets you so far until the bully comes along and smashes you in the gut.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,191 ✭✭✭ZeroThreat



    I doubt Russia will be in a possible to 'smash' us, unless of course WW3 actually starts. Then all bets are off.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,509 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    "You are repeating propaganda. Putin is a b*ll*x, but he has said over and over that the Ukrainians are the same people as the Russians."

    No, he's said over and over again, there is no Ukraine, it's just Russia. So, if you thought of yourself as a Ukrainian, you wouldn't have a place in Putler's world. He doesn't allow for a Ukraine to exist. Only glorious Soviet Union type hegemony is valid, with Putler at the top of it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,485 ✭✭✭Fighting Tao


    Didn’t take long to fall off the fence!

    All that has been discussed here. The opposition wanted to hand Ukraine over to Putin. Sure Putin had a puppet as leader for quite a few years. Ukraine wanted to stay independent and so it has been rightly being ridding itself of Russian influence.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    It’s also possible (likely) they’ve mobilised and liquidated all of the technical people like electricians, gas plumbers, engineers etc by sending them to the front line and others will have fled the country to avoid that fate so they’re left with an increasingly small number of qualified and technically competent people and probably have a lot of people chancing their arm, trying to carry out repairs on often shoddy infrastructure.

    The result will be things failing, fires, explosions and other collapses.

    Russia already had a shortage of people - this has made it a thousand times worse.

    Then add that you can’t get support from suppliers, spare components, replacement parts, so you do some kludge of a repair…

    This is the kind of thing that happens when you’re led by a deranged authoritarian government headed by a dictator.

    You’re watching a country morph from semi normality last year into some kind of giant version of North Korea.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,893 ✭✭✭deirdremf


    Was it George Bush II who told the world they were either with him or against him when he invaded Iraq on the basis of the "Weapons of Mass Destruction" lie? It's easy to say, easy to take sides.

    No need to look for the uncomfortable truths when you do because you have God on your side.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,485 ✭✭✭Fighting Tao


    What about this? What about that? A standard fall back for supporters/approvers of peadophile Russians.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,509 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Nah. That was Afghanistan. Harboring those that had supported the WTC attacks.

    Do get a better source for your propaganda now.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,775 ✭✭✭zv2


    (8) Murders and persecutes his political opposition.

    “Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” — Voltaire



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,775 ✭✭✭zv2


    “Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” — Voltaire



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,775 ✭✭✭zv2


    Apparently we have all been deceived. It is the Poles who are attacking and pretending it is the Russians-


    “Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” — Voltaire



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,775 ✭✭✭zv2


    ...


    “Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” — Voltaire



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,520 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Yes, they stayed 20 years, and if the Afghans had their way, the would be welcome to stay 20 more. The rebuilt Afghanistan, and all its institutions, and fully prepared Afghans to take over when they left. They couldn't have done more. The fact that Afghans themselves failed is not the fault of the US. But of course, its always the fault of Big Bad America .



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,455 ✭✭✭weisses


    The 9/11 suspects were mostly Saudis... let that sink in



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,509 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    A good discussion for elsewhere. This thread's about RuZZias actions in the Ukraine.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,191 ✭✭✭ZeroThreat


    They shouldn't have wasted a single $ on the worthless black hole that is Afghanistan.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,062 ✭✭✭Hobgoblin11


    2 person killed, 7 wounded as result of Russian shelling in Kherson


    Dundalk, Co. Louth



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,217 ✭✭✭✭MadYaker


    The Holocaust was an industrialized mass murder campaign with the specific purpose of wiping out Jews completely (and various other groups). Putin is bombing Ukraine because he thinks it will force them to negotiate. He isn't trying to eradicate them from existence. He's wrong about it, but that's the purpose of this bombing. Yes it's true he doesn't care how many civilians he kills, but that doesn't mean he's trying to kill them all. This was a botched attempt at a land grab that's gone badly wrong, not some type of ethnic cleansing.

    This is nonsense. At the rate Ukrainian civilians are dying it would take many decades for Putin to achieve this goal, he's 70 he won't be around that long. Around 6 millions Jews died in the Holocaust do you really think 6 million Ukrainian civilians will have died by the time this is over?


    What I don't understand is why he wanted Ukraine in the first place. What has it got that Russia doesn't?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 17,984 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe




This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement